Design and validation of a decision support checklist for efficient resource allocation in research projects during proposal preparation

•Definition of 8 evaluation criteria for a better selection of research proposals.•Development of a score that assess the possibility of success of research proposals.•Validation of the score with the final decision from the funding bodies.•Creation of Return of Investment rate to optimize the avail...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of radiology 2024-04, Vol.173, p.111362-111362, Article 111362
Hauptverfasser: Penadés-Blasco, Ana, Cerdá-Alberich, Leonor, Sierra, José Miguel Carot, Alberich-Bayarri, Angel, Martínez, Ainhoa Genovés, Añó, Rita Diranzo, Parrilla, Cristina Clemente, Llobera, Juan Maria Soriano, Consuelo, David Vivas, Martí-Bonmatí, Luis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 111362
container_issue
container_start_page 111362
container_title European journal of radiology
container_volume 173
creator Penadés-Blasco, Ana
Cerdá-Alberich, Leonor
Sierra, José Miguel Carot
Alberich-Bayarri, Angel
Martínez, Ainhoa Genovés
Añó, Rita Diranzo
Parrilla, Cristina Clemente
Llobera, Juan Maria Soriano
Consuelo, David Vivas
Martí-Bonmatí, Luis
description •Definition of 8 evaluation criteria for a better selection of research proposals.•Development of a score that assess the possibility of success of research proposals.•Validation of the score with the final decision from the funding bodies.•Creation of Return of Investment rate to optimize the available resources. This article presents the design and validation of evaluation criteria checklist aimed at facilitating decision-making processes regarding participation in research projects and allocation of resources before the preparation of research proposals. A multidisciplinary team developed a comprehensive evaluation focusing on the proposal preparation phase of research projects. A Delphi survey method was used to establish a connection between the relevance of the project and the possible success of research proposals. Assessment criteria were agreed upon, each assigned specific weights. The results of the survey were applied to a database of 62 proposals for which our research group sought funding during 2020–2021. The method was validated using the funding body's outcomes (approval or rejection) of the submitted proposals as the ground truth per project type (national, European and regional). The results of the survey generated a checklist of 8 criteria (excellence, impact, and efficiency aspects) that effectively assess the possibility of success of research proposals during the preparatory phase. For national projects, the tool validation demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 76.19%; European projects exhibited a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 53.84%; and regional projects showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 30%. By establishing an agreed set of evaluation criteria, the developed comprehensive index enables a more precise decision support tool for the participation in research proposals and the allocation of necessary resources. This control system saves valuable time and effort for research groups while enhancing the overall efficiency of available resources.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111362
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2928248462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X24000780</els_id><sourcerecordid>2928248462</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-af693f4bb32895e8a7827f4d75c448292e800b029c31cf83f17ad50142ae746d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctO5DAQtNAiGB5fgIR83Etm_UrsHDisgF1WQuICEjfLY7fBIRMHO0HiD_hsEgJ75NTdVlV1uwqhE0rWlNDqV7OGJhm3ZoSJNaWUV2wHraiSrJCSyR9oRSQjBRHqfh8d5NwQQkpRsz20zxWvRFmTFXq7gBweOmw6h19MG5wZQuxw9NhgBzbkecpj38c0YPsI9qkNecA-JgzeBxugG3CCHMdkAZu2jXZRCN38DCbZR9yn2IAdMnZjCt3DPPcxm3ZqoDfpg3CEdr1pMxx_1kN09-fy9vyquL75--_893VhOamHwviq5l5sNpypugRlpGLSCydLK4RiNQNFyIaw2nJqveKeSuNKQgUzIEXl-CH6uehORzyPkAe9DdlC25oO4pj1JKGYUKJiE5QvUJtizgm87lPYmvSqKdFzBLrRHxHoOQK9RDCxTj8XjJstuP-cL88nwNkCgOmbLwGSzrONFlxIk0vaxfDtgncvTJtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2928248462</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design and validation of a decision support checklist for efficient resource allocation in research projects during proposal preparation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Penadés-Blasco, Ana ; Cerdá-Alberich, Leonor ; Sierra, José Miguel Carot ; Alberich-Bayarri, Angel ; Martínez, Ainhoa Genovés ; Añó, Rita Diranzo ; Parrilla, Cristina Clemente ; Llobera, Juan Maria Soriano ; Consuelo, David Vivas ; Martí-Bonmatí, Luis</creator><creatorcontrib>Penadés-Blasco, Ana ; Cerdá-Alberich, Leonor ; Sierra, José Miguel Carot ; Alberich-Bayarri, Angel ; Martínez, Ainhoa Genovés ; Añó, Rita Diranzo ; Parrilla, Cristina Clemente ; Llobera, Juan Maria Soriano ; Consuelo, David Vivas ; Martí-Bonmatí, Luis</creatorcontrib><description>•Definition of 8 evaluation criteria for a better selection of research proposals.•Development of a score that assess the possibility of success of research proposals.•Validation of the score with the final decision from the funding bodies.•Creation of Return of Investment rate to optimize the available resources. This article presents the design and validation of evaluation criteria checklist aimed at facilitating decision-making processes regarding participation in research projects and allocation of resources before the preparation of research proposals. A multidisciplinary team developed a comprehensive evaluation focusing on the proposal preparation phase of research projects. A Delphi survey method was used to establish a connection between the relevance of the project and the possible success of research proposals. Assessment criteria were agreed upon, each assigned specific weights. The results of the survey were applied to a database of 62 proposals for which our research group sought funding during 2020–2021. The method was validated using the funding body's outcomes (approval or rejection) of the submitted proposals as the ground truth per project type (national, European and regional). The results of the survey generated a checklist of 8 criteria (excellence, impact, and efficiency aspects) that effectively assess the possibility of success of research proposals during the preparatory phase. For national projects, the tool validation demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 76.19%; European projects exhibited a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 53.84%; and regional projects showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 30%. By establishing an agreed set of evaluation criteria, the developed comprehensive index enables a more precise decision support tool for the participation in research proposals and the allocation of necessary resources. This control system saves valuable time and effort for research groups while enhancing the overall efficiency of available resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111362</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38364590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Checklist ; Composite Indicator ; Efficiency ; Humans ; Opportunity cost ; Optimisation ; Resource Allocation - methods ; Resources ; Return of Investment</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2024-04, Vol.173, p.111362-111362, Article 111362</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-af693f4bb32895e8a7827f4d75c448292e800b029c31cf83f17ad50142ae746d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111362$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38364590$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Penadés-Blasco, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerdá-Alberich, Leonor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sierra, José Miguel Carot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberich-Bayarri, Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Ainhoa Genovés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Añó, Rita Diranzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrilla, Cristina Clemente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llobera, Juan Maria Soriano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consuelo, David Vivas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martí-Bonmatí, Luis</creatorcontrib><title>Design and validation of a decision support checklist for efficient resource allocation in research projects during proposal preparation</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>•Definition of 8 evaluation criteria for a better selection of research proposals.•Development of a score that assess the possibility of success of research proposals.•Validation of the score with the final decision from the funding bodies.•Creation of Return of Investment rate to optimize the available resources. This article presents the design and validation of evaluation criteria checklist aimed at facilitating decision-making processes regarding participation in research projects and allocation of resources before the preparation of research proposals. A multidisciplinary team developed a comprehensive evaluation focusing on the proposal preparation phase of research projects. A Delphi survey method was used to establish a connection between the relevance of the project and the possible success of research proposals. Assessment criteria were agreed upon, each assigned specific weights. The results of the survey were applied to a database of 62 proposals for which our research group sought funding during 2020–2021. The method was validated using the funding body's outcomes (approval or rejection) of the submitted proposals as the ground truth per project type (national, European and regional). The results of the survey generated a checklist of 8 criteria (excellence, impact, and efficiency aspects) that effectively assess the possibility of success of research proposals during the preparatory phase. For national projects, the tool validation demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 76.19%; European projects exhibited a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 53.84%; and regional projects showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 30%. By establishing an agreed set of evaluation criteria, the developed comprehensive index enables a more precise decision support tool for the participation in research proposals and the allocation of necessary resources. This control system saves valuable time and effort for research groups while enhancing the overall efficiency of available resources.</description><subject>Checklist</subject><subject>Composite Indicator</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Opportunity cost</subject><subject>Optimisation</subject><subject>Resource Allocation - methods</subject><subject>Resources</subject><subject>Return of Investment</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UctO5DAQtNAiGB5fgIR83Etm_UrsHDisgF1WQuICEjfLY7fBIRMHO0HiD_hsEgJ75NTdVlV1uwqhE0rWlNDqV7OGJhm3ZoSJNaWUV2wHraiSrJCSyR9oRSQjBRHqfh8d5NwQQkpRsz20zxWvRFmTFXq7gBweOmw6h19MG5wZQuxw9NhgBzbkecpj38c0YPsI9qkNecA-JgzeBxugG3CCHMdkAZu2jXZRCN38DCbZR9yn2IAdMnZjCt3DPPcxm3ZqoDfpg3CEdr1pMxx_1kN09-fy9vyquL75--_893VhOamHwviq5l5sNpypugRlpGLSCydLK4RiNQNFyIaw2nJqveKeSuNKQgUzIEXl-CH6uehORzyPkAe9DdlC25oO4pj1JKGYUKJiE5QvUJtizgm87lPYmvSqKdFzBLrRHxHoOQK9RDCxTj8XjJstuP-cL88nwNkCgOmbLwGSzrONFlxIk0vaxfDtgncvTJtA</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Penadés-Blasco, Ana</creator><creator>Cerdá-Alberich, Leonor</creator><creator>Sierra, José Miguel Carot</creator><creator>Alberich-Bayarri, Angel</creator><creator>Martínez, Ainhoa Genovés</creator><creator>Añó, Rita Diranzo</creator><creator>Parrilla, Cristina Clemente</creator><creator>Llobera, Juan Maria Soriano</creator><creator>Consuelo, David Vivas</creator><creator>Martí-Bonmatí, Luis</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Design and validation of a decision support checklist for efficient resource allocation in research projects during proposal preparation</title><author>Penadés-Blasco, Ana ; Cerdá-Alberich, Leonor ; Sierra, José Miguel Carot ; Alberich-Bayarri, Angel ; Martínez, Ainhoa Genovés ; Añó, Rita Diranzo ; Parrilla, Cristina Clemente ; Llobera, Juan Maria Soriano ; Consuelo, David Vivas ; Martí-Bonmatí, Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-af693f4bb32895e8a7827f4d75c448292e800b029c31cf83f17ad50142ae746d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Checklist</topic><topic>Composite Indicator</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Opportunity cost</topic><topic>Optimisation</topic><topic>Resource Allocation - methods</topic><topic>Resources</topic><topic>Return of Investment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Penadés-Blasco, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerdá-Alberich, Leonor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sierra, José Miguel Carot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberich-Bayarri, Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Ainhoa Genovés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Añó, Rita Diranzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrilla, Cristina Clemente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llobera, Juan Maria Soriano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consuelo, David Vivas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martí-Bonmatí, Luis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Penadés-Blasco, Ana</au><au>Cerdá-Alberich, Leonor</au><au>Sierra, José Miguel Carot</au><au>Alberich-Bayarri, Angel</au><au>Martínez, Ainhoa Genovés</au><au>Añó, Rita Diranzo</au><au>Parrilla, Cristina Clemente</au><au>Llobera, Juan Maria Soriano</au><au>Consuelo, David Vivas</au><au>Martí-Bonmatí, Luis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design and validation of a decision support checklist for efficient resource allocation in research projects during proposal preparation</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>173</volume><spage>111362</spage><epage>111362</epage><pages>111362-111362</pages><artnum>111362</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>•Definition of 8 evaluation criteria for a better selection of research proposals.•Development of a score that assess the possibility of success of research proposals.•Validation of the score with the final decision from the funding bodies.•Creation of Return of Investment rate to optimize the available resources. This article presents the design and validation of evaluation criteria checklist aimed at facilitating decision-making processes regarding participation in research projects and allocation of resources before the preparation of research proposals. A multidisciplinary team developed a comprehensive evaluation focusing on the proposal preparation phase of research projects. A Delphi survey method was used to establish a connection between the relevance of the project and the possible success of research proposals. Assessment criteria were agreed upon, each assigned specific weights. The results of the survey were applied to a database of 62 proposals for which our research group sought funding during 2020–2021. The method was validated using the funding body's outcomes (approval or rejection) of the submitted proposals as the ground truth per project type (national, European and regional). The results of the survey generated a checklist of 8 criteria (excellence, impact, and efficiency aspects) that effectively assess the possibility of success of research proposals during the preparatory phase. For national projects, the tool validation demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 76.19%; European projects exhibited a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 53.84%; and regional projects showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 30%. By establishing an agreed set of evaluation criteria, the developed comprehensive index enables a more precise decision support tool for the participation in research proposals and the allocation of necessary resources. This control system saves valuable time and effort for research groups while enhancing the overall efficiency of available resources.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>38364590</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111362</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0720-048X
ispartof European journal of radiology, 2024-04, Vol.173, p.111362-111362, Article 111362
issn 0720-048X
1872-7727
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2928248462
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Checklist
Composite Indicator
Efficiency
Humans
Opportunity cost
Optimisation
Resource Allocation - methods
Resources
Return of Investment
title Design and validation of a decision support checklist for efficient resource allocation in research projects during proposal preparation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T13%3A24%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design%20and%20validation%20of%20a%20decision%20support%20checklist%20for%20efficient%20resource%20allocation%20in%20research%20projects%20during%20proposal%20preparation&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Penad%C3%A9s-Blasco,%20Ana&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=173&rft.spage=111362&rft.epage=111362&rft.pages=111362-111362&rft.artnum=111362&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111362&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2928248462%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2928248462&rft_id=info:pmid/38364590&rft_els_id=S0720048X24000780&rfr_iscdi=true