Immediate effects of elbow orthoses on elbow proprioception in asymptomatic individuals: A randomized sham-controlled single-blinded study
Improving proprioception can reduce the risk of injuries, while its disruption may lead to injuries and recurrent or persistent symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of elbow orthoses on elbow proprioception in asymptomatic individuals. This was a randomized, controlled, singl...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hand therapy 2024-04, Vol.37 (2), p.192-200 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 200 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 192 |
| container_title | Journal of hand therapy |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Sevik Kacmaz, Kevser Unver, Bayram |
| description | Improving proprioception can reduce the risk of injuries, while its disruption may lead to injuries and recurrent or persistent symptoms.
This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of elbow orthoses on elbow proprioception in asymptomatic individuals.
This was a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study with a sham application.
Sixty participants were equally distributed into three orthosis groups (counterforce, sleeve, and sham). Proprioception was assessed using active joint position sense error (JPSE) at 70° and 110° of elbow flexion at three time points: baseline (BS), immediately after (IA) wearing the orthosis, and 30 minutes after (30MA) wearing the orthosis.
Between groups: No significant difference in JPSE was observed at 70° (p = 0.095); however, there was a significant difference at 110° (p = 0.005).
Between time points: At 70°, JPSE did not exhibit a significant difference (p = 0.055), whereas a significant difference was observed at 110° (p = 0.020).
Interaction of time points×groups: No significant interaction was observed either at 70° (p = 0.476) or at 110° (p = 0.346).
At 70°, within the sleeve group, significant differences were identified between BS-30MA (p = 0.001) and IA-30MA (p = 0.009).
At 110°, in the sleeve group, significant differences were observed between BS-30MA (p = 0.007) and IA-30MA (p = 0.007).
In the counterforce group, significant differences were identified between BS-30MA time points (p = 0.001).
At 70°, no difference was observed within the overall evaluation in the counterforce group (p > 0.05), whereas at 110°, a significant difference was noted (p = 0.026).
At both 70° and 110°, no differences were identified within the overall evaluation in the sleeve and sham groups (p > 0.05).
In asymptomatic individuals, sleeve orthosis improved elbow proprioception at 70°, whereas both counterforce and sleeve orthoses were effective at 110°.
•Counterforce orthosis may improve elbow proprioception.•Sleeve orthosis may improve elbow proprioception.•A 30-minute usage may be insufficient to improve proprioception significantly.•These orthoses can be employed without suppressing elbow proprioception. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jht.2023.12.010 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2928248022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0894113023001989</els_id><sourcerecordid>2928248022</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-e2a833e970bc5adbfdfd60a2b0a9d0ae89b80f3d0248d604fbede69cdcb2371a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2O1DAQhC0EYmcXHoALisSFS0LbTjIJnFYrFlZaiQtI3Cz_dBhHSTzYzqLhEXhqejQDBw6crGpXlez-GHvBoeLA2zdjNe5yJUDIiosKODxiG97UTQlQf33MNtD1dcm5hAt2mdIIwBsB26fsQnayhbprN-zX3Tyj8zpjgcOANqciDAVOJvwoQsy7kJAmy3myj2EffbC4z56Gfil0Osz7HGadvSXt_IN3q57S2-K6iHpxYfY_0RVpp-fShiXHME1H7ZdvE5ZmoshR5tUdnrEnAyXx-fm8Yl9u33---Vjef_pwd3N9X1opZS5R6E5K7LdgbKOdGdzgWtDCgO4daOx608EgHYi6o4t6MOiw7a2zRsgt1_KKvT710m--r5iymn2yOE16wbAmJXrRURaEIOurf6xjWONCr1MS2prLrm1acvGTy8aQUsRB0ZJmHQ-KgzqCUqMiUOoISnGhCBRlXp6bV0MA_ib-kCHDu5MBaRUPHqNK1uNiCVYkTMoF_5_63y2Ap3o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3064138656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immediate effects of elbow orthoses on elbow proprioception in asymptomatic individuals: A randomized sham-controlled single-blinded study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sevik Kacmaz, Kevser ; Unver, Bayram</creator><creatorcontrib>Sevik Kacmaz, Kevser ; Unver, Bayram</creatorcontrib><description>Improving proprioception can reduce the risk of injuries, while its disruption may lead to injuries and recurrent or persistent symptoms.
This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of elbow orthoses on elbow proprioception in asymptomatic individuals.
This was a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study with a sham application.
Sixty participants were equally distributed into three orthosis groups (counterforce, sleeve, and sham). Proprioception was assessed using active joint position sense error (JPSE) at 70° and 110° of elbow flexion at three time points: baseline (BS), immediately after (IA) wearing the orthosis, and 30 minutes after (30MA) wearing the orthosis.
Between groups: No significant difference in JPSE was observed at 70° (p = 0.095); however, there was a significant difference at 110° (p = 0.005).
Between time points: At 70°, JPSE did not exhibit a significant difference (p = 0.055), whereas a significant difference was observed at 110° (p = 0.020).
Interaction of time points×groups: No significant interaction was observed either at 70° (p = 0.476) or at 110° (p = 0.346).
At 70°, within the sleeve group, significant differences were identified between BS-30MA (p = 0.001) and IA-30MA (p = 0.009).
At 110°, in the sleeve group, significant differences were observed between BS-30MA (p = 0.007) and IA-30MA (p = 0.007).
In the counterforce group, significant differences were identified between BS-30MA time points (p = 0.001).
At 70°, no difference was observed within the overall evaluation in the counterforce group (p > 0.05), whereas at 110°, a significant difference was noted (p = 0.026).
At both 70° and 110°, no differences were identified within the overall evaluation in the sleeve and sham groups (p > 0.05).
In asymptomatic individuals, sleeve orthosis improved elbow proprioception at 70°, whereas both counterforce and sleeve orthoses were effective at 110°.
•Counterforce orthosis may improve elbow proprioception.•Sleeve orthosis may improve elbow proprioception.•A 30-minute usage may be insufficient to improve proprioception significantly.•These orthoses can be employed without suppressing elbow proprioception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-1130</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1545-004X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-004X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.12.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38360486</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Asymptomatic ; Brace ; Elbow ; Elbow (anatomy) ; External support approaches ; Health risks ; Injuries ; Joint position sense ; Manipulative therapy ; Orthoses ; Proprioception ; Rehabilitation ; Risk reduction ; Sleeves ; Splint ; Stress concentration ; Trauma</subject><ispartof>Journal of hand therapy, 2024-04, Vol.37 (2), p.192-200</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2024. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-e2a833e970bc5adbfdfd60a2b0a9d0ae89b80f3d0248d604fbede69cdcb2371a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001989$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38360486$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sevik Kacmaz, Kevser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unver, Bayram</creatorcontrib><title>Immediate effects of elbow orthoses on elbow proprioception in asymptomatic individuals: A randomized sham-controlled single-blinded study</title><title>Journal of hand therapy</title><addtitle>J Hand Ther</addtitle><description>Improving proprioception can reduce the risk of injuries, while its disruption may lead to injuries and recurrent or persistent symptoms.
This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of elbow orthoses on elbow proprioception in asymptomatic individuals.
This was a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study with a sham application.
Sixty participants were equally distributed into three orthosis groups (counterforce, sleeve, and sham). Proprioception was assessed using active joint position sense error (JPSE) at 70° and 110° of elbow flexion at three time points: baseline (BS), immediately after (IA) wearing the orthosis, and 30 minutes after (30MA) wearing the orthosis.
Between groups: No significant difference in JPSE was observed at 70° (p = 0.095); however, there was a significant difference at 110° (p = 0.005).
Between time points: At 70°, JPSE did not exhibit a significant difference (p = 0.055), whereas a significant difference was observed at 110° (p = 0.020).
Interaction of time points×groups: No significant interaction was observed either at 70° (p = 0.476) or at 110° (p = 0.346).
At 70°, within the sleeve group, significant differences were identified between BS-30MA (p = 0.001) and IA-30MA (p = 0.009).
At 110°, in the sleeve group, significant differences were observed between BS-30MA (p = 0.007) and IA-30MA (p = 0.007).
In the counterforce group, significant differences were identified between BS-30MA time points (p = 0.001).
At 70°, no difference was observed within the overall evaluation in the counterforce group (p > 0.05), whereas at 110°, a significant difference was noted (p = 0.026).
At both 70° and 110°, no differences were identified within the overall evaluation in the sleeve and sham groups (p > 0.05).
In asymptomatic individuals, sleeve orthosis improved elbow proprioception at 70°, whereas both counterforce and sleeve orthoses were effective at 110°.
•Counterforce orthosis may improve elbow proprioception.•Sleeve orthosis may improve elbow proprioception.•A 30-minute usage may be insufficient to improve proprioception significantly.•These orthoses can be employed without suppressing elbow proprioception.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Brace</subject><subject>Elbow</subject><subject>Elbow (anatomy)</subject><subject>External support approaches</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Joint position sense</subject><subject>Manipulative therapy</subject><subject>Orthoses</subject><subject>Proprioception</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Sleeves</subject><subject>Splint</subject><subject>Stress concentration</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><issn>0894-1130</issn><issn>1545-004X</issn><issn>1545-004X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2O1DAQhC0EYmcXHoALisSFS0LbTjIJnFYrFlZaiQtI3Cz_dBhHSTzYzqLhEXhqejQDBw6crGpXlez-GHvBoeLA2zdjNe5yJUDIiosKODxiG97UTQlQf33MNtD1dcm5hAt2mdIIwBsB26fsQnayhbprN-zX3Tyj8zpjgcOANqciDAVOJvwoQsy7kJAmy3myj2EffbC4z56Gfil0Osz7HGadvSXt_IN3q57S2-K6iHpxYfY_0RVpp-fShiXHME1H7ZdvE5ZmoshR5tUdnrEnAyXx-fm8Yl9u33---Vjef_pwd3N9X1opZS5R6E5K7LdgbKOdGdzgWtDCgO4daOx608EgHYi6o4t6MOiw7a2zRsgt1_KKvT710m--r5iymn2yOE16wbAmJXrRURaEIOurf6xjWONCr1MS2prLrm1acvGTy8aQUsRB0ZJmHQ-KgzqCUqMiUOoISnGhCBRlXp6bV0MA_ib-kCHDu5MBaRUPHqNK1uNiCVYkTMoF_5_63y2Ap3o</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Sevik Kacmaz, Kevser</creator><creator>Unver, Bayram</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Immediate effects of elbow orthoses on elbow proprioception in asymptomatic individuals: A randomized sham-controlled single-blinded study</title><author>Sevik Kacmaz, Kevser ; Unver, Bayram</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-e2a833e970bc5adbfdfd60a2b0a9d0ae89b80f3d0248d604fbede69cdcb2371a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Brace</topic><topic>Elbow</topic><topic>Elbow (anatomy)</topic><topic>External support approaches</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Joint position sense</topic><topic>Manipulative therapy</topic><topic>Orthoses</topic><topic>Proprioception</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Sleeves</topic><topic>Splint</topic><topic>Stress concentration</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sevik Kacmaz, Kevser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unver, Bayram</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hand therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sevik Kacmaz, Kevser</au><au>Unver, Bayram</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immediate effects of elbow orthoses on elbow proprioception in asymptomatic individuals: A randomized sham-controlled single-blinded study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hand therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Hand Ther</addtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>192</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>192-200</pages><issn>0894-1130</issn><issn>1545-004X</issn><eissn>1545-004X</eissn><abstract>Improving proprioception can reduce the risk of injuries, while its disruption may lead to injuries and recurrent or persistent symptoms.
This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of elbow orthoses on elbow proprioception in asymptomatic individuals.
This was a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study with a sham application.
Sixty participants were equally distributed into three orthosis groups (counterforce, sleeve, and sham). Proprioception was assessed using active joint position sense error (JPSE) at 70° and 110° of elbow flexion at three time points: baseline (BS), immediately after (IA) wearing the orthosis, and 30 minutes after (30MA) wearing the orthosis.
Between groups: No significant difference in JPSE was observed at 70° (p = 0.095); however, there was a significant difference at 110° (p = 0.005).
Between time points: At 70°, JPSE did not exhibit a significant difference (p = 0.055), whereas a significant difference was observed at 110° (p = 0.020).
Interaction of time points×groups: No significant interaction was observed either at 70° (p = 0.476) or at 110° (p = 0.346).
At 70°, within the sleeve group, significant differences were identified between BS-30MA (p = 0.001) and IA-30MA (p = 0.009).
At 110°, in the sleeve group, significant differences were observed between BS-30MA (p = 0.007) and IA-30MA (p = 0.007).
In the counterforce group, significant differences were identified between BS-30MA time points (p = 0.001).
At 70°, no difference was observed within the overall evaluation in the counterforce group (p > 0.05), whereas at 110°, a significant difference was noted (p = 0.026).
At both 70° and 110°, no differences were identified within the overall evaluation in the sleeve and sham groups (p > 0.05).
In asymptomatic individuals, sleeve orthosis improved elbow proprioception at 70°, whereas both counterforce and sleeve orthoses were effective at 110°.
•Counterforce orthosis may improve elbow proprioception.•Sleeve orthosis may improve elbow proprioception.•A 30-minute usage may be insufficient to improve proprioception significantly.•These orthoses can be employed without suppressing elbow proprioception.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38360486</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jht.2023.12.010</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0894-1130 |
| ispartof | Journal of hand therapy, 2024-04, Vol.37 (2), p.192-200 |
| issn | 0894-1130 1545-004X 1545-004X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2928248022 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Accuracy Asymptomatic Brace Elbow Elbow (anatomy) External support approaches Health risks Injuries Joint position sense Manipulative therapy Orthoses Proprioception Rehabilitation Risk reduction Sleeves Splint Stress concentration Trauma |
| title | Immediate effects of elbow orthoses on elbow proprioception in asymptomatic individuals: A randomized sham-controlled single-blinded study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T01%3A07%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immediate%20effects%20of%20elbow%20orthoses%20on%20elbow%20proprioception%20in%20asymptomatic%20individuals:%20A%20randomized%20sham-controlled%20single-blinded%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hand%20therapy&rft.au=Sevik%20Kacmaz,%20Kevser&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=192-200&rft.issn=0894-1130&rft.eissn=1545-004X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jht.2023.12.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2928248022%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3064138656&rft_id=info:pmid/38360486&rft_els_id=S0894113023001989&rfr_iscdi=true |