Murrah Building Bombing Revisited: A Qualitative Assessment of Blast Damage and Collapse Patterns

On April 19, 1995, a truck loaded with an ammonium nitrate and fuel oil bomb caused collapse of fully half of the total floor area of the nine-story, reinforced concrete Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. The extent of the collapse, which extended well beyond the zone of direct structural bla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of performance of constructed facilities 2006-11, Vol.20 (4), p.330-335
1. Verfasser: Osteraas, John D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 335
container_issue 4
container_start_page 330
container_title Journal of performance of constructed facilities
container_volume 20
creator Osteraas, John D
description On April 19, 1995, a truck loaded with an ammonium nitrate and fuel oil bomb caused collapse of fully half of the total floor area of the nine-story, reinforced concrete Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. The extent of the collapse, which extended well beyond the zone of direct structural blast damage, prompted studies of progressive/disproportionate collapse and development of new design guidelines for important buildings. While there is no question that the collapse was the result of the loss of only four columns, there is a common belief that direct blast effects destroyed three of those columns. Firsthand observation of debris, collapse patterns, damage patterns, and thousands of photographs taken during search and rescue activities at the building suggest the possibility that only one column was destroyed by direct blast effects, while the other three buckled due to loss of lateral support provided by beams and floor diaphragms that were destroyed by the blast. While the distinction may be subtle, it has significant implications for the design of tougher buildings. Specific lessons include ductile detailing, the necessity of maintaining the integrity of a three-dimensional frame, and explicit consideration of structural fuses to protect critical elements.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(330)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29279940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29279940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-dee16b2294feedb4af78d26be6908d54d4c1986b9c1ea489a0cd48fdbfd2196e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtPwzAQhC0EEqXwH3xC7SFgO25qV-LQlvKQQLzP1ibeQKo8iu1U4t-TqIgj4rJ7mRntzkfIKWdnnCX8fDR_Wa7GTKlpFCuhRoKxZCzYTI7imI33yIBrGUeTCdP7ZPArOyRH3q8ZY2KqpwMC961z8EEXbVHaon6ni6ZK-_2M28IXAe2MzulTC2URIBRbpHPv0fsK60CbnC5K8IFeQgXvSKG2dNmUJWw80kcIAV3tj8lBDqXHk589JG9Xq9flTXT3cH27nN9FECsWIovIk1QILXNEm0rIp8qKJMVEM2Un0sqMa5WkOuMIUmlgmZUqt2luBdcJxkNyusvduOazRR9MVfgMu2tqbFpvhO4-1pL9Q8jlREvRCS92wsw13jvMzcYVFbgvw5npERjTIzB9t6bv1vQIumGk6RB0fr3zQxdv1k3r6q6AX_Of3m-Z8Yzs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29145942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Murrah Building Bombing Revisited: A Qualitative Assessment of Blast Damage and Collapse Patterns</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Osteraas, John D</creator><creatorcontrib>Osteraas, John D</creatorcontrib><description>On April 19, 1995, a truck loaded with an ammonium nitrate and fuel oil bomb caused collapse of fully half of the total floor area of the nine-story, reinforced concrete Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. The extent of the collapse, which extended well beyond the zone of direct structural blast damage, prompted studies of progressive/disproportionate collapse and development of new design guidelines for important buildings. While there is no question that the collapse was the result of the loss of only four columns, there is a common belief that direct blast effects destroyed three of those columns. Firsthand observation of debris, collapse patterns, damage patterns, and thousands of photographs taken during search and rescue activities at the building suggest the possibility that only one column was destroyed by direct blast effects, while the other three buckled due to loss of lateral support provided by beams and floor diaphragms that were destroyed by the blast. While the distinction may be subtle, it has significant implications for the design of tougher buildings. Specific lessons include ductile detailing, the necessity of maintaining the integrity of a three-dimensional frame, and explicit consideration of structural fuses to protect critical elements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-3828</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(330)</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of performance of constructed facilities, 2006-11, Vol.20 (4), p.330-335</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-dee16b2294feedb4af78d26be6908d54d4c1986b9c1ea489a0cd48fdbfd2196e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-dee16b2294feedb4af78d26be6908d54d4c1986b9c1ea489a0cd48fdbfd2196e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(330)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(330)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,75936,75944</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osteraas, John D</creatorcontrib><title>Murrah Building Bombing Revisited: A Qualitative Assessment of Blast Damage and Collapse Patterns</title><title>Journal of performance of constructed facilities</title><description>On April 19, 1995, a truck loaded with an ammonium nitrate and fuel oil bomb caused collapse of fully half of the total floor area of the nine-story, reinforced concrete Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. The extent of the collapse, which extended well beyond the zone of direct structural blast damage, prompted studies of progressive/disproportionate collapse and development of new design guidelines for important buildings. While there is no question that the collapse was the result of the loss of only four columns, there is a common belief that direct blast effects destroyed three of those columns. Firsthand observation of debris, collapse patterns, damage patterns, and thousands of photographs taken during search and rescue activities at the building suggest the possibility that only one column was destroyed by direct blast effects, while the other three buckled due to loss of lateral support provided by beams and floor diaphragms that were destroyed by the blast. While the distinction may be subtle, it has significant implications for the design of tougher buildings. Specific lessons include ductile detailing, the necessity of maintaining the integrity of a three-dimensional frame, and explicit consideration of structural fuses to protect critical elements.</description><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>0887-3828</issn><issn>1943-5509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUtPwzAQhC0EEqXwH3xC7SFgO25qV-LQlvKQQLzP1ibeQKo8iu1U4t-TqIgj4rJ7mRntzkfIKWdnnCX8fDR_Wa7GTKlpFCuhRoKxZCzYTI7imI33yIBrGUeTCdP7ZPArOyRH3q8ZY2KqpwMC961z8EEXbVHaon6ni6ZK-_2M28IXAe2MzulTC2URIBRbpHPv0fsK60CbnC5K8IFeQgXvSKG2dNmUJWw80kcIAV3tj8lBDqXHk589JG9Xq9flTXT3cH27nN9FECsWIovIk1QILXNEm0rIp8qKJMVEM2Un0sqMa5WkOuMIUmlgmZUqt2luBdcJxkNyusvduOazRR9MVfgMu2tqbFpvhO4-1pL9Q8jlREvRCS92wsw13jvMzcYVFbgvw5npERjTIzB9t6bv1vQIumGk6RB0fr3zQxdv1k3r6q6AX_Of3m-Z8Yzs</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Osteraas, John D</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7TB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Murrah Building Bombing Revisited: A Qualitative Assessment of Blast Damage and Collapse Patterns</title><author>Osteraas, John D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a380t-dee16b2294feedb4af78d26be6908d54d4c1986b9c1ea489a0cd48fdbfd2196e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osteraas, John D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of performance of constructed facilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osteraas, John D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Murrah Building Bombing Revisited: A Qualitative Assessment of Blast Damage and Collapse Patterns</atitle><jtitle>Journal of performance of constructed facilities</jtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>330</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>330-335</pages><issn>0887-3828</issn><eissn>1943-5509</eissn><abstract>On April 19, 1995, a truck loaded with an ammonium nitrate and fuel oil bomb caused collapse of fully half of the total floor area of the nine-story, reinforced concrete Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. The extent of the collapse, which extended well beyond the zone of direct structural blast damage, prompted studies of progressive/disproportionate collapse and development of new design guidelines for important buildings. While there is no question that the collapse was the result of the loss of only four columns, there is a common belief that direct blast effects destroyed three of those columns. Firsthand observation of debris, collapse patterns, damage patterns, and thousands of photographs taken during search and rescue activities at the building suggest the possibility that only one column was destroyed by direct blast effects, while the other three buckled due to loss of lateral support provided by beams and floor diaphragms that were destroyed by the blast. While the distinction may be subtle, it has significant implications for the design of tougher buildings. Specific lessons include ductile detailing, the necessity of maintaining the integrity of a three-dimensional frame, and explicit consideration of structural fuses to protect critical elements.</abstract><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(330)</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-3828
ispartof Journal of performance of constructed facilities, 2006-11, Vol.20 (4), p.330-335
issn 0887-3828
1943-5509
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29279940
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects TECHNICAL PAPERS
title Murrah Building Bombing Revisited: A Qualitative Assessment of Blast Damage and Collapse Patterns
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A10%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Murrah%20Building%20Bombing%20Revisited:%20A%20Qualitative%20Assessment%20of%20Blast%20Damage%20and%20Collapse%20Patterns&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20performance%20of%20constructed%20facilities&rft.au=Osteraas,%20John%20D&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=330&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=330-335&rft.issn=0887-3828&rft.eissn=1943-5509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(330)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29279940%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29145942&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true