Prefrontal activation when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step
The present study investigated neural mechanisms for suppressing a highly automatic balance recovery step. Response inhibition has typically been researched using focal hand reaction tasks performed by seated participants, and this has revealed a neural stopping network including the Inferior Fronta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gait & posture 2024-01, Vol.107, p.281-286 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 286 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 281 |
container_title | Gait & posture |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Abugu, Ezinne U. Harper, Sara A. Kim, Youngwook Bolton, David A.E. |
description | The present study investigated neural mechanisms for suppressing a highly automatic balance recovery step. Response inhibition has typically been researched using focal hand reaction tasks performed by seated participants, and this has revealed a neural stopping network including the Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG). It is unclear if the same neural networks contribute to suppressing an unwanted balance reaction.
Is there greater IFG activation when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step?
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to measure brain activity in 21 young adults as they performed a balance recovery task that demanded rapid step suppression following postural perturbation. The hypothesis was that the IFG would show heightened activity when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step. A lean and-release system was used to impose temporally unpredictable forward perturbations by releasing participants from a supported forward lean. For most trials (80%), participants were told to recover balance by quickly stepping forward (STEP). However, on 20% of trials at random, a high-pitch tone was played immediately after postural perturbation signaling participants to suppress a step and fully relax into a catch harness (STOP). This allowed us to target the ability to cancel an already initiated step in a balance recovery context. Average oxygenated hemoglobin changes were contrasted between STEP and STOP trials, 1-6seconds post perturbation.
The results showed a greater bilateral prefrontal response during STOP trials, supporting the idea that executive brain networks are active when suppressing a balance recovery step.
Our study demonstrates one way in which higher brain processes may help us prevent falls in complex environments where behavioral flexibility is necessary. This study also presents a novel method for assessing response inhibition in an upright postural context where rapid stepping reactions are required.
•Functional near infrared spectroscopy measured brain activation in a balance task.•Automatic step reactions were occasionally interrupted by a stop cue.•Prefrontal cortical activity increased when suppressing a balance recovery step.•This demonstrates a novel way to probe inhibition in a reactive balance task. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.10.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2926529940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0966636223014716</els_id><sourcerecordid>2926529940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-84deae4668a06052525803804690e914b3532e7ab80435489f3133a8259cf3313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOAyEUhonR2Fp9hWaWbmbkMkNhp2m8NGmiC10TSs9UmplhBKamby9NrVvDAvLxHw7nQ2hKcEEw4XfbYqNt7F2IBcWUJVgkfIbGRMxkTimR52iMJec5Z5yO0FUIW4xxyQS9RCMmWCklm43R4s1D7V0XdZNpE-1OR-u67PsTuiwMfe8hBNttMt1leoiuTdcmW-lGdwYyD8btwO-zEKG_Rhe1bgLc_O4T9PH0-D5_yZevz4v5wzI3jFQxF-UaNJScC405rmhaAjOBSy4xSFKuWMUozPQqIVaVQtaMMKYFraSpWTpP0O3x3d67rwFCVK0NBpr0JXBDUFRSXlEpS5yi_Bg13oWQBlW9t632e0WwOmhUW3XSqA4aDzzhVDj97TGsWlj_lZ28pcD9MQBp0p0Fr4KxkJysbZIS1drZ_3r8AH-hhoE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2926529940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prefrontal activation when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Abugu, Ezinne U. ; Harper, Sara A. ; Kim, Youngwook ; Bolton, David A.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abugu, Ezinne U. ; Harper, Sara A. ; Kim, Youngwook ; Bolton, David A.E.</creatorcontrib><description>The present study investigated neural mechanisms for suppressing a highly automatic balance recovery step. Response inhibition has typically been researched using focal hand reaction tasks performed by seated participants, and this has revealed a neural stopping network including the Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG). It is unclear if the same neural networks contribute to suppressing an unwanted balance reaction.
Is there greater IFG activation when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step?
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to measure brain activity in 21 young adults as they performed a balance recovery task that demanded rapid step suppression following postural perturbation. The hypothesis was that the IFG would show heightened activity when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step. A lean and-release system was used to impose temporally unpredictable forward perturbations by releasing participants from a supported forward lean. For most trials (80%), participants were told to recover balance by quickly stepping forward (STEP). However, on 20% of trials at random, a high-pitch tone was played immediately after postural perturbation signaling participants to suppress a step and fully relax into a catch harness (STOP). This allowed us to target the ability to cancel an already initiated step in a balance recovery context. Average oxygenated hemoglobin changes were contrasted between STEP and STOP trials, 1-6seconds post perturbation.
The results showed a greater bilateral prefrontal response during STOP trials, supporting the idea that executive brain networks are active when suppressing a balance recovery step.
Our study demonstrates one way in which higher brain processes may help us prevent falls in complex environments where behavioral flexibility is necessary. This study also presents a novel method for assessing response inhibition in an upright postural context where rapid stepping reactions are required.
•Functional near infrared spectroscopy measured brain activation in a balance task.•Automatic step reactions were occasionally interrupted by a stop cue.•Prefrontal cortical activity increased when suppressing a balance recovery step.•This demonstrates a novel way to probe inhibition in a reactive balance task.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-6362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.10.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38349937</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Brain - physiology ; fNIRS ; Hand - physiology ; Humans ; Inferior Frontal Gyrus ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Prefrontal Cortex ; Reactive Balance ; Response Inhibition ; Standing Position ; Stop Signal Task ; Upper Extremity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Gait & posture, 2024-01, Vol.107, p.281-286</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-84deae4668a06052525803804690e914b3532e7ab80435489f3133a8259cf3313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38349937$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abugu, Ezinne U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, Sara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Youngwook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolton, David A.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Prefrontal activation when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step</title><title>Gait & posture</title><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><description>The present study investigated neural mechanisms for suppressing a highly automatic balance recovery step. Response inhibition has typically been researched using focal hand reaction tasks performed by seated participants, and this has revealed a neural stopping network including the Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG). It is unclear if the same neural networks contribute to suppressing an unwanted balance reaction.
Is there greater IFG activation when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step?
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to measure brain activity in 21 young adults as they performed a balance recovery task that demanded rapid step suppression following postural perturbation. The hypothesis was that the IFG would show heightened activity when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step. A lean and-release system was used to impose temporally unpredictable forward perturbations by releasing participants from a supported forward lean. For most trials (80%), participants were told to recover balance by quickly stepping forward (STEP). However, on 20% of trials at random, a high-pitch tone was played immediately after postural perturbation signaling participants to suppress a step and fully relax into a catch harness (STOP). This allowed us to target the ability to cancel an already initiated step in a balance recovery context. Average oxygenated hemoglobin changes were contrasted between STEP and STOP trials, 1-6seconds post perturbation.
The results showed a greater bilateral prefrontal response during STOP trials, supporting the idea that executive brain networks are active when suppressing a balance recovery step.
Our study demonstrates one way in which higher brain processes may help us prevent falls in complex environments where behavioral flexibility is necessary. This study also presents a novel method for assessing response inhibition in an upright postural context where rapid stepping reactions are required.
•Functional near infrared spectroscopy measured brain activation in a balance task.•Automatic step reactions were occasionally interrupted by a stop cue.•Prefrontal cortical activity increased when suppressing a balance recovery step.•This demonstrates a novel way to probe inhibition in a reactive balance task.</description><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>fNIRS</subject><subject>Hand - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inferior Frontal Gyrus</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Prefrontal Cortex</subject><subject>Reactive Balance</subject><subject>Response Inhibition</subject><subject>Standing Position</subject><subject>Stop Signal Task</subject><subject>Upper Extremity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0966-6362</issn><issn>1879-2219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOAyEUhonR2Fp9hWaWbmbkMkNhp2m8NGmiC10TSs9UmplhBKamby9NrVvDAvLxHw7nQ2hKcEEw4XfbYqNt7F2IBcWUJVgkfIbGRMxkTimR52iMJec5Z5yO0FUIW4xxyQS9RCMmWCklm43R4s1D7V0XdZNpE-1OR-u67PsTuiwMfe8hBNttMt1leoiuTdcmW-lGdwYyD8btwO-zEKG_Rhe1bgLc_O4T9PH0-D5_yZevz4v5wzI3jFQxF-UaNJScC405rmhaAjOBSy4xSFKuWMUozPQqIVaVQtaMMKYFraSpWTpP0O3x3d67rwFCVK0NBpr0JXBDUFRSXlEpS5yi_Bg13oWQBlW9t632e0WwOmhUW3XSqA4aDzzhVDj97TGsWlj_lZ28pcD9MQBp0p0Fr4KxkJysbZIS1drZ_3r8AH-hhoE</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Abugu, Ezinne U.</creator><creator>Harper, Sara A.</creator><creator>Kim, Youngwook</creator><creator>Bolton, David A.E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Prefrontal activation when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step</title><author>Abugu, Ezinne U. ; Harper, Sara A. ; Kim, Youngwook ; Bolton, David A.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-84deae4668a06052525803804690e914b3532e7ab80435489f3133a8259cf3313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>fNIRS</topic><topic>Hand - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inferior Frontal Gyrus</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Prefrontal Cortex</topic><topic>Reactive Balance</topic><topic>Response Inhibition</topic><topic>Standing Position</topic><topic>Stop Signal Task</topic><topic>Upper Extremity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abugu, Ezinne U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, Sara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Youngwook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolton, David A.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gait & posture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abugu, Ezinne U.</au><au>Harper, Sara A.</au><au>Kim, Youngwook</au><au>Bolton, David A.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prefrontal activation when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step</atitle><jtitle>Gait & posture</jtitle><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>107</volume><spage>281</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>281-286</pages><issn>0966-6362</issn><eissn>1879-2219</eissn><abstract>The present study investigated neural mechanisms for suppressing a highly automatic balance recovery step. Response inhibition has typically been researched using focal hand reaction tasks performed by seated participants, and this has revealed a neural stopping network including the Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG). It is unclear if the same neural networks contribute to suppressing an unwanted balance reaction.
Is there greater IFG activation when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step?
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to measure brain activity in 21 young adults as they performed a balance recovery task that demanded rapid step suppression following postural perturbation. The hypothesis was that the IFG would show heightened activity when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step. A lean and-release system was used to impose temporally unpredictable forward perturbations by releasing participants from a supported forward lean. For most trials (80%), participants were told to recover balance by quickly stepping forward (STEP). However, on 20% of trials at random, a high-pitch tone was played immediately after postural perturbation signaling participants to suppress a step and fully relax into a catch harness (STOP). This allowed us to target the ability to cancel an already initiated step in a balance recovery context. Average oxygenated hemoglobin changes were contrasted between STEP and STOP trials, 1-6seconds post perturbation.
The results showed a greater bilateral prefrontal response during STOP trials, supporting the idea that executive brain networks are active when suppressing a balance recovery step.
Our study demonstrates one way in which higher brain processes may help us prevent falls in complex environments where behavioral flexibility is necessary. This study also presents a novel method for assessing response inhibition in an upright postural context where rapid stepping reactions are required.
•Functional near infrared spectroscopy measured brain activation in a balance task.•Automatic step reactions were occasionally interrupted by a stop cue.•Prefrontal cortical activity increased when suppressing a balance recovery step.•This demonstrates a novel way to probe inhibition in a reactive balance task.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>38349937</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.10.016</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0966-6362 |
ispartof | Gait & posture, 2024-01, Vol.107, p.281-286 |
issn | 0966-6362 1879-2219 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2926529940 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE |
subjects | Brain - physiology fNIRS Hand - physiology Humans Inferior Frontal Gyrus Postural Balance - physiology Prefrontal Cortex Reactive Balance Response Inhibition Standing Position Stop Signal Task Upper Extremity Young Adult |
title | Prefrontal activation when suppressing an automatic balance recovery step |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T11%3A02%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prefrontal%20activation%20when%20suppressing%20an%20automatic%20balance%20recovery%20step&rft.jtitle=Gait%20&%20posture&rft.au=Abugu,%20Ezinne%20U.&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=107&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=281-286&rft.issn=0966-6362&rft.eissn=1879-2219&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.10.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2926529940%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2926529940&rft_id=info:pmid/38349937&rft_els_id=S0966636223014716&rfr_iscdi=true |