Species diversity and interspecific information flow

ABSTRACT Interspecific information flow is known to affect individual fitness, population dynamics and community assembly, but there has been less study of how species diversity affects information flow and thereby ecosystem functioning and services. We address this question by first examining diffe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 2024-06, Vol.99 (3), p.999-1014
Hauptverfasser: Goodale, Eben, Magrath, Robert D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1014
container_issue 3
container_start_page 999
container_title Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
container_volume 99
creator Goodale, Eben
Magrath, Robert D.
description ABSTRACT Interspecific information flow is known to affect individual fitness, population dynamics and community assembly, but there has been less study of how species diversity affects information flow and thereby ecosystem functioning and services. We address this question by first examining differences among species in the sensitivity, accuracy, transmissibility, detectability and value of the cues and signals they produce, and in how they receive, store and use information derived from heterospecifics. We then review how interspecific information flow occurs in communities, involving a diversity of species and sensory modes, and how this flow can affect ecosystem‐level functions, such as decomposition, seed dispersal or algae removal on coral reefs. We highlight evidence that some keystone species are particularly critical as a source of information used by eavesdroppers, and so have a disproportionate effect on information flow. Such keystone species include community informants producing signals, particularly about predation risk, that influence other species' landscapes of fear, and aggregation initiators creating cues or signals about resources. We suggest that the presence of keystone species means that there will likely be a positive relationship in many communities between species diversity and information through a ‘sampling effect’, in which larger pools of species are more likely to include the keystone species by chance. We then consider whether the number and relative abundance of species, irrespective of the presence of keystone species, matter to interspecific information flow; on this issue, the theory is less developed, and the evidence scant and indirect. Higher diversity could increase the quantity or quality of information that is used by eavesdroppers because redundancy increases the reliability of information or because the species provide complementary information. Alternatively, there could be a lack of a relationship between species diversity and information if there is widespread information parasitism where users are not sources, or if information sourced from heterospecifics is of lower value than that gained personally or sourced from conspecifics. Recent research suggests that species diversity does have information‐modulated community and ecosystem consequences, especially in birds, such as the diversity of species at feeders increasing resource exploitation, or the number of imitated species increasing responses to vocal
doi_str_mv 10.1111/brv.13055
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2926518853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2926518853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-26cdda1a43f1f2c501e745753bd5bf5d3f26e315e41bb8950bb0d766694f38813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMotlYXvoAU3Ohi2pzJJJNZavEGBcEb7sJkkkDKXGoy09K3N-1UF4LZnJyTj5-TD6FzwBMIZyrdagIEU3qAhpCwLAJOPw939yRKMwIDdOL9AuMwYOQYDQiP04ynMETJ61IXVvuxsivtvG0347xWY1u3ods-GVuEzjSuylvb1GNTNutTdGTy0uuzfR2h9_u7t9ljNH9-eJrdzKOCUEKjmBVK5ZAnxICJC4pBpwlNKZGKSkMVMTHTBKhOQEqeUSwlViljLEsM4RzICF31uUvXfHXat6KyvtBlmde66byIs5hR4JySgF7-QRdN5-qwnQhigPHwZRyo654qXOO900Ysna1ytxGAxValCCrFTmVgL_aJnay0-iV_3AVg2gNrW-rN_0ni9uWjj_wGxq576g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3051683820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Species diversity and interspecific information flow</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Goodale, Eben ; Magrath, Robert D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goodale, Eben ; Magrath, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Interspecific information flow is known to affect individual fitness, population dynamics and community assembly, but there has been less study of how species diversity affects information flow and thereby ecosystem functioning and services. We address this question by first examining differences among species in the sensitivity, accuracy, transmissibility, detectability and value of the cues and signals they produce, and in how they receive, store and use information derived from heterospecifics. We then review how interspecific information flow occurs in communities, involving a diversity of species and sensory modes, and how this flow can affect ecosystem‐level functions, such as decomposition, seed dispersal or algae removal on coral reefs. We highlight evidence that some keystone species are particularly critical as a source of information used by eavesdroppers, and so have a disproportionate effect on information flow. Such keystone species include community informants producing signals, particularly about predation risk, that influence other species' landscapes of fear, and aggregation initiators creating cues or signals about resources. We suggest that the presence of keystone species means that there will likely be a positive relationship in many communities between species diversity and information through a ‘sampling effect’, in which larger pools of species are more likely to include the keystone species by chance. We then consider whether the number and relative abundance of species, irrespective of the presence of keystone species, matter to interspecific information flow; on this issue, the theory is less developed, and the evidence scant and indirect. Higher diversity could increase the quantity or quality of information that is used by eavesdroppers because redundancy increases the reliability of information or because the species provide complementary information. Alternatively, there could be a lack of a relationship between species diversity and information if there is widespread information parasitism where users are not sources, or if information sourced from heterospecifics is of lower value than that gained personally or sourced from conspecifics. Recent research suggests that species diversity does have information‐modulated community and ecosystem consequences, especially in birds, such as the diversity of species at feeders increasing resource exploitation, or the number of imitated species increasing responses to vocal mimics. A first step for future research includes comprehensive observations of information flow among different taxa and habitats. Then studies should investigate whether species diversity influences the cumulative quality or quantity of information at the community level, and consequently ecosystem‐level processes. An applied objective is to conserve species in part for their value as sources of information for other species, including for humans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-7931</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-185X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-185X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/brv.13055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38279871</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>aggregation initiators ; Algae ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; community informants ; Community involvement ; Conspecifics ; Coral reefs ; Eavesdropping ; Ecological function ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; heterospecific eavesdropping ; Information flow ; Information sources ; Interspecific ; interspecific information ; Keystone species ; Parasitism ; Population dynamics ; Predation ; public information ; Redundancy ; Relative abundance ; resource discovery ; Resource exploitation ; sampling effect ; Seed dispersal ; social learning ; Species diversity ; species interactions ; Species Specificity</subject><ispartof>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2024-06, Vol.99 (3), p.999-1014</ispartof><rights>2024 Cambridge Philosophical Society.</rights><rights>Biological Reviews © 2024 Cambridge Philosophical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-26cdda1a43f1f2c501e745753bd5bf5d3f26e315e41bb8950bb0d766694f38813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-26cdda1a43f1f2c501e745753bd5bf5d3f26e315e41bb8950bb0d766694f38813</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3403-2847 ; 0000-0002-9109-609X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbrv.13055$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbrv.13055$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38279871$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goodale, Eben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magrath, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><title>Species diversity and interspecific information flow</title><title>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</title><addtitle>Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Interspecific information flow is known to affect individual fitness, population dynamics and community assembly, but there has been less study of how species diversity affects information flow and thereby ecosystem functioning and services. We address this question by first examining differences among species in the sensitivity, accuracy, transmissibility, detectability and value of the cues and signals they produce, and in how they receive, store and use information derived from heterospecifics. We then review how interspecific information flow occurs in communities, involving a diversity of species and sensory modes, and how this flow can affect ecosystem‐level functions, such as decomposition, seed dispersal or algae removal on coral reefs. We highlight evidence that some keystone species are particularly critical as a source of information used by eavesdroppers, and so have a disproportionate effect on information flow. Such keystone species include community informants producing signals, particularly about predation risk, that influence other species' landscapes of fear, and aggregation initiators creating cues or signals about resources. We suggest that the presence of keystone species means that there will likely be a positive relationship in many communities between species diversity and information through a ‘sampling effect’, in which larger pools of species are more likely to include the keystone species by chance. We then consider whether the number and relative abundance of species, irrespective of the presence of keystone species, matter to interspecific information flow; on this issue, the theory is less developed, and the evidence scant and indirect. Higher diversity could increase the quantity or quality of information that is used by eavesdroppers because redundancy increases the reliability of information or because the species provide complementary information. Alternatively, there could be a lack of a relationship between species diversity and information if there is widespread information parasitism where users are not sources, or if information sourced from heterospecifics is of lower value than that gained personally or sourced from conspecifics. Recent research suggests that species diversity does have information‐modulated community and ecosystem consequences, especially in birds, such as the diversity of species at feeders increasing resource exploitation, or the number of imitated species increasing responses to vocal mimics. A first step for future research includes comprehensive observations of information flow among different taxa and habitats. Then studies should investigate whether species diversity influences the cumulative quality or quantity of information at the community level, and consequently ecosystem‐level processes. An applied objective is to conserve species in part for their value as sources of information for other species, including for humans.</description><subject>aggregation initiators</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>community informants</subject><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Conspecifics</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>Eavesdropping</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>heterospecific eavesdropping</subject><subject>Information flow</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Interspecific</subject><subject>interspecific information</subject><subject>Keystone species</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>public information</subject><subject>Redundancy</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>resource discovery</subject><subject>Resource exploitation</subject><subject>sampling effect</subject><subject>Seed dispersal</subject><subject>social learning</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>species interactions</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><issn>1464-7931</issn><issn>1469-185X</issn><issn>1469-185X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMotlYXvoAU3Ohi2pzJJJNZavEGBcEb7sJkkkDKXGoy09K3N-1UF4LZnJyTj5-TD6FzwBMIZyrdagIEU3qAhpCwLAJOPw939yRKMwIDdOL9AuMwYOQYDQiP04ynMETJ61IXVvuxsivtvG0347xWY1u3ods-GVuEzjSuylvb1GNTNutTdGTy0uuzfR2h9_u7t9ljNH9-eJrdzKOCUEKjmBVK5ZAnxICJC4pBpwlNKZGKSkMVMTHTBKhOQEqeUSwlViljLEsM4RzICF31uUvXfHXat6KyvtBlmde66byIs5hR4JySgF7-QRdN5-qwnQhigPHwZRyo654qXOO900Ysna1ytxGAxValCCrFTmVgL_aJnay0-iV_3AVg2gNrW-rN_0ni9uWjj_wGxq576g</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Goodale, Eben</creator><creator>Magrath, Robert D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3403-2847</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9109-609X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Species diversity and interspecific information flow</title><author>Goodale, Eben ; Magrath, Robert D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-26cdda1a43f1f2c501e745753bd5bf5d3f26e315e41bb8950bb0d766694f38813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>aggregation initiators</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>community informants</topic><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Conspecifics</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>Eavesdropping</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>heterospecific eavesdropping</topic><topic>Information flow</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Interspecific</topic><topic>interspecific information</topic><topic>Keystone species</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>public information</topic><topic>Redundancy</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>resource discovery</topic><topic>Resource exploitation</topic><topic>sampling effect</topic><topic>Seed dispersal</topic><topic>social learning</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>species interactions</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goodale, Eben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magrath, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goodale, Eben</au><au>Magrath, Robert D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Species diversity and interspecific information flow</atitle><jtitle>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>999</spage><epage>1014</epage><pages>999-1014</pages><issn>1464-7931</issn><issn>1469-185X</issn><eissn>1469-185X</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Interspecific information flow is known to affect individual fitness, population dynamics and community assembly, but there has been less study of how species diversity affects information flow and thereby ecosystem functioning and services. We address this question by first examining differences among species in the sensitivity, accuracy, transmissibility, detectability and value of the cues and signals they produce, and in how they receive, store and use information derived from heterospecifics. We then review how interspecific information flow occurs in communities, involving a diversity of species and sensory modes, and how this flow can affect ecosystem‐level functions, such as decomposition, seed dispersal or algae removal on coral reefs. We highlight evidence that some keystone species are particularly critical as a source of information used by eavesdroppers, and so have a disproportionate effect on information flow. Such keystone species include community informants producing signals, particularly about predation risk, that influence other species' landscapes of fear, and aggregation initiators creating cues or signals about resources. We suggest that the presence of keystone species means that there will likely be a positive relationship in many communities between species diversity and information through a ‘sampling effect’, in which larger pools of species are more likely to include the keystone species by chance. We then consider whether the number and relative abundance of species, irrespective of the presence of keystone species, matter to interspecific information flow; on this issue, the theory is less developed, and the evidence scant and indirect. Higher diversity could increase the quantity or quality of information that is used by eavesdroppers because redundancy increases the reliability of information or because the species provide complementary information. Alternatively, there could be a lack of a relationship between species diversity and information if there is widespread information parasitism where users are not sources, or if information sourced from heterospecifics is of lower value than that gained personally or sourced from conspecifics. Recent research suggests that species diversity does have information‐modulated community and ecosystem consequences, especially in birds, such as the diversity of species at feeders increasing resource exploitation, or the number of imitated species increasing responses to vocal mimics. A first step for future research includes comprehensive observations of information flow among different taxa and habitats. Then studies should investigate whether species diversity influences the cumulative quality or quantity of information at the community level, and consequently ecosystem‐level processes. An applied objective is to conserve species in part for their value as sources of information for other species, including for humans.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>38279871</pmid><doi>10.1111/brv.13055</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3403-2847</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9109-609X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-7931
ispartof Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2024-06, Vol.99 (3), p.999-1014
issn 1464-7931
1469-185X
1469-185X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2926518853
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects aggregation initiators
Algae
Animals
Biodiversity
community informants
Community involvement
Conspecifics
Coral reefs
Eavesdropping
Ecological function
Ecosystem
Ecosystems
heterospecific eavesdropping
Information flow
Information sources
Interspecific
interspecific information
Keystone species
Parasitism
Population dynamics
Predation
public information
Redundancy
Relative abundance
resource discovery
Resource exploitation
sampling effect
Seed dispersal
social learning
Species diversity
species interactions
Species Specificity
title Species diversity and interspecific information flow
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A18%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Species%20diversity%20and%20interspecific%20information%20flow&rft.jtitle=Biological%20reviews%20of%20the%20Cambridge%20Philosophical%20Society&rft.au=Goodale,%20Eben&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=999&rft.epage=1014&rft.pages=999-1014&rft.issn=1464-7931&rft.eissn=1469-185X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/brv.13055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2926518853%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3051683820&rft_id=info:pmid/38279871&rfr_iscdi=true