How to improve IARC's RF‐EMF cancer hazard communication

A crucial aspect of IARC's evaluation of the relative carcinogenicity of agents is the communication of its conclusions. The present paper addressed the experimental risk perception literature pertaining to IARC's radiofrequency electromagnetic field evaluation communication, and derived s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioelectromagnetics 2024-05, Vol.45 (4), p.200-205
Hauptverfasser: Wiedemann, Peter M., Croft, Rodney J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 205
container_issue 4
container_start_page 200
container_title Bioelectromagnetics
container_volume 45
creator Wiedemann, Peter M.
Croft, Rodney J.
description A crucial aspect of IARC's evaluation of the relative carcinogenicity of agents is the communication of its conclusions. The present paper addressed the experimental risk perception literature pertaining to IARC's radiofrequency electromagnetic field evaluation communication, and derived specific recommendations for improving it. Highlights Demonstrates the challenges of current IARC RF‐EMF communication practices. Evaluates the experimental risk communication research relating to IARC RF‐EMF communications. Provides recommendations for improving IARC RF‐EMF communications.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bem.22499
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2926079654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2926079654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3489-c47ef978ae65308e3c9c33caa6c0b430c2e00b0861722e118a6966b1627aed793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AURgdRbK0ufAEJuFAXae_8ZDLjrpbWFlqEouBumEynmNJkaqax1JWP4DP6JEZTXQiu7uZw7sdB6BRDGwOQTmKzNiFMyj3UxBHBIRb8cR81Acs4FIyTBjryfgEAQgA9RA0qKBNRFDXR9dBtgrUL0mxVuBcbjLrT3oUPpoOPt_f-ZBAYnRtbBE_6VRezwLgsK_PU6HXq8mN0MNdLb092t4UeBv373jAc392Oet1xaKonMjQstnMZC215REFYaqSh1GjNDSSMgiEWIAHBcUyIxVhoLjlPMCextrNY0ha6rL3VwufS-rXKUm_scqlz60qviCQcYskjVqHnf9CFK4u8WqcoUAmMxQxX1FVNmcJ5X9i5WhVppoutwqC-gqoqqPoOWrFnO2OZZHb2S_4UrIBODWzSpd3-b1I3_Umt_ARx93ys</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3039044741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to improve IARC's RF‐EMF cancer hazard communication</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wiedemann, Peter M. ; Croft, Rodney J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiedemann, Peter M. ; Croft, Rodney J.</creatorcontrib><description>A crucial aspect of IARC's evaluation of the relative carcinogenicity of agents is the communication of its conclusions. The present paper addressed the experimental risk perception literature pertaining to IARC's radiofrequency electromagnetic field evaluation communication, and derived specific recommendations for improving it. Highlights Demonstrates the challenges of current IARC RF‐EMF communication practices. Evaluates the experimental risk communication research relating to IARC RF‐EMF communications. Provides recommendations for improving IARC RF‐EMF communications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-8462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-186X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bem.22499</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38348555</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Carcinogenicity ; Carcinogens ; Electromagnetic fields ; IARC ; Low frequency ; Radio frequency ; Risk communication ; Risk perception</subject><ispartof>Bioelectromagnetics, 2024-05, Vol.45 (4), p.200-205</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Bioelectromagnetics Society.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Bioelectromagnetics Society.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3489-c47ef978ae65308e3c9c33caa6c0b430c2e00b0861722e118a6966b1627aed793</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5986-9136</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbem.22499$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbem.22499$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38348555$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiedemann, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Croft, Rodney J.</creatorcontrib><title>How to improve IARC's RF‐EMF cancer hazard communication</title><title>Bioelectromagnetics</title><addtitle>Bioelectromagnetics</addtitle><description>A crucial aspect of IARC's evaluation of the relative carcinogenicity of agents is the communication of its conclusions. The present paper addressed the experimental risk perception literature pertaining to IARC's radiofrequency electromagnetic field evaluation communication, and derived specific recommendations for improving it. Highlights Demonstrates the challenges of current IARC RF‐EMF communication practices. Evaluates the experimental risk communication research relating to IARC RF‐EMF communications. Provides recommendations for improving IARC RF‐EMF communications.</description><subject>Carcinogenicity</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Electromagnetic fields</subject><subject>IARC</subject><subject>Low frequency</subject><subject>Radio frequency</subject><subject>Risk communication</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><issn>0197-8462</issn><issn>1521-186X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AURgdRbK0ufAEJuFAXae_8ZDLjrpbWFlqEouBumEynmNJkaqax1JWP4DP6JEZTXQiu7uZw7sdB6BRDGwOQTmKzNiFMyj3UxBHBIRb8cR81Acs4FIyTBjryfgEAQgA9RA0qKBNRFDXR9dBtgrUL0mxVuBcbjLrT3oUPpoOPt_f-ZBAYnRtbBE_6VRezwLgsK_PU6HXq8mN0MNdLb092t4UeBv373jAc392Oet1xaKonMjQstnMZC215REFYaqSh1GjNDSSMgiEWIAHBcUyIxVhoLjlPMCextrNY0ha6rL3VwufS-rXKUm_scqlz60qviCQcYskjVqHnf9CFK4u8WqcoUAmMxQxX1FVNmcJ5X9i5WhVppoutwqC-gqoqqPoOWrFnO2OZZHb2S_4UrIBODWzSpd3-b1I3_Umt_ARx93ys</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Wiedemann, Peter M.</creator><creator>Croft, Rodney J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5986-9136</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>How to improve IARC's RF‐EMF cancer hazard communication</title><author>Wiedemann, Peter M. ; Croft, Rodney J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3489-c47ef978ae65308e3c9c33caa6c0b430c2e00b0861722e118a6966b1627aed793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Carcinogenicity</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Electromagnetic fields</topic><topic>IARC</topic><topic>Low frequency</topic><topic>Radio frequency</topic><topic>Risk communication</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiedemann, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Croft, Rodney J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bioelectromagnetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiedemann, Peter M.</au><au>Croft, Rodney J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to improve IARC's RF‐EMF cancer hazard communication</atitle><jtitle>Bioelectromagnetics</jtitle><addtitle>Bioelectromagnetics</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>200</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>200-205</pages><issn>0197-8462</issn><eissn>1521-186X</eissn><abstract>A crucial aspect of IARC's evaluation of the relative carcinogenicity of agents is the communication of its conclusions. The present paper addressed the experimental risk perception literature pertaining to IARC's radiofrequency electromagnetic field evaluation communication, and derived specific recommendations for improving it. Highlights Demonstrates the challenges of current IARC RF‐EMF communication practices. Evaluates the experimental risk communication research relating to IARC RF‐EMF communications. Provides recommendations for improving IARC RF‐EMF communications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38348555</pmid><doi>10.1002/bem.22499</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5986-9136</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-8462
ispartof Bioelectromagnetics, 2024-05, Vol.45 (4), p.200-205
issn 0197-8462
1521-186X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2926079654
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Carcinogenicity
Carcinogens
Electromagnetic fields
IARC
Low frequency
Radio frequency
Risk communication
Risk perception
title How to improve IARC's RF‐EMF cancer hazard communication
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A47%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20improve%20IARC's%20RF%E2%80%90EMF%20cancer%20hazard%20communication&rft.jtitle=Bioelectromagnetics&rft.au=Wiedemann,%20Peter%20M.&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=200&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=200-205&rft.issn=0197-8462&rft.eissn=1521-186X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bem.22499&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2926079654%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3039044741&rft_id=info:pmid/38348555&rfr_iscdi=true