Targeted use of postoperative discharge phone calls to reduce early readmission rates
Postoperative readmissions are common and costly. Office-initiated phone calls to patients shortly after discharge may identify concerns and allow for early intervention to prevent readmission. We sought to evaluate our 30-day readmission rate after the implementation of a standardized postoperative...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vascular surgery 2024-05, Vol.79 (5), p.1206-1216.e4 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1216.e4 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1206 |
container_title | Journal of vascular surgery |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Salley, Katherine E. Crawford, Allison S. Robichaud, Devon I. DeVivo, Gabrielle Steppacher, Robert C. Schanzer, Andres Simons, Jessica P. |
description | Postoperative readmissions are common and costly. Office-initiated phone calls to patients shortly after discharge may identify concerns and allow for early intervention to prevent readmission. We sought to evaluate our 30-day readmission rate after the implementation of a standardized postoperative discharge phone call (PODPC) intervention, compared with a historical aggregated cohort.
From July 2020 to 21, postoperative patients were prospectively identified at 48 hour after discharge. Medical assistants performed PODPCs, administering a survey designed to identify medical/surgical issues that could signify a complication and warrant escalation to a nurse practitioner (NP) for further management. Demographics, comorbidities, and procedure type were obtained retrospectively. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate PODPC responses, frequency of escalation, readmission, and reasons. The electronic medical record identified a historical aggregated cohort (July 2018 to 2019) and the 30-day readmission rate. A χ2 analysis was used to compare readmission rates between the preintervention historical and PODPC intervention groups. Predictors of 30-day readmission were modeled with multivariable logistic regression.
Of 411 PODPCs conducted, 106 patients (26%) reported not feeling well; having concerns. Eighty-four PODPCs (20%) triggered escalation to a NP; of these, 60 patients (71%) were counseled over the phone by an NP, 16 (19%) were brought into clinic, 6 (7%) were sent to the emergency department, and 2 (2%) did not answer the NP call. Of 411 patients, 17% (n = 68) were readmitted within 30 days. Comparatively, the historical aggregated cohort readmission rate was significantly higher at 28% (n = 346; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.65; P = .046), and feeling run down; having difficulty with movement; needing assistance for most activities (OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 2.09-7.43; P < .0001) were predictive of 30-day readmission when controlling for procedure type.
Although readmissions remained common (>15%), being in the intervention cohort was associated with a significantly lower readmission rate compared with the historical aggregated cohort. One-fifth of PODPCs identified a concern; however, >90% of these could be managed by an NP by phone or in clinic. This PODPC intervention holds promise as a viable mechanism for decreasing readmissions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.01.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2925485892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741521424000673</els_id><sourcerecordid>2925485892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-c8a45087a77d9575ee175dbe03dd6bccfe9022dfc41ca1700b4ff9233e45d79c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWqs_wIvk6GXXSTZpdvEk4hcUvOg5pMmsTdk2a7Jb8N-b0urR0zDwPi8zDyFXDEoGbHa7KlfbVHLgogRWAjRHZMKgUcWshuaYTEAJVkjOxBk5T2kFwJis1Sk5q2ouxEyICfl4N_ETB3R0TEhDS_uQhtBjNIPfInU-2eUuQftl2CC1pusSHQKN6EaLFE3svvNi3Nqn5MOGZhDTBTlpTZfw8jCn5OPp8f3hpZi_Pb8-3M8LW4EcClsbIaFWRinXSCURmZJugVA5N1tY22IDnLvWCmYNUwAL0bYNryoU0qnGVlNys-_tY_gaMQ06n2Gx68wGw5g0b7gUtawzMyVsH7UxpBSx1X30axO_NQO9s6lXOtvUO5samM42M3N9qB8Xa3R_xK--HLjbBzA_ufUYdbIeNxadj2gH7YL_p_4HDvCGng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2925485892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Targeted use of postoperative discharge phone calls to reduce early readmission rates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>Salley, Katherine E. ; Crawford, Allison S. ; Robichaud, Devon I. ; DeVivo, Gabrielle ; Steppacher, Robert C. ; Schanzer, Andres ; Simons, Jessica P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salley, Katherine E. ; Crawford, Allison S. ; Robichaud, Devon I. ; DeVivo, Gabrielle ; Steppacher, Robert C. ; Schanzer, Andres ; Simons, Jessica P.</creatorcontrib><description>Postoperative readmissions are common and costly. Office-initiated phone calls to patients shortly after discharge may identify concerns and allow for early intervention to prevent readmission. We sought to evaluate our 30-day readmission rate after the implementation of a standardized postoperative discharge phone call (PODPC) intervention, compared with a historical aggregated cohort.
From July 2020 to 21, postoperative patients were prospectively identified at 48 hour after discharge. Medical assistants performed PODPCs, administering a survey designed to identify medical/surgical issues that could signify a complication and warrant escalation to a nurse practitioner (NP) for further management. Demographics, comorbidities, and procedure type were obtained retrospectively. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate PODPC responses, frequency of escalation, readmission, and reasons. The electronic medical record identified a historical aggregated cohort (July 2018 to 2019) and the 30-day readmission rate. A χ2 analysis was used to compare readmission rates between the preintervention historical and PODPC intervention groups. Predictors of 30-day readmission were modeled with multivariable logistic regression.
Of 411 PODPCs conducted, 106 patients (26%) reported not feeling well; having concerns. Eighty-four PODPCs (20%) triggered escalation to a NP; of these, 60 patients (71%) were counseled over the phone by an NP, 16 (19%) were brought into clinic, 6 (7%) were sent to the emergency department, and 2 (2%) did not answer the NP call. Of 411 patients, 17% (n = 68) were readmitted within 30 days. Comparatively, the historical aggregated cohort readmission rate was significantly higher at 28% (n = 346; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.65; P = .046), and feeling run down; having difficulty with movement; needing assistance for most activities (OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 2.09-7.43; P < .0001) were predictive of 30-day readmission when controlling for procedure type.
Although readmissions remained common (>15%), being in the intervention cohort was associated with a significantly lower readmission rate compared with the historical aggregated cohort. One-fifth of PODPCs identified a concern; however, >90% of these could be managed by an NP by phone or in clinic. This PODPC intervention holds promise as a viable mechanism for decreasing readmissions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.01.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38244644</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Comorbidity ; Complications of vascular surgery ; Humans ; NESVS 2023 ; Patient Discharge ; Patient Readmission ; Phone call intervention ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative readmission ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2024-05, Vol.79 (5), p.1206-1216.e4</ispartof><rights>2024 Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-c8a45087a77d9575ee175dbe03dd6bccfe9022dfc41ca1700b4ff9233e45d79c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3357-2358 ; 0000-0002-4714-4293</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.01.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38244644$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salley, Katherine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Allison S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robichaud, Devon I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeVivo, Gabrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steppacher, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schanzer, Andres</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simons, Jessica P.</creatorcontrib><title>Targeted use of postoperative discharge phone calls to reduce early readmission rates</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Postoperative readmissions are common and costly. Office-initiated phone calls to patients shortly after discharge may identify concerns and allow for early intervention to prevent readmission. We sought to evaluate our 30-day readmission rate after the implementation of a standardized postoperative discharge phone call (PODPC) intervention, compared with a historical aggregated cohort.
From July 2020 to 21, postoperative patients were prospectively identified at 48 hour after discharge. Medical assistants performed PODPCs, administering a survey designed to identify medical/surgical issues that could signify a complication and warrant escalation to a nurse practitioner (NP) for further management. Demographics, comorbidities, and procedure type were obtained retrospectively. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate PODPC responses, frequency of escalation, readmission, and reasons. The electronic medical record identified a historical aggregated cohort (July 2018 to 2019) and the 30-day readmission rate. A χ2 analysis was used to compare readmission rates between the preintervention historical and PODPC intervention groups. Predictors of 30-day readmission were modeled with multivariable logistic regression.
Of 411 PODPCs conducted, 106 patients (26%) reported not feeling well; having concerns. Eighty-four PODPCs (20%) triggered escalation to a NP; of these, 60 patients (71%) were counseled over the phone by an NP, 16 (19%) were brought into clinic, 6 (7%) were sent to the emergency department, and 2 (2%) did not answer the NP call. Of 411 patients, 17% (n = 68) were readmitted within 30 days. Comparatively, the historical aggregated cohort readmission rate was significantly higher at 28% (n = 346; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.65; P = .046), and feeling run down; having difficulty with movement; needing assistance for most activities (OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 2.09-7.43; P < .0001) were predictive of 30-day readmission when controlling for procedure type.
Although readmissions remained common (>15%), being in the intervention cohort was associated with a significantly lower readmission rate compared with the historical aggregated cohort. One-fifth of PODPCs identified a concern; however, >90% of these could be managed by an NP by phone or in clinic. This PODPC intervention holds promise as a viable mechanism for decreasing readmissions.</description><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Complications of vascular surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>NESVS 2023</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Patient Readmission</subject><subject>Phone call intervention</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative readmission</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWqs_wIvk6GXXSTZpdvEk4hcUvOg5pMmsTdk2a7Jb8N-b0urR0zDwPi8zDyFXDEoGbHa7KlfbVHLgogRWAjRHZMKgUcWshuaYTEAJVkjOxBk5T2kFwJis1Sk5q2ouxEyICfl4N_ETB3R0TEhDS_uQhtBjNIPfInU-2eUuQftl2CC1pusSHQKN6EaLFE3svvNi3Nqn5MOGZhDTBTlpTZfw8jCn5OPp8f3hpZi_Pb8-3M8LW4EcClsbIaFWRinXSCURmZJugVA5N1tY22IDnLvWCmYNUwAL0bYNryoU0qnGVlNys-_tY_gaMQ06n2Gx68wGw5g0b7gUtawzMyVsH7UxpBSx1X30axO_NQO9s6lXOtvUO5samM42M3N9qB8Xa3R_xK--HLjbBzA_ufUYdbIeNxadj2gH7YL_p_4HDvCGng</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Salley, Katherine E.</creator><creator>Crawford, Allison S.</creator><creator>Robichaud, Devon I.</creator><creator>DeVivo, Gabrielle</creator><creator>Steppacher, Robert C.</creator><creator>Schanzer, Andres</creator><creator>Simons, Jessica P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3357-2358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4714-4293</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Targeted use of postoperative discharge phone calls to reduce early readmission rates</title><author>Salley, Katherine E. ; Crawford, Allison S. ; Robichaud, Devon I. ; DeVivo, Gabrielle ; Steppacher, Robert C. ; Schanzer, Andres ; Simons, Jessica P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-c8a45087a77d9575ee175dbe03dd6bccfe9022dfc41ca1700b4ff9233e45d79c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Complications of vascular surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>NESVS 2023</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Patient Readmission</topic><topic>Phone call intervention</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative readmission</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salley, Katherine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Allison S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robichaud, Devon I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeVivo, Gabrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steppacher, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schanzer, Andres</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simons, Jessica P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salley, Katherine E.</au><au>Crawford, Allison S.</au><au>Robichaud, Devon I.</au><au>DeVivo, Gabrielle</au><au>Steppacher, Robert C.</au><au>Schanzer, Andres</au><au>Simons, Jessica P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Targeted use of postoperative discharge phone calls to reduce early readmission rates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1206</spage><epage>1216.e4</epage><pages>1206-1216.e4</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>Postoperative readmissions are common and costly. Office-initiated phone calls to patients shortly after discharge may identify concerns and allow for early intervention to prevent readmission. We sought to evaluate our 30-day readmission rate after the implementation of a standardized postoperative discharge phone call (PODPC) intervention, compared with a historical aggregated cohort.
From July 2020 to 21, postoperative patients were prospectively identified at 48 hour after discharge. Medical assistants performed PODPCs, administering a survey designed to identify medical/surgical issues that could signify a complication and warrant escalation to a nurse practitioner (NP) for further management. Demographics, comorbidities, and procedure type were obtained retrospectively. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate PODPC responses, frequency of escalation, readmission, and reasons. The electronic medical record identified a historical aggregated cohort (July 2018 to 2019) and the 30-day readmission rate. A χ2 analysis was used to compare readmission rates between the preintervention historical and PODPC intervention groups. Predictors of 30-day readmission were modeled with multivariable logistic regression.
Of 411 PODPCs conducted, 106 patients (26%) reported not feeling well; having concerns. Eighty-four PODPCs (20%) triggered escalation to a NP; of these, 60 patients (71%) were counseled over the phone by an NP, 16 (19%) were brought into clinic, 6 (7%) were sent to the emergency department, and 2 (2%) did not answer the NP call. Of 411 patients, 17% (n = 68) were readmitted within 30 days. Comparatively, the historical aggregated cohort readmission rate was significantly higher at 28% (n = 346; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.65; P = .046), and feeling run down; having difficulty with movement; needing assistance for most activities (OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 2.09-7.43; P < .0001) were predictive of 30-day readmission when controlling for procedure type.
Although readmissions remained common (>15%), being in the intervention cohort was associated with a significantly lower readmission rate compared with the historical aggregated cohort. One-fifth of PODPCs identified a concern; however, >90% of these could be managed by an NP by phone or in clinic. This PODPC intervention holds promise as a viable mechanism for decreasing readmissions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38244644</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2024.01.009</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3357-2358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4714-4293</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-5214 |
ispartof | Journal of vascular surgery, 2024-05, Vol.79 (5), p.1206-1216.e4 |
issn | 0741-5214 1097-6809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2925485892 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier) |
subjects | Comorbidity Complications of vascular surgery Humans NESVS 2023 Patient Discharge Patient Readmission Phone call intervention Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative readmission Retrospective Studies Risk Factors |
title | Targeted use of postoperative discharge phone calls to reduce early readmission rates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A08%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Targeted%20use%20of%20postoperative%20discharge%20phone%20calls%20to%20reduce%20early%20readmission%20rates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Salley,%20Katherine%20E.&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1206&rft.epage=1216.e4&rft.pages=1206-1216.e4&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.01.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2925485892%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2925485892&rft_id=info:pmid/38244644&rft_els_id=S0741521424000673&rfr_iscdi=true |