Comparison between Early Clinical Results of Dual-Linear and Conventional Foot-Pedal Control in Phacoemulsification
The aim of this study was to compare early clinical results regarding the safety and efficacy of dual-linear vs. conventional foot-pedal control in cataract surgery. This was a paired-eye contralateral, retrospective, observational study. Each patient underwent cataract surgery in both eyes: one eye...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2024-01, Vol.13 (3), p.693 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 693 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Kim, Hyungil Seong, Jiyun Rho, Changrae |
| description | The aim of this study was to compare early clinical results regarding the safety and efficacy of dual-linear vs. conventional foot-pedal control in cataract surgery.
This was a paired-eye contralateral, retrospective, observational study. Each patient underwent cataract surgery in both eyes: one eye with dual-linear foot-pedal control (study group) and the other eye with conventional foot-pedal control (control group). Absolute phaco time (APT), average phaco power, effective phaco time (EPT), and surgical complications were analyzed and compared. Corneal endothelial cell count, corneal thickness, corneal volume, and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) were measured preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
A total of 94 patients (188 eyes) were enrolled. The respective APT, average phaco power, and EPT values were 7.05 ± 5.31 s, 28.4 ± 1.00, and 2.05 ± 1.56 s in the study group and 6.82 ± 6.48 s, 18.9 ± 1.74, and 1.35 ± 1.35 s in the control group.
The average phaco power and EPT values were significantly higher in the study group. The safety of the dual-linear foot pedal was comparable to that of a conventional pedal in terms of endothelial cell loss, central corneal thickness, and surgical complications. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm13030693 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2925034474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A782091147</galeid><sourcerecordid>A782091147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-cfa9b74b5305139f4bb83f69a67e7f8875fa07cb814a35fa5702fd4002d5e9793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1rFTEUxYMottSu3EugG0GmZuZmXpJlGfsFDyyi6yGTudE8MslrMqP0v29eW2tbTBY5HH73cMMh5H3NjgEU-7wxUw0M2ErBK7LfMCEqBhJeP9F75DDnDStHSt7U4i3ZKy4IkGKf5C5OW51cjoEOOP9BDPRUJ39DO--CM9rTb5gXP2caLf2yaF-tXUCdqA4j7WL4jWF2MRTuLMa5usKxyOLPKXrqAr36pU3EafHZ2RK3Y9-RN1b7jIcP7wH5cXb6vbuo1l_PL7uTdWVAqLkyVqtB8KEF1tagLB8GCXal9EqgsFKK1momzCBrrqHoVrDGjpyxZmxRCQUH5ON97jbF6wXz3E8uG_ReB4xL7hvVtAw4F7ygRy_QTVxS-dUdBYorBfCP-qk99i7YOCdtdqH9iZANU3XNRaGO_0OVO-LkTAxoXfGfDXy6HzAp5pzQ9tvkJp1u-pr1u5b7Jy0X-sPDqssw4fjI_u0UbgH61aCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2923949933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between Early Clinical Results of Dual-Linear and Conventional Foot-Pedal Control in Phacoemulsification</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Kim, Hyungil ; Seong, Jiyun ; Rho, Changrae</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyungil ; Seong, Jiyun ; Rho, Changrae</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to compare early clinical results regarding the safety and efficacy of dual-linear vs. conventional foot-pedal control in cataract surgery.
This was a paired-eye contralateral, retrospective, observational study. Each patient underwent cataract surgery in both eyes: one eye with dual-linear foot-pedal control (study group) and the other eye with conventional foot-pedal control (control group). Absolute phaco time (APT), average phaco power, effective phaco time (EPT), and surgical complications were analyzed and compared. Corneal endothelial cell count, corneal thickness, corneal volume, and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) were measured preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
A total of 94 patients (188 eyes) were enrolled. The respective APT, average phaco power, and EPT values were 7.05 ± 5.31 s, 28.4 ± 1.00, and 2.05 ± 1.56 s in the study group and 6.82 ± 6.48 s, 18.9 ± 1.74, and 1.35 ± 1.35 s in the control group.
The average phaco power and EPT values were significantly higher in the study group. The safety of the dual-linear foot pedal was comparable to that of a conventional pedal in terms of endothelial cell loss, central corneal thickness, and surgical complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030693</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38337387</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Astigmatism ; Biometrics ; Cataract ; Cataracts ; Control equipment ; Cornea ; Endothelium ; Eye surgery ; Intraocular lenses ; Methods ; Ophthalmology ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Pedal-powered mechanisms ; Phacoemulsification ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Tomography ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-01, Vol.13 (3), p.693</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-cfa9b74b5305139f4bb83f69a67e7f8875fa07cb814a35fa5702fd4002d5e9793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38337387$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyungil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seong, Jiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rho, Changrae</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between Early Clinical Results of Dual-Linear and Conventional Foot-Pedal Control in Phacoemulsification</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to compare early clinical results regarding the safety and efficacy of dual-linear vs. conventional foot-pedal control in cataract surgery.
This was a paired-eye contralateral, retrospective, observational study. Each patient underwent cataract surgery in both eyes: one eye with dual-linear foot-pedal control (study group) and the other eye with conventional foot-pedal control (control group). Absolute phaco time (APT), average phaco power, effective phaco time (EPT), and surgical complications were analyzed and compared. Corneal endothelial cell count, corneal thickness, corneal volume, and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) were measured preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
A total of 94 patients (188 eyes) were enrolled. The respective APT, average phaco power, and EPT values were 7.05 ± 5.31 s, 28.4 ± 1.00, and 2.05 ± 1.56 s in the study group and 6.82 ± 6.48 s, 18.9 ± 1.74, and 1.35 ± 1.35 s in the control group.
The average phaco power and EPT values were significantly higher in the study group. The safety of the dual-linear foot pedal was comparable to that of a conventional pedal in terms of endothelial cell loss, central corneal thickness, and surgical complications.</description><subject>Astigmatism</subject><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Cataract</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Control equipment</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Endothelium</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Intraocular lenses</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pedal-powered mechanisms</subject><subject>Phacoemulsification</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1rFTEUxYMottSu3EugG0GmZuZmXpJlGfsFDyyi6yGTudE8MslrMqP0v29eW2tbTBY5HH73cMMh5H3NjgEU-7wxUw0M2ErBK7LfMCEqBhJeP9F75DDnDStHSt7U4i3ZKy4IkGKf5C5OW51cjoEOOP9BDPRUJ39DO--CM9rTb5gXP2caLf2yaF-tXUCdqA4j7WL4jWF2MRTuLMa5usKxyOLPKXrqAr36pU3EafHZ2RK3Y9-RN1b7jIcP7wH5cXb6vbuo1l_PL7uTdWVAqLkyVqtB8KEF1tagLB8GCXal9EqgsFKK1momzCBrrqHoVrDGjpyxZmxRCQUH5ON97jbF6wXz3E8uG_ReB4xL7hvVtAw4F7ygRy_QTVxS-dUdBYorBfCP-qk99i7YOCdtdqH9iZANU3XNRaGO_0OVO-LkTAxoXfGfDXy6HzAp5pzQ9tvkJp1u-pr1u5b7Jy0X-sPDqssw4fjI_u0UbgH61aCQ</recordid><startdate>20240125</startdate><enddate>20240125</enddate><creator>Kim, Hyungil</creator><creator>Seong, Jiyun</creator><creator>Rho, Changrae</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240125</creationdate><title>Comparison between Early Clinical Results of Dual-Linear and Conventional Foot-Pedal Control in Phacoemulsification</title><author>Kim, Hyungil ; Seong, Jiyun ; Rho, Changrae</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-cfa9b74b5305139f4bb83f69a67e7f8875fa07cb814a35fa5702fd4002d5e9793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Astigmatism</topic><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Cataract</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Control equipment</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Endothelium</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Intraocular lenses</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pedal-powered mechanisms</topic><topic>Phacoemulsification</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyungil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seong, Jiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rho, Changrae</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hyungil</au><au>Seong, Jiyun</au><au>Rho, Changrae</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between Early Clinical Results of Dual-Linear and Conventional Foot-Pedal Control in Phacoemulsification</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2024-01-25</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>693</spage><pages>693-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to compare early clinical results regarding the safety and efficacy of dual-linear vs. conventional foot-pedal control in cataract surgery.
This was a paired-eye contralateral, retrospective, observational study. Each patient underwent cataract surgery in both eyes: one eye with dual-linear foot-pedal control (study group) and the other eye with conventional foot-pedal control (control group). Absolute phaco time (APT), average phaco power, effective phaco time (EPT), and surgical complications were analyzed and compared. Corneal endothelial cell count, corneal thickness, corneal volume, and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) were measured preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
A total of 94 patients (188 eyes) were enrolled. The respective APT, average phaco power, and EPT values were 7.05 ± 5.31 s, 28.4 ± 1.00, and 2.05 ± 1.56 s in the study group and 6.82 ± 6.48 s, 18.9 ± 1.74, and 1.35 ± 1.35 s in the control group.
The average phaco power and EPT values were significantly higher in the study group. The safety of the dual-linear foot pedal was comparable to that of a conventional pedal in terms of endothelial cell loss, central corneal thickness, and surgical complications.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>38337387</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm13030693</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-01, Vol.13 (3), p.693 |
| issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2925034474 |
| source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
| subjects | Astigmatism Biometrics Cataract Cataracts Control equipment Cornea Endothelium Eye surgery Intraocular lenses Methods Ophthalmology Patient outcomes Patients Pedal-powered mechanisms Phacoemulsification Surgeons Surgery Surgical outcomes Tomography Ultrasonic imaging |
| title | Comparison between Early Clinical Results of Dual-Linear and Conventional Foot-Pedal Control in Phacoemulsification |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A59%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20Early%20Clinical%20Results%20of%20Dual-Linear%20and%20Conventional%20Foot-Pedal%20Control%20in%20Phacoemulsification&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Kim,%20Hyungil&rft.date=2024-01-25&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=693&rft.pages=693-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm13030693&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA782091147%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2923949933&rft_id=info:pmid/38337387&rft_galeid=A782091147&rfr_iscdi=true |