Are brake response times altered post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections?
To assess if brake response times are altered pre and post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections. Brake response times were assessed before and after CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections in a cohort of patients. The average of 3 brake response times was recorded before and 30 min...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of radiology 2024-03, Vol.97 (1156), p.834-837 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 837 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1156 |
| container_start_page | 834 |
| container_title | British journal of radiology |
| container_volume | 97 |
| creator | Hanley, Marion Eustace, Sarah K Ryan, David T McLoughlin, Stephen Hynes, John P Kavanagh, Eoin C Eustace, Stephen J |
| description | To assess if brake response times are altered pre and post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections.
Brake response times were assessed before and after CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections in a cohort of patients. The average of 3 brake response times was recorded before and 30 min after injection. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad. A paired Student t-test was used to compare the times before and after the injections.
Forty patients were included in this study. The mean age was 55 years. There were 17 male and 23 female patients. There was no significant difference in the mean pre and post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injection brake response times; 0.94 s (range 0.4-1.2 s) and 0.93 s (range 0.5-1.25 s), respectively (P = .77).
Brake response time did not significantly differ pre and 30 min post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections.
To the authors' best knowledge, there are no current studies assessing brake response times post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections. While driving safety cannot be proven by a single metric, it is a useful study in demonstrating that this is not inhibited in a cohort of patients. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/bjr/tqae034 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2925034265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2925034265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-3d5a23d2e3b94bd984d2a1ecab2ca9a7cb406ea39652be75fe2d8c56db93b9003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLAzEYRYMotlZX7iVLQcZmkslMspJSfEHBTQvuhjy-Suq8mmQE_70pVleXC-fexUHoOif3OZFsrnd-HvcKCCtO0DSvCpEJQd5P0ZQQUmU5FXyCLkLYHSqX5BxNmGCsIlxO0WbhAWuvPgF7CEPfBcDRtRCwaiJ4sHjoQ8TLdfYxOpuqAf_ljGpwGFwHuEs1Tfs-YtftwESXLh4u0dlWNQGujjlDm6fH9fIlW709vy4Xq8xQUcSMWa4osxSYloW2UhSWqhyM0tQoqSqjC1KCYrLkVEPFt0CtMLy0WqYFIWyGbn9_B9_vRwixbl0w0DSqg34MNZWUJy205Am9-0WN70PwsK0H71rlv-uc1AePdfJYHz0m-uZ4POoW7D_7J479AAQucMM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2925034265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are brake response times altered post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Hanley, Marion ; Eustace, Sarah K ; Ryan, David T ; McLoughlin, Stephen ; Hynes, John P ; Kavanagh, Eoin C ; Eustace, Stephen J</creator><creatorcontrib>Hanley, Marion ; Eustace, Sarah K ; Ryan, David T ; McLoughlin, Stephen ; Hynes, John P ; Kavanagh, Eoin C ; Eustace, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><description>To assess if brake response times are altered pre and post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections.
Brake response times were assessed before and after CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections in a cohort of patients. The average of 3 brake response times was recorded before and 30 min after injection. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad. A paired Student t-test was used to compare the times before and after the injections.
Forty patients were included in this study. The mean age was 55 years. There were 17 male and 23 female patients. There was no significant difference in the mean pre and post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injection brake response times; 0.94 s (range 0.4-1.2 s) and 0.93 s (range 0.5-1.25 s), respectively (P = .77).
Brake response time did not significantly differ pre and 30 min post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections.
To the authors' best knowledge, there are no current studies assessing brake response times post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections. While driving safety cannot be proven by a single metric, it is a useful study in demonstrating that this is not inhibited in a cohort of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38337059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiculopathy ; Reaction Time ; Spinal Nerve Roots - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2024-03, Vol.97 (1156), p.834-837</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Institute of Radiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-3d5a23d2e3b94bd984d2a1ecab2ca9a7cb406ea39652be75fe2d8c56db93b9003</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2357-0420</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38337059$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hanley, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eustace, Sarah K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, David T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLoughlin, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hynes, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, Eoin C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eustace, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><title>Are brake response times altered post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections?</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>To assess if brake response times are altered pre and post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections.
Brake response times were assessed before and after CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections in a cohort of patients. The average of 3 brake response times was recorded before and 30 min after injection. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad. A paired Student t-test was used to compare the times before and after the injections.
Forty patients were included in this study. The mean age was 55 years. There were 17 male and 23 female patients. There was no significant difference in the mean pre and post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injection brake response times; 0.94 s (range 0.4-1.2 s) and 0.93 s (range 0.5-1.25 s), respectively (P = .77).
Brake response time did not significantly differ pre and 30 min post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections.
To the authors' best knowledge, there are no current studies assessing brake response times post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections. While driving safety cannot be proven by a single metric, it is a useful study in demonstrating that this is not inhibited in a cohort of patients.</description><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiculopathy</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Spinal Nerve Roots - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLAzEYRYMotlZX7iVLQcZmkslMspJSfEHBTQvuhjy-Suq8mmQE_70pVleXC-fexUHoOif3OZFsrnd-HvcKCCtO0DSvCpEJQd5P0ZQQUmU5FXyCLkLYHSqX5BxNmGCsIlxO0WbhAWuvPgF7CEPfBcDRtRCwaiJ4sHjoQ8TLdfYxOpuqAf_ljGpwGFwHuEs1Tfs-YtftwESXLh4u0dlWNQGujjlDm6fH9fIlW709vy4Xq8xQUcSMWa4osxSYloW2UhSWqhyM0tQoqSqjC1KCYrLkVEPFt0CtMLy0WqYFIWyGbn9_B9_vRwixbl0w0DSqg34MNZWUJy205Am9-0WN70PwsK0H71rlv-uc1AePdfJYHz0m-uZ4POoW7D_7J479AAQucMM</recordid><startdate>20240328</startdate><enddate>20240328</enddate><creator>Hanley, Marion</creator><creator>Eustace, Sarah K</creator><creator>Ryan, David T</creator><creator>McLoughlin, Stephen</creator><creator>Hynes, John P</creator><creator>Kavanagh, Eoin C</creator><creator>Eustace, Stephen J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2357-0420</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240328</creationdate><title>Are brake response times altered post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections?</title><author>Hanley, Marion ; Eustace, Sarah K ; Ryan, David T ; McLoughlin, Stephen ; Hynes, John P ; Kavanagh, Eoin C ; Eustace, Stephen J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-3d5a23d2e3b94bd984d2a1ecab2ca9a7cb406ea39652be75fe2d8c56db93b9003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiculopathy</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Spinal Nerve Roots - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hanley, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eustace, Sarah K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, David T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLoughlin, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hynes, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, Eoin C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eustace, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hanley, Marion</au><au>Eustace, Sarah K</au><au>Ryan, David T</au><au>McLoughlin, Stephen</au><au>Hynes, John P</au><au>Kavanagh, Eoin C</au><au>Eustace, Stephen J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are brake response times altered post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2024-03-28</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>1156</issue><spage>834</spage><epage>837</epage><pages>834-837</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>To assess if brake response times are altered pre and post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections.
Brake response times were assessed before and after CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections in a cohort of patients. The average of 3 brake response times was recorded before and 30 min after injection. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad. A paired Student t-test was used to compare the times before and after the injections.
Forty patients were included in this study. The mean age was 55 years. There were 17 male and 23 female patients. There was no significant difference in the mean pre and post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injection brake response times; 0.94 s (range 0.4-1.2 s) and 0.93 s (range 0.5-1.25 s), respectively (P = .77).
Brake response time did not significantly differ pre and 30 min post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections.
To the authors' best knowledge, there are no current studies assessing brake response times post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections. While driving safety cannot be proven by a single metric, it is a useful study in demonstrating that this is not inhibited in a cohort of patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>38337059</pmid><doi>10.1093/bjr/tqae034</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2357-0420</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-1285 |
| ispartof | British journal of radiology, 2024-03, Vol.97 (1156), p.834-837 |
| issn | 0007-1285 1748-880X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2925034265 |
| source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Cervical Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging Female Humans Male Middle Aged Radiculopathy Reaction Time Spinal Nerve Roots - diagnostic imaging Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
| title | Are brake response times altered post CT-guided cervical spine nerve root injections? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A47%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20brake%20response%20times%20altered%20post%20CT-guided%20cervical%20spine%20nerve%20root%20injections?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Hanley,%20Marion&rft.date=2024-03-28&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=1156&rft.spage=834&rft.epage=837&rft.pages=834-837&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bjr/tqae034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2925034265%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2925034265&rft_id=info:pmid/38337059&rfr_iscdi=true |