Reply to the 'Comment on "A single level tunneling model for molecular junctions: evaluating the simulation methods"' by I Baldea, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , 2024, 26 , D2CP05110A (http://D2CP05110A)
We respond to the recent comment by Dr. Ion Bâldea concerning our work, "A single level tunneling model for molecular junctions: evaluating the simulation methods [E. M. Opodi , , 2022, , 11958]". Dr. Bâldea has raised concerns about the applicability map we developed based on the comparis...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP 2024-02, Vol.26 (8), p.7236-7238 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 7238 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 7236 |
| container_title | Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Li, Zheyang Yu, Xi |
| description | We respond to the recent comment by Dr. Ion Bâldea concerning our work, "A single level tunneling model for molecular junctions: evaluating the simulation methods [E. M. Opodi
,
, 2022,
, 11958]". Dr. Bâldea has raised concerns about the applicability map we developed based on the comparison study of the 3 analytical models used in the study of molecular electronics. In our response, we have dissected Dr. Bâldea's critique into four primary points. For each, we have provided comprehensive replies that address and rectify the misinterpretations of our initial study. We'd like to thank Dr. Ion Bâldea for his comments, which have resulted in further clarification of the applicability of the analytical models for the study of molecular electronics. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1039/d3cp05375j |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2925033310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2925033310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-a3f794f565c7be3148e9088cf125fdbeef1e50e411bfc9afe88f4357b06dac913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhS0EomVgwwOgq7JoQZ2OHcf56W5I-SmqRIVgHTnONcnIjkPsVJoX5LlwNG2R2FwfH386sn0Iec3oBaO83LRcjVTwXOyekGOWZnxd0iJ9-qjz7Ii88H5HKWWC8efkiBecJzkrj8mf7ziaPQQHoUM4rZy1OARwA5xswffDL4Ng8A4NhHkY0EQHrGvjXrspKoNqNnKC3Tyo0LvBXwLeSTPLsJBLpu9tJJYzsBg61_qTU2j2cA0fpGlRnsNtt_cXUHVoH-bBOYeEJmmcWZRXSXVLBWN0C2ddCOPlZvPPeveSPNPSeHx1v67Iz08ff1Rf1jffPl9X25u1SvI0rCXXeZlqkQmVN8hZWmD8qkJplgjdNoiaoaCYMtZoVUqNRaFTLvKGZq1UJeMrcnbIHSf3e0Yfatt7hcbIAd3s66RMBOWcx15W5O1_6M7N0xBvFylOeZZTkUTq_YFSk_N-Ql2PU2_ltK8ZrZd26yu-vDK2-zXCb-4j58Zi-4g-1Mn_Apdsmo4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2930367052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reply to the 'Comment on "A single level tunneling model for molecular junctions: evaluating the simulation methods"' by I Baldea, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , 2024, 26 , D2CP05110A (http://D2CP05110A)</title><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Li, Zheyang ; Yu, Xi</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheyang ; Yu, Xi</creatorcontrib><description>We respond to the recent comment by Dr. Ion Bâldea concerning our work, "A single level tunneling model for molecular junctions: evaluating the simulation methods [E. M. Opodi
,
, 2022,
, 11958]". Dr. Bâldea has raised concerns about the applicability map we developed based on the comparison study of the 3 analytical models used in the study of molecular electronics. In our response, we have dissected Dr. Bâldea's critique into four primary points. For each, we have provided comprehensive replies that address and rectify the misinterpretations of our initial study. We'd like to thank Dr. Ion Bâldea for his comments, which have resulted in further clarification of the applicability of the analytical models for the study of molecular electronics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-9076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-9084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d3cp05375j</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38332719</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Electronics ; Mathematical models ; Molecular electronics</subject><ispartof>Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2024-02, Vol.26 (8), p.7236-7238</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-a3f794f565c7be3148e9088cf125fdbeef1e50e411bfc9afe88f4357b06dac913</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5750-7003</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38332719$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Xi</creatorcontrib><title>Reply to the 'Comment on "A single level tunneling model for molecular junctions: evaluating the simulation methods"' by I Baldea, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , 2024, 26 , D2CP05110A (http://D2CP05110A)</title><title>Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP</title><addtitle>Phys Chem Chem Phys</addtitle><description>We respond to the recent comment by Dr. Ion Bâldea concerning our work, "A single level tunneling model for molecular junctions: evaluating the simulation methods [E. M. Opodi
,
, 2022,
, 11958]". Dr. Bâldea has raised concerns about the applicability map we developed based on the comparison study of the 3 analytical models used in the study of molecular electronics. In our response, we have dissected Dr. Bâldea's critique into four primary points. For each, we have provided comprehensive replies that address and rectify the misinterpretations of our initial study. We'd like to thank Dr. Ion Bâldea for his comments, which have resulted in further clarification of the applicability of the analytical models for the study of molecular electronics.</description><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Molecular electronics</subject><issn>1463-9076</issn><issn>1463-9084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhS0EomVgwwOgq7JoQZ2OHcf56W5I-SmqRIVgHTnONcnIjkPsVJoX5LlwNG2R2FwfH386sn0Iec3oBaO83LRcjVTwXOyekGOWZnxd0iJ9-qjz7Ii88H5HKWWC8efkiBecJzkrj8mf7ziaPQQHoUM4rZy1OARwA5xswffDL4Ng8A4NhHkY0EQHrGvjXrspKoNqNnKC3Tyo0LvBXwLeSTPLsJBLpu9tJJYzsBg61_qTU2j2cA0fpGlRnsNtt_cXUHVoH-bBOYeEJmmcWZRXSXVLBWN0C2ddCOPlZvPPeveSPNPSeHx1v67Iz08ff1Rf1jffPl9X25u1SvI0rCXXeZlqkQmVN8hZWmD8qkJplgjdNoiaoaCYMtZoVUqNRaFTLvKGZq1UJeMrcnbIHSf3e0Yfatt7hcbIAd3s66RMBOWcx15W5O1_6M7N0xBvFylOeZZTkUTq_YFSk_N-Ql2PU2_ltK8ZrZd26yu-vDK2-zXCb-4j58Zi-4g-1Mn_Apdsmo4</recordid><startdate>20240222</startdate><enddate>20240222</enddate><creator>Li, Zheyang</creator><creator>Yu, Xi</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5750-7003</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240222</creationdate><title>Reply to the 'Comment on "A single level tunneling model for molecular junctions: evaluating the simulation methods"' by I Baldea, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , 2024, 26 , D2CP05110A (http://D2CP05110A)</title><author>Li, Zheyang ; Yu, Xi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-a3f794f565c7be3148e9088cf125fdbeef1e50e411bfc9afe88f4357b06dac913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Molecular electronics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Xi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Zheyang</au><au>Yu, Xi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reply to the 'Comment on "A single level tunneling model for molecular junctions: evaluating the simulation methods"' by I Baldea, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , 2024, 26 , D2CP05110A (http://D2CP05110A)</atitle><jtitle>Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Chem Chem Phys</addtitle><date>2024-02-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>7236</spage><epage>7238</epage><pages>7236-7238</pages><issn>1463-9076</issn><eissn>1463-9084</eissn><abstract>We respond to the recent comment by Dr. Ion Bâldea concerning our work, "A single level tunneling model for molecular junctions: evaluating the simulation methods [E. M. Opodi
,
, 2022,
, 11958]". Dr. Bâldea has raised concerns about the applicability map we developed based on the comparison study of the 3 analytical models used in the study of molecular electronics. In our response, we have dissected Dr. Bâldea's critique into four primary points. For each, we have provided comprehensive replies that address and rectify the misinterpretations of our initial study. We'd like to thank Dr. Ion Bâldea for his comments, which have resulted in further clarification of the applicability of the analytical models for the study of molecular electronics.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><pmid>38332719</pmid><doi>10.1039/d3cp05375j</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5750-7003</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1463-9076 |
| ispartof | Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2024-02, Vol.26 (8), p.7236-7238 |
| issn | 1463-9076 1463-9084 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2925033310 |
| source | Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Electronics Mathematical models Molecular electronics |
| title | Reply to the 'Comment on "A single level tunneling model for molecular junctions: evaluating the simulation methods"' by I Baldea, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , 2024, 26 , D2CP05110A (http://D2CP05110A) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A38%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reply%20to%20the%20'Comment%20on%20%22A%20single%20level%20tunneling%20model%20for%20molecular%20junctions:%20evaluating%20the%20simulation%20methods%22'%20by%20I%20Baldea,%20Phys.%20Chem.%20Chem.%20Phys.%20,%202024,%2026%20,%20D2CP05110A%20(http://D2CP05110A)&rft.jtitle=Physical%20chemistry%20chemical%20physics%20:%20PCCP&rft.au=Li,%20Zheyang&rft.date=2024-02-22&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=7236&rft.epage=7238&rft.pages=7236-7238&rft.issn=1463-9076&rft.eissn=1463-9084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d3cp05375j&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2925033310%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2930367052&rft_id=info:pmid/38332719&rfr_iscdi=true |