Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Vaccines for Patients with High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN 2/3) Associated with Human Papillomavirus: A Systematic Review

Despite the knowledge that HPV is responsible for high-grade CIN and cervical cancer, little is known about the use of therapeutic vaccines as a treatment. We aimed to synthesize and critically evaluate the evidence from clinical trials on the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of therapeutic vacc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancers 2024-02, Vol.16 (3), p.672
Hauptverfasser: Gonçalves, Caroline Amélia, Pereira-da-Silva, Gabriela, Silveira, Renata Cristina Campos Pereira, Mayer, Paulo César Morales, Zilly, Adriana, Lopes-Júnior, Luís Carlos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 672
container_title Cancers
container_volume 16
creator Gonçalves, Caroline Amélia
Pereira-da-Silva, Gabriela
Silveira, Renata Cristina Campos Pereira
Mayer, Paulo César Morales
Zilly, Adriana
Lopes-Júnior, Luís Carlos
description Despite the knowledge that HPV is responsible for high-grade CIN and cervical cancer, little is known about the use of therapeutic vaccines as a treatment. We aimed to synthesize and critically evaluate the evidence from clinical trials on the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of therapeutic vaccines in the treatment of patients with high-grade CIN associated with HPV. A systematic review of clinical trials adhering to the PRISMA 2020 statement in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and LILACS was undertaken, with no data or language restrictions. Primary endpoints related to the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of these vaccines were assessed by reviewing the adverse/toxic effects associated with the therapeutic vaccine administration via histopathological regression of the lesion and/or regression of the lesion size and via viral clearance and through the immunological response of individuals who received treatment compared to those who did not or before and after receiving the vaccine, respectively. A total of 1184 studies were identified, and 16 met all the criteria. Overall, the therapeutic vaccines were heterogeneous regarding their formulation, dose, intervention protocol, and routes of administration, making a meta-analysis unfeasible. In most studies (n = 15), the vaccines were safe and well tolerated, with clinical efficacy regarding the lesions and histopathological regression or viral clearance. In addition, eleven studies showed favorable immunological responses against HPV, and seven studies showed a positive correlation between immunogenicity and the clinical response, indicating promising results that should be further investigated. In summary, therapeutic vaccines, although urgently needed to avoid progression of CIN 2/3 patients, still present sparse data, requiring greater investments in a well-designed phase III RCT.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/cancers16030672
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2925008741</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A782090053</galeid><sourcerecordid>A782090053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-878f157c92dabfda87f2d432485b182fbdab8c9b5267a5d4b69d6fd3c105714a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEolXpmRuyxKVIbNexkzjhtlqVdqWqIFq4RhN7vOsqsYPtbLX_jp-GV10qqLAP8-HnfTWyJsve5vSc84bOJViJPuQV5bQS7EV2zKhgs6pqipd_5UfZaQj3NB3Oc1GJ19kRr5NBwfhx9usWNMbdR3KhtZEgUwZWkdUwTNat0Rpp4o44Te426GHEKRpJfoCUxmIg2nnyFaJBGwN5MHFDrsx6M7v0oJAs0W-TZU9WNnrAMT1jb1J9g27sIRggZ8vVDWFz_oEsQnDSQER18JkGsMl7NH3vBtgaP4VPZEFudyHiAPspvuHW4MOb7JWGPuDpIZ5k3z9f3C2vZtdfLlfLxfVMFpzHWS1qnZdCNkxBpxXUQjNVcFbUZZfXTHepXcumK1kloFRFVzWq0orLnJYiL4CfZGePvqN3PycMsR1MkNj3YNFNoWUNKymtRZEn9P0z9N5N3qbp9hRv8qpI4YlaQ4-tsdqlX5J703YhakYbSkueqPP_UOkqHIx0FrVJ_X8E80eB9C4Ej7odvRnA79qctvu1aZ-tTVK8O4w7dQOqJ_7PkvDfIkW_EQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2923916492</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Vaccines for Patients with High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN 2/3) Associated with Human Papillomavirus: A Systematic Review</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Gonçalves, Caroline Amélia ; Pereira-da-Silva, Gabriela ; Silveira, Renata Cristina Campos Pereira ; Mayer, Paulo César Morales ; Zilly, Adriana ; Lopes-Júnior, Luís Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, Caroline Amélia ; Pereira-da-Silva, Gabriela ; Silveira, Renata Cristina Campos Pereira ; Mayer, Paulo César Morales ; Zilly, Adriana ; Lopes-Júnior, Luís Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the knowledge that HPV is responsible for high-grade CIN and cervical cancer, little is known about the use of therapeutic vaccines as a treatment. We aimed to synthesize and critically evaluate the evidence from clinical trials on the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of therapeutic vaccines in the treatment of patients with high-grade CIN associated with HPV. A systematic review of clinical trials adhering to the PRISMA 2020 statement in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and LILACS was undertaken, with no data or language restrictions. Primary endpoints related to the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of these vaccines were assessed by reviewing the adverse/toxic effects associated with the therapeutic vaccine administration via histopathological regression of the lesion and/or regression of the lesion size and via viral clearance and through the immunological response of individuals who received treatment compared to those who did not or before and after receiving the vaccine, respectively. A total of 1184 studies were identified, and 16 met all the criteria. Overall, the therapeutic vaccines were heterogeneous regarding their formulation, dose, intervention protocol, and routes of administration, making a meta-analysis unfeasible. In most studies (n = 15), the vaccines were safe and well tolerated, with clinical efficacy regarding the lesions and histopathological regression or viral clearance. In addition, eleven studies showed favorable immunological responses against HPV, and seven studies showed a positive correlation between immunogenicity and the clinical response, indicating promising results that should be further investigated. In summary, therapeutic vaccines, although urgently needed to avoid progression of CIN 2/3 patients, still present sparse data, requiring greater investments in a well-designed phase III RCT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030672</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38339423</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Antigens ; Bias ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; Cell cycle ; Cervical cancer ; Citation management software ; Clinical trials ; Contamination ; Developing countries ; Health aspects ; Human papillomavirus ; Immune response ; Immunogenicity ; Intervention ; LDCs ; Lesions ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Meta-analysis ; Papillomavirus infections ; Patients ; Safety ; Systematic review ; Vaccines ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2024-02, Vol.16 (3), p.672</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-878f157c92dabfda87f2d432485b182fbdab8c9b5267a5d4b69d6fd3c105714a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-878f157c92dabfda87f2d432485b182fbdab8c9b5267a5d4b69d6fd3c105714a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8714-8205 ; 0000-0002-2424-6510</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38339423$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, Caroline Amélia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira-da-Silva, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Renata Cristina Campos Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Paulo César Morales</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilly, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes-Júnior, Luís Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Vaccines for Patients with High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN 2/3) Associated with Human Papillomavirus: A Systematic Review</title><title>Cancers</title><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><description>Despite the knowledge that HPV is responsible for high-grade CIN and cervical cancer, little is known about the use of therapeutic vaccines as a treatment. We aimed to synthesize and critically evaluate the evidence from clinical trials on the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of therapeutic vaccines in the treatment of patients with high-grade CIN associated with HPV. A systematic review of clinical trials adhering to the PRISMA 2020 statement in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and LILACS was undertaken, with no data or language restrictions. Primary endpoints related to the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of these vaccines were assessed by reviewing the adverse/toxic effects associated with the therapeutic vaccine administration via histopathological regression of the lesion and/or regression of the lesion size and via viral clearance and through the immunological response of individuals who received treatment compared to those who did not or before and after receiving the vaccine, respectively. A total of 1184 studies were identified, and 16 met all the criteria. Overall, the therapeutic vaccines were heterogeneous regarding their formulation, dose, intervention protocol, and routes of administration, making a meta-analysis unfeasible. In most studies (n = 15), the vaccines were safe and well tolerated, with clinical efficacy regarding the lesions and histopathological regression or viral clearance. In addition, eleven studies showed favorable immunological responses against HPV, and seven studies showed a positive correlation between immunogenicity and the clinical response, indicating promising results that should be further investigated. In summary, therapeutic vaccines, although urgently needed to avoid progression of CIN 2/3 patients, still present sparse data, requiring greater investments in a well-designed phase III RCT.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cell cycle</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Citation management software</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Immunogenicity</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Papillomavirus infections</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEolXpmRuyxKVIbNexkzjhtlqVdqWqIFq4RhN7vOsqsYPtbLX_jp-GV10qqLAP8-HnfTWyJsve5vSc84bOJViJPuQV5bQS7EV2zKhgs6pqipd_5UfZaQj3NB3Oc1GJ19kRr5NBwfhx9usWNMbdR3KhtZEgUwZWkdUwTNat0Rpp4o44Te426GHEKRpJfoCUxmIg2nnyFaJBGwN5MHFDrsx6M7v0oJAs0W-TZU9WNnrAMT1jb1J9g27sIRggZ8vVDWFz_oEsQnDSQER18JkGsMl7NH3vBtgaP4VPZEFudyHiAPspvuHW4MOb7JWGPuDpIZ5k3z9f3C2vZtdfLlfLxfVMFpzHWS1qnZdCNkxBpxXUQjNVcFbUZZfXTHepXcumK1kloFRFVzWq0orLnJYiL4CfZGePvqN3PycMsR1MkNj3YNFNoWUNKymtRZEn9P0z9N5N3qbp9hRv8qpI4YlaQ4-tsdqlX5J703YhakYbSkueqPP_UOkqHIx0FrVJ_X8E80eB9C4Ej7odvRnA79qctvu1aZ-tTVK8O4w7dQOqJ_7PkvDfIkW_EQ</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Gonçalves, Caroline Amélia</creator><creator>Pereira-da-Silva, Gabriela</creator><creator>Silveira, Renata Cristina Campos Pereira</creator><creator>Mayer, Paulo César Morales</creator><creator>Zilly, Adriana</creator><creator>Lopes-Júnior, Luís Carlos</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8714-8205</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2424-6510</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Vaccines for Patients with High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN 2/3) Associated with Human Papillomavirus: A Systematic Review</title><author>Gonçalves, Caroline Amélia ; Pereira-da-Silva, Gabriela ; Silveira, Renata Cristina Campos Pereira ; Mayer, Paulo César Morales ; Zilly, Adriana ; Lopes-Júnior, Luís Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-878f157c92dabfda87f2d432485b182fbdab8c9b5267a5d4b69d6fd3c105714a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cell cycle</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Citation management software</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Immunogenicity</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Papillomavirus infections</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, Caroline Amélia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira-da-Silva, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Renata Cristina Campos Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Paulo César Morales</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilly, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes-Júnior, Luís Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonçalves, Caroline Amélia</au><au>Pereira-da-Silva, Gabriela</au><au>Silveira, Renata Cristina Campos Pereira</au><au>Mayer, Paulo César Morales</au><au>Zilly, Adriana</au><au>Lopes-Júnior, Luís Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Vaccines for Patients with High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN 2/3) Associated with Human Papillomavirus: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>672</spage><pages>672-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>Despite the knowledge that HPV is responsible for high-grade CIN and cervical cancer, little is known about the use of therapeutic vaccines as a treatment. We aimed to synthesize and critically evaluate the evidence from clinical trials on the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of therapeutic vaccines in the treatment of patients with high-grade CIN associated with HPV. A systematic review of clinical trials adhering to the PRISMA 2020 statement in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and LILACS was undertaken, with no data or language restrictions. Primary endpoints related to the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of these vaccines were assessed by reviewing the adverse/toxic effects associated with the therapeutic vaccine administration via histopathological regression of the lesion and/or regression of the lesion size and via viral clearance and through the immunological response of individuals who received treatment compared to those who did not or before and after receiving the vaccine, respectively. A total of 1184 studies were identified, and 16 met all the criteria. Overall, the therapeutic vaccines were heterogeneous regarding their formulation, dose, intervention protocol, and routes of administration, making a meta-analysis unfeasible. In most studies (n = 15), the vaccines were safe and well tolerated, with clinical efficacy regarding the lesions and histopathological regression or viral clearance. In addition, eleven studies showed favorable immunological responses against HPV, and seven studies showed a positive correlation between immunogenicity and the clinical response, indicating promising results that should be further investigated. In summary, therapeutic vaccines, although urgently needed to avoid progression of CIN 2/3 patients, still present sparse data, requiring greater investments in a well-designed phase III RCT.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>38339423</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers16030672</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8714-8205</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2424-6510</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-6694
ispartof Cancers, 2024-02, Vol.16 (3), p.672
issn 2072-6694
2072-6694
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2925008741
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Analysis
Antigens
Bias
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
Cell cycle
Cervical cancer
Citation management software
Clinical trials
Contamination
Developing countries
Health aspects
Human papillomavirus
Immune response
Immunogenicity
Intervention
LDCs
Lesions
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Meta-analysis
Papillomavirus infections
Patients
Safety
Systematic review
Vaccines
Viruses
title Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Vaccines for Patients with High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN 2/3) Associated with Human Papillomavirus: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T16%3A29%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety,%20Efficacy,%20and%20Immunogenicity%20of%20Therapeutic%20Vaccines%20for%20Patients%20with%20High-Grade%20Cervical%20Intraepithelial%20Neoplasia%20(CIN%202/3)%20Associated%20with%20Human%20Papillomavirus:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Gon%C3%A7alves,%20Caroline%20Am%C3%A9lia&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=672&rft.pages=672-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers16030672&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA782090053%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2923916492&rft_id=info:pmid/38339423&rft_galeid=A782090053&rfr_iscdi=true