Individual word representations dissociate from linguistic context along a cortical unimodal to heteromodal gradient

Language comprehension involves multiple hierarchical processing stages across time, space, and levels of representation. When processing a word, the sensory input is transformed into increasingly representations that need to be integrated with the linguistic context. Thus, language comprehension in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human brain mapping 2024-02, Vol.45 (2), p.e26607-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Eisenhauer, Susanne, Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus, Cornelissen, Piers L., Smallwood, Jonathan, Jefferies, Elizabeth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page e26607
container_title Human brain mapping
container_volume 45
creator Eisenhauer, Susanne
Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus
Cornelissen, Piers L.
Smallwood, Jonathan
Jefferies, Elizabeth
description Language comprehension involves multiple hierarchical processing stages across time, space, and levels of representation. When processing a word, the sensory input is transformed into increasingly representations that need to be integrated with the linguistic context. Thus, language comprehension involves both input‐driven as well as context‐dependent processes. While neuroimaging research has traditionally focused on mapping individual brain regions to the distinct underlying processes, recent studies indicate that whole‐brain distributed patterns of cortical activation might be highly relevant for cognitive functions, including language. One such pattern, based on resting‐state connectivity, is the ‘principal cortical gradient’, which dissociates sensory from heteromodal brain regions. The present study investigated the extent to which this gradient provides an organizational principle underlying language function, using a multimodal neuroimaging dataset of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings from 102 participants during sentence reading. We found that the brain response to individual representations of a word (word length, orthographic distance, and word frequency), which reflect visual; orthographic; and lexical properties, gradually increases towards the sensory end of the gradient. Although these properties showed opposite effect directions in fMRI and MEG, their association with the sensory end of the gradient was consistent across both neuroimaging modalities. In contrast, MEG revealed that properties reflecting a word's relation to its linguistic context (semantic similarity and position within the sentence) involve the heteromodal end of the gradient to a stronger extent. This dissociation between individual word and contextual properties was stable across earlier and later time windows during word presentation, indicating interactive processing of word representations and linguistic context at opposing ends of the principal gradient. To conclude, our findings indicate that the principal gradient underlies the organization of a range of linguistic representations while supporting a gradual distinction between context‐independent and context‐dependent representations. Furthermore, the gradient reveals convergent patterns across neuroimaging modalities (similar location along the gradient) in the presence of divergent responses (opposite effect directions). Functional magnetic resonance imaging a
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hbm.26607
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2924997449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2924997449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4027-f6e481be4437ab365208b0751eb9412bca4dff09b2f46a0c4cb7534f1c998e5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtP3TAQRq0KVB7ton-gssSGLgJ-JY6XFFFAouqmXUe2M74YJfbFdqD8-5p7KQskVp4ZHR-N5kPoCyUnlBB2emvmE9Z1RH5A-5Qo2RCq-M5z3bWNEpLuoYOc7wihtCX0I9rjPeeqV3Iflesw-gc_LnrCjzGNOME6QYZQdPExZDz6nKP1ugB2Kc548mG1-Fy8xTaGAn8L1lMMK6xrn-q4ipbg5zjWokR8CwXqv027Snr0Vf0J7To9Zfj88h6iPz8ufp9fNTe_Lq_Pz24aKwiTjetA9NSAEFxqw7uWkd4Q2VIwSlBmrBajc0QZ5kSniRXWyJYLR61SPbSOH6LjrXed4v0CuQyzzxamSQeISx6YYkIpKYSq6NEb9C4uKdTtNhTtWMtZpb5tKZtizgncsE5-1ulpoGR4jmKoUQybKCr79cW4mBnGV_L_7StwugUe_QRP75uGq-8_t8p_OCGUsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2924162532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Individual word representations dissociate from linguistic context along a cortical unimodal to heteromodal gradient</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</source><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Eisenhauer, Susanne ; Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus ; Cornelissen, Piers L. ; Smallwood, Jonathan ; Jefferies, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Eisenhauer, Susanne ; Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus ; Cornelissen, Piers L. ; Smallwood, Jonathan ; Jefferies, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Language comprehension involves multiple hierarchical processing stages across time, space, and levels of representation. When processing a word, the sensory input is transformed into increasingly representations that need to be integrated with the linguistic context. Thus, language comprehension involves both input‐driven as well as context‐dependent processes. While neuroimaging research has traditionally focused on mapping individual brain regions to the distinct underlying processes, recent studies indicate that whole‐brain distributed patterns of cortical activation might be highly relevant for cognitive functions, including language. One such pattern, based on resting‐state connectivity, is the ‘principal cortical gradient’, which dissociates sensory from heteromodal brain regions. The present study investigated the extent to which this gradient provides an organizational principle underlying language function, using a multimodal neuroimaging dataset of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings from 102 participants during sentence reading. We found that the brain response to individual representations of a word (word length, orthographic distance, and word frequency), which reflect visual; orthographic; and lexical properties, gradually increases towards the sensory end of the gradient. Although these properties showed opposite effect directions in fMRI and MEG, their association with the sensory end of the gradient was consistent across both neuroimaging modalities. In contrast, MEG revealed that properties reflecting a word's relation to its linguistic context (semantic similarity and position within the sentence) involve the heteromodal end of the gradient to a stronger extent. This dissociation between individual word and contextual properties was stable across earlier and later time windows during word presentation, indicating interactive processing of word representations and linguistic context at opposing ends of the principal gradient. To conclude, our findings indicate that the principal gradient underlies the organization of a range of linguistic representations while supporting a gradual distinction between context‐independent and context‐dependent representations. Furthermore, the gradient reveals convergent patterns across neuroimaging modalities (similar location along the gradient) in the presence of divergent responses (opposite effect directions). Functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography recordings (N = 102) reveal that language comprehension during sentence reading is organized along a sensory‐to‐heteromodal cortical gradient. Word representations and linguistic context fall at opposite ends along this gradient, while both ends of the gradient are interactively activated through time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1065-9471</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0193</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26607</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38339897</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Brain ; Brain mapping ; Cognitive ability ; Comprehension ; Context ; cortical gradients ; Datasets ; fMRI ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Information processing ; Language ; Language thought relationship ; Linguistics ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetoencephalography ; Medical imaging ; MEG ; Neural networks ; Neuroimaging ; Neurosciences ; Orthography ; Phonology ; Representations ; Semantics ; Sensory integration ; Sentences ; Windows (intervals) ; Word frequency ; Word length ; word representations ; Words (language)</subject><ispartof>Human brain mapping, 2024-02, Vol.45 (2), p.e26607-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4027-f6e481be4437ab365208b0751eb9412bca4dff09b2f46a0c4cb7534f1c998e5f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2570-0604</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhbm.26607$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhbm.26607$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38339897$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eisenhauer, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelissen, Piers L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smallwood, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jefferies, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Individual word representations dissociate from linguistic context along a cortical unimodal to heteromodal gradient</title><title>Human brain mapping</title><addtitle>Hum Brain Mapp</addtitle><description>Language comprehension involves multiple hierarchical processing stages across time, space, and levels of representation. When processing a word, the sensory input is transformed into increasingly representations that need to be integrated with the linguistic context. Thus, language comprehension involves both input‐driven as well as context‐dependent processes. While neuroimaging research has traditionally focused on mapping individual brain regions to the distinct underlying processes, recent studies indicate that whole‐brain distributed patterns of cortical activation might be highly relevant for cognitive functions, including language. One such pattern, based on resting‐state connectivity, is the ‘principal cortical gradient’, which dissociates sensory from heteromodal brain regions. The present study investigated the extent to which this gradient provides an organizational principle underlying language function, using a multimodal neuroimaging dataset of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings from 102 participants during sentence reading. We found that the brain response to individual representations of a word (word length, orthographic distance, and word frequency), which reflect visual; orthographic; and lexical properties, gradually increases towards the sensory end of the gradient. Although these properties showed opposite effect directions in fMRI and MEG, their association with the sensory end of the gradient was consistent across both neuroimaging modalities. In contrast, MEG revealed that properties reflecting a word's relation to its linguistic context (semantic similarity and position within the sentence) involve the heteromodal end of the gradient to a stronger extent. This dissociation between individual word and contextual properties was stable across earlier and later time windows during word presentation, indicating interactive processing of word representations and linguistic context at opposing ends of the principal gradient. To conclude, our findings indicate that the principal gradient underlies the organization of a range of linguistic representations while supporting a gradual distinction between context‐independent and context‐dependent representations. Furthermore, the gradient reveals convergent patterns across neuroimaging modalities (similar location along the gradient) in the presence of divergent responses (opposite effect directions). Functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography recordings (N = 102) reveal that language comprehension during sentence reading is organized along a sensory‐to‐heteromodal cortical gradient. Word representations and linguistic context fall at opposite ends along this gradient, while both ends of the gradient are interactively activated through time.</description><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain mapping</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>cortical gradients</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language thought relationship</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetoencephalography</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>MEG</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Orthography</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sensory integration</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Windows (intervals)</subject><subject>Word frequency</subject><subject>Word length</subject><subject>word representations</subject><subject>Words (language)</subject><issn>1065-9471</issn><issn>1097-0193</issn><issn>1097-0193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtP3TAQRq0KVB7ton-gssSGLgJ-JY6XFFFAouqmXUe2M74YJfbFdqD8-5p7KQskVp4ZHR-N5kPoCyUnlBB2emvmE9Z1RH5A-5Qo2RCq-M5z3bWNEpLuoYOc7wihtCX0I9rjPeeqV3Iflesw-gc_LnrCjzGNOME6QYZQdPExZDz6nKP1ugB2Kc548mG1-Fy8xTaGAn8L1lMMK6xrn-q4ipbg5zjWokR8CwXqv027Snr0Vf0J7To9Zfj88h6iPz8ufp9fNTe_Lq_Pz24aKwiTjetA9NSAEFxqw7uWkd4Q2VIwSlBmrBajc0QZ5kSniRXWyJYLR61SPbSOH6LjrXed4v0CuQyzzxamSQeISx6YYkIpKYSq6NEb9C4uKdTtNhTtWMtZpb5tKZtizgncsE5-1ulpoGR4jmKoUQybKCr79cW4mBnGV_L_7StwugUe_QRP75uGq-8_t8p_OCGUsQ</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Eisenhauer, Susanne</creator><creator>Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus</creator><creator>Cornelissen, Piers L.</creator><creator>Smallwood, Jonathan</creator><creator>Jefferies, Elizabeth</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2570-0604</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Individual word representations dissociate from linguistic context along a cortical unimodal to heteromodal gradient</title><author>Eisenhauer, Susanne ; Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus ; Cornelissen, Piers L. ; Smallwood, Jonathan ; Jefferies, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4027-f6e481be4437ab365208b0751eb9412bca4dff09b2f46a0c4cb7534f1c998e5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain mapping</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>cortical gradients</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language thought relationship</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetoencephalography</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>MEG</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Orthography</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sensory integration</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Windows (intervals)</topic><topic>Word frequency</topic><topic>Word length</topic><topic>word representations</topic><topic>Words (language)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eisenhauer, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelissen, Piers L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smallwood, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jefferies, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human brain mapping</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eisenhauer, Susanne</au><au>Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus</au><au>Cornelissen, Piers L.</au><au>Smallwood, Jonathan</au><au>Jefferies, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Individual word representations dissociate from linguistic context along a cortical unimodal to heteromodal gradient</atitle><jtitle>Human brain mapping</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Brain Mapp</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e26607</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e26607-n/a</pages><issn>1065-9471</issn><issn>1097-0193</issn><eissn>1097-0193</eissn><abstract>Language comprehension involves multiple hierarchical processing stages across time, space, and levels of representation. When processing a word, the sensory input is transformed into increasingly representations that need to be integrated with the linguistic context. Thus, language comprehension involves both input‐driven as well as context‐dependent processes. While neuroimaging research has traditionally focused on mapping individual brain regions to the distinct underlying processes, recent studies indicate that whole‐brain distributed patterns of cortical activation might be highly relevant for cognitive functions, including language. One such pattern, based on resting‐state connectivity, is the ‘principal cortical gradient’, which dissociates sensory from heteromodal brain regions. The present study investigated the extent to which this gradient provides an organizational principle underlying language function, using a multimodal neuroimaging dataset of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings from 102 participants during sentence reading. We found that the brain response to individual representations of a word (word length, orthographic distance, and word frequency), which reflect visual; orthographic; and lexical properties, gradually increases towards the sensory end of the gradient. Although these properties showed opposite effect directions in fMRI and MEG, their association with the sensory end of the gradient was consistent across both neuroimaging modalities. In contrast, MEG revealed that properties reflecting a word's relation to its linguistic context (semantic similarity and position within the sentence) involve the heteromodal end of the gradient to a stronger extent. This dissociation between individual word and contextual properties was stable across earlier and later time windows during word presentation, indicating interactive processing of word representations and linguistic context at opposing ends of the principal gradient. To conclude, our findings indicate that the principal gradient underlies the organization of a range of linguistic representations while supporting a gradual distinction between context‐independent and context‐dependent representations. Furthermore, the gradient reveals convergent patterns across neuroimaging modalities (similar location along the gradient) in the presence of divergent responses (opposite effect directions). Functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography recordings (N = 102) reveal that language comprehension during sentence reading is organized along a sensory‐to‐heteromodal cortical gradient. Word representations and linguistic context fall at opposite ends along this gradient, while both ends of the gradient are interactively activated through time.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>38339897</pmid><doi>10.1002/hbm.26607</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2570-0604</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1065-9471
ispartof Human brain mapping, 2024-02, Vol.45 (2), p.e26607-n/a
issn 1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2924997449
source Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection; Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Brain
Brain mapping
Cognitive ability
Comprehension
Context
cortical gradients
Datasets
fMRI
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
Information processing
Language
Language thought relationship
Linguistics
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetoencephalography
Medical imaging
MEG
Neural networks
Neuroimaging
Neurosciences
Orthography
Phonology
Representations
Semantics
Sensory integration
Sentences
Windows (intervals)
Word frequency
Word length
word representations
Words (language)
title Individual word representations dissociate from linguistic context along a cortical unimodal to heteromodal gradient
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T14%3A21%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual%20word%20representations%20dissociate%20from%20linguistic%20context%20along%20a%20cortical%20unimodal%20to%20heteromodal%20gradient&rft.jtitle=Human%20brain%20mapping&rft.au=Eisenhauer,%20Susanne&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e26607&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e26607-n/a&rft.issn=1065-9471&rft.eissn=1097-0193&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hbm.26607&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2924997449%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2924162532&rft_id=info:pmid/38339897&rfr_iscdi=true