Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement

Resurgence is a temporary increase in a previously suppressed target behavior following a worsening in reinforcement conditions. Previous studies have examined how higher rates or magnitudes of alternative reinforcement affect suppression of the target behavior and subsequent resurgence. However, th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2024-03, Vol.121 (2), p.246-258
Hauptverfasser: Shahan, Timothy A., Sutton, Gabrielle M., Van Allsburg, Jack, Avellaneda, Matias, Greer, Brian D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 258
container_issue 2
container_start_page 246
container_title Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
container_volume 121
creator Shahan, Timothy A.
Sutton, Gabrielle M.
Van Allsburg, Jack
Avellaneda, Matias
Greer, Brian D.
description Resurgence is a temporary increase in a previously suppressed target behavior following a worsening in reinforcement conditions. Previous studies have examined how higher rates or magnitudes of alternative reinforcement affect suppression of the target behavior and subsequent resurgence. However, there has been no investigation of the effects of higher versus lower qualities of alternative reinforcement on resurgence. Using a three‐phase resurgence preparation with rats, the present experiments examined the effects of an alternative reinforcer that was of higher (Experiment 1) or lower (Experiment 2) quality than the reinforcer that had previously maintained the target behavior. The results of both experiments showed greater reductions in target behavior with a higher quality alternative reinforcer and larger increases in target responding when a higher quality alternative reinforcer was removed. Along with prior findings with higher rates and magnitudes of alternative reinforcement, these findings suggest that variations in reinforcer dimensions that increase the efficacy of alternative reinforcement also tend to increase resurgence when alternative reinforcement is removed. The results are discussed in terms of the resurgence as choice in context model and in terms of potential clinical implications.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jeab.904
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2923910863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2956915452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-7fca4e5587e5c03aa5fa358d2f65f0f3fa1a1a81444ec0010832e42f82ab48fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk7BXyAFb7zpzGc_LufYnDIQh16XrDuZGWmjSevYvzdlU0GQwMmB8-Th5EXokuAhwZjebkAuhznmR6hPcpbFLCXkGPXDiMYi1B46834TmjxJ6SnqsYzRnAjcR9MF-NatoS4hmlpj7FbX62im12_gIuuiud2G5rmVRje7aGQacLVs9CdEC9C1sq6ECurmHJ0oaTxcHO4Bep1OXsazeP50_zAezeOS8ZzHqSolByGyFESJmZRCSSayFVWJUFgxJUk4GeGcQ4kxwWFP4FRlVC55FtgButl73539aME3RaV9CcbIGmzrC5pTlodnCQvo9R90Y9uwvOkokYTvc0F_haWz3jtQxbvTlXS7guCiy7bosi1CtgG9OgjbZQWrH_A7zADEe2CrDez-FRWPk9FdJ_wCZS-B-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2956915452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Shahan, Timothy A. ; Sutton, Gabrielle M. ; Van Allsburg, Jack ; Avellaneda, Matias ; Greer, Brian D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shahan, Timothy A. ; Sutton, Gabrielle M. ; Van Allsburg, Jack ; Avellaneda, Matias ; Greer, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><description>Resurgence is a temporary increase in a previously suppressed target behavior following a worsening in reinforcement conditions. Previous studies have examined how higher rates or magnitudes of alternative reinforcement affect suppression of the target behavior and subsequent resurgence. However, there has been no investigation of the effects of higher versus lower qualities of alternative reinforcement on resurgence. Using a three‐phase resurgence preparation with rats, the present experiments examined the effects of an alternative reinforcer that was of higher (Experiment 1) or lower (Experiment 2) quality than the reinforcer that had previously maintained the target behavior. The results of both experiments showed greater reductions in target behavior with a higher quality alternative reinforcer and larger increases in target responding when a higher quality alternative reinforcer was removed. Along with prior findings with higher rates and magnitudes of alternative reinforcement, these findings suggest that variations in reinforcer dimensions that increase the efficacy of alternative reinforcement also tend to increase resurgence when alternative reinforcement is removed. The results are discussed in terms of the resurgence as choice in context model and in terms of potential clinical implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jeab.904</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38329150</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; choice ; Conditioning, Operant ; Extinction, Psychological ; Rats ; Reinforcement ; reinforcement quality ; Reinforcement Schedule ; Reinforcement, Psychology ; relapse ; resurgence</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2024-03, Vol.121 (2), p.246-258</ispartof><rights>2024 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.</rights><rights>2024 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-7fca4e5587e5c03aa5fa358d2f65f0f3fa1a1a81444ec0010832e42f82ab48fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-7fca4e5587e5c03aa5fa358d2f65f0f3fa1a1a81444ec0010832e42f82ab48fa3</cites><orcidid>0009-0008-9446-7184 ; 0000-0003-4734-0443 ; 0000-0002-6338-8714 ; 0009-0000-3476-156X ; 0000-0001-8256-9994</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjeab.904$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjeab.904$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38329150$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shahan, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Gabrielle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Allsburg, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avellaneda, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greer, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><title>Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>Resurgence is a temporary increase in a previously suppressed target behavior following a worsening in reinforcement conditions. Previous studies have examined how higher rates or magnitudes of alternative reinforcement affect suppression of the target behavior and subsequent resurgence. However, there has been no investigation of the effects of higher versus lower qualities of alternative reinforcement on resurgence. Using a three‐phase resurgence preparation with rats, the present experiments examined the effects of an alternative reinforcer that was of higher (Experiment 1) or lower (Experiment 2) quality than the reinforcer that had previously maintained the target behavior. The results of both experiments showed greater reductions in target behavior with a higher quality alternative reinforcer and larger increases in target responding when a higher quality alternative reinforcer was removed. Along with prior findings with higher rates and magnitudes of alternative reinforcement, these findings suggest that variations in reinforcer dimensions that increase the efficacy of alternative reinforcement also tend to increase resurgence when alternative reinforcement is removed. The results are discussed in terms of the resurgence as choice in context model and in terms of potential clinical implications.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>choice</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>reinforcement quality</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>Reinforcement, Psychology</subject><subject>relapse</subject><subject>resurgence</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk7BXyAFb7zpzGc_LufYnDIQh16XrDuZGWmjSevYvzdlU0GQwMmB8-Th5EXokuAhwZjebkAuhznmR6hPcpbFLCXkGPXDiMYi1B46834TmjxJ6SnqsYzRnAjcR9MF-NatoS4hmlpj7FbX62im12_gIuuiud2G5rmVRje7aGQacLVs9CdEC9C1sq6ECurmHJ0oaTxcHO4Bep1OXsazeP50_zAezeOS8ZzHqSolByGyFESJmZRCSSayFVWJUFgxJUk4GeGcQ4kxwWFP4FRlVC55FtgButl73539aME3RaV9CcbIGmzrC5pTlodnCQvo9R90Y9uwvOkokYTvc0F_haWz3jtQxbvTlXS7guCiy7bosi1CtgG9OgjbZQWrH_A7zADEe2CrDez-FRWPk9FdJ_wCZS-B-A</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Shahan, Timothy A.</creator><creator>Sutton, Gabrielle M.</creator><creator>Van Allsburg, Jack</creator><creator>Avellaneda, Matias</creator><creator>Greer, Brian D.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9446-7184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4734-0443</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6338-8714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3476-156X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-9994</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement</title><author>Shahan, Timothy A. ; Sutton, Gabrielle M. ; Van Allsburg, Jack ; Avellaneda, Matias ; Greer, Brian D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-7fca4e5587e5c03aa5fa358d2f65f0f3fa1a1a81444ec0010832e42f82ab48fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>choice</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>reinforcement quality</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>Reinforcement, Psychology</topic><topic>relapse</topic><topic>resurgence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shahan, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Gabrielle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Allsburg, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avellaneda, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greer, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shahan, Timothy A.</au><au>Sutton, Gabrielle M.</au><au>Van Allsburg, Jack</au><au>Avellaneda, Matias</au><au>Greer, Brian D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>246-258</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><abstract>Resurgence is a temporary increase in a previously suppressed target behavior following a worsening in reinforcement conditions. Previous studies have examined how higher rates or magnitudes of alternative reinforcement affect suppression of the target behavior and subsequent resurgence. However, there has been no investigation of the effects of higher versus lower qualities of alternative reinforcement on resurgence. Using a three‐phase resurgence preparation with rats, the present experiments examined the effects of an alternative reinforcer that was of higher (Experiment 1) or lower (Experiment 2) quality than the reinforcer that had previously maintained the target behavior. The results of both experiments showed greater reductions in target behavior with a higher quality alternative reinforcer and larger increases in target responding when a higher quality alternative reinforcer was removed. Along with prior findings with higher rates and magnitudes of alternative reinforcement, these findings suggest that variations in reinforcer dimensions that increase the efficacy of alternative reinforcement also tend to increase resurgence when alternative reinforcement is removed. The results are discussed in terms of the resurgence as choice in context model and in terms of potential clinical implications.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38329150</pmid><doi>10.1002/jeab.904</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9446-7184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4734-0443</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6338-8714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3476-156X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-9994</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5002
ispartof Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2024-03, Vol.121 (2), p.246-258
issn 0022-5002
1938-3711
1938-3711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2923910863
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Animals
choice
Conditioning, Operant
Extinction, Psychological
Rats
Reinforcement
reinforcement quality
Reinforcement Schedule
Reinforcement, Psychology
relapse
resurgence
title Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A21%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resurgence%20Following%20Higher%20or%20Lower%20Quality%20Alternative%20Reinforcement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Shahan,%20Timothy%20A.&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=246-258&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jeab.904&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2956915452%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2956915452&rft_id=info:pmid/38329150&rfr_iscdi=true