Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement
Resurgence is a temporary increase in a previously suppressed target behavior following a worsening in reinforcement conditions. Previous studies have examined how higher rates or magnitudes of alternative reinforcement affect suppression of the target behavior and subsequent resurgence. However, th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2024-03, Vol.121 (2), p.246-258 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 258 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 246 |
container_title | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Shahan, Timothy A. Sutton, Gabrielle M. Van Allsburg, Jack Avellaneda, Matias Greer, Brian D. |
description | Resurgence is a temporary increase in a previously suppressed target behavior following a worsening in reinforcement conditions. Previous studies have examined how higher rates or magnitudes of alternative reinforcement affect suppression of the target behavior and subsequent resurgence. However, there has been no investigation of the effects of higher versus lower qualities of alternative reinforcement on resurgence. Using a three‐phase resurgence preparation with rats, the present experiments examined the effects of an alternative reinforcer that was of higher (Experiment 1) or lower (Experiment 2) quality than the reinforcer that had previously maintained the target behavior. The results of both experiments showed greater reductions in target behavior with a higher quality alternative reinforcer and larger increases in target responding when a higher quality alternative reinforcer was removed. Along with prior findings with higher rates and magnitudes of alternative reinforcement, these findings suggest that variations in reinforcer dimensions that increase the efficacy of alternative reinforcement also tend to increase resurgence when alternative reinforcement is removed. The results are discussed in terms of the resurgence as choice in context model and in terms of potential clinical implications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jeab.904 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2923910863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2956915452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-7fca4e5587e5c03aa5fa358d2f65f0f3fa1a1a81444ec0010832e42f82ab48fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk7BXyAFb7zpzGc_LufYnDIQh16XrDuZGWmjSevYvzdlU0GQwMmB8-Th5EXokuAhwZjebkAuhznmR6hPcpbFLCXkGPXDiMYi1B46834TmjxJ6SnqsYzRnAjcR9MF-NatoS4hmlpj7FbX62im12_gIuuiud2G5rmVRje7aGQacLVs9CdEC9C1sq6ECurmHJ0oaTxcHO4Bep1OXsazeP50_zAezeOS8ZzHqSolByGyFESJmZRCSSayFVWJUFgxJUk4GeGcQ4kxwWFP4FRlVC55FtgButl73539aME3RaV9CcbIGmzrC5pTlodnCQvo9R90Y9uwvOkokYTvc0F_haWz3jtQxbvTlXS7guCiy7bosi1CtgG9OgjbZQWrH_A7zADEe2CrDez-FRWPk9FdJ_wCZS-B-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2956915452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Shahan, Timothy A. ; Sutton, Gabrielle M. ; Van Allsburg, Jack ; Avellaneda, Matias ; Greer, Brian D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shahan, Timothy A. ; Sutton, Gabrielle M. ; Van Allsburg, Jack ; Avellaneda, Matias ; Greer, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><description>Resurgence is a temporary increase in a previously suppressed target behavior following a worsening in reinforcement conditions. Previous studies have examined how higher rates or magnitudes of alternative reinforcement affect suppression of the target behavior and subsequent resurgence. However, there has been no investigation of the effects of higher versus lower qualities of alternative reinforcement on resurgence. Using a three‐phase resurgence preparation with rats, the present experiments examined the effects of an alternative reinforcer that was of higher (Experiment 1) or lower (Experiment 2) quality than the reinforcer that had previously maintained the target behavior. The results of both experiments showed greater reductions in target behavior with a higher quality alternative reinforcer and larger increases in target responding when a higher quality alternative reinforcer was removed. Along with prior findings with higher rates and magnitudes of alternative reinforcement, these findings suggest that variations in reinforcer dimensions that increase the efficacy of alternative reinforcement also tend to increase resurgence when alternative reinforcement is removed. The results are discussed in terms of the resurgence as choice in context model and in terms of potential clinical implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jeab.904</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38329150</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; choice ; Conditioning, Operant ; Extinction, Psychological ; Rats ; Reinforcement ; reinforcement quality ; Reinforcement Schedule ; Reinforcement, Psychology ; relapse ; resurgence</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2024-03, Vol.121 (2), p.246-258</ispartof><rights>2024 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.</rights><rights>2024 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-7fca4e5587e5c03aa5fa358d2f65f0f3fa1a1a81444ec0010832e42f82ab48fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-7fca4e5587e5c03aa5fa358d2f65f0f3fa1a1a81444ec0010832e42f82ab48fa3</cites><orcidid>0009-0008-9446-7184 ; 0000-0003-4734-0443 ; 0000-0002-6338-8714 ; 0009-0000-3476-156X ; 0000-0001-8256-9994</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjeab.904$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjeab.904$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38329150$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shahan, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Gabrielle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Allsburg, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avellaneda, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greer, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><title>Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>Resurgence is a temporary increase in a previously suppressed target behavior following a worsening in reinforcement conditions. Previous studies have examined how higher rates or magnitudes of alternative reinforcement affect suppression of the target behavior and subsequent resurgence. However, there has been no investigation of the effects of higher versus lower qualities of alternative reinforcement on resurgence. Using a three‐phase resurgence preparation with rats, the present experiments examined the effects of an alternative reinforcer that was of higher (Experiment 1) or lower (Experiment 2) quality than the reinforcer that had previously maintained the target behavior. The results of both experiments showed greater reductions in target behavior with a higher quality alternative reinforcer and larger increases in target responding when a higher quality alternative reinforcer was removed. Along with prior findings with higher rates and magnitudes of alternative reinforcement, these findings suggest that variations in reinforcer dimensions that increase the efficacy of alternative reinforcement also tend to increase resurgence when alternative reinforcement is removed. The results are discussed in terms of the resurgence as choice in context model and in terms of potential clinical implications.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>choice</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>reinforcement quality</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>Reinforcement, Psychology</subject><subject>relapse</subject><subject>resurgence</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk7BXyAFb7zpzGc_LufYnDIQh16XrDuZGWmjSevYvzdlU0GQwMmB8-Th5EXokuAhwZjebkAuhznmR6hPcpbFLCXkGPXDiMYi1B46834TmjxJ6SnqsYzRnAjcR9MF-NatoS4hmlpj7FbX62im12_gIuuiud2G5rmVRje7aGQacLVs9CdEC9C1sq6ECurmHJ0oaTxcHO4Bep1OXsazeP50_zAezeOS8ZzHqSolByGyFESJmZRCSSayFVWJUFgxJUk4GeGcQ4kxwWFP4FRlVC55FtgButl73539aME3RaV9CcbIGmzrC5pTlodnCQvo9R90Y9uwvOkokYTvc0F_haWz3jtQxbvTlXS7guCiy7bosi1CtgG9OgjbZQWrH_A7zADEe2CrDez-FRWPk9FdJ_wCZS-B-A</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Shahan, Timothy A.</creator><creator>Sutton, Gabrielle M.</creator><creator>Van Allsburg, Jack</creator><creator>Avellaneda, Matias</creator><creator>Greer, Brian D.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9446-7184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4734-0443</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6338-8714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3476-156X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-9994</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement</title><author>Shahan, Timothy A. ; Sutton, Gabrielle M. ; Van Allsburg, Jack ; Avellaneda, Matias ; Greer, Brian D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-7fca4e5587e5c03aa5fa358d2f65f0f3fa1a1a81444ec0010832e42f82ab48fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>choice</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>reinforcement quality</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>Reinforcement, Psychology</topic><topic>relapse</topic><topic>resurgence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shahan, Timothy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Gabrielle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Allsburg, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avellaneda, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greer, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shahan, Timothy A.</au><au>Sutton, Gabrielle M.</au><au>Van Allsburg, Jack</au><au>Avellaneda, Matias</au><au>Greer, Brian D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>246-258</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><abstract>Resurgence is a temporary increase in a previously suppressed target behavior following a worsening in reinforcement conditions. Previous studies have examined how higher rates or magnitudes of alternative reinforcement affect suppression of the target behavior and subsequent resurgence. However, there has been no investigation of the effects of higher versus lower qualities of alternative reinforcement on resurgence. Using a three‐phase resurgence preparation with rats, the present experiments examined the effects of an alternative reinforcer that was of higher (Experiment 1) or lower (Experiment 2) quality than the reinforcer that had previously maintained the target behavior. The results of both experiments showed greater reductions in target behavior with a higher quality alternative reinforcer and larger increases in target responding when a higher quality alternative reinforcer was removed. Along with prior findings with higher rates and magnitudes of alternative reinforcement, these findings suggest that variations in reinforcer dimensions that increase the efficacy of alternative reinforcement also tend to increase resurgence when alternative reinforcement is removed. The results are discussed in terms of the resurgence as choice in context model and in terms of potential clinical implications.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38329150</pmid><doi>10.1002/jeab.904</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9446-7184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4734-0443</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6338-8714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3476-156X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-9994</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5002 |
ispartof | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2024-03, Vol.121 (2), p.246-258 |
issn | 0022-5002 1938-3711 1938-3711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2923910863 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animals choice Conditioning, Operant Extinction, Psychological Rats Reinforcement reinforcement quality Reinforcement Schedule Reinforcement, Psychology relapse resurgence |
title | Resurgence Following Higher or Lower Quality Alternative Reinforcement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A21%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resurgence%20Following%20Higher%20or%20Lower%20Quality%20Alternative%20Reinforcement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Shahan,%20Timothy%20A.&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=246-258&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jeab.904&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2956915452%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2956915452&rft_id=info:pmid/38329150&rfr_iscdi=true |