Engraftment and Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Two Chimerism Test Strategies, Next-Generation Sequencing versus a Combination of Short-Tandem Repeats and Quantitative PCR

Chimerism testing supports the study of engraftment and measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In chimerism MRD, relapse can be predicted by increasing mixed chimerism (IMC), recipient increase ≥0.1% in peripheral blood, and proliferating r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD 2024-04, Vol.26 (4), p.233-244
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Aiwen, Macecevic, Stacey, Thomas, Dawn, Allen, Jeffrey, Mandley, Sarah, Kawczak, Paul, Jurcago, Raymond, Tyler, Jennifer, Casey, Heather, Bosler, David, Sobecks, Ronald, Hamilton, Betty, Sauter, Craig, Mineishi, Shin, Claxton, David, Shike, Hiroko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 244
container_issue 4
container_start_page 233
container_title The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD
container_volume 26
creator Zhang, Aiwen
Macecevic, Stacey
Thomas, Dawn
Allen, Jeffrey
Mandley, Sarah
Kawczak, Paul
Jurcago, Raymond
Tyler, Jennifer
Casey, Heather
Bosler, David
Sobecks, Ronald
Hamilton, Betty
Sauter, Craig
Mineishi, Shin
Claxton, David
Shike, Hiroko
description Chimerism testing supports the study of engraftment and measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In chimerism MRD, relapse can be predicted by increasing mixed chimerism (IMC), recipient increase ≥0.1% in peripheral blood, and proliferating recipient cells as a surrogate of tumor activity. Conventionally, the combination of short-tandem repeat (STR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) was needed to ensure assay sensitivity and accuracy in all chimerism status. We evaluated the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) as an alternate technique. The median numbers of informative markers in unrelated/related cases were 124/82 (NGS; from 202 single-nucleotide polymorphism), 5/3 (qPCR), and 17/10 (STR). Assay sensitivity was 0.22% (NGS), 0.1% (qPCR), and 1% (STR). NGS batch (4 to 48 samples) required 19.60 to 24.80 hours and 1.52 to 2.42 hours of hands-on time (comparable to STR/qPCR). NGS assay cost/sample was $91 to $151, similar to qPCR ($99) but higher than STR ($27). Using 56 serial DNAs from six post-transplant patients monitored by the qPCR/STR, the correlation with NGS was strong for percentage recipient (y = 1.102x + 0.010; R  = 0.968) and percentage recipient change (y = 0.892x + 0.041; R  = 0.945). NGS identified all 17 IMC events detected by qPCR (100% sensitivity). The NGS chimerism provides sufficient sensitivity, accuracy, and economical/logistical feasibility in supporting engraftment and MRD monitoring.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.01.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2922952133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2922952133</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-cdfddbe0ef0676a32bb2f112d6de565eafd498d5023091cfbad577103040a49c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1Uctu1EAQtJAQCYE_QKiPHLCZhx9rbsiEBCnhsbucV21PezMrz4wzMw7hq_kFZpNwaqm6qrq6O8vecFZwxusPh-Jg3KTuC8FEWTBeMNY8y055W8q8WXF-kr0M4cAYL8tavMhO5EqyRlTyNPt7bvcex2jIRkCr4JowLB77iWBNQasFJ_isQ0IJrp3V0Xlt95Ak5OGSDEY3O01RD7CJZKCjaYKtRxvmCW3EqJ39CJ0zM3odnAU3wva3g-5GG0qIgS2FmLQeI-01hffwje5jfkGW_IMaNnS7kB2OY-_IhyUAHg17bR_7yXFz43zMt2mBFGFNM2EMD-v8XFIIfYxxR_CjW7_Kno84BXr9VM-yX1_Ot91lfvX94mv36SqfBecxH9SoVE-MRlY3NUrR92LkXKhaUVVXhKMq25WqmJCs5cPYo6qahjPJSoZlO8iz7N2j7-xdSh_izugwpNugJbeEnWiFaCvBpUzUt0_UpTekdrPXBv2f3f8nyX9QtZrH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2922952133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Engraftment and Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Two Chimerism Test Strategies, Next-Generation Sequencing versus a Combination of Short-Tandem Repeats and Quantitative PCR</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Aiwen ; Macecevic, Stacey ; Thomas, Dawn ; Allen, Jeffrey ; Mandley, Sarah ; Kawczak, Paul ; Jurcago, Raymond ; Tyler, Jennifer ; Casey, Heather ; Bosler, David ; Sobecks, Ronald ; Hamilton, Betty ; Sauter, Craig ; Mineishi, Shin ; Claxton, David ; Shike, Hiroko</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Aiwen ; Macecevic, Stacey ; Thomas, Dawn ; Allen, Jeffrey ; Mandley, Sarah ; Kawczak, Paul ; Jurcago, Raymond ; Tyler, Jennifer ; Casey, Heather ; Bosler, David ; Sobecks, Ronald ; Hamilton, Betty ; Sauter, Craig ; Mineishi, Shin ; Claxton, David ; Shike, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><description>Chimerism testing supports the study of engraftment and measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In chimerism MRD, relapse can be predicted by increasing mixed chimerism (IMC), recipient increase ≥0.1% in peripheral blood, and proliferating recipient cells as a surrogate of tumor activity. Conventionally, the combination of short-tandem repeat (STR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) was needed to ensure assay sensitivity and accuracy in all chimerism status. We evaluated the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) as an alternate technique. The median numbers of informative markers in unrelated/related cases were 124/82 (NGS; from 202 single-nucleotide polymorphism), 5/3 (qPCR), and 17/10 (STR). Assay sensitivity was 0.22% (NGS), 0.1% (qPCR), and 1% (STR). NGS batch (4 to 48 samples) required 19.60 to 24.80 hours and 1.52 to 2.42 hours of hands-on time (comparable to STR/qPCR). NGS assay cost/sample was $91 to $151, similar to qPCR ($99) but higher than STR ($27). Using 56 serial DNAs from six post-transplant patients monitored by the qPCR/STR, the correlation with NGS was strong for percentage recipient (y = 1.102x + 0.010; R  = 0.968) and percentage recipient change (y = 0.892x + 0.041; R  = 0.945). NGS identified all 17 IMC events detected by qPCR (100% sensitivity). The NGS chimerism provides sufficient sensitivity, accuracy, and economical/logistical feasibility in supporting engraftment and MRD monitoring.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7811</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.01.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38307253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Chimerism ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing ; Humans ; Microsatellite Repeats ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis ; Neoplasm, Residual - genetics ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><ispartof>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2024-04, Vol.26 (4), p.233-244</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38307253$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Aiwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macecevic, Stacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawczak, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurcago, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casey, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosler, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobecks, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Betty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauter, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mineishi, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claxton, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shike, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><title>Engraftment and Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Two Chimerism Test Strategies, Next-Generation Sequencing versus a Combination of Short-Tandem Repeats and Quantitative PCR</title><title>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD</title><addtitle>J Mol Diagn</addtitle><description>Chimerism testing supports the study of engraftment and measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In chimerism MRD, relapse can be predicted by increasing mixed chimerism (IMC), recipient increase ≥0.1% in peripheral blood, and proliferating recipient cells as a surrogate of tumor activity. Conventionally, the combination of short-tandem repeat (STR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) was needed to ensure assay sensitivity and accuracy in all chimerism status. We evaluated the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) as an alternate technique. The median numbers of informative markers in unrelated/related cases were 124/82 (NGS; from 202 single-nucleotide polymorphism), 5/3 (qPCR), and 17/10 (STR). Assay sensitivity was 0.22% (NGS), 0.1% (qPCR), and 1% (STR). NGS batch (4 to 48 samples) required 19.60 to 24.80 hours and 1.52 to 2.42 hours of hands-on time (comparable to STR/qPCR). NGS assay cost/sample was $91 to $151, similar to qPCR ($99) but higher than STR ($27). Using 56 serial DNAs from six post-transplant patients monitored by the qPCR/STR, the correlation with NGS was strong for percentage recipient (y = 1.102x + 0.010; R  = 0.968) and percentage recipient change (y = 0.892x + 0.041; R  = 0.945). NGS identified all 17 IMC events detected by qPCR (100% sensitivity). The NGS chimerism provides sufficient sensitivity, accuracy, and economical/logistical feasibility in supporting engraftment and MRD monitoring.</description><subject>Chimerism</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation</subject><subject>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microsatellite Repeats</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - genetics</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><issn>1943-7811</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1Uctu1EAQtJAQCYE_QKiPHLCZhx9rbsiEBCnhsbucV21PezMrz4wzMw7hq_kFZpNwaqm6qrq6O8vecFZwxusPh-Jg3KTuC8FEWTBeMNY8y055W8q8WXF-kr0M4cAYL8tavMhO5EqyRlTyNPt7bvcex2jIRkCr4JowLB77iWBNQasFJ_isQ0IJrp3V0Xlt95Ak5OGSDEY3O01RD7CJZKCjaYKtRxvmCW3EqJ39CJ0zM3odnAU3wva3g-5GG0qIgS2FmLQeI-01hffwje5jfkGW_IMaNnS7kB2OY-_IhyUAHg17bR_7yXFz43zMt2mBFGFNM2EMD-v8XFIIfYxxR_CjW7_Kno84BXr9VM-yX1_Ot91lfvX94mv36SqfBecxH9SoVE-MRlY3NUrR92LkXKhaUVVXhKMq25WqmJCs5cPYo6qahjPJSoZlO8iz7N2j7-xdSh_izugwpNugJbeEnWiFaCvBpUzUt0_UpTekdrPXBv2f3f8nyX9QtZrH</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Zhang, Aiwen</creator><creator>Macecevic, Stacey</creator><creator>Thomas, Dawn</creator><creator>Allen, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Mandley, Sarah</creator><creator>Kawczak, Paul</creator><creator>Jurcago, Raymond</creator><creator>Tyler, Jennifer</creator><creator>Casey, Heather</creator><creator>Bosler, David</creator><creator>Sobecks, Ronald</creator><creator>Hamilton, Betty</creator><creator>Sauter, Craig</creator><creator>Mineishi, Shin</creator><creator>Claxton, David</creator><creator>Shike, Hiroko</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Engraftment and Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Two Chimerism Test Strategies, Next-Generation Sequencing versus a Combination of Short-Tandem Repeats and Quantitative PCR</title><author>Zhang, Aiwen ; Macecevic, Stacey ; Thomas, Dawn ; Allen, Jeffrey ; Mandley, Sarah ; Kawczak, Paul ; Jurcago, Raymond ; Tyler, Jennifer ; Casey, Heather ; Bosler, David ; Sobecks, Ronald ; Hamilton, Betty ; Sauter, Craig ; Mineishi, Shin ; Claxton, David ; Shike, Hiroko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-cdfddbe0ef0676a32bb2f112d6de565eafd498d5023091cfbad577103040a49c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Chimerism</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation</topic><topic>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microsatellite Repeats</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - genetics</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Aiwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macecevic, Stacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawczak, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurcago, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casey, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosler, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobecks, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Betty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauter, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mineishi, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claxton, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shike, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Aiwen</au><au>Macecevic, Stacey</au><au>Thomas, Dawn</au><au>Allen, Jeffrey</au><au>Mandley, Sarah</au><au>Kawczak, Paul</au><au>Jurcago, Raymond</au><au>Tyler, Jennifer</au><au>Casey, Heather</au><au>Bosler, David</au><au>Sobecks, Ronald</au><au>Hamilton, Betty</au><au>Sauter, Craig</au><au>Mineishi, Shin</au><au>Claxton, David</au><au>Shike, Hiroko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Engraftment and Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Two Chimerism Test Strategies, Next-Generation Sequencing versus a Combination of Short-Tandem Repeats and Quantitative PCR</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD</jtitle><addtitle>J Mol Diagn</addtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>233</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>233-244</pages><eissn>1943-7811</eissn><abstract>Chimerism testing supports the study of engraftment and measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In chimerism MRD, relapse can be predicted by increasing mixed chimerism (IMC), recipient increase ≥0.1% in peripheral blood, and proliferating recipient cells as a surrogate of tumor activity. Conventionally, the combination of short-tandem repeat (STR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) was needed to ensure assay sensitivity and accuracy in all chimerism status. We evaluated the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) as an alternate technique. The median numbers of informative markers in unrelated/related cases were 124/82 (NGS; from 202 single-nucleotide polymorphism), 5/3 (qPCR), and 17/10 (STR). Assay sensitivity was 0.22% (NGS), 0.1% (qPCR), and 1% (STR). NGS batch (4 to 48 samples) required 19.60 to 24.80 hours and 1.52 to 2.42 hours of hands-on time (comparable to STR/qPCR). NGS assay cost/sample was $91 to $151, similar to qPCR ($99) but higher than STR ($27). Using 56 serial DNAs from six post-transplant patients monitored by the qPCR/STR, the correlation with NGS was strong for percentage recipient (y = 1.102x + 0.010; R  = 0.968) and percentage recipient change (y = 0.892x + 0.041; R  = 0.945). NGS identified all 17 IMC events detected by qPCR (100% sensitivity). The NGS chimerism provides sufficient sensitivity, accuracy, and economical/logistical feasibility in supporting engraftment and MRD monitoring.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>38307253</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.01.007</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1943-7811
ispartof The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2024-04, Vol.26 (4), p.233-244
issn 1943-7811
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2922952133
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Chimerism
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Microsatellite Repeats
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis
Neoplasm, Residual - genetics
Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
title Engraftment and Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Two Chimerism Test Strategies, Next-Generation Sequencing versus a Combination of Short-Tandem Repeats and Quantitative PCR
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T10%3A54%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Engraftment%20and%20Measurable%20Residual%20Disease%20Monitoring%20after%20Hematopoietic%20Stem%20Cell%20Transplantation:%20Comparison%20of%20Two%20Chimerism%20Test%20Strategies,%20Next-Generation%20Sequencing%20versus%20a%20Combination%20of%20Short-Tandem%20Repeats%20and%20Quantitative%20PCR&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20molecular%20diagnostics%20:%20JMD&rft.au=Zhang,%20Aiwen&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=233-244&rft.eissn=1943-7811&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.01.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2922952133%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2922952133&rft_id=info:pmid/38307253&rfr_iscdi=true