Engraftment and Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Two Chimerism Test Strategies, Next-Generation Sequencing versus a Combination of Short-Tandem Repeats and Quantitative PCR
Chimerism testing supports the study of engraftment and measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In chimerism MRD, relapse can be predicted by increasing mixed chimerism (IMC), recipient increase ≥0.1% in peripheral blood, and proliferating r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD 2024-04, Vol.26 (4), p.233-244 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 244 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 233 |
container_title | The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Zhang, Aiwen Macecevic, Stacey Thomas, Dawn Allen, Jeffrey Mandley, Sarah Kawczak, Paul Jurcago, Raymond Tyler, Jennifer Casey, Heather Bosler, David Sobecks, Ronald Hamilton, Betty Sauter, Craig Mineishi, Shin Claxton, David Shike, Hiroko |
description | Chimerism testing supports the study of engraftment and measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In chimerism MRD, relapse can be predicted by increasing mixed chimerism (IMC), recipient increase ≥0.1% in peripheral blood, and proliferating recipient cells as a surrogate of tumor activity. Conventionally, the combination of short-tandem repeat (STR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) was needed to ensure assay sensitivity and accuracy in all chimerism status. We evaluated the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) as an alternate technique. The median numbers of informative markers in unrelated/related cases were 124/82 (NGS; from 202 single-nucleotide polymorphism), 5/3 (qPCR), and 17/10 (STR). Assay sensitivity was 0.22% (NGS), 0.1% (qPCR), and 1% (STR). NGS batch (4 to 48 samples) required 19.60 to 24.80 hours and 1.52 to 2.42 hours of hands-on time (comparable to STR/qPCR). NGS assay cost/sample was $91 to $151, similar to qPCR ($99) but higher than STR ($27). Using 56 serial DNAs from six post-transplant patients monitored by the qPCR/STR, the correlation with NGS was strong for percentage recipient (y = 1.102x + 0.010; R
= 0.968) and percentage recipient change (y = 0.892x + 0.041; R
= 0.945). NGS identified all 17 IMC events detected by qPCR (100% sensitivity). The NGS chimerism provides sufficient sensitivity, accuracy, and economical/logistical feasibility in supporting engraftment and MRD monitoring. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.01.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2922952133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2922952133</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-cdfddbe0ef0676a32bb2f112d6de565eafd498d5023091cfbad577103040a49c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1Uctu1EAQtJAQCYE_QKiPHLCZhx9rbsiEBCnhsbucV21PezMrz4wzMw7hq_kFZpNwaqm6qrq6O8vecFZwxusPh-Jg3KTuC8FEWTBeMNY8y055W8q8WXF-kr0M4cAYL8tavMhO5EqyRlTyNPt7bvcex2jIRkCr4JowLB77iWBNQasFJ_isQ0IJrp3V0Xlt95Ak5OGSDEY3O01RD7CJZKCjaYKtRxvmCW3EqJ39CJ0zM3odnAU3wva3g-5GG0qIgS2FmLQeI-01hffwje5jfkGW_IMaNnS7kB2OY-_IhyUAHg17bR_7yXFz43zMt2mBFGFNM2EMD-v8XFIIfYxxR_CjW7_Kno84BXr9VM-yX1_Ot91lfvX94mv36SqfBecxH9SoVE-MRlY3NUrR92LkXKhaUVVXhKMq25WqmJCs5cPYo6qahjPJSoZlO8iz7N2j7-xdSh_izugwpNugJbeEnWiFaCvBpUzUt0_UpTekdrPXBv2f3f8nyX9QtZrH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2922952133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Engraftment and Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Two Chimerism Test Strategies, Next-Generation Sequencing versus a Combination of Short-Tandem Repeats and Quantitative PCR</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Aiwen ; Macecevic, Stacey ; Thomas, Dawn ; Allen, Jeffrey ; Mandley, Sarah ; Kawczak, Paul ; Jurcago, Raymond ; Tyler, Jennifer ; Casey, Heather ; Bosler, David ; Sobecks, Ronald ; Hamilton, Betty ; Sauter, Craig ; Mineishi, Shin ; Claxton, David ; Shike, Hiroko</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Aiwen ; Macecevic, Stacey ; Thomas, Dawn ; Allen, Jeffrey ; Mandley, Sarah ; Kawczak, Paul ; Jurcago, Raymond ; Tyler, Jennifer ; Casey, Heather ; Bosler, David ; Sobecks, Ronald ; Hamilton, Betty ; Sauter, Craig ; Mineishi, Shin ; Claxton, David ; Shike, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><description>Chimerism testing supports the study of engraftment and measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In chimerism MRD, relapse can be predicted by increasing mixed chimerism (IMC), recipient increase ≥0.1% in peripheral blood, and proliferating recipient cells as a surrogate of tumor activity. Conventionally, the combination of short-tandem repeat (STR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) was needed to ensure assay sensitivity and accuracy in all chimerism status. We evaluated the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) as an alternate technique. The median numbers of informative markers in unrelated/related cases were 124/82 (NGS; from 202 single-nucleotide polymorphism), 5/3 (qPCR), and 17/10 (STR). Assay sensitivity was 0.22% (NGS), 0.1% (qPCR), and 1% (STR). NGS batch (4 to 48 samples) required 19.60 to 24.80 hours and 1.52 to 2.42 hours of hands-on time (comparable to STR/qPCR). NGS assay cost/sample was $91 to $151, similar to qPCR ($99) but higher than STR ($27). Using 56 serial DNAs from six post-transplant patients monitored by the qPCR/STR, the correlation with NGS was strong for percentage recipient (y = 1.102x + 0.010; R
= 0.968) and percentage recipient change (y = 0.892x + 0.041; R
= 0.945). NGS identified all 17 IMC events detected by qPCR (100% sensitivity). The NGS chimerism provides sufficient sensitivity, accuracy, and economical/logistical feasibility in supporting engraftment and MRD monitoring.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7811</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.01.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38307253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Chimerism ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing ; Humans ; Microsatellite Repeats ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis ; Neoplasm, Residual - genetics ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><ispartof>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2024-04, Vol.26 (4), p.233-244</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38307253$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Aiwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macecevic, Stacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawczak, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurcago, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casey, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosler, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobecks, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Betty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauter, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mineishi, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claxton, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shike, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><title>Engraftment and Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Two Chimerism Test Strategies, Next-Generation Sequencing versus a Combination of Short-Tandem Repeats and Quantitative PCR</title><title>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD</title><addtitle>J Mol Diagn</addtitle><description>Chimerism testing supports the study of engraftment and measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In chimerism MRD, relapse can be predicted by increasing mixed chimerism (IMC), recipient increase ≥0.1% in peripheral blood, and proliferating recipient cells as a surrogate of tumor activity. Conventionally, the combination of short-tandem repeat (STR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) was needed to ensure assay sensitivity and accuracy in all chimerism status. We evaluated the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) as an alternate technique. The median numbers of informative markers in unrelated/related cases were 124/82 (NGS; from 202 single-nucleotide polymorphism), 5/3 (qPCR), and 17/10 (STR). Assay sensitivity was 0.22% (NGS), 0.1% (qPCR), and 1% (STR). NGS batch (4 to 48 samples) required 19.60 to 24.80 hours and 1.52 to 2.42 hours of hands-on time (comparable to STR/qPCR). NGS assay cost/sample was $91 to $151, similar to qPCR ($99) but higher than STR ($27). Using 56 serial DNAs from six post-transplant patients monitored by the qPCR/STR, the correlation with NGS was strong for percentage recipient (y = 1.102x + 0.010; R
= 0.968) and percentage recipient change (y = 0.892x + 0.041; R
= 0.945). NGS identified all 17 IMC events detected by qPCR (100% sensitivity). The NGS chimerism provides sufficient sensitivity, accuracy, and economical/logistical feasibility in supporting engraftment and MRD monitoring.</description><subject>Chimerism</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation</subject><subject>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microsatellite Repeats</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - genetics</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><issn>1943-7811</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1Uctu1EAQtJAQCYE_QKiPHLCZhx9rbsiEBCnhsbucV21PezMrz4wzMw7hq_kFZpNwaqm6qrq6O8vecFZwxusPh-Jg3KTuC8FEWTBeMNY8y055W8q8WXF-kr0M4cAYL8tavMhO5EqyRlTyNPt7bvcex2jIRkCr4JowLB77iWBNQasFJ_isQ0IJrp3V0Xlt95Ak5OGSDEY3O01RD7CJZKCjaYKtRxvmCW3EqJ39CJ0zM3odnAU3wva3g-5GG0qIgS2FmLQeI-01hffwje5jfkGW_IMaNnS7kB2OY-_IhyUAHg17bR_7yXFz43zMt2mBFGFNM2EMD-v8XFIIfYxxR_CjW7_Kno84BXr9VM-yX1_Ot91lfvX94mv36SqfBecxH9SoVE-MRlY3NUrR92LkXKhaUVVXhKMq25WqmJCs5cPYo6qahjPJSoZlO8iz7N2j7-xdSh_izugwpNugJbeEnWiFaCvBpUzUt0_UpTekdrPXBv2f3f8nyX9QtZrH</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Zhang, Aiwen</creator><creator>Macecevic, Stacey</creator><creator>Thomas, Dawn</creator><creator>Allen, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Mandley, Sarah</creator><creator>Kawczak, Paul</creator><creator>Jurcago, Raymond</creator><creator>Tyler, Jennifer</creator><creator>Casey, Heather</creator><creator>Bosler, David</creator><creator>Sobecks, Ronald</creator><creator>Hamilton, Betty</creator><creator>Sauter, Craig</creator><creator>Mineishi, Shin</creator><creator>Claxton, David</creator><creator>Shike, Hiroko</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Engraftment and Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Two Chimerism Test Strategies, Next-Generation Sequencing versus a Combination of Short-Tandem Repeats and Quantitative PCR</title><author>Zhang, Aiwen ; Macecevic, Stacey ; Thomas, Dawn ; Allen, Jeffrey ; Mandley, Sarah ; Kawczak, Paul ; Jurcago, Raymond ; Tyler, Jennifer ; Casey, Heather ; Bosler, David ; Sobecks, Ronald ; Hamilton, Betty ; Sauter, Craig ; Mineishi, Shin ; Claxton, David ; Shike, Hiroko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-cdfddbe0ef0676a32bb2f112d6de565eafd498d5023091cfbad577103040a49c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Chimerism</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation</topic><topic>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microsatellite Repeats</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - genetics</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Aiwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macecevic, Stacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawczak, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurcago, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casey, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosler, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobecks, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Betty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauter, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mineishi, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claxton, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shike, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Aiwen</au><au>Macecevic, Stacey</au><au>Thomas, Dawn</au><au>Allen, Jeffrey</au><au>Mandley, Sarah</au><au>Kawczak, Paul</au><au>Jurcago, Raymond</au><au>Tyler, Jennifer</au><au>Casey, Heather</au><au>Bosler, David</au><au>Sobecks, Ronald</au><au>Hamilton, Betty</au><au>Sauter, Craig</au><au>Mineishi, Shin</au><au>Claxton, David</au><au>Shike, Hiroko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Engraftment and Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Two Chimerism Test Strategies, Next-Generation Sequencing versus a Combination of Short-Tandem Repeats and Quantitative PCR</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD</jtitle><addtitle>J Mol Diagn</addtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>233</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>233-244</pages><eissn>1943-7811</eissn><abstract>Chimerism testing supports the study of engraftment and measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In chimerism MRD, relapse can be predicted by increasing mixed chimerism (IMC), recipient increase ≥0.1% in peripheral blood, and proliferating recipient cells as a surrogate of tumor activity. Conventionally, the combination of short-tandem repeat (STR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) was needed to ensure assay sensitivity and accuracy in all chimerism status. We evaluated the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) as an alternate technique. The median numbers of informative markers in unrelated/related cases were 124/82 (NGS; from 202 single-nucleotide polymorphism), 5/3 (qPCR), and 17/10 (STR). Assay sensitivity was 0.22% (NGS), 0.1% (qPCR), and 1% (STR). NGS batch (4 to 48 samples) required 19.60 to 24.80 hours and 1.52 to 2.42 hours of hands-on time (comparable to STR/qPCR). NGS assay cost/sample was $91 to $151, similar to qPCR ($99) but higher than STR ($27). Using 56 serial DNAs from six post-transplant patients monitored by the qPCR/STR, the correlation with NGS was strong for percentage recipient (y = 1.102x + 0.010; R
= 0.968) and percentage recipient change (y = 0.892x + 0.041; R
= 0.945). NGS identified all 17 IMC events detected by qPCR (100% sensitivity). The NGS chimerism provides sufficient sensitivity, accuracy, and economical/logistical feasibility in supporting engraftment and MRD monitoring.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>38307253</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.01.007</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1943-7811 |
ispartof | The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2024-04, Vol.26 (4), p.233-244 |
issn | 1943-7811 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2922952133 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Chimerism Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing Humans Microsatellite Repeats Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Neoplasm, Residual - diagnosis Neoplasm, Residual - genetics Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods |
title | Engraftment and Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Two Chimerism Test Strategies, Next-Generation Sequencing versus a Combination of Short-Tandem Repeats and Quantitative PCR |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T10%3A54%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Engraftment%20and%20Measurable%20Residual%20Disease%20Monitoring%20after%20Hematopoietic%20Stem%20Cell%20Transplantation:%20Comparison%20of%20Two%20Chimerism%20Test%20Strategies,%20Next-Generation%20Sequencing%20versus%20a%20Combination%20of%20Short-Tandem%20Repeats%20and%20Quantitative%20PCR&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20molecular%20diagnostics%20:%20JMD&rft.au=Zhang,%20Aiwen&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=233-244&rft.eissn=1943-7811&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.01.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2922952133%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2922952133&rft_id=info:pmid/38307253&rfr_iscdi=true |