Patients with a high defibrillation threshold: Approaches to management

Implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) have revolutionized the prognosis for patients at elevated risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. For safety, defibrillation should be effective with a minimum of 10 J below the device's maximum energy. While modern ICDs rarely deliver ineffective s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2024-02, Vol.47 (2), p.222-232
Hauptverfasser: Vidal Margenat, Alejandro, Zedan, Ahmed, Schubert, Scott, Gopani, Srushti, Hariharan, Ramesh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 2
container_start_page 222
container_title Pacing and clinical electrophysiology
container_volume 47
creator Vidal Margenat, Alejandro
Zedan, Ahmed
Schubert, Scott
Gopani, Srushti
Hariharan, Ramesh
description Implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) have revolutionized the prognosis for patients at elevated risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. For safety, defibrillation should be effective with a minimum of 10 J below the device's maximum energy. While modern ICDs rarely deliver ineffective shocks in primary prevention, the surge in managing severe heart failure patients has led to an increased number of patients with high defibrillation thresholds (DFTs). This article elucidates the potential causes of high DFT, including clinical factors, lead and device placement, the presence of a Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD), prolonged ventricular arrhythmias, shock vectors, waveform tilt, medications, and manufacturer‐specific options. We also detail management strategies, highlighting alternative shock coil placements, practical recommendations, and case studies from our institution. Our management algorithm suggests addressing preventable causes, re‐evaluating coil positions, considering non‐invasive system modifications, upgrading to a higher‐capacity device, and adding extra coil(s).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/pace.14936
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2920572629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2926085942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-fb2b24d0b525df1074606723b625a5383082e0799c5675f5d84966efddd23de33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LwzAABuAgipvTiz9ACl5EqOajSRNvY8wpDNxBzyFt0jWjHzNpGfv3ZnZ68GAuOeTJy8sLwDWCDyicx63KzQNKBGEnYIxoAmOOqDgFY4iSNOaEixG48H4DIWQwoedgRDgWiKdwDBYr1VnTdD7a2a6MVFTadRlpU9jM2aoKj20TdaUzvmwr_RRNt1vXqrw0PuraqFaNWps6_L8EZ4WqvLk63hPw8Tx_n73Ey7fF62y6jHOCGIuLDGc40TCjmOoCwTRhkKWYZAxTRQknkGMDUyFyylJaUM0TwZgptNaYaEPIBNwNuaHGZ298J2vrcxOaNqbtvcQCQ5pihkWgt3_opu1dE9odFIOcigQHdT-o3LXeO1PIrbO1cnuJoDzMKw_zyu95A745RvZZbfQv_dkzADSAna3M_p8ouZrO5kPoF8lsgyE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2926085942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patients with a high defibrillation threshold: Approaches to management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Vidal Margenat, Alejandro ; Zedan, Ahmed ; Schubert, Scott ; Gopani, Srushti ; Hariharan, Ramesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Vidal Margenat, Alejandro ; Zedan, Ahmed ; Schubert, Scott ; Gopani, Srushti ; Hariharan, Ramesh</creatorcontrib><description>Implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) have revolutionized the prognosis for patients at elevated risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. For safety, defibrillation should be effective with a minimum of 10 J below the device's maximum energy. While modern ICDs rarely deliver ineffective shocks in primary prevention, the surge in managing severe heart failure patients has led to an increased number of patients with high defibrillation thresholds (DFTs). This article elucidates the potential causes of high DFT, including clinical factors, lead and device placement, the presence of a Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD), prolonged ventricular arrhythmias, shock vectors, waveform tilt, medications, and manufacturer‐specific options. We also detail management strategies, highlighting alternative shock coil placements, practical recommendations, and case studies from our institution. Our management algorithm suggests addressing preventable causes, re‐evaluating coil positions, considering non‐invasive system modifications, upgrading to a higher‐capacity device, and adding extra coil(s).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pace.14936</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38291870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac ; Congestive heart failure ; Defibrillators, Implantable ; Electric Countershock ; Heart-Assist Devices ; high defibrillation thresholds ; Humans ; implantable cardioverted defibrillators ; left ventricular assist device ; Prognosis ; Ventricle ; Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy ; ventricular tachyarrhythmias</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2024-02, Vol.47 (2), p.222-232</ispartof><rights>2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-fb2b24d0b525df1074606723b625a5383082e0799c5675f5d84966efddd23de33</cites><orcidid>0009-0003-1446-1668</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpace.14936$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpace.14936$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38291870$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vidal Margenat, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zedan, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopani, Srushti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hariharan, Ramesh</creatorcontrib><title>Patients with a high defibrillation threshold: Approaches to management</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) have revolutionized the prognosis for patients at elevated risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. For safety, defibrillation should be effective with a minimum of 10 J below the device's maximum energy. While modern ICDs rarely deliver ineffective shocks in primary prevention, the surge in managing severe heart failure patients has led to an increased number of patients with high defibrillation thresholds (DFTs). This article elucidates the potential causes of high DFT, including clinical factors, lead and device placement, the presence of a Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD), prolonged ventricular arrhythmias, shock vectors, waveform tilt, medications, and manufacturer‐specific options. We also detail management strategies, highlighting alternative shock coil placements, practical recommendations, and case studies from our institution. Our management algorithm suggests addressing preventable causes, re‐evaluating coil positions, considering non‐invasive system modifications, upgrading to a higher‐capacity device, and adding extra coil(s).</description><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac</subject><subject>Congestive heart failure</subject><subject>Defibrillators, Implantable</subject><subject>Electric Countershock</subject><subject>Heart-Assist Devices</subject><subject>high defibrillation thresholds</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implantable cardioverted defibrillators</subject><subject>left ventricular assist device</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Ventricle</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><subject>ventricular tachyarrhythmias</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LwzAABuAgipvTiz9ACl5EqOajSRNvY8wpDNxBzyFt0jWjHzNpGfv3ZnZ68GAuOeTJy8sLwDWCDyicx63KzQNKBGEnYIxoAmOOqDgFY4iSNOaEixG48H4DIWQwoedgRDgWiKdwDBYr1VnTdD7a2a6MVFTadRlpU9jM2aoKj20TdaUzvmwr_RRNt1vXqrw0PuraqFaNWps6_L8EZ4WqvLk63hPw8Tx_n73Ey7fF62y6jHOCGIuLDGc40TCjmOoCwTRhkKWYZAxTRQknkGMDUyFyylJaUM0TwZgptNaYaEPIBNwNuaHGZ298J2vrcxOaNqbtvcQCQ5pihkWgt3_opu1dE9odFIOcigQHdT-o3LXeO1PIrbO1cnuJoDzMKw_zyu95A745RvZZbfQv_dkzADSAna3M_p8ouZrO5kPoF8lsgyE</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Vidal Margenat, Alejandro</creator><creator>Zedan, Ahmed</creator><creator>Schubert, Scott</creator><creator>Gopani, Srushti</creator><creator>Hariharan, Ramesh</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1446-1668</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>Patients with a high defibrillation threshold: Approaches to management</title><author>Vidal Margenat, Alejandro ; Zedan, Ahmed ; Schubert, Scott ; Gopani, Srushti ; Hariharan, Ramesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-fb2b24d0b525df1074606723b625a5383082e0799c5675f5d84966efddd23de33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac</topic><topic>Congestive heart failure</topic><topic>Defibrillators, Implantable</topic><topic>Electric Countershock</topic><topic>Heart-Assist Devices</topic><topic>high defibrillation thresholds</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implantable cardioverted defibrillators</topic><topic>left ventricular assist device</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Ventricle</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</topic><topic>ventricular tachyarrhythmias</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vidal Margenat, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zedan, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopani, Srushti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hariharan, Ramesh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vidal Margenat, Alejandro</au><au>Zedan, Ahmed</au><au>Schubert, Scott</au><au>Gopani, Srushti</au><au>Hariharan, Ramesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patients with a high defibrillation threshold: Approaches to management</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>222</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>222-232</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) have revolutionized the prognosis for patients at elevated risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. For safety, defibrillation should be effective with a minimum of 10 J below the device's maximum energy. While modern ICDs rarely deliver ineffective shocks in primary prevention, the surge in managing severe heart failure patients has led to an increased number of patients with high defibrillation thresholds (DFTs). This article elucidates the potential causes of high DFT, including clinical factors, lead and device placement, the presence of a Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD), prolonged ventricular arrhythmias, shock vectors, waveform tilt, medications, and manufacturer‐specific options. We also detail management strategies, highlighting alternative shock coil placements, practical recommendations, and case studies from our institution. Our management algorithm suggests addressing preventable causes, re‐evaluating coil positions, considering non‐invasive system modifications, upgrading to a higher‐capacity device, and adding extra coil(s).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38291870</pmid><doi>10.1111/pace.14936</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1446-1668</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-8389
ispartof Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2024-02, Vol.47 (2), p.222-232
issn 0147-8389
1540-8159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2920572629
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Congestive heart failure
Defibrillators, Implantable
Electric Countershock
Heart-Assist Devices
high defibrillation thresholds
Humans
implantable cardioverted defibrillators
left ventricular assist device
Prognosis
Ventricle
Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy
ventricular tachyarrhythmias
title Patients with a high defibrillation threshold: Approaches to management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T21%3A09%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patients%20with%20a%20high%20defibrillation%20threshold:%20Approaches%20to%20management&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Vidal%20Margenat,%20Alejandro&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=222&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=222-232&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pace.14936&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2926085942%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2926085942&rft_id=info:pmid/38291870&rfr_iscdi=true