The malnutrition screening tool STRONGKIDS performed better than other screening tools for children hospitalised in Egypt
Aim To compare the accuracy of three different screening tools, namely, the Paediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS), Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Paediatrics (STAMP), and Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGKIDS), in assessing malnutrition ri...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Acta Paediatrica 2024-05, Vol.113 (5), p.1006-1012 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1012 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1006 |
| container_title | Acta Paediatrica |
| container_volume | 113 |
| creator | Omar, Omneya Magdy Tayel, Dalia I. Saleh, Radwa Mohamed Ramadan, Magdy Abdelfatah |
| description | Aim
To compare the accuracy of three different screening tools, namely, the Paediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS), Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Paediatrics (STAMP), and Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGKIDS), in assessing malnutrition risk in hospitalised children.
Methods
A cross‐sectional study was conducted on 300 children aged 6 months to 15 years at Alexandria University Children's Hospital, Egypt. The sensitivity and specificity of each tool were calculated to detect acute and chronic malnutrition, and an agreement test was conducted between the nutritional screening tools. The patients were classified into different nutritional risk groups, and their classification was compared with anthropometric measures and clinical variables, such as the length of hospital stay (LOS).
Results
The prevalence of stunting and wasting on admission was found to be 3% and 6.6%, respectively. Children categorised as high‐risk on admission had a longer LOS than those at low risk. The agreement test between the STAMP score and STRONGKIDS score on admission showed the most significant agreement, and STRONGKIDS had the best accuracy in detecting acute and chronic malnutrition.
Conclusion
The comparison of the three screening tools revealed that STRONGKIDS exhibited the best accuracy in detecting acute and chronic malnutrition. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/apa.17123 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2920572248</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3034970528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3133-12c5b72a7049fe88338e9ae6470ed609f3729abbeb057883795c7537b260b4223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS0EokvhwB9AlrjAIa09juP4uCqlVFQU0eVsOdlJ4yprp7YjtP8ely1IIDGXGWm-9zSaR8hrzk54qVM72xOuOIgnZMUbySsAUE_JirVMVBKkOCIvUrpjDISum-fkSLSguazbFdlvRqQ7O_klR5dd8DT1EdE7f0tzCBO92Xy7_nLx-fLDDZ0xDiHucEs7zBkjzaP1NOSxjH-rEi0g7Uc3bSN6OoY0u2wnl4rWeXp-u5_zS_JssFPCV4_9mHz_eL45-1RdXV9cnq2vql5wISoOvewUWMVqPWDbCtGittjUiuG2YXoQCrTtOuyYVGWttOyVFKqDhnU1gDgm7w6-cwz3C6Zsdi71OE3WY1iSAQ1FCVC3BX37D3oXlujLdUYwUWvFJDxQ7w9UH0NKEQczR7ezcW84Mw95mJKH-ZVHYd88Oi5dedwf8ncABTg9AD_chPv_O5n11_XB8idJ65PC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3034970528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The malnutrition screening tool STRONGKIDS performed better than other screening tools for children hospitalised in Egypt</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</source><creator>Omar, Omneya Magdy ; Tayel, Dalia I. ; Saleh, Radwa Mohamed ; Ramadan, Magdy Abdelfatah</creator><creatorcontrib>Omar, Omneya Magdy ; Tayel, Dalia I. ; Saleh, Radwa Mohamed ; Ramadan, Magdy Abdelfatah</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
To compare the accuracy of three different screening tools, namely, the Paediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS), Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Paediatrics (STAMP), and Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGKIDS), in assessing malnutrition risk in hospitalised children.
Methods
A cross‐sectional study was conducted on 300 children aged 6 months to 15 years at Alexandria University Children's Hospital, Egypt. The sensitivity and specificity of each tool were calculated to detect acute and chronic malnutrition, and an agreement test was conducted between the nutritional screening tools. The patients were classified into different nutritional risk groups, and their classification was compared with anthropometric measures and clinical variables, such as the length of hospital stay (LOS).
Results
The prevalence of stunting and wasting on admission was found to be 3% and 6.6%, respectively. Children categorised as high‐risk on admission had a longer LOS than those at low risk. The agreement test between the STAMP score and STRONGKIDS score on admission showed the most significant agreement, and STRONGKIDS had the best accuracy in detecting acute and chronic malnutrition.
Conclusion
The comparison of the three screening tools revealed that STRONGKIDS exhibited the best accuracy in detecting acute and chronic malnutrition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0803-5253</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1651-2227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/apa.17123</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38291548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Norway: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Child ; Children ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Egypt - epidemiology ; Humans ; Malnutrition ; Malnutrition - diagnosis ; Malnutrition - epidemiology ; Mass Screening ; Nutrition Assessment ; Nutritional Status ; PYMS ; Risk groups ; STAMP ; STRONGKIDS</subject><ispartof>Acta Paediatrica, 2024-05, Vol.113 (5), p.1006-1012</ispartof><rights>2024 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2024 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 Foundation Acta Pædiatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3133-12c5b72a7049fe88338e9ae6470ed609f3729abbeb057883795c7537b260b4223</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1967-8893</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fapa.17123$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fapa.17123$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fapa.17123$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38291548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Omar, Omneya Magdy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tayel, Dalia I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Radwa Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramadan, Magdy Abdelfatah</creatorcontrib><title>The malnutrition screening tool STRONGKIDS performed better than other screening tools for children hospitalised in Egypt</title><title>Acta Paediatrica</title><addtitle>Acta Paediatr</addtitle><description>Aim
To compare the accuracy of three different screening tools, namely, the Paediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS), Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Paediatrics (STAMP), and Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGKIDS), in assessing malnutrition risk in hospitalised children.
Methods
A cross‐sectional study was conducted on 300 children aged 6 months to 15 years at Alexandria University Children's Hospital, Egypt. The sensitivity and specificity of each tool were calculated to detect acute and chronic malnutrition, and an agreement test was conducted between the nutritional screening tools. The patients were classified into different nutritional risk groups, and their classification was compared with anthropometric measures and clinical variables, such as the length of hospital stay (LOS).
Results
The prevalence of stunting and wasting on admission was found to be 3% and 6.6%, respectively. Children categorised as high‐risk on admission had a longer LOS than those at low risk. The agreement test between the STAMP score and STRONGKIDS score on admission showed the most significant agreement, and STRONGKIDS had the best accuracy in detecting acute and chronic malnutrition.
Conclusion
The comparison of the three screening tools revealed that STRONGKIDS exhibited the best accuracy in detecting acute and chronic malnutrition.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Egypt - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Malnutrition</subject><subject>Malnutrition - diagnosis</subject><subject>Malnutrition - epidemiology</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Nutrition Assessment</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><subject>PYMS</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>STAMP</subject><subject>STRONGKIDS</subject><issn>0803-5253</issn><issn>1651-2227</issn><issn>1651-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS0EokvhwB9AlrjAIa09juP4uCqlVFQU0eVsOdlJ4yprp7YjtP8ely1IIDGXGWm-9zSaR8hrzk54qVM72xOuOIgnZMUbySsAUE_JirVMVBKkOCIvUrpjDISum-fkSLSguazbFdlvRqQ7O_klR5dd8DT1EdE7f0tzCBO92Xy7_nLx-fLDDZ0xDiHucEs7zBkjzaP1NOSxjH-rEi0g7Uc3bSN6OoY0u2wnl4rWeXp-u5_zS_JssFPCV4_9mHz_eL45-1RdXV9cnq2vql5wISoOvewUWMVqPWDbCtGittjUiuG2YXoQCrTtOuyYVGWttOyVFKqDhnU1gDgm7w6-cwz3C6Zsdi71OE3WY1iSAQ1FCVC3BX37D3oXlujLdUYwUWvFJDxQ7w9UH0NKEQczR7ezcW84Mw95mJKH-ZVHYd88Oi5dedwf8ncABTg9AD_chPv_O5n11_XB8idJ65PC</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Omar, Omneya Magdy</creator><creator>Tayel, Dalia I.</creator><creator>Saleh, Radwa Mohamed</creator><creator>Ramadan, Magdy Abdelfatah</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-8893</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>The malnutrition screening tool STRONGKIDS performed better than other screening tools for children hospitalised in Egypt</title><author>Omar, Omneya Magdy ; Tayel, Dalia I. ; Saleh, Radwa Mohamed ; Ramadan, Magdy Abdelfatah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3133-12c5b72a7049fe88338e9ae6470ed609f3729abbeb057883795c7537b260b4223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Egypt - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Malnutrition</topic><topic>Malnutrition - diagnosis</topic><topic>Malnutrition - epidemiology</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Nutrition Assessment</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><topic>PYMS</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>STAMP</topic><topic>STRONGKIDS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Omar, Omneya Magdy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tayel, Dalia I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Radwa Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramadan, Magdy Abdelfatah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta Paediatrica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Omar, Omneya Magdy</au><au>Tayel, Dalia I.</au><au>Saleh, Radwa Mohamed</au><au>Ramadan, Magdy Abdelfatah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The malnutrition screening tool STRONGKIDS performed better than other screening tools for children hospitalised in Egypt</atitle><jtitle>Acta Paediatrica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Paediatr</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1006</spage><epage>1012</epage><pages>1006-1012</pages><issn>0803-5253</issn><issn>1651-2227</issn><eissn>1651-2227</eissn><abstract>Aim
To compare the accuracy of three different screening tools, namely, the Paediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS), Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Paediatrics (STAMP), and Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGKIDS), in assessing malnutrition risk in hospitalised children.
Methods
A cross‐sectional study was conducted on 300 children aged 6 months to 15 years at Alexandria University Children's Hospital, Egypt. The sensitivity and specificity of each tool were calculated to detect acute and chronic malnutrition, and an agreement test was conducted between the nutritional screening tools. The patients were classified into different nutritional risk groups, and their classification was compared with anthropometric measures and clinical variables, such as the length of hospital stay (LOS).
Results
The prevalence of stunting and wasting on admission was found to be 3% and 6.6%, respectively. Children categorised as high‐risk on admission had a longer LOS than those at low risk. The agreement test between the STAMP score and STRONGKIDS score on admission showed the most significant agreement, and STRONGKIDS had the best accuracy in detecting acute and chronic malnutrition.
Conclusion
The comparison of the three screening tools revealed that STRONGKIDS exhibited the best accuracy in detecting acute and chronic malnutrition.</abstract><cop>Norway</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38291548</pmid><doi>10.1111/apa.17123</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-8893</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0803-5253 |
| ispartof | Acta Paediatrica, 2024-05, Vol.113 (5), p.1006-1012 |
| issn | 0803-5253 1651-2227 1651-2227 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2920572248 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection |
| subjects | Accuracy Child Children Cross-Sectional Studies Egypt - epidemiology Humans Malnutrition Malnutrition - diagnosis Malnutrition - epidemiology Mass Screening Nutrition Assessment Nutritional Status PYMS Risk groups STAMP STRONGKIDS |
| title | The malnutrition screening tool STRONGKIDS performed better than other screening tools for children hospitalised in Egypt |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T17%3A59%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20malnutrition%20screening%20tool%20STRONGKIDS%20performed%20better%20than%20other%20screening%20tools%20for%20children%20hospitalised%20in%20Egypt&rft.jtitle=Acta%20Paediatrica&rft.au=Omar,%20Omneya%20Magdy&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1006&rft.epage=1012&rft.pages=1006-1012&rft.issn=0803-5253&rft.eissn=1651-2227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/apa.17123&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_24P%3E3034970528%3C/proquest_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3034970528&rft_id=info:pmid/38291548&rfr_iscdi=true |