The potential steroid hormone contribution of farm animals to freshwaters, the United Kingdom as a case study
The combined farm animal population is considerably larger than the human one in the United Kingdom, implying a possibly important contribution to the environmental load of steroid hormones entering water. To make comparisons on the amount of steroid hormones produced by the different livestock, inf...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Science of the total environment 2006-06, Vol.362 (1), p.166-178 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 178 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 166 |
container_title | The Science of the total environment |
container_volume | 362 |
creator | Johnson, A.C. Williams, R.J. Matthiessen, P. |
description | The combined farm animal population is considerably larger than the human one in the United Kingdom, implying a possibly important contribution to the environmental load of steroid hormones entering water. To make comparisons on the amount of steroid hormones produced by the different livestock, information was gathered on the structure of the UK farm animal populations and the amount of hormones excreted by animals at each of their life stages. An individual normalised dairy cow excretes two orders of magnitude more, and a normalised pig excretes more than one order of magnitude more steroid oestrogens than a normalised human. In terms of excretion, the combined farm animal population (including sheep and poultry) probably generates around four times more oestrogens than the human population in the UK. The biggest contributor on the animal side is the relatively small dairy cow population. If steroid oestrogens behave like herbicides, in which a worst case loss to surface waters is around 1%, then it could be argued that farm animals are responsible for 15% of all the oestrogens in UK waters. When simulations were made with the MACRO pesticide leaching model, predicted concentrations for field drains failed to exceed 1 ng/L. The rapid biodegradation rates, and high sorption rates taken from the literature and used in the model suggested less than 0.001% of oestrogens would reach the field drains. This survey suggests that direct excretion of steroid hormones by animals into water courses, or discharges from farmyard drains, are likely to be more important sources of contamination rather than via normal agricultural scenarios. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.06.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29198753</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969705004523</els_id><sourcerecordid>14771603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-106c4788ee2913cfd34b299f6a4ebe16339ee5c8f607fe87016962554d1652f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtvEzEUhS0EakPpXwBv6KoZ7Hn4sawqWhCV2IS15djXxNGMHWxPUf89HiWiy9zN3Xzn3KtzEPpESUMJZV_2TTa-xALhuWkJGRrCGkL7N2hFBZdrSlr2Fq0I6cVaMskv0fuc96QOF_QCXVJGhoEyuULTZgf4sBgVr0ecC6ToLd7FNMUA2MRQkt_OxceAo8NOpwnr4Cc9Zlwidgny7q-uqnyLS7X6FXwBi3_48NvGimassdEZqvNsXz6gd64q4fq0r9Dm4evm_tv66efj9_u7p7XpZVvq-8z0XAiAVtLOONv121ZKx3QPW6Cs6yTAYIRjhDsQvCYiWTsMvaVsaF13hW6OtocU_8yQi5p8NjCOOkCcs6quUvChOw8S0UnRi7Mg7TmvoS6O_AiaFHNO4NQh1bTSi6JELdWpvfpfnVqqU4SpWl1VfjydmLcT2FfdqasKfD4BOhs9uqSD8fmV44J0A6OVuztyUBN-9pCWgxAMWJ_AFGWjP_vMP65ZvEk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14771603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The potential steroid hormone contribution of farm animals to freshwaters, the United Kingdom as a case study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Johnson, A.C. ; Williams, R.J. ; Matthiessen, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, A.C. ; Williams, R.J. ; Matthiessen, P.</creatorcontrib><description>The combined farm animal population is considerably larger than the human one in the United Kingdom, implying a possibly important contribution to the environmental load of steroid hormones entering water. To make comparisons on the amount of steroid hormones produced by the different livestock, information was gathered on the structure of the UK farm animal populations and the amount of hormones excreted by animals at each of their life stages. An individual normalised dairy cow excretes two orders of magnitude more, and a normalised pig excretes more than one order of magnitude more steroid oestrogens than a normalised human. In terms of excretion, the combined farm animal population (including sheep and poultry) probably generates around four times more oestrogens than the human population in the UK. The biggest contributor on the animal side is the relatively small dairy cow population. If steroid oestrogens behave like herbicides, in which a worst case loss to surface waters is around 1%, then it could be argued that farm animals are responsible for 15% of all the oestrogens in UK waters. When simulations were made with the MACRO pesticide leaching model, predicted concentrations for field drains failed to exceed 1 ng/L. The rapid biodegradation rates, and high sorption rates taken from the literature and used in the model suggested less than 0.001% of oestrogens would reach the field drains. This survey suggests that direct excretion of steroid hormones by animals into water courses, or discharges from farmyard drains, are likely to be more important sources of contamination rather than via normal agricultural scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.06.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16055169</identifier><identifier>CODEN: STENDL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Androgens ; Animals ; Animals, Domestic ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Continental surface waters ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Endocrine Disruptors ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Environmental Monitoring ; Estradiol - analysis ; Estradiol - urine ; Estrone - analysis ; Estrone - urine ; Exact sciences and technology ; Farm animal excretion ; Fishes ; Fresh Water ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Manure ; Natural water pollution ; Oestrogens ; Pollution ; Pollution, environment geology ; Slurry ; Soil and water pollution ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; Soil science ; United Kingdom ; Water Movements ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2006-06, Vol.362 (1), p.166-178</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-106c4788ee2913cfd34b299f6a4ebe16339ee5c8f607fe87016962554d1652f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-106c4788ee2913cfd34b299f6a4ebe16339ee5c8f607fe87016962554d1652f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.06.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17803561$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16055169$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthiessen, P.</creatorcontrib><title>The potential steroid hormone contribution of farm animals to freshwaters, the United Kingdom as a case study</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>The combined farm animal population is considerably larger than the human one in the United Kingdom, implying a possibly important contribution to the environmental load of steroid hormones entering water. To make comparisons on the amount of steroid hormones produced by the different livestock, information was gathered on the structure of the UK farm animal populations and the amount of hormones excreted by animals at each of their life stages. An individual normalised dairy cow excretes two orders of magnitude more, and a normalised pig excretes more than one order of magnitude more steroid oestrogens than a normalised human. In terms of excretion, the combined farm animal population (including sheep and poultry) probably generates around four times more oestrogens than the human population in the UK. The biggest contributor on the animal side is the relatively small dairy cow population. If steroid oestrogens behave like herbicides, in which a worst case loss to surface waters is around 1%, then it could be argued that farm animals are responsible for 15% of all the oestrogens in UK waters. When simulations were made with the MACRO pesticide leaching model, predicted concentrations for field drains failed to exceed 1 ng/L. The rapid biodegradation rates, and high sorption rates taken from the literature and used in the model suggested less than 0.001% of oestrogens would reach the field drains. This survey suggests that direct excretion of steroid hormones by animals into water courses, or discharges from farmyard drains, are likely to be more important sources of contamination rather than via normal agricultural scenarios.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Androgens</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Domestic</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Continental surface waters</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Endocrine Disruptors</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Estradiol - analysis</subject><subject>Estradiol - urine</subject><subject>Estrone - analysis</subject><subject>Estrone - urine</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Farm animal excretion</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Fresh Water</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Manure</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Oestrogens</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Slurry</subject><subject>Soil and water pollution</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtvEzEUhS0EakPpXwBv6KoZ7Hn4sawqWhCV2IS15djXxNGMHWxPUf89HiWiy9zN3Xzn3KtzEPpESUMJZV_2TTa-xALhuWkJGRrCGkL7N2hFBZdrSlr2Fq0I6cVaMskv0fuc96QOF_QCXVJGhoEyuULTZgf4sBgVr0ecC6ToLd7FNMUA2MRQkt_OxceAo8NOpwnr4Cc9Zlwidgny7q-uqnyLS7X6FXwBi3_48NvGimassdEZqvNsXz6gd64q4fq0r9Dm4evm_tv66efj9_u7p7XpZVvq-8z0XAiAVtLOONv121ZKx3QPW6Cs6yTAYIRjhDsQvCYiWTsMvaVsaF13hW6OtocU_8yQi5p8NjCOOkCcs6quUvChOw8S0UnRi7Mg7TmvoS6O_AiaFHNO4NQh1bTSi6JELdWpvfpfnVqqU4SpWl1VfjydmLcT2FfdqasKfD4BOhs9uqSD8fmV44J0A6OVuztyUBN-9pCWgxAMWJ_AFGWjP_vMP65ZvEk</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Johnson, A.C.</creator><creator>Williams, R.J.</creator><creator>Matthiessen, P.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>The potential steroid hormone contribution of farm animals to freshwaters, the United Kingdom as a case study</title><author>Johnson, A.C. ; Williams, R.J. ; Matthiessen, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-106c4788ee2913cfd34b299f6a4ebe16339ee5c8f607fe87016962554d1652f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Androgens</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Domestic</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Continental surface waters</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Endocrine Disruptors</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Estradiol - analysis</topic><topic>Estradiol - urine</topic><topic>Estrone - analysis</topic><topic>Estrone - urine</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Farm animal excretion</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Fresh Water</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Manure</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Oestrogens</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Slurry</topic><topic>Soil and water pollution</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthiessen, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, A.C.</au><au>Williams, R.J.</au><au>Matthiessen, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The potential steroid hormone contribution of farm animals to freshwaters, the United Kingdom as a case study</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>362</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>166-178</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><coden>STENDL</coden><abstract>The combined farm animal population is considerably larger than the human one in the United Kingdom, implying a possibly important contribution to the environmental load of steroid hormones entering water. To make comparisons on the amount of steroid hormones produced by the different livestock, information was gathered on the structure of the UK farm animal populations and the amount of hormones excreted by animals at each of their life stages. An individual normalised dairy cow excretes two orders of magnitude more, and a normalised pig excretes more than one order of magnitude more steroid oestrogens than a normalised human. In terms of excretion, the combined farm animal population (including sheep and poultry) probably generates around four times more oestrogens than the human population in the UK. The biggest contributor on the animal side is the relatively small dairy cow population. If steroid oestrogens behave like herbicides, in which a worst case loss to surface waters is around 1%, then it could be argued that farm animals are responsible for 15% of all the oestrogens in UK waters. When simulations were made with the MACRO pesticide leaching model, predicted concentrations for field drains failed to exceed 1 ng/L. The rapid biodegradation rates, and high sorption rates taken from the literature and used in the model suggested less than 0.001% of oestrogens would reach the field drains. This survey suggests that direct excretion of steroid hormones by animals into water courses, or discharges from farmyard drains, are likely to be more important sources of contamination rather than via normal agricultural scenarios.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>16055169</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.06.014</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-9697 |
ispartof | The Science of the total environment, 2006-06, Vol.362 (1), p.166-178 |
issn | 0048-9697 1879-1026 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29198753 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Agriculture Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Androgens Animals Animals, Domestic Applied sciences Biological and medical sciences Continental surface waters Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Endocrine Disruptors Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Environmental Monitoring Estradiol - analysis Estradiol - urine Estrone - analysis Estrone - urine Exact sciences and technology Farm animal excretion Fishes Fresh Water Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Manure Natural water pollution Oestrogens Pollution Pollution, environment geology Slurry Soil and water pollution Soil Pollutants - analysis Soil science United Kingdom Water Movements Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water treatment and pollution |
title | The potential steroid hormone contribution of farm animals to freshwaters, the United Kingdom as a case study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A49%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20potential%20steroid%20hormone%20contribution%20of%20farm%20animals%20to%20freshwaters,%20the%20United%20Kingdom%20as%20a%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Johnson,%20A.C.&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=362&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=166-178&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft.coden=STENDL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.06.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14771603%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14771603&rft_id=info:pmid/16055169&rft_els_id=S0048969705004523&rfr_iscdi=true |