Consensus on the content of an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork: An e‐Delphi study

Aims and Objectives To establish consensus on items to be included in an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork in a hospital setting. The objective was to identify the items through a methodological literature review. Refine the items and obtain consensus on the items. Background A definitio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical nursing 2024-05, Vol.33 (5), p.1786-1797
Hauptverfasser: Viljoen, Alida, Leech, Ronell, Heyns, Tanya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1797
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1786
container_title Journal of clinical nursing
container_volume 33
creator Viljoen, Alida
Leech, Ronell
Heyns, Tanya
description Aims and Objectives To establish consensus on items to be included in an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork in a hospital setting. The objective was to identify the items through a methodological literature review. Refine the items and obtain consensus on the items. Background A definition and related attributes of person‐centred teamwork have been agreed upon. An instrument is needed to measure and monitor person‐centred teamwork in hospital settings. Design Consensus, electronic Delphi design. Methods Items were identified through a methodological literature review. These items were included in three electronic Delphi rounds. Using purposive and snowball sampling, 16 international experts on person‐centred care, teamwork and/or instrument development were invited to participate in three electronic Delphi rounds via Google Forms. Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate their agreement on the relevance and clarity of each item. Items were included if consensus was 0.75. Content analysis was used to analyse written feedback from experts. Results The response rate was 56% (n = 9/16). Nine experts participated over an 8‐week period to reach consensus on the items to be included in an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork in hospital settings. The experts' responses and suggestions for rephrasing, removing and adding items were incorporated into each round. Conclusion A Delphi consensus exercise was completed, and experts reached agreement on 38 items to be included in an instrument that can be used to evaluate person‐centred teamwork in hospital settings. Relevance to clinical practice We engaged with nine international experts in the academic and clinical field of person‐centeredness, teamwork and/or instrument development. An online platform was used to allow the experts to give input into the study. The experts engaged from their own environment with full autonomy and anonymity. Person‐centred teamwork, aimed at improving practice is now measurable. Person‐centred teams improve outcomes of patients. Person‐centred teamwork was specifically developed to assist low compliance areas in hospitals.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jocn.17042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2919743557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2919743557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3522-5e2b51c056a1333e853bfe19402b4d4a9976761ffcd9386c1acdd2568d172353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOl42PoAE3IhQTXKatHU3jHdEN-5DJj3Fjm0yJi0yOx_BZ_RJ7DjqwoVnc-D8Hz-Hj5B9zk74MKczb90Jz1gq1siIg5KJyJhYJyNWKJFwprItsh3jjDEOQsAm2YJc5Gmaw4jYiXcRXewj9Y52T0itdx26jvqKGkdrF7vQt8tD52mLJvYB6RxD9O7j7d0OQcCSdmjaVx-ez-jYURyCc2zmTzWNXV8udslGZZqIe997hzxeXjxOrpO7h6ubyfgusSCFSCSKqeSWSWU4AGAuYVohL1ImpmmZmqLIVKZ4VdmygFxZbmxZCqnykmcCJOyQo1XtPPiXHmOn2zpabBrj0PdRi4IXWQpSZgN6-Aed-T644TkNTOQMFBR8oI5XlA0-xoCVnoe6NWGhOdNL83ppXn-ZH-CD78p-2mL5i_6oHgC-Al7rBhf_VOnbh8n9qvQToGOPUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3028036391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consensus on the content of an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork: An e‐Delphi study</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Viljoen, Alida ; Leech, Ronell ; Heyns, Tanya</creator><creatorcontrib>Viljoen, Alida ; Leech, Ronell ; Heyns, Tanya</creatorcontrib><description>Aims and Objectives To establish consensus on items to be included in an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork in a hospital setting. The objective was to identify the items through a methodological literature review. Refine the items and obtain consensus on the items. Background A definition and related attributes of person‐centred teamwork have been agreed upon. An instrument is needed to measure and monitor person‐centred teamwork in hospital settings. Design Consensus, electronic Delphi design. Methods Items were identified through a methodological literature review. These items were included in three electronic Delphi rounds. Using purposive and snowball sampling, 16 international experts on person‐centred care, teamwork and/or instrument development were invited to participate in three electronic Delphi rounds via Google Forms. Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate their agreement on the relevance and clarity of each item. Items were included if consensus was 0.75. Content analysis was used to analyse written feedback from experts. Results The response rate was 56% (n = 9/16). Nine experts participated over an 8‐week period to reach consensus on the items to be included in an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork in hospital settings. The experts' responses and suggestions for rephrasing, removing and adding items were incorporated into each round. Conclusion A Delphi consensus exercise was completed, and experts reached agreement on 38 items to be included in an instrument that can be used to evaluate person‐centred teamwork in hospital settings. Relevance to clinical practice We engaged with nine international experts in the academic and clinical field of person‐centeredness, teamwork and/or instrument development. An online platform was used to allow the experts to give input into the study. The experts engaged from their own environment with full autonomy and anonymity. Person‐centred teamwork, aimed at improving practice is now measurable. Person‐centred teams improve outcomes of patients. Person‐centred teamwork was specifically developed to assist low compliance areas in hospitals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-1067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38284483</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>consensus ; Delphi method ; electronic Delphi ; Inpatient care ; instrument development ; Literature reviews ; Nursing care ; Patient-centered care ; person‐centred teamwork ; Quality improvement ; Quality of care ; Teamwork</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical nursing, 2024-05, Vol.33 (5), p.1786-1797</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3522-5e2b51c056a1333e853bfe19402b4d4a9976761ffcd9386c1acdd2568d172353</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2225-3311 ; 0000-0002-5739-3672 ; 0000-0002-6088-2717</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjocn.17042$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjocn.17042$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38284483$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Viljoen, Alida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leech, Ronell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyns, Tanya</creatorcontrib><title>Consensus on the content of an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork: An e‐Delphi study</title><title>Journal of clinical nursing</title><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><description>Aims and Objectives To establish consensus on items to be included in an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork in a hospital setting. The objective was to identify the items through a methodological literature review. Refine the items and obtain consensus on the items. Background A definition and related attributes of person‐centred teamwork have been agreed upon. An instrument is needed to measure and monitor person‐centred teamwork in hospital settings. Design Consensus, electronic Delphi design. Methods Items were identified through a methodological literature review. These items were included in three electronic Delphi rounds. Using purposive and snowball sampling, 16 international experts on person‐centred care, teamwork and/or instrument development were invited to participate in three electronic Delphi rounds via Google Forms. Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate their agreement on the relevance and clarity of each item. Items were included if consensus was 0.75. Content analysis was used to analyse written feedback from experts. Results The response rate was 56% (n = 9/16). Nine experts participated over an 8‐week period to reach consensus on the items to be included in an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork in hospital settings. The experts' responses and suggestions for rephrasing, removing and adding items were incorporated into each round. Conclusion A Delphi consensus exercise was completed, and experts reached agreement on 38 items to be included in an instrument that can be used to evaluate person‐centred teamwork in hospital settings. Relevance to clinical practice We engaged with nine international experts in the academic and clinical field of person‐centeredness, teamwork and/or instrument development. An online platform was used to allow the experts to give input into the study. The experts engaged from their own environment with full autonomy and anonymity. Person‐centred teamwork, aimed at improving practice is now measurable. Person‐centred teams improve outcomes of patients. Person‐centred teamwork was specifically developed to assist low compliance areas in hospitals.</description><subject>consensus</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>electronic Delphi</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>instrument development</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Patient-centered care</subject><subject>person‐centred teamwork</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><issn>0962-1067</issn><issn>1365-2702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOl42PoAE3IhQTXKatHU3jHdEN-5DJj3Fjm0yJi0yOx_BZ_RJ7DjqwoVnc-D8Hz-Hj5B9zk74MKczb90Jz1gq1siIg5KJyJhYJyNWKJFwprItsh3jjDEOQsAm2YJc5Gmaw4jYiXcRXewj9Y52T0itdx26jvqKGkdrF7vQt8tD52mLJvYB6RxD9O7j7d0OQcCSdmjaVx-ez-jYURyCc2zmTzWNXV8udslGZZqIe997hzxeXjxOrpO7h6ubyfgusSCFSCSKqeSWSWU4AGAuYVohL1ImpmmZmqLIVKZ4VdmygFxZbmxZCqnykmcCJOyQo1XtPPiXHmOn2zpabBrj0PdRi4IXWQpSZgN6-Aed-T644TkNTOQMFBR8oI5XlA0-xoCVnoe6NWGhOdNL83ppXn-ZH-CD78p-2mL5i_6oHgC-Al7rBhf_VOnbh8n9qvQToGOPUQ</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Viljoen, Alida</creator><creator>Leech, Ronell</creator><creator>Heyns, Tanya</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2225-3311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-3672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6088-2717</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Consensus on the content of an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork: An e‐Delphi study</title><author>Viljoen, Alida ; Leech, Ronell ; Heyns, Tanya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3522-5e2b51c056a1333e853bfe19402b4d4a9976761ffcd9386c1acdd2568d172353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>consensus</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>electronic Delphi</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>instrument development</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Patient-centered care</topic><topic>person‐centred teamwork</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Viljoen, Alida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leech, Ronell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyns, Tanya</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Viljoen, Alida</au><au>Leech, Ronell</au><au>Heyns, Tanya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consensus on the content of an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork: An e‐Delphi study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1786</spage><epage>1797</epage><pages>1786-1797</pages><issn>0962-1067</issn><eissn>1365-2702</eissn><abstract>Aims and Objectives To establish consensus on items to be included in an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork in a hospital setting. The objective was to identify the items through a methodological literature review. Refine the items and obtain consensus on the items. Background A definition and related attributes of person‐centred teamwork have been agreed upon. An instrument is needed to measure and monitor person‐centred teamwork in hospital settings. Design Consensus, electronic Delphi design. Methods Items were identified through a methodological literature review. These items were included in three electronic Delphi rounds. Using purposive and snowball sampling, 16 international experts on person‐centred care, teamwork and/or instrument development were invited to participate in three electronic Delphi rounds via Google Forms. Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate their agreement on the relevance and clarity of each item. Items were included if consensus was 0.75. Content analysis was used to analyse written feedback from experts. Results The response rate was 56% (n = 9/16). Nine experts participated over an 8‐week period to reach consensus on the items to be included in an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork in hospital settings. The experts' responses and suggestions for rephrasing, removing and adding items were incorporated into each round. Conclusion A Delphi consensus exercise was completed, and experts reached agreement on 38 items to be included in an instrument that can be used to evaluate person‐centred teamwork in hospital settings. Relevance to clinical practice We engaged with nine international experts in the academic and clinical field of person‐centeredness, teamwork and/or instrument development. An online platform was used to allow the experts to give input into the study. The experts engaged from their own environment with full autonomy and anonymity. Person‐centred teamwork, aimed at improving practice is now measurable. Person‐centred teams improve outcomes of patients. Person‐centred teamwork was specifically developed to assist low compliance areas in hospitals.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38284483</pmid><doi>10.1111/jocn.17042</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2225-3311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-3672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6088-2717</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-1067
ispartof Journal of clinical nursing, 2024-05, Vol.33 (5), p.1786-1797
issn 0962-1067
1365-2702
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2919743557
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects consensus
Delphi method
electronic Delphi
Inpatient care
instrument development
Literature reviews
Nursing care
Patient-centered care
person‐centred teamwork
Quality improvement
Quality of care
Teamwork
title Consensus on the content of an instrument to measure person‐centred teamwork: An e‐Delphi study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A00%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consensus%20on%20the%20content%20of%20an%20instrument%20to%20measure%20person%E2%80%90centred%20teamwork:%20An%20e%E2%80%90Delphi%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20nursing&rft.au=Viljoen,%20Alida&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1786&rft.epage=1797&rft.pages=1786-1797&rft.issn=0962-1067&rft.eissn=1365-2702&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jocn.17042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919743557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3028036391&rft_id=info:pmid/38284483&rfr_iscdi=true