Animal Models in Regulatory Breakpoint Determination: Review of New Drug Applications of Approved Antibiotics from 2014-2022
We sought to better understand the utility and role of animal models of infection for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antibiotics for the indications of community-, hospital-acquired-, and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (CABP, HABP, VABP), complicated urinary tract infection (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personalized medicine 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.111 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 111 |
container_title | Journal of personalized medicine |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Selig, Daniel Caridha, Diana Evans, Martin Kress, Adrian Lanteri, Charlotte Ressner, Roseanne DeLuca, Jesse |
description | We sought to better understand the utility and role of animal models of infection for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antibiotics for the indications of community-, hospital-acquired-, and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (CABP, HABP, VABP), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), and acute bacterial skin and structural infections (ABSSSIs). We reviewed relevant documents from new drug applications (NDA) of FDA-approved antibiotics from 2014-2019 for the above indications. Murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the choice of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) target in 11/12 NDAs reviewed. PKPD targets associated with at least a 1-log bacterial decrease were commonly considered ideal (10/12 NDAs) to support breakpoints. Plasma PK, as opposed to organ specific PK, was generally considered most reliable for PKPD correlation. Breakpoint determination was multi-disciplinary, accounting at minimum for epidemiologic cutoffs, non-clinical PKPD, clinical exposure-response and clinical efficacy. Non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with probability of target attainment (PTA) analyses generated breakpoints that were consistent with epidemiologic cutoffs and clinically derived breakpoints. In 6/12 NDAs, there was limited data to support clinically derived breakpoints, and hence the non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with PTA analyses played a heightened role in the final breakpoint determination. Sponsor and FDA breakpoint decisions were in general agreement. Disagreement may have arisen from differences in the definition of the optimal PKPD index or the ability to extrapolate protein binding from animals to humans. Overall, murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the reviewed NDAs by providing evidence of pre-clinical efficacy and PKPD target determination, and played, in combination with PTA analysis, a significant role in breakpoint determination for labeling purposes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jpm14010111 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2919743182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A780877870</galeid><sourcerecordid>A780877870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2c3183aa192f96ac1fa9c27a6f947ed83e43276aef0aec9667fe9cf81d8f2fdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc9vFSEQx4nR2Kb25N2QeDExW2HYLuBtbf2VVE2Mnjc8dnjhuQsrsDVN_OPl2arVCIcZmM8MX_Il5CFnJ0Jo9my3zLxlnHHO75BDYPK0aVvo7t7KD8hxzjtWlzoF6Nh9ciAUyA6EOCTf--BnM9F3ccQpUx_oR9yukykxXdEXCc2XJfpQ6DkWTLMPpvgYnlfo0uM3Gh19X8N5Wre0X5bJ25_1vC_Uc4qXONI-FL_xsXibqUtxpsB42wADeEDuOTNlPL6JR-Tzq5efzt40Fx9evz3rLxorpC4NWMGVMIZrcLozljujLUjTOd1KHJXAVtT_GHTMoNVdJx1q6xQflQM3bsQReXI9tyr6umIuw-yzxWkyAeOaB9Bcy7Y-AhV9_A-6i2sKVd2eUlKyFtQfamsmHHxwsSRj90OHXipWMSVZpU7-Q9U94uxtDOh8vf-r4el1g00x54RuWFJ1J10NnA17u4dbdlf60Y3UdTPj-Jv9Za74AfH-oxY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918770428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Animal Models in Regulatory Breakpoint Determination: Review of New Drug Applications of Approved Antibiotics from 2014-2022</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Selig, Daniel ; Caridha, Diana ; Evans, Martin ; Kress, Adrian ; Lanteri, Charlotte ; Ressner, Roseanne ; DeLuca, Jesse</creator><creatorcontrib>Selig, Daniel ; Caridha, Diana ; Evans, Martin ; Kress, Adrian ; Lanteri, Charlotte ; Ressner, Roseanne ; DeLuca, Jesse</creatorcontrib><description>We sought to better understand the utility and role of animal models of infection for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antibiotics for the indications of community-, hospital-acquired-, and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (CABP, HABP, VABP), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), and acute bacterial skin and structural infections (ABSSSIs). We reviewed relevant documents from new drug applications (NDA) of FDA-approved antibiotics from 2014-2019 for the above indications. Murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the choice of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) target in 11/12 NDAs reviewed. PKPD targets associated with at least a 1-log bacterial decrease were commonly considered ideal (10/12 NDAs) to support breakpoints. Plasma PK, as opposed to organ specific PK, was generally considered most reliable for PKPD correlation. Breakpoint determination was multi-disciplinary, accounting at minimum for epidemiologic cutoffs, non-clinical PKPD, clinical exposure-response and clinical efficacy. Non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with probability of target attainment (PTA) analyses generated breakpoints that were consistent with epidemiologic cutoffs and clinically derived breakpoints. In 6/12 NDAs, there was limited data to support clinically derived breakpoints, and hence the non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with PTA analyses played a heightened role in the final breakpoint determination. Sponsor and FDA breakpoint decisions were in general agreement. Disagreement may have arisen from differences in the definition of the optimal PKPD index or the ability to extrapolate protein binding from animals to humans. Overall, murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the reviewed NDAs by providing evidence of pre-clinical efficacy and PKPD target determination, and played, in combination with PTA analysis, a significant role in breakpoint determination for labeling purposes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-4426</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-4426</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010111</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38276233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Animal models ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; Bacterial pneumonia ; Breakpoints ; Dalbavancin ; Decision making ; Dose-response effects ; Drug approval ; Drug dosages ; Epidemiology ; FDA approval ; Health aspects ; Infections ; Intra-abdominal infection ; Neutropenia ; Pathogens ; Pharmacodynamics ; Pharmacokinetics ; Pharmacology ; Pneumonia ; Protein binding ; Registration ; Reviews ; Urinary tract ; Urinary tract infections ; Virulence</subject><ispartof>Journal of personalized medicine, 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.111</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2c3183aa192f96ac1fa9c27a6f947ed83e43276aef0aec9667fe9cf81d8f2fdb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6107-5984</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38276233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Selig, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caridha, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kress, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanteri, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ressner, Roseanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLuca, Jesse</creatorcontrib><title>Animal Models in Regulatory Breakpoint Determination: Review of New Drug Applications of Approved Antibiotics from 2014-2022</title><title>Journal of personalized medicine</title><addtitle>J Pers Med</addtitle><description>We sought to better understand the utility and role of animal models of infection for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antibiotics for the indications of community-, hospital-acquired-, and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (CABP, HABP, VABP), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), and acute bacterial skin and structural infections (ABSSSIs). We reviewed relevant documents from new drug applications (NDA) of FDA-approved antibiotics from 2014-2019 for the above indications. Murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the choice of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) target in 11/12 NDAs reviewed. PKPD targets associated with at least a 1-log bacterial decrease were commonly considered ideal (10/12 NDAs) to support breakpoints. Plasma PK, as opposed to organ specific PK, was generally considered most reliable for PKPD correlation. Breakpoint determination was multi-disciplinary, accounting at minimum for epidemiologic cutoffs, non-clinical PKPD, clinical exposure-response and clinical efficacy. Non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with probability of target attainment (PTA) analyses generated breakpoints that were consistent with epidemiologic cutoffs and clinically derived breakpoints. In 6/12 NDAs, there was limited data to support clinically derived breakpoints, and hence the non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with PTA analyses played a heightened role in the final breakpoint determination. Sponsor and FDA breakpoint decisions were in general agreement. Disagreement may have arisen from differences in the definition of the optimal PKPD index or the ability to extrapolate protein binding from animals to humans. Overall, murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the reviewed NDAs by providing evidence of pre-clinical efficacy and PKPD target determination, and played, in combination with PTA analysis, a significant role in breakpoint determination for labeling purposes.</description><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial pneumonia</subject><subject>Breakpoints</subject><subject>Dalbavancin</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dose-response effects</subject><subject>Drug approval</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intra-abdominal infection</subject><subject>Neutropenia</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Pharmacodynamics</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Protein binding</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Urinary tract</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Virulence</subject><issn>2075-4426</issn><issn>2075-4426</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc9vFSEQx4nR2Kb25N2QeDExW2HYLuBtbf2VVE2Mnjc8dnjhuQsrsDVN_OPl2arVCIcZmM8MX_Il5CFnJ0Jo9my3zLxlnHHO75BDYPK0aVvo7t7KD8hxzjtWlzoF6Nh9ciAUyA6EOCTf--BnM9F3ccQpUx_oR9yukykxXdEXCc2XJfpQ6DkWTLMPpvgYnlfo0uM3Gh19X8N5Wre0X5bJ25_1vC_Uc4qXONI-FL_xsXibqUtxpsB42wADeEDuOTNlPL6JR-Tzq5efzt40Fx9evz3rLxorpC4NWMGVMIZrcLozljujLUjTOd1KHJXAVtT_GHTMoNVdJx1q6xQflQM3bsQReXI9tyr6umIuw-yzxWkyAeOaB9Bcy7Y-AhV9_A-6i2sKVd2eUlKyFtQfamsmHHxwsSRj90OHXipWMSVZpU7-Q9U94uxtDOh8vf-r4el1g00x54RuWFJ1J10NnA17u4dbdlf60Y3UdTPj-Jv9Za74AfH-oxY</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Selig, Daniel</creator><creator>Caridha, Diana</creator><creator>Evans, Martin</creator><creator>Kress, Adrian</creator><creator>Lanteri, Charlotte</creator><creator>Ressner, Roseanne</creator><creator>DeLuca, Jesse</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6107-5984</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Animal Models in Regulatory Breakpoint Determination: Review of New Drug Applications of Approved Antibiotics from 2014-2022</title><author>Selig, Daniel ; Caridha, Diana ; Evans, Martin ; Kress, Adrian ; Lanteri, Charlotte ; Ressner, Roseanne ; DeLuca, Jesse</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2c3183aa192f96ac1fa9c27a6f947ed83e43276aef0aec9667fe9cf81d8f2fdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial pneumonia</topic><topic>Breakpoints</topic><topic>Dalbavancin</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dose-response effects</topic><topic>Drug approval</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intra-abdominal infection</topic><topic>Neutropenia</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Pharmacodynamics</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Protein binding</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Urinary tract</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Virulence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Selig, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caridha, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kress, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanteri, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ressner, Roseanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLuca, Jesse</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personalized medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Selig, Daniel</au><au>Caridha, Diana</au><au>Evans, Martin</au><au>Kress, Adrian</au><au>Lanteri, Charlotte</au><au>Ressner, Roseanne</au><au>DeLuca, Jesse</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Animal Models in Regulatory Breakpoint Determination: Review of New Drug Applications of Approved Antibiotics from 2014-2022</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personalized medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Med</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><pages>111-</pages><issn>2075-4426</issn><eissn>2075-4426</eissn><abstract>We sought to better understand the utility and role of animal models of infection for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antibiotics for the indications of community-, hospital-acquired-, and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (CABP, HABP, VABP), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), and acute bacterial skin and structural infections (ABSSSIs). We reviewed relevant documents from new drug applications (NDA) of FDA-approved antibiotics from 2014-2019 for the above indications. Murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the choice of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) target in 11/12 NDAs reviewed. PKPD targets associated with at least a 1-log bacterial decrease were commonly considered ideal (10/12 NDAs) to support breakpoints. Plasma PK, as opposed to organ specific PK, was generally considered most reliable for PKPD correlation. Breakpoint determination was multi-disciplinary, accounting at minimum for epidemiologic cutoffs, non-clinical PKPD, clinical exposure-response and clinical efficacy. Non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with probability of target attainment (PTA) analyses generated breakpoints that were consistent with epidemiologic cutoffs and clinically derived breakpoints. In 6/12 NDAs, there was limited data to support clinically derived breakpoints, and hence the non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with PTA analyses played a heightened role in the final breakpoint determination. Sponsor and FDA breakpoint decisions were in general agreement. Disagreement may have arisen from differences in the definition of the optimal PKPD index or the ability to extrapolate protein binding from animals to humans. Overall, murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the reviewed NDAs by providing evidence of pre-clinical efficacy and PKPD target determination, and played, in combination with PTA analysis, a significant role in breakpoint determination for labeling purposes.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>38276233</pmid><doi>10.3390/jpm14010111</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6107-5984</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2075-4426 |
ispartof | Journal of personalized medicine, 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.111 |
issn | 2075-4426 2075-4426 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2919743182 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animal models Antibiotics Bacteria Bacterial pneumonia Breakpoints Dalbavancin Decision making Dose-response effects Drug approval Drug dosages Epidemiology FDA approval Health aspects Infections Intra-abdominal infection Neutropenia Pathogens Pharmacodynamics Pharmacokinetics Pharmacology Pneumonia Protein binding Registration Reviews Urinary tract Urinary tract infections Virulence |
title | Animal Models in Regulatory Breakpoint Determination: Review of New Drug Applications of Approved Antibiotics from 2014-2022 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A00%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Animal%20Models%20in%20Regulatory%20Breakpoint%20Determination:%20Review%20of%20New%20Drug%20Applications%20of%20Approved%20Antibiotics%20from%202014-2022&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personalized%20medicine&rft.au=Selig,%20Daniel&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.pages=111-&rft.issn=2075-4426&rft.eissn=2075-4426&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jpm14010111&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA780877870%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918770428&rft_id=info:pmid/38276233&rft_galeid=A780877870&rfr_iscdi=true |