Animal Models in Regulatory Breakpoint Determination: Review of New Drug Applications of Approved Antibiotics from 2014-2022

We sought to better understand the utility and role of animal models of infection for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antibiotics for the indications of community-, hospital-acquired-, and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (CABP, HABP, VABP), complicated urinary tract infection (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personalized medicine 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.111
Hauptverfasser: Selig, Daniel, Caridha, Diana, Evans, Martin, Kress, Adrian, Lanteri, Charlotte, Ressner, Roseanne, DeLuca, Jesse
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 111
container_title Journal of personalized medicine
container_volume 14
creator Selig, Daniel
Caridha, Diana
Evans, Martin
Kress, Adrian
Lanteri, Charlotte
Ressner, Roseanne
DeLuca, Jesse
description We sought to better understand the utility and role of animal models of infection for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antibiotics for the indications of community-, hospital-acquired-, and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (CABP, HABP, VABP), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), and acute bacterial skin and structural infections (ABSSSIs). We reviewed relevant documents from new drug applications (NDA) of FDA-approved antibiotics from 2014-2019 for the above indications. Murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the choice of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) target in 11/12 NDAs reviewed. PKPD targets associated with at least a 1-log bacterial decrease were commonly considered ideal (10/12 NDAs) to support breakpoints. Plasma PK, as opposed to organ specific PK, was generally considered most reliable for PKPD correlation. Breakpoint determination was multi-disciplinary, accounting at minimum for epidemiologic cutoffs, non-clinical PKPD, clinical exposure-response and clinical efficacy. Non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with probability of target attainment (PTA) analyses generated breakpoints that were consistent with epidemiologic cutoffs and clinically derived breakpoints. In 6/12 NDAs, there was limited data to support clinically derived breakpoints, and hence the non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with PTA analyses played a heightened role in the final breakpoint determination. Sponsor and FDA breakpoint decisions were in general agreement. Disagreement may have arisen from differences in the definition of the optimal PKPD index or the ability to extrapolate protein binding from animals to humans. Overall, murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the reviewed NDAs by providing evidence of pre-clinical efficacy and PKPD target determination, and played, in combination with PTA analysis, a significant role in breakpoint determination for labeling purposes.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jpm14010111
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2919743182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A780877870</galeid><sourcerecordid>A780877870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2c3183aa192f96ac1fa9c27a6f947ed83e43276aef0aec9667fe9cf81d8f2fdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc9vFSEQx4nR2Kb25N2QeDExW2HYLuBtbf2VVE2Mnjc8dnjhuQsrsDVN_OPl2arVCIcZmM8MX_Il5CFnJ0Jo9my3zLxlnHHO75BDYPK0aVvo7t7KD8hxzjtWlzoF6Nh9ciAUyA6EOCTf--BnM9F3ccQpUx_oR9yukykxXdEXCc2XJfpQ6DkWTLMPpvgYnlfo0uM3Gh19X8N5Wre0X5bJ25_1vC_Uc4qXONI-FL_xsXibqUtxpsB42wADeEDuOTNlPL6JR-Tzq5efzt40Fx9evz3rLxorpC4NWMGVMIZrcLozljujLUjTOd1KHJXAVtT_GHTMoNVdJx1q6xQflQM3bsQReXI9tyr6umIuw-yzxWkyAeOaB9Bcy7Y-AhV9_A-6i2sKVd2eUlKyFtQfamsmHHxwsSRj90OHXipWMSVZpU7-Q9U94uxtDOh8vf-r4el1g00x54RuWFJ1J10NnA17u4dbdlf60Y3UdTPj-Jv9Za74AfH-oxY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918770428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Animal Models in Regulatory Breakpoint Determination: Review of New Drug Applications of Approved Antibiotics from 2014-2022</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Selig, Daniel ; Caridha, Diana ; Evans, Martin ; Kress, Adrian ; Lanteri, Charlotte ; Ressner, Roseanne ; DeLuca, Jesse</creator><creatorcontrib>Selig, Daniel ; Caridha, Diana ; Evans, Martin ; Kress, Adrian ; Lanteri, Charlotte ; Ressner, Roseanne ; DeLuca, Jesse</creatorcontrib><description>We sought to better understand the utility and role of animal models of infection for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antibiotics for the indications of community-, hospital-acquired-, and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (CABP, HABP, VABP), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), and acute bacterial skin and structural infections (ABSSSIs). We reviewed relevant documents from new drug applications (NDA) of FDA-approved antibiotics from 2014-2019 for the above indications. Murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the choice of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) target in 11/12 NDAs reviewed. PKPD targets associated with at least a 1-log bacterial decrease were commonly considered ideal (10/12 NDAs) to support breakpoints. Plasma PK, as opposed to organ specific PK, was generally considered most reliable for PKPD correlation. Breakpoint determination was multi-disciplinary, accounting at minimum for epidemiologic cutoffs, non-clinical PKPD, clinical exposure-response and clinical efficacy. Non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with probability of target attainment (PTA) analyses generated breakpoints that were consistent with epidemiologic cutoffs and clinically derived breakpoints. In 6/12 NDAs, there was limited data to support clinically derived breakpoints, and hence the non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with PTA analyses played a heightened role in the final breakpoint determination. Sponsor and FDA breakpoint decisions were in general agreement. Disagreement may have arisen from differences in the definition of the optimal PKPD index or the ability to extrapolate protein binding from animals to humans. Overall, murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the reviewed NDAs by providing evidence of pre-clinical efficacy and PKPD target determination, and played, in combination with PTA analysis, a significant role in breakpoint determination for labeling purposes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-4426</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-4426</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010111</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38276233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Animal models ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; Bacterial pneumonia ; Breakpoints ; Dalbavancin ; Decision making ; Dose-response effects ; Drug approval ; Drug dosages ; Epidemiology ; FDA approval ; Health aspects ; Infections ; Intra-abdominal infection ; Neutropenia ; Pathogens ; Pharmacodynamics ; Pharmacokinetics ; Pharmacology ; Pneumonia ; Protein binding ; Registration ; Reviews ; Urinary tract ; Urinary tract infections ; Virulence</subject><ispartof>Journal of personalized medicine, 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.111</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2c3183aa192f96ac1fa9c27a6f947ed83e43276aef0aec9667fe9cf81d8f2fdb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6107-5984</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38276233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Selig, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caridha, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kress, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanteri, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ressner, Roseanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLuca, Jesse</creatorcontrib><title>Animal Models in Regulatory Breakpoint Determination: Review of New Drug Applications of Approved Antibiotics from 2014-2022</title><title>Journal of personalized medicine</title><addtitle>J Pers Med</addtitle><description>We sought to better understand the utility and role of animal models of infection for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antibiotics for the indications of community-, hospital-acquired-, and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (CABP, HABP, VABP), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), and acute bacterial skin and structural infections (ABSSSIs). We reviewed relevant documents from new drug applications (NDA) of FDA-approved antibiotics from 2014-2019 for the above indications. Murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the choice of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) target in 11/12 NDAs reviewed. PKPD targets associated with at least a 1-log bacterial decrease were commonly considered ideal (10/12 NDAs) to support breakpoints. Plasma PK, as opposed to organ specific PK, was generally considered most reliable for PKPD correlation. Breakpoint determination was multi-disciplinary, accounting at minimum for epidemiologic cutoffs, non-clinical PKPD, clinical exposure-response and clinical efficacy. Non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with probability of target attainment (PTA) analyses generated breakpoints that were consistent with epidemiologic cutoffs and clinically derived breakpoints. In 6/12 NDAs, there was limited data to support clinically derived breakpoints, and hence the non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with PTA analyses played a heightened role in the final breakpoint determination. Sponsor and FDA breakpoint decisions were in general agreement. Disagreement may have arisen from differences in the definition of the optimal PKPD index or the ability to extrapolate protein binding from animals to humans. Overall, murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the reviewed NDAs by providing evidence of pre-clinical efficacy and PKPD target determination, and played, in combination with PTA analysis, a significant role in breakpoint determination for labeling purposes.</description><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial pneumonia</subject><subject>Breakpoints</subject><subject>Dalbavancin</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dose-response effects</subject><subject>Drug approval</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intra-abdominal infection</subject><subject>Neutropenia</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Pharmacodynamics</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Protein binding</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Urinary tract</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Virulence</subject><issn>2075-4426</issn><issn>2075-4426</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc9vFSEQx4nR2Kb25N2QeDExW2HYLuBtbf2VVE2Mnjc8dnjhuQsrsDVN_OPl2arVCIcZmM8MX_Il5CFnJ0Jo9my3zLxlnHHO75BDYPK0aVvo7t7KD8hxzjtWlzoF6Nh9ciAUyA6EOCTf--BnM9F3ccQpUx_oR9yukykxXdEXCc2XJfpQ6DkWTLMPpvgYnlfo0uM3Gh19X8N5Wre0X5bJ25_1vC_Uc4qXONI-FL_xsXibqUtxpsB42wADeEDuOTNlPL6JR-Tzq5efzt40Fx9evz3rLxorpC4NWMGVMIZrcLozljujLUjTOd1KHJXAVtT_GHTMoNVdJx1q6xQflQM3bsQReXI9tyr6umIuw-yzxWkyAeOaB9Bcy7Y-AhV9_A-6i2sKVd2eUlKyFtQfamsmHHxwsSRj90OHXipWMSVZpU7-Q9U94uxtDOh8vf-r4el1g00x54RuWFJ1J10NnA17u4dbdlf60Y3UdTPj-Jv9Za74AfH-oxY</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Selig, Daniel</creator><creator>Caridha, Diana</creator><creator>Evans, Martin</creator><creator>Kress, Adrian</creator><creator>Lanteri, Charlotte</creator><creator>Ressner, Roseanne</creator><creator>DeLuca, Jesse</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6107-5984</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Animal Models in Regulatory Breakpoint Determination: Review of New Drug Applications of Approved Antibiotics from 2014-2022</title><author>Selig, Daniel ; Caridha, Diana ; Evans, Martin ; Kress, Adrian ; Lanteri, Charlotte ; Ressner, Roseanne ; DeLuca, Jesse</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2c3183aa192f96ac1fa9c27a6f947ed83e43276aef0aec9667fe9cf81d8f2fdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial pneumonia</topic><topic>Breakpoints</topic><topic>Dalbavancin</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dose-response effects</topic><topic>Drug approval</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intra-abdominal infection</topic><topic>Neutropenia</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Pharmacodynamics</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Protein binding</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Urinary tract</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Virulence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Selig, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caridha, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kress, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanteri, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ressner, Roseanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLuca, Jesse</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personalized medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Selig, Daniel</au><au>Caridha, Diana</au><au>Evans, Martin</au><au>Kress, Adrian</au><au>Lanteri, Charlotte</au><au>Ressner, Roseanne</au><au>DeLuca, Jesse</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Animal Models in Regulatory Breakpoint Determination: Review of New Drug Applications of Approved Antibiotics from 2014-2022</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personalized medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Med</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><pages>111-</pages><issn>2075-4426</issn><eissn>2075-4426</eissn><abstract>We sought to better understand the utility and role of animal models of infection for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antibiotics for the indications of community-, hospital-acquired-, and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (CABP, HABP, VABP), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI), complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), and acute bacterial skin and structural infections (ABSSSIs). We reviewed relevant documents from new drug applications (NDA) of FDA-approved antibiotics from 2014-2019 for the above indications. Murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the choice of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) target in 11/12 NDAs reviewed. PKPD targets associated with at least a 1-log bacterial decrease were commonly considered ideal (10/12 NDAs) to support breakpoints. Plasma PK, as opposed to organ specific PK, was generally considered most reliable for PKPD correlation. Breakpoint determination was multi-disciplinary, accounting at minimum for epidemiologic cutoffs, non-clinical PKPD, clinical exposure-response and clinical efficacy. Non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with probability of target attainment (PTA) analyses generated breakpoints that were consistent with epidemiologic cutoffs and clinically derived breakpoints. In 6/12 NDAs, there was limited data to support clinically derived breakpoints, and hence the non-clinical PKPD targets in combination with PTA analyses played a heightened role in the final breakpoint determination. Sponsor and FDA breakpoint decisions were in general agreement. Disagreement may have arisen from differences in the definition of the optimal PKPD index or the ability to extrapolate protein binding from animals to humans. Overall, murine neutropenic thigh infection models supported the reviewed NDAs by providing evidence of pre-clinical efficacy and PKPD target determination, and played, in combination with PTA analysis, a significant role in breakpoint determination for labeling purposes.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>38276233</pmid><doi>10.3390/jpm14010111</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6107-5984</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2075-4426
ispartof Journal of personalized medicine, 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.111
issn 2075-4426
2075-4426
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2919743182
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central
subjects Animal models
Antibiotics
Bacteria
Bacterial pneumonia
Breakpoints
Dalbavancin
Decision making
Dose-response effects
Drug approval
Drug dosages
Epidemiology
FDA approval
Health aspects
Infections
Intra-abdominal infection
Neutropenia
Pathogens
Pharmacodynamics
Pharmacokinetics
Pharmacology
Pneumonia
Protein binding
Registration
Reviews
Urinary tract
Urinary tract infections
Virulence
title Animal Models in Regulatory Breakpoint Determination: Review of New Drug Applications of Approved Antibiotics from 2014-2022
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A00%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Animal%20Models%20in%20Regulatory%20Breakpoint%20Determination:%20Review%20of%20New%20Drug%20Applications%20of%20Approved%20Antibiotics%20from%202014-2022&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personalized%20medicine&rft.au=Selig,%20Daniel&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.pages=111-&rft.issn=2075-4426&rft.eissn=2075-4426&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jpm14010111&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA780877870%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918770428&rft_id=info:pmid/38276233&rft_galeid=A780877870&rfr_iscdi=true