Feasibility and acceptability of study methods and psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis

Objective This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer and the study methods used to evaluate the interventions in question. Methods Articles were identified via MEDLINE,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2024-01, Vol.33 (1), p.e6278-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Brunet, Jennifer, Price, Jenson, Baillot, Aurélie, Dann, Erica, Vani, Madison F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page e6278
container_title Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)
container_volume 33
creator Brunet, Jennifer
Price, Jenson
Baillot, Aurélie
Dann, Erica
Vani, Madison F.
description Objective This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer and the study methods used to evaluate the interventions in question. Methods Articles were identified via MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsychINFO, and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were: (1) peer‐reviewed publication in English from 2000 onward with accessible full‐text, (2) reported data on the feasibility and/or acceptability of psychosocial interventions and/or study methods, (3) included at least one measure of body image or reported a body‐related theme, and (4) sample comprised women diagnosed with breast cancer. All study designs were eligible. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Results Sixty‐two articles were included. Participants and comparator groups varied as did interventions. Feasibility and acceptability of the interventions and study methods were inconsistently operationalized and reported across studies. Evidence of feasibility and acceptability was heterogeneous within and across studies, though mostly positive. Conclusion Published psychosocial interventions for body image and study methods are generally feasible and acceptable. Findings should be used to advance the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions designed to improve outcomes (body image or otherwise) for women diagnosed with breast cancer. Systematic review registration This review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; ID: CRD42021269062, 11 September 2021).
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pon.6278
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2919742874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2919205353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3448-9c43b0335d57d2af970276ac30d229567ec69c6fe758eabc5376755f878d34fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhiMEoqUg8QTIEhcuKY4dxzG3qmoBqaIc4Bw59mTXVWIHj7OrvBZPiHe7gITEaUbjT9-M_BfF64peVpSy93Pwlw2T7ZPivKJKlVVTVU8PvZClYrU6K14gPlCaYdU8L854y1rGuDgvft6CRte70aWVaG-JNgbmpE-TMBBMi13JBGkbLB6RGVezDRiM0yNxPkHcgU8ueCRDiKQPmXeT3gDRU_Absg8TeGKd3viAYMnepS3pY16ciNHeQPxArgiumGDSyRkSYedgf9zldYx5toP87tMW0OHL4tmgR4RXp3pRfL-9-Xb9qby7__j5-uquNLyu21KZmveUc2GFtEwPSlImG204tYwp0UgwjTLNAFK0oHsjuGykEEMrW8vrwfCL4t2jd47hxwKYusmhgXHUHsKCHVOVkjVrZZ3Rt_-gD2GJPl93pBgVXPC_QhMDYoShm2P-p7h2Fe0OOXY5x-6QY0bfnIRLP4H9A_4OLgPlI7B3I6z_FXVf778chb8AMoyqyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919205353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility and acceptability of study methods and psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Brunet, Jennifer ; Price, Jenson ; Baillot, Aurélie ; Dann, Erica ; Vani, Madison F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brunet, Jennifer ; Price, Jenson ; Baillot, Aurélie ; Dann, Erica ; Vani, Madison F.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer and the study methods used to evaluate the interventions in question. Methods Articles were identified via MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsychINFO, and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were: (1) peer‐reviewed publication in English from 2000 onward with accessible full‐text, (2) reported data on the feasibility and/or acceptability of psychosocial interventions and/or study methods, (3) included at least one measure of body image or reported a body‐related theme, and (4) sample comprised women diagnosed with breast cancer. All study designs were eligible. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Results Sixty‐two articles were included. Participants and comparator groups varied as did interventions. Feasibility and acceptability of the interventions and study methods were inconsistently operationalized and reported across studies. Evidence of feasibility and acceptability was heterogeneous within and across studies, though mostly positive. Conclusion Published psychosocial interventions for body image and study methods are generally feasible and acceptable. Findings should be used to advance the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions designed to improve outcomes (body image or otherwise) for women diagnosed with breast cancer. Systematic review registration This review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; ID: CRD42021269062, 11 September 2021).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pon.6278</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38282235</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Body image ; Breast cancer ; breast tumors ; Extraction ; Feasibility ; mixed methods ; oncology ; Psychosocial factors ; Psychosocial intervention ; qualitative research ; Quality assessment ; quantitative research ; Self image ; Systematic review ; Women</subject><ispartof>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2024-01, Vol.33 (1), p.e6278-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. Psycho‐Oncology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Psycho-Oncology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3448-9c43b0335d57d2af970276ac30d229567ec69c6fe758eabc5376755f878d34fc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3242-5444 ; 0000-0003-0630-4155 ; 0000-0001-8715-3429 ; 0000-0003-4874-0481</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpon.6278$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpon.6278$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,30978,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38282235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brunet, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Jenson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baillot, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dann, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vani, Madison F.</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility and acceptability of study methods and psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis</title><title>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Psychooncology</addtitle><description>Objective This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer and the study methods used to evaluate the interventions in question. Methods Articles were identified via MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsychINFO, and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were: (1) peer‐reviewed publication in English from 2000 onward with accessible full‐text, (2) reported data on the feasibility and/or acceptability of psychosocial interventions and/or study methods, (3) included at least one measure of body image or reported a body‐related theme, and (4) sample comprised women diagnosed with breast cancer. All study designs were eligible. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Results Sixty‐two articles were included. Participants and comparator groups varied as did interventions. Feasibility and acceptability of the interventions and study methods were inconsistently operationalized and reported across studies. Evidence of feasibility and acceptability was heterogeneous within and across studies, though mostly positive. Conclusion Published psychosocial interventions for body image and study methods are generally feasible and acceptable. Findings should be used to advance the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions designed to improve outcomes (body image or otherwise) for women diagnosed with breast cancer. Systematic review registration This review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; ID: CRD42021269062, 11 September 2021).</description><subject>Body image</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>breast tumors</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>mixed methods</subject><subject>oncology</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Psychosocial intervention</subject><subject>qualitative research</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>quantitative research</subject><subject>Self image</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1057-9249</issn><issn>1099-1611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhiMEoqUg8QTIEhcuKY4dxzG3qmoBqaIc4Bw59mTXVWIHj7OrvBZPiHe7gITEaUbjT9-M_BfF64peVpSy93Pwlw2T7ZPivKJKlVVTVU8PvZClYrU6K14gPlCaYdU8L854y1rGuDgvft6CRte70aWVaG-JNgbmpE-TMBBMi13JBGkbLB6RGVezDRiM0yNxPkHcgU8ueCRDiKQPmXeT3gDRU_Absg8TeGKd3viAYMnepS3pY16ciNHeQPxArgiumGDSyRkSYedgf9zldYx5toP87tMW0OHL4tmgR4RXp3pRfL-9-Xb9qby7__j5-uquNLyu21KZmveUc2GFtEwPSlImG204tYwp0UgwjTLNAFK0oHsjuGykEEMrW8vrwfCL4t2jd47hxwKYusmhgXHUHsKCHVOVkjVrZZ3Rt_-gD2GJPl93pBgVXPC_QhMDYoShm2P-p7h2Fe0OOXY5x-6QY0bfnIRLP4H9A_4OLgPlI7B3I6z_FXVf778chb8AMoyqyQ</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Brunet, Jennifer</creator><creator>Price, Jenson</creator><creator>Baillot, Aurélie</creator><creator>Dann, Erica</creator><creator>Vani, Madison F.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3242-5444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0630-4155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-3429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-0481</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Feasibility and acceptability of study methods and psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis</title><author>Brunet, Jennifer ; Price, Jenson ; Baillot, Aurélie ; Dann, Erica ; Vani, Madison F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3448-9c43b0335d57d2af970276ac30d229567ec69c6fe758eabc5376755f878d34fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Body image</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>breast tumors</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>mixed methods</topic><topic>oncology</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Psychosocial intervention</topic><topic>qualitative research</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>quantitative research</topic><topic>Self image</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brunet, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Jenson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baillot, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dann, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vani, Madison F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brunet, Jennifer</au><au>Price, Jenson</au><au>Baillot, Aurélie</au><au>Dann, Erica</au><au>Vani, Madison F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility and acceptability of study methods and psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis</atitle><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Psychooncology</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e6278</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e6278-n/a</pages><issn>1057-9249</issn><eissn>1099-1611</eissn><abstract>Objective This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer and the study methods used to evaluate the interventions in question. Methods Articles were identified via MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsychINFO, and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were: (1) peer‐reviewed publication in English from 2000 onward with accessible full‐text, (2) reported data on the feasibility and/or acceptability of psychosocial interventions and/or study methods, (3) included at least one measure of body image or reported a body‐related theme, and (4) sample comprised women diagnosed with breast cancer. All study designs were eligible. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Results Sixty‐two articles were included. Participants and comparator groups varied as did interventions. Feasibility and acceptability of the interventions and study methods were inconsistently operationalized and reported across studies. Evidence of feasibility and acceptability was heterogeneous within and across studies, though mostly positive. Conclusion Published psychosocial interventions for body image and study methods are generally feasible and acceptable. Findings should be used to advance the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions designed to improve outcomes (body image or otherwise) for women diagnosed with breast cancer. Systematic review registration This review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; ID: CRD42021269062, 11 September 2021).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38282235</pmid><doi>10.1002/pon.6278</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3242-5444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0630-4155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-3429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-0481</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9249
ispartof Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2024-01, Vol.33 (1), p.e6278-n/a
issn 1057-9249
1099-1611
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2919742874
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Body image
Breast cancer
breast tumors
Extraction
Feasibility
mixed methods
oncology
Psychosocial factors
Psychosocial intervention
qualitative research
Quality assessment
quantitative research
Self image
Systematic review
Women
title Feasibility and acceptability of study methods and psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A24%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20and%20acceptability%20of%20study%20methods%20and%20psychosocial%20interventions%20for%20body%20image%20among%20women%20diagnosed%20with%20breast%20cancer:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20narrative%20synthesis&rft.jtitle=Psycho-oncology%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Brunet,%20Jennifer&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e6278&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e6278-n/a&rft.issn=1057-9249&rft.eissn=1099-1611&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pon.6278&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919205353%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919205353&rft_id=info:pmid/38282235&rfr_iscdi=true