Feasibility and acceptability of study methods and psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
Objective This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer and the study methods used to evaluate the interventions in question. Methods Articles were identified via MEDLINE,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2024-01, Vol.33 (1), p.e6278-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e6278 |
container_title | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Brunet, Jennifer Price, Jenson Baillot, Aurélie Dann, Erica Vani, Madison F. |
description | Objective
This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer and the study methods used to evaluate the interventions in question.
Methods
Articles were identified via MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsychINFO, and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were: (1) peer‐reviewed publication in English from 2000 onward with accessible full‐text, (2) reported data on the feasibility and/or acceptability of psychosocial interventions and/or study methods, (3) included at least one measure of body image or reported a body‐related theme, and (4) sample comprised women diagnosed with breast cancer. All study designs were eligible. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment.
Results
Sixty‐two articles were included. Participants and comparator groups varied as did interventions. Feasibility and acceptability of the interventions and study methods were inconsistently operationalized and reported across studies. Evidence of feasibility and acceptability was heterogeneous within and across studies, though mostly positive.
Conclusion
Published psychosocial interventions for body image and study methods are generally feasible and acceptable. Findings should be used to advance the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions designed to improve outcomes (body image or otherwise) for women diagnosed with breast cancer.
Systematic review registration
This review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; ID: CRD42021269062, 11 September 2021). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pon.6278 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2919742874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2919205353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3448-9c43b0335d57d2af970276ac30d229567ec69c6fe758eabc5376755f878d34fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhiMEoqUg8QTIEhcuKY4dxzG3qmoBqaIc4Bw59mTXVWIHj7OrvBZPiHe7gITEaUbjT9-M_BfF64peVpSy93Pwlw2T7ZPivKJKlVVTVU8PvZClYrU6K14gPlCaYdU8L854y1rGuDgvft6CRte70aWVaG-JNgbmpE-TMBBMi13JBGkbLB6RGVezDRiM0yNxPkHcgU8ueCRDiKQPmXeT3gDRU_Absg8TeGKd3viAYMnepS3pY16ciNHeQPxArgiumGDSyRkSYedgf9zldYx5toP87tMW0OHL4tmgR4RXp3pRfL-9-Xb9qby7__j5-uquNLyu21KZmveUc2GFtEwPSlImG204tYwp0UgwjTLNAFK0oHsjuGykEEMrW8vrwfCL4t2jd47hxwKYusmhgXHUHsKCHVOVkjVrZZ3Rt_-gD2GJPl93pBgVXPC_QhMDYoShm2P-p7h2Fe0OOXY5x-6QY0bfnIRLP4H9A_4OLgPlI7B3I6z_FXVf778chb8AMoyqyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919205353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility and acceptability of study methods and psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Brunet, Jennifer ; Price, Jenson ; Baillot, Aurélie ; Dann, Erica ; Vani, Madison F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brunet, Jennifer ; Price, Jenson ; Baillot, Aurélie ; Dann, Erica ; Vani, Madison F.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer and the study methods used to evaluate the interventions in question.
Methods
Articles were identified via MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsychINFO, and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were: (1) peer‐reviewed publication in English from 2000 onward with accessible full‐text, (2) reported data on the feasibility and/or acceptability of psychosocial interventions and/or study methods, (3) included at least one measure of body image or reported a body‐related theme, and (4) sample comprised women diagnosed with breast cancer. All study designs were eligible. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment.
Results
Sixty‐two articles were included. Participants and comparator groups varied as did interventions. Feasibility and acceptability of the interventions and study methods were inconsistently operationalized and reported across studies. Evidence of feasibility and acceptability was heterogeneous within and across studies, though mostly positive.
Conclusion
Published psychosocial interventions for body image and study methods are generally feasible and acceptable. Findings should be used to advance the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions designed to improve outcomes (body image or otherwise) for women diagnosed with breast cancer.
Systematic review registration
This review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; ID: CRD42021269062, 11 September 2021).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pon.6278</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38282235</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Body image ; Breast cancer ; breast tumors ; Extraction ; Feasibility ; mixed methods ; oncology ; Psychosocial factors ; Psychosocial intervention ; qualitative research ; Quality assessment ; quantitative research ; Self image ; Systematic review ; Women</subject><ispartof>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2024-01, Vol.33 (1), p.e6278-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. Psycho‐Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Psycho-Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3448-9c43b0335d57d2af970276ac30d229567ec69c6fe758eabc5376755f878d34fc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3242-5444 ; 0000-0003-0630-4155 ; 0000-0001-8715-3429 ; 0000-0003-4874-0481</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpon.6278$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpon.6278$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,30978,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38282235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brunet, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Jenson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baillot, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dann, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vani, Madison F.</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility and acceptability of study methods and psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis</title><title>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Psychooncology</addtitle><description>Objective
This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer and the study methods used to evaluate the interventions in question.
Methods
Articles were identified via MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsychINFO, and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were: (1) peer‐reviewed publication in English from 2000 onward with accessible full‐text, (2) reported data on the feasibility and/or acceptability of psychosocial interventions and/or study methods, (3) included at least one measure of body image or reported a body‐related theme, and (4) sample comprised women diagnosed with breast cancer. All study designs were eligible. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment.
Results
Sixty‐two articles were included. Participants and comparator groups varied as did interventions. Feasibility and acceptability of the interventions and study methods were inconsistently operationalized and reported across studies. Evidence of feasibility and acceptability was heterogeneous within and across studies, though mostly positive.
Conclusion
Published psychosocial interventions for body image and study methods are generally feasible and acceptable. Findings should be used to advance the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions designed to improve outcomes (body image or otherwise) for women diagnosed with breast cancer.
Systematic review registration
This review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; ID: CRD42021269062, 11 September 2021).</description><subject>Body image</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>breast tumors</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>mixed methods</subject><subject>oncology</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Psychosocial intervention</subject><subject>qualitative research</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>quantitative research</subject><subject>Self image</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1057-9249</issn><issn>1099-1611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhiMEoqUg8QTIEhcuKY4dxzG3qmoBqaIc4Bw59mTXVWIHj7OrvBZPiHe7gITEaUbjT9-M_BfF64peVpSy93Pwlw2T7ZPivKJKlVVTVU8PvZClYrU6K14gPlCaYdU8L854y1rGuDgvft6CRte70aWVaG-JNgbmpE-TMBBMi13JBGkbLB6RGVezDRiM0yNxPkHcgU8ueCRDiKQPmXeT3gDRU_Absg8TeGKd3viAYMnepS3pY16ciNHeQPxArgiumGDSyRkSYedgf9zldYx5toP87tMW0OHL4tmgR4RXp3pRfL-9-Xb9qby7__j5-uquNLyu21KZmveUc2GFtEwPSlImG204tYwp0UgwjTLNAFK0oHsjuGykEEMrW8vrwfCL4t2jd47hxwKYusmhgXHUHsKCHVOVkjVrZZ3Rt_-gD2GJPl93pBgVXPC_QhMDYoShm2P-p7h2Fe0OOXY5x-6QY0bfnIRLP4H9A_4OLgPlI7B3I6z_FXVf778chb8AMoyqyQ</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Brunet, Jennifer</creator><creator>Price, Jenson</creator><creator>Baillot, Aurélie</creator><creator>Dann, Erica</creator><creator>Vani, Madison F.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3242-5444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0630-4155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-3429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-0481</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Feasibility and acceptability of study methods and psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis</title><author>Brunet, Jennifer ; Price, Jenson ; Baillot, Aurélie ; Dann, Erica ; Vani, Madison F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3448-9c43b0335d57d2af970276ac30d229567ec69c6fe758eabc5376755f878d34fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Body image</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>breast tumors</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>mixed methods</topic><topic>oncology</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Psychosocial intervention</topic><topic>qualitative research</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>quantitative research</topic><topic>Self image</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brunet, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Jenson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baillot, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dann, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vani, Madison F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brunet, Jennifer</au><au>Price, Jenson</au><au>Baillot, Aurélie</au><au>Dann, Erica</au><au>Vani, Madison F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility and acceptability of study methods and psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis</atitle><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Psychooncology</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e6278</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e6278-n/a</pages><issn>1057-9249</issn><eissn>1099-1611</eissn><abstract>Objective
This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer and the study methods used to evaluate the interventions in question.
Methods
Articles were identified via MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsychINFO, and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were: (1) peer‐reviewed publication in English from 2000 onward with accessible full‐text, (2) reported data on the feasibility and/or acceptability of psychosocial interventions and/or study methods, (3) included at least one measure of body image or reported a body‐related theme, and (4) sample comprised women diagnosed with breast cancer. All study designs were eligible. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment.
Results
Sixty‐two articles were included. Participants and comparator groups varied as did interventions. Feasibility and acceptability of the interventions and study methods were inconsistently operationalized and reported across studies. Evidence of feasibility and acceptability was heterogeneous within and across studies, though mostly positive.
Conclusion
Published psychosocial interventions for body image and study methods are generally feasible and acceptable. Findings should be used to advance the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions designed to improve outcomes (body image or otherwise) for women diagnosed with breast cancer.
Systematic review registration
This review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; ID: CRD42021269062, 11 September 2021).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38282235</pmid><doi>10.1002/pon.6278</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3242-5444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0630-4155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-3429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4874-0481</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1057-9249 |
ispartof | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2024-01, Vol.33 (1), p.e6278-n/a |
issn | 1057-9249 1099-1611 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2919742874 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Body image Breast cancer breast tumors Extraction Feasibility mixed methods oncology Psychosocial factors Psychosocial intervention qualitative research Quality assessment quantitative research Self image Systematic review Women |
title | Feasibility and acceptability of study methods and psychosocial interventions for body image among women diagnosed with breast cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A24%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20and%20acceptability%20of%20study%20methods%20and%20psychosocial%20interventions%20for%20body%20image%20among%20women%20diagnosed%20with%20breast%20cancer:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20narrative%20synthesis&rft.jtitle=Psycho-oncology%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Brunet,%20Jennifer&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e6278&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e6278-n/a&rft.issn=1057-9249&rft.eissn=1099-1611&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pon.6278&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919205353%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919205353&rft_id=info:pmid/38282235&rfr_iscdi=true |