Nature visits, but not residential greenness, are associated with reduced income-related inequalities in subjective well-being

Nature exposure can promote human health and well-being. Additionally, there is some, albeit mixed, evidence that this relationship is stronger for socio-economically disadvantaged groups (equigenesis). Using a cross-sectional survey of the Austrian population (N = 2300), we explored the relationships between both residential greenness and recreational nature visits, and affective (WHO-5 Well-Being Index) and evaluative (Personal Well-Being Index-7) subjective well-being. Partially supporting the equigenesis hypothesis, regression analyses controlling for potential confounders found that recreational visit frequency, but not residential greenness, moderated the effect of income-related disparities in both subjective well-being metrics. Results suggest that merely making neighborhoods greener may not itself help reduce inequalities in subjective well-being. Additionally, greater efforts are also needed to support individuals from all sectors of society to access natural settings for recreation as this could significantly improve the well-being of some of the poorest in society. •We explored well-being, residential greenness and recreational visits.•No evidence for links between subjective well-being and residential greenness.•Positive association between well-being and recreational nature visit frequency.•Nature visits associated with smaller income-related inequalities in well-being.•Promoting recreational use of nature may help reduce inequalities in well-being.