Microbiological alterations in the conjunctiva of hot tub-soaking ophthalmologists (MACHO): a randomized double-blind clinical trial

To determine if there is a difference in the quantity of microbial flora of the conjunctiva in individuals practicing head submersion ("dunk") versus no head submersion ("no-dunk") during hot tub use. In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, healthy volunteers aged ≥ 18 ye...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical hypothesis, discovery and innovation in ophthalmology discovery and innovation in ophthalmology, 2020, Vol.9 (4), p.221-230
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Michele D, Pasricha, Neel, Driver, Todd H, Lopez, Sarah E, Seitzman, Gerami D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 230
container_issue 4
container_start_page 221
container_title Medical hypothesis, discovery and innovation in ophthalmology
container_volume 9
creator Lee, Michele D
Pasricha, Neel
Driver, Todd H
Lopez, Sarah E
Seitzman, Gerami D
description To determine if there is a difference in the quantity of microbial flora of the conjunctiva in individuals practicing head submersion ("dunk") versus no head submersion ("no-dunk") during hot tub use. In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, healthy volunteers aged ≥ 18 years were recruited. Participants were randomized to head submersion versus no head submersion during a 15-minute hot tub soak. Study personnel, masked to the dunk or no-dunk group assignment, obtained conjunctival cultures before and immediately after hot tub use. De-identified specimens were submitted to the clinical microbiology laboratory for culture and analysis. The main outcome measure was the difference in the quantity of organisms cultured from the conjunctiva before and after hot tub exposure, as determined using a defined ordinal scale. A two-tailed Student's t-test was performed to compare the total microbial colony counts between the two arms. Simpson's diversity was used to measure the changes in organism diversity between the arms. Of 36 enrolled subjects, 19 were randomly assigned to the dunk and 17 were assigned to the no-dunk groups. Water samples obtained from all hot tubs were culture negative. Eleven of 19 eyes (58%) from the dunk group and eight of 17 eyes (47%) from the no-dunk group had negative conjunctival bacterial cultures before and after hot tub exposure. However, six of 19 eyes (32%) and four of 17 eyes (24%) of the dunk and no-dunk groups, respectively, were culture-positive after, but not before hot tub exposure. The quantity of organisms before and after hot tub exposure was not significantly different between the two arms ( = 0.12). However, the dunk group only showed a small increase in the quantity of organisms after as compared to before hot tub use ( = 0.03). None of the samples from subjects or hot tubs were culture-positive for . Head submersion in a public hot tubs during a 15-minute soak does not appear to change conjunctival flora, as determined by culture plate yield, this does not eliminate the association between hot tub use and devastating and painful corneal blindness. Therefore, our recommendation is to remove contact lenses prior to hot tub use, avoid head submersion in a hot tub, and urgently seek ophthalmological help if any eye pain and/or decrease in vision is experienced after hot tub use.
doi_str_mv 10.51329/mehdiophthal1409
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2917560244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2786432453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c196t-4f315cedbf7cc834ff1afc713e3d744e50834961d21192340b3834bcf5fcd8c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUclKBDEQDaKojH6AFwl40UNrZ-kl3mRwA8WLnpt0FjtjOhmTtKBnP9wwjiLWoap4vHpV1APgAJWnFSKYnY1qkMYvhzRwi2jJNsAuJhgXBCO2-affAfsxLsocjCLc4m2wQ1pMGanqXfB5b0TwvfHWPxvBLeQ2qcCT8S5C42AaFBTeLSYnknnj0Gs4-ATT1BfR8xfjnuH6hHElEVOEx_cX85uHk3PIYeBO-tF8KAmln3qrit4aJ6HIebUuBcPtHtjS3Ea1v64z8HR1-Ti_Ke4erm_nF3eFQKxOBdUEVULJXjdCtIRqjbgWDSKKyIZSVZUZZDWSGCGGCS17koFe6EoL2YqSzMDxt-4y-NdJxdSNJgplLXfKT7HDDDVVXWJKM_XoH3Xhp-DydR1u2poSTCuSWeiblX8YY1C6WwYz8vDeobJbudT9dynPHK6Vp35U8nfixxPyBQK3kjU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2786432453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbiological alterations in the conjunctiva of hot tub-soaking ophthalmologists (MACHO): a randomized double-blind clinical trial</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Lee, Michele D ; Pasricha, Neel ; Driver, Todd H ; Lopez, Sarah E ; Seitzman, Gerami D</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Michele D ; Pasricha, Neel ; Driver, Todd H ; Lopez, Sarah E ; Seitzman, Gerami D</creatorcontrib><description>To determine if there is a difference in the quantity of microbial flora of the conjunctiva in individuals practicing head submersion ("dunk") versus no head submersion ("no-dunk") during hot tub use. In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, healthy volunteers aged ≥ 18 years were recruited. Participants were randomized to head submersion versus no head submersion during a 15-minute hot tub soak. Study personnel, masked to the dunk or no-dunk group assignment, obtained conjunctival cultures before and immediately after hot tub use. De-identified specimens were submitted to the clinical microbiology laboratory for culture and analysis. The main outcome measure was the difference in the quantity of organisms cultured from the conjunctiva before and after hot tub exposure, as determined using a defined ordinal scale. A two-tailed Student's t-test was performed to compare the total microbial colony counts between the two arms. Simpson's diversity was used to measure the changes in organism diversity between the arms. Of 36 enrolled subjects, 19 were randomly assigned to the dunk and 17 were assigned to the no-dunk groups. Water samples obtained from all hot tubs were culture negative. Eleven of 19 eyes (58%) from the dunk group and eight of 17 eyes (47%) from the no-dunk group had negative conjunctival bacterial cultures before and after hot tub exposure. However, six of 19 eyes (32%) and four of 17 eyes (24%) of the dunk and no-dunk groups, respectively, were culture-positive after, but not before hot tub exposure. The quantity of organisms before and after hot tub exposure was not significantly different between the two arms ( = 0.12). However, the dunk group only showed a small increase in the quantity of organisms after as compared to before hot tub use ( = 0.03). None of the samples from subjects or hot tubs were culture-positive for . Head submersion in a public hot tubs during a 15-minute soak does not appear to change conjunctival flora, as determined by culture plate yield, this does not eliminate the association between hot tub use and devastating and painful corneal blindness. Therefore, our recommendation is to remove contact lenses prior to hot tub use, avoid head submersion in a hot tub, and urgently seek ophthalmological help if any eye pain and/or decrease in vision is experienced after hot tub use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2322-3219</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2322-4436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2322-3219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1409</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38249356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: International Virtual Ophthalmic Research Center (IVORC)</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Double-blind studies ; Organisms ; Saunas &amp; hot tubs</subject><ispartof>Medical hypothesis, discovery and innovation in ophthalmology, 2020, Vol.9 (4), p.221-230</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38249356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Michele D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasricha, Neel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driver, Todd H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seitzman, Gerami D</creatorcontrib><title>Microbiological alterations in the conjunctiva of hot tub-soaking ophthalmologists (MACHO): a randomized double-blind clinical trial</title><title>Medical hypothesis, discovery and innovation in ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>To determine if there is a difference in the quantity of microbial flora of the conjunctiva in individuals practicing head submersion ("dunk") versus no head submersion ("no-dunk") during hot tub use. In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, healthy volunteers aged ≥ 18 years were recruited. Participants were randomized to head submersion versus no head submersion during a 15-minute hot tub soak. Study personnel, masked to the dunk or no-dunk group assignment, obtained conjunctival cultures before and immediately after hot tub use. De-identified specimens were submitted to the clinical microbiology laboratory for culture and analysis. The main outcome measure was the difference in the quantity of organisms cultured from the conjunctiva before and after hot tub exposure, as determined using a defined ordinal scale. A two-tailed Student's t-test was performed to compare the total microbial colony counts between the two arms. Simpson's diversity was used to measure the changes in organism diversity between the arms. Of 36 enrolled subjects, 19 were randomly assigned to the dunk and 17 were assigned to the no-dunk groups. Water samples obtained from all hot tubs were culture negative. Eleven of 19 eyes (58%) from the dunk group and eight of 17 eyes (47%) from the no-dunk group had negative conjunctival bacterial cultures before and after hot tub exposure. However, six of 19 eyes (32%) and four of 17 eyes (24%) of the dunk and no-dunk groups, respectively, were culture-positive after, but not before hot tub exposure. The quantity of organisms before and after hot tub exposure was not significantly different between the two arms ( = 0.12). However, the dunk group only showed a small increase in the quantity of organisms after as compared to before hot tub use ( = 0.03). None of the samples from subjects or hot tubs were culture-positive for . Head submersion in a public hot tubs during a 15-minute soak does not appear to change conjunctival flora, as determined by culture plate yield, this does not eliminate the association between hot tub use and devastating and painful corneal blindness. Therefore, our recommendation is to remove contact lenses prior to hot tub use, avoid head submersion in a hot tub, and urgently seek ophthalmological help if any eye pain and/or decrease in vision is experienced after hot tub use.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Organisms</subject><subject>Saunas &amp; hot tubs</subject><issn>2322-3219</issn><issn>2322-4436</issn><issn>2322-3219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUclKBDEQDaKojH6AFwl40UNrZ-kl3mRwA8WLnpt0FjtjOhmTtKBnP9wwjiLWoap4vHpV1APgAJWnFSKYnY1qkMYvhzRwi2jJNsAuJhgXBCO2-affAfsxLsocjCLc4m2wQ1pMGanqXfB5b0TwvfHWPxvBLeQ2qcCT8S5C42AaFBTeLSYnknnj0Gs4-ATT1BfR8xfjnuH6hHElEVOEx_cX85uHk3PIYeBO-tF8KAmln3qrit4aJ6HIebUuBcPtHtjS3Ea1v64z8HR1-Ti_Ke4erm_nF3eFQKxOBdUEVULJXjdCtIRqjbgWDSKKyIZSVZUZZDWSGCGGCS17koFe6EoL2YqSzMDxt-4y-NdJxdSNJgplLXfKT7HDDDVVXWJKM_XoH3Xhp-DydR1u2poSTCuSWeiblX8YY1C6WwYz8vDeobJbudT9dynPHK6Vp35U8nfixxPyBQK3kjU</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Lee, Michele D</creator><creator>Pasricha, Neel</creator><creator>Driver, Todd H</creator><creator>Lopez, Sarah E</creator><creator>Seitzman, Gerami D</creator><general>International Virtual Ophthalmic Research Center (IVORC)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Microbiological alterations in the conjunctiva of hot tub-soaking ophthalmologists (MACHO): a randomized double-blind clinical trial</title><author>Lee, Michele D ; Pasricha, Neel ; Driver, Todd H ; Lopez, Sarah E ; Seitzman, Gerami D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c196t-4f315cedbf7cc834ff1afc713e3d744e50834961d21192340b3834bcf5fcd8c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Organisms</topic><topic>Saunas &amp; hot tubs</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Michele D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasricha, Neel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driver, Todd H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seitzman, Gerami D</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical hypothesis, discovery and innovation in ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Michele D</au><au>Pasricha, Neel</au><au>Driver, Todd H</au><au>Lopez, Sarah E</au><au>Seitzman, Gerami D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbiological alterations in the conjunctiva of hot tub-soaking ophthalmologists (MACHO): a randomized double-blind clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Medical hypothesis, discovery and innovation in ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>230</epage><pages>221-230</pages><issn>2322-3219</issn><issn>2322-4436</issn><eissn>2322-3219</eissn><abstract>To determine if there is a difference in the quantity of microbial flora of the conjunctiva in individuals practicing head submersion ("dunk") versus no head submersion ("no-dunk") during hot tub use. In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, healthy volunteers aged ≥ 18 years were recruited. Participants were randomized to head submersion versus no head submersion during a 15-minute hot tub soak. Study personnel, masked to the dunk or no-dunk group assignment, obtained conjunctival cultures before and immediately after hot tub use. De-identified specimens were submitted to the clinical microbiology laboratory for culture and analysis. The main outcome measure was the difference in the quantity of organisms cultured from the conjunctiva before and after hot tub exposure, as determined using a defined ordinal scale. A two-tailed Student's t-test was performed to compare the total microbial colony counts between the two arms. Simpson's diversity was used to measure the changes in organism diversity between the arms. Of 36 enrolled subjects, 19 were randomly assigned to the dunk and 17 were assigned to the no-dunk groups. Water samples obtained from all hot tubs were culture negative. Eleven of 19 eyes (58%) from the dunk group and eight of 17 eyes (47%) from the no-dunk group had negative conjunctival bacterial cultures before and after hot tub exposure. However, six of 19 eyes (32%) and four of 17 eyes (24%) of the dunk and no-dunk groups, respectively, were culture-positive after, but not before hot tub exposure. The quantity of organisms before and after hot tub exposure was not significantly different between the two arms ( = 0.12). However, the dunk group only showed a small increase in the quantity of organisms after as compared to before hot tub use ( = 0.03). None of the samples from subjects or hot tubs were culture-positive for . Head submersion in a public hot tubs during a 15-minute soak does not appear to change conjunctival flora, as determined by culture plate yield, this does not eliminate the association between hot tub use and devastating and painful corneal blindness. Therefore, our recommendation is to remove contact lenses prior to hot tub use, avoid head submersion in a hot tub, and urgently seek ophthalmological help if any eye pain and/or decrease in vision is experienced after hot tub use.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>International Virtual Ophthalmic Research Center (IVORC)</pub><pmid>38249356</pmid><doi>10.51329/mehdiophthal1409</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2322-3219
ispartof Medical hypothesis, discovery and innovation in ophthalmology, 2020, Vol.9 (4), p.221-230
issn 2322-3219
2322-4436
2322-3219
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2917560244
source PMC (PubMed Central); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Clinical trials
Double-blind studies
Organisms
Saunas & hot tubs
title Microbiological alterations in the conjunctiva of hot tub-soaking ophthalmologists (MACHO): a randomized double-blind clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T06%3A59%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbiological%20alterations%20in%20the%20conjunctiva%20of%20hot%20tub-soaking%20ophthalmologists%20(MACHO):%20a%20randomized%20double-blind%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Medical%20hypothesis,%20discovery%20and%20innovation%20in%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Lee,%20Michele%20D&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=230&rft.pages=221-230&rft.issn=2322-3219&rft.eissn=2322-3219&rft_id=info:doi/10.51329/mehdiophthal1409&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2786432453%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2786432453&rft_id=info:pmid/38249356&rfr_iscdi=true