Choosing the right adjuvant therapy for stage III–IVA endometrial cancer: A comparative analysis of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy

The optimal adjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced endometrial cancer (EC) remains debatable. We comparatively analyzed recurrence patterns and survival outcomes in patients with stage III–IVA EC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) exclusively or combined with radiotherapy (CRT)....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2024-03, Vol.182, p.39-44
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Hyun Ju, Lee, Joongyo, Lee, Kwang-Beom, Sung, KiHoon, Kim, Yong Bae, Kim, Young Saing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 44
container_issue
container_start_page 39
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 182
creator Kim, Hyun Ju
Lee, Joongyo
Lee, Kwang-Beom
Sung, KiHoon
Kim, Yong Bae
Kim, Young Saing
description The optimal adjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced endometrial cancer (EC) remains debatable. We comparatively analyzed recurrence patterns and survival outcomes in patients with stage III–IVA EC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) exclusively or combined with radiotherapy (CRT). We retrospectively analyzed 184 patients treated for stage III–IVA EC at 2 tertiary institutions between 2010 and 2021. All patients underwent standard primary surgery and received either CT alone (n = 89) or CRT (n = 95) as an adjuvant treatment. We compared the failure patterns, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) between the CT and CRT groups. The median follow-up period was 54.8 months. Most patients underwent pelvic (94.6%) or para-aortic (75.5%) lymphadenectomies. The 5-year RFS was 69.2% with CRT versus 56.3% with CT (P = 0.038), and 5-year OS was 86.1% versus 78.9% (P = 0.357). Pelvic and para-aortic recurrence rates were significantly higher in the CT group (pelvic: 29.2%; para-aortic: 20.2%) than in the CRT group (pelvic: 10.5%; para-aortic: 6.3%). The CRT group showed a higher rate of distant recurrence (CRT, 23.2% vs. CT, 14.6%) however, the 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups (CRT, 28% vs. CT, 35%). This study highlights the potential benefits of adjuvant CRT in patients with stage III–IVA EC. The incorporation of molecular classification is necessary to derive optimal personalized adjuvant treatment strategies for this patient population. •Chemoradiotherapy significantly improved recurrence-free survival of patients with stage III–IVA endometrial cancer.•The majority of patients received chemoradiotherapy in the form of sequential chemotherapy plus radiotherapy.•Predominant recurrence pattern after chemotherapy involved failures in the pelvic and para-aortic regions.•The 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups.•Our findings highlight the potential benefits of chemoradiotherapy as an adjuvant treatment in stage III-IVA EC.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2917552608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090825824000246</els_id><sourcerecordid>2917552608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-4527e7334717e7ff6b0c47d29fbad8972eb0fded0160b339bea1b76941c12a3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU2LFDEUDKK4s6u_QJAcvfT4kvSn4GEY1G1Y2Iu715BOXmYydHfGJDPQN4_e_Yf-EnucWY8LBQ-KevV4VYS8Y7BkwMqPu-W0mUa_5MDzJbAZ1QuyYNAUWVkXzUuyAGggq3lRX5HrGHcAIIDx1-RK1DwvIS8W5Nd6631044amLdLgNttEldkdjmpMJyqo_UStDzQmtUHatu2fn7_bxxXF0fgBU3Cqp1qNGsMnuqLaD3sVVHJHpGpU_RRdpN5SvcXBB2Wcf_JUozmzF-INeWVVH_HtZd6Qh69fvq9vs7v7b-16dZdpAU3K8oJXWAmRV2ye1pYd6LwyvLGdMnVTcezAGjRzQNAJ0XSoWFeVTc4040pYcUM-nH33wf84YExycFFj36sR_SFK3rCqKHgJ9SwVZ6kOPsaAVu6DG1SYJAN5qkDu5L8K5KkCCWxGNW-9vxw4dAOa_ztPmc-Cz2cBzm8eHQYZtcM5QeMC6iSNd88e-Auh9JxY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2917552608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Choosing the right adjuvant therapy for stage III–IVA endometrial cancer: A comparative analysis of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kim, Hyun Ju ; Lee, Joongyo ; Lee, Kwang-Beom ; Sung, KiHoon ; Kim, Yong Bae ; Kim, Young Saing</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Ju ; Lee, Joongyo ; Lee, Kwang-Beom ; Sung, KiHoon ; Kim, Yong Bae ; Kim, Young Saing</creatorcontrib><description>The optimal adjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced endometrial cancer (EC) remains debatable. We comparatively analyzed recurrence patterns and survival outcomes in patients with stage III–IVA EC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) exclusively or combined with radiotherapy (CRT). We retrospectively analyzed 184 patients treated for stage III–IVA EC at 2 tertiary institutions between 2010 and 2021. All patients underwent standard primary surgery and received either CT alone (n = 89) or CRT (n = 95) as an adjuvant treatment. We compared the failure patterns, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) between the CT and CRT groups. The median follow-up period was 54.8 months. Most patients underwent pelvic (94.6%) or para-aortic (75.5%) lymphadenectomies. The 5-year RFS was 69.2% with CRT versus 56.3% with CT (P = 0.038), and 5-year OS was 86.1% versus 78.9% (P = 0.357). Pelvic and para-aortic recurrence rates were significantly higher in the CT group (pelvic: 29.2%; para-aortic: 20.2%) than in the CRT group (pelvic: 10.5%; para-aortic: 6.3%). The CRT group showed a higher rate of distant recurrence (CRT, 23.2% vs. CT, 14.6%) however, the 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups (CRT, 28% vs. CT, 35%). This study highlights the potential benefits of adjuvant CRT in patients with stage III–IVA EC. The incorporation of molecular classification is necessary to derive optimal personalized adjuvant treatment strategies for this patient population. •Chemoradiotherapy significantly improved recurrence-free survival of patients with stage III–IVA endometrial cancer.•The majority of patients received chemoradiotherapy in the form of sequential chemotherapy plus radiotherapy.•Predominant recurrence pattern after chemotherapy involved failures in the pelvic and para-aortic regions.•The 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups.•Our findings highlight the potential benefits of chemoradiotherapy as an adjuvant treatment in stage III-IVA EC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38246045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adjuvant therapy ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant - adverse effects ; Chemotherapy ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Endometrial Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Locally advanced ; Neoplasm Staging ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Retrospective Studies ; Stage III–IVA endometrial cancer</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 2024-03, Vol.182, p.39-44</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-4527e7334717e7ff6b0c47d29fbad8972eb0fded0160b339bea1b76941c12a3f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38246045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joongyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kwang-Beom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, KiHoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong Bae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Saing</creatorcontrib><title>Choosing the right adjuvant therapy for stage III–IVA endometrial cancer: A comparative analysis of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>The optimal adjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced endometrial cancer (EC) remains debatable. We comparatively analyzed recurrence patterns and survival outcomes in patients with stage III–IVA EC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) exclusively or combined with radiotherapy (CRT). We retrospectively analyzed 184 patients treated for stage III–IVA EC at 2 tertiary institutions between 2010 and 2021. All patients underwent standard primary surgery and received either CT alone (n = 89) or CRT (n = 95) as an adjuvant treatment. We compared the failure patterns, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) between the CT and CRT groups. The median follow-up period was 54.8 months. Most patients underwent pelvic (94.6%) or para-aortic (75.5%) lymphadenectomies. The 5-year RFS was 69.2% with CRT versus 56.3% with CT (P = 0.038), and 5-year OS was 86.1% versus 78.9% (P = 0.357). Pelvic and para-aortic recurrence rates were significantly higher in the CT group (pelvic: 29.2%; para-aortic: 20.2%) than in the CRT group (pelvic: 10.5%; para-aortic: 6.3%). The CRT group showed a higher rate of distant recurrence (CRT, 23.2% vs. CT, 14.6%) however, the 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups (CRT, 28% vs. CT, 35%). This study highlights the potential benefits of adjuvant CRT in patients with stage III–IVA EC. The incorporation of molecular classification is necessary to derive optimal personalized adjuvant treatment strategies for this patient population. •Chemoradiotherapy significantly improved recurrence-free survival of patients with stage III–IVA endometrial cancer.•The majority of patients received chemoradiotherapy in the form of sequential chemotherapy plus radiotherapy.•Predominant recurrence pattern after chemotherapy involved failures in the pelvic and para-aortic regions.•The 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups.•Our findings highlight the potential benefits of chemoradiotherapy as an adjuvant treatment in stage III-IVA EC.</description><subject>Adjuvant therapy</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant - adverse effects</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Locally advanced</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stage III–IVA endometrial cancer</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU2LFDEUDKK4s6u_QJAcvfT4kvSn4GEY1G1Y2Iu715BOXmYydHfGJDPQN4_e_Yf-EnucWY8LBQ-KevV4VYS8Y7BkwMqPu-W0mUa_5MDzJbAZ1QuyYNAUWVkXzUuyAGggq3lRX5HrGHcAIIDx1-RK1DwvIS8W5Nd6631044amLdLgNttEldkdjmpMJyqo_UStDzQmtUHatu2fn7_bxxXF0fgBU3Cqp1qNGsMnuqLaD3sVVHJHpGpU_RRdpN5SvcXBB2Wcf_JUozmzF-INeWVVH_HtZd6Qh69fvq9vs7v7b-16dZdpAU3K8oJXWAmRV2ye1pYd6LwyvLGdMnVTcezAGjRzQNAJ0XSoWFeVTc4040pYcUM-nH33wf84YExycFFj36sR_SFK3rCqKHgJ9SwVZ6kOPsaAVu6DG1SYJAN5qkDu5L8K5KkCCWxGNW-9vxw4dAOa_ztPmc-Cz2cBzm8eHQYZtcM5QeMC6iSNd88e-Auh9JxY</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Kim, Hyun Ju</creator><creator>Lee, Joongyo</creator><creator>Lee, Kwang-Beom</creator><creator>Sung, KiHoon</creator><creator>Kim, Yong Bae</creator><creator>Kim, Young Saing</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Choosing the right adjuvant therapy for stage III–IVA endometrial cancer: A comparative analysis of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy</title><author>Kim, Hyun Ju ; Lee, Joongyo ; Lee, Kwang-Beom ; Sung, KiHoon ; Kim, Yong Bae ; Kim, Young Saing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-4527e7334717e7ff6b0c47d29fbad8972eb0fded0160b339bea1b76941c12a3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adjuvant therapy</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant - adverse effects</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Locally advanced</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stage III–IVA endometrial cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joongyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kwang-Beom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, KiHoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong Bae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Saing</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hyun Ju</au><au>Lee, Joongyo</au><au>Lee, Kwang-Beom</au><au>Sung, KiHoon</au><au>Kim, Yong Bae</au><au>Kim, Young Saing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Choosing the right adjuvant therapy for stage III–IVA endometrial cancer: A comparative analysis of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>182</volume><spage>39</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>39-44</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><abstract>The optimal adjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced endometrial cancer (EC) remains debatable. We comparatively analyzed recurrence patterns and survival outcomes in patients with stage III–IVA EC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) exclusively or combined with radiotherapy (CRT). We retrospectively analyzed 184 patients treated for stage III–IVA EC at 2 tertiary institutions between 2010 and 2021. All patients underwent standard primary surgery and received either CT alone (n = 89) or CRT (n = 95) as an adjuvant treatment. We compared the failure patterns, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) between the CT and CRT groups. The median follow-up period was 54.8 months. Most patients underwent pelvic (94.6%) or para-aortic (75.5%) lymphadenectomies. The 5-year RFS was 69.2% with CRT versus 56.3% with CT (P = 0.038), and 5-year OS was 86.1% versus 78.9% (P = 0.357). Pelvic and para-aortic recurrence rates were significantly higher in the CT group (pelvic: 29.2%; para-aortic: 20.2%) than in the CRT group (pelvic: 10.5%; para-aortic: 6.3%). The CRT group showed a higher rate of distant recurrence (CRT, 23.2% vs. CT, 14.6%) however, the 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups (CRT, 28% vs. CT, 35%). This study highlights the potential benefits of adjuvant CRT in patients with stage III–IVA EC. The incorporation of molecular classification is necessary to derive optimal personalized adjuvant treatment strategies for this patient population. •Chemoradiotherapy significantly improved recurrence-free survival of patients with stage III–IVA endometrial cancer.•The majority of patients received chemoradiotherapy in the form of sequential chemotherapy plus radiotherapy.•Predominant recurrence pattern after chemotherapy involved failures in the pelvic and para-aortic regions.•The 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups.•Our findings highlight the potential benefits of chemoradiotherapy as an adjuvant treatment in stage III-IVA EC.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38246045</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.017</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 2024-03, Vol.182, p.39-44
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2917552608
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adjuvant therapy
Chemoradiotherapy
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant - adverse effects
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Combined Modality Therapy
Endometrial Neoplasms - drug therapy
Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery
Female
Humans
Locally advanced
Neoplasm Staging
Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Retrospective Studies
Stage III–IVA endometrial cancer
title Choosing the right adjuvant therapy for stage III–IVA endometrial cancer: A comparative analysis of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T17%3A44%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Choosing%20the%20right%20adjuvant%20therapy%20for%20stage%20III%E2%80%93IVA%20endometrial%20cancer:%20A%20comparative%20analysis%20of%20chemoradiotherapy%20and%20chemotherapy&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Kim,%20Hyun%20Ju&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=182&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=39-44&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2917552608%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2917552608&rft_id=info:pmid/38246045&rft_els_id=S0090825824000246&rfr_iscdi=true