Three Epochs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care

IMPORTANCE: Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) has reached an all-time high, and health care leaders across the ecosystem are faced with questions about where, when, and how to deploy AI and how to understand its risks, problems, and possibilities. OBSERVATIONS: While AI as a concept has exist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2024-01, Vol.331 (3), p.242-244
Hauptverfasser: Howell, Michael D, Corrado, Greg S, DeSalvo, Karen B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 244
container_issue 3
container_start_page 242
container_title JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association
container_volume 331
creator Howell, Michael D
Corrado, Greg S
DeSalvo, Karen B
description IMPORTANCE: Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) has reached an all-time high, and health care leaders across the ecosystem are faced with questions about where, when, and how to deploy AI and how to understand its risks, problems, and possibilities. OBSERVATIONS: While AI as a concept has existed since the 1950s, all AI is not the same. Capabilities and risks of various kinds of AI differ markedly, and on examination 3 epochs of AI emerge. AI 1.0 includes symbolic AI, which attempts to encode human knowledge into computational rules, as well as probabilistic models. The era of AI 2.0 began with deep learning, in which models learn from examples labeled with ground truth. This era brought about many advances both in people’s daily lives and in health care. Deep learning models are task-specific, meaning they do one thing at a time, and they primarily focus on classification and prediction. AI 3.0 is the era of foundation models and generative AI. Models in AI 3.0 have fundamentally new (and potentially transformative) capabilities, as well as new kinds of risks, such as hallucinations. These models can do many different kinds of tasks without being retrained on a new dataset. For example, a simple text instruction will change the model’s behavior. Prompts such as “Write this note for a specialist consultant” and “Write this note for the patient’s mother” will produce markedly different content. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Foundation models and generative AI represent a major revolution in AI’s capabilities, ffering tremendous potential to improve care. Health care leaders are making decisions about AI today. While any heuristic omits details and loses nuance, the framework of AI 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 may be helpful to decision-makers because each epoch has fundamentally different capabilities and risks.
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jama.2023.25057
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2915569654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2813874</ama_id><sourcerecordid>2919857875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a259t-4f75dd4aea7f02962c46b8432121c7badf2aaaa6998c7ea39c3349e36e0f27ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwIzGgSCwsaf0Z22NVFVqpEkuZLde50FT5KHYy8O9xKGXglhvuubtXD0L3BE8JxmR2sLWdUkzZlAos5AUaE8FUyoRWl2iMsVap5IqP0E0IBxyLMHmNRkxRKjHVY5Rt9x4gWR5btw9JWyRz35VF6UpbJeumg6oqP6BxkJRNsgJbdftkYT3coqvCVgHufvsEvb8st4tVunl7XS_mm9RSobuUF1LkObdgZRHfZdTxbKc4o4QSJ3c2L6iNlWmtnATLtGOMa2AZ4IJKm7MJej7dPfr2s4fQmboMLqayDbR9MFQTITKdCR7Rp3_ooe19E9MNlFZCKikiNTtRzrcheCjM0Ze19V-GYDMoNYNSMyg1P0rjxuPv3X5XQ_7Hnx1G4OEEDIvnKVWEKcnZN4L5eGY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919857875</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three Epochs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care</title><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Howell, Michael D ; Corrado, Greg S ; DeSalvo, Karen B</creator><creatorcontrib>Howell, Michael D ; Corrado, Greg S ; DeSalvo, Karen B</creatorcontrib><description>IMPORTANCE: Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) has reached an all-time high, and health care leaders across the ecosystem are faced with questions about where, when, and how to deploy AI and how to understand its risks, problems, and possibilities. OBSERVATIONS: While AI as a concept has existed since the 1950s, all AI is not the same. Capabilities and risks of various kinds of AI differ markedly, and on examination 3 epochs of AI emerge. AI 1.0 includes symbolic AI, which attempts to encode human knowledge into computational rules, as well as probabilistic models. The era of AI 2.0 began with deep learning, in which models learn from examples labeled with ground truth. This era brought about many advances both in people’s daily lives and in health care. Deep learning models are task-specific, meaning they do one thing at a time, and they primarily focus on classification and prediction. AI 3.0 is the era of foundation models and generative AI. Models in AI 3.0 have fundamentally new (and potentially transformative) capabilities, as well as new kinds of risks, such as hallucinations. These models can do many different kinds of tasks without being retrained on a new dataset. For example, a simple text instruction will change the model’s behavior. Prompts such as “Write this note for a specialist consultant” and “Write this note for the patient’s mother” will produce markedly different content. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Foundation models and generative AI represent a major revolution in AI’s capabilities, ffering tremendous potential to improve care. Health care leaders are making decisions about AI today. While any heuristic omits details and loses nuance, the framework of AI 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 may be helpful to decision-makers because each epoch has fundamentally different capabilities and risks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.25057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38227029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Deep learning ; Generative artificial intelligence ; Health care ; Machine learning ; Mathematical models ; Probabilistic models</subject><ispartof>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2024-01, Vol.331 (3), p.242-244</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Jan 16, 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a259t-4f75dd4aea7f02962c46b8432121c7badf2aaaa6998c7ea39c3349e36e0f27ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a259t-4f75dd4aea7f02962c46b8432121c7badf2aaaa6998c7ea39c3349e36e0f27ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/10.1001/jama.2023.25057$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2023.25057$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,780,784,3338,27923,27924,76260,76263</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38227029$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howell, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corrado, Greg S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeSalvo, Karen B</creatorcontrib><title>Three Epochs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care</title><title>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</title><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><description>IMPORTANCE: Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) has reached an all-time high, and health care leaders across the ecosystem are faced with questions about where, when, and how to deploy AI and how to understand its risks, problems, and possibilities. OBSERVATIONS: While AI as a concept has existed since the 1950s, all AI is not the same. Capabilities and risks of various kinds of AI differ markedly, and on examination 3 epochs of AI emerge. AI 1.0 includes symbolic AI, which attempts to encode human knowledge into computational rules, as well as probabilistic models. The era of AI 2.0 began with deep learning, in which models learn from examples labeled with ground truth. This era brought about many advances both in people’s daily lives and in health care. Deep learning models are task-specific, meaning they do one thing at a time, and they primarily focus on classification and prediction. AI 3.0 is the era of foundation models and generative AI. Models in AI 3.0 have fundamentally new (and potentially transformative) capabilities, as well as new kinds of risks, such as hallucinations. These models can do many different kinds of tasks without being retrained on a new dataset. For example, a simple text instruction will change the model’s behavior. Prompts such as “Write this note for a specialist consultant” and “Write this note for the patient’s mother” will produce markedly different content. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Foundation models and generative AI represent a major revolution in AI’s capabilities, ffering tremendous potential to improve care. Health care leaders are making decisions about AI today. While any heuristic omits details and loses nuance, the framework of AI 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 may be helpful to decision-makers because each epoch has fundamentally different capabilities and risks.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Generative artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Probabilistic models</subject><issn>0098-7484</issn><issn>1538-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwIzGgSCwsaf0Z22NVFVqpEkuZLde50FT5KHYy8O9xKGXglhvuubtXD0L3BE8JxmR2sLWdUkzZlAos5AUaE8FUyoRWl2iMsVap5IqP0E0IBxyLMHmNRkxRKjHVY5Rt9x4gWR5btw9JWyRz35VF6UpbJeumg6oqP6BxkJRNsgJbdftkYT3coqvCVgHufvsEvb8st4tVunl7XS_mm9RSobuUF1LkObdgZRHfZdTxbKc4o4QSJ3c2L6iNlWmtnATLtGOMa2AZ4IJKm7MJej7dPfr2s4fQmboMLqayDbR9MFQTITKdCR7Rp3_ooe19E9MNlFZCKikiNTtRzrcheCjM0Ze19V-GYDMoNYNSMyg1P0rjxuPv3X5XQ_7Hnx1G4OEEDIvnKVWEKcnZN4L5eGY</recordid><startdate>20240116</startdate><enddate>20240116</enddate><creator>Howell, Michael D</creator><creator>Corrado, Greg S</creator><creator>DeSalvo, Karen B</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240116</creationdate><title>Three Epochs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care</title><author>Howell, Michael D ; Corrado, Greg S ; DeSalvo, Karen B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a259t-4f75dd4aea7f02962c46b8432121c7badf2aaaa6998c7ea39c3349e36e0f27ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Generative artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Probabilistic models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howell, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corrado, Greg S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeSalvo, Karen B</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howell, Michael D</au><au>Corrado, Greg S</au><au>DeSalvo, Karen B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three Epochs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care</atitle><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><date>2024-01-16</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>331</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>242</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>242-244</pages><issn>0098-7484</issn><eissn>1538-3598</eissn><abstract>IMPORTANCE: Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) has reached an all-time high, and health care leaders across the ecosystem are faced with questions about where, when, and how to deploy AI and how to understand its risks, problems, and possibilities. OBSERVATIONS: While AI as a concept has existed since the 1950s, all AI is not the same. Capabilities and risks of various kinds of AI differ markedly, and on examination 3 epochs of AI emerge. AI 1.0 includes symbolic AI, which attempts to encode human knowledge into computational rules, as well as probabilistic models. The era of AI 2.0 began with deep learning, in which models learn from examples labeled with ground truth. This era brought about many advances both in people’s daily lives and in health care. Deep learning models are task-specific, meaning they do one thing at a time, and they primarily focus on classification and prediction. AI 3.0 is the era of foundation models and generative AI. Models in AI 3.0 have fundamentally new (and potentially transformative) capabilities, as well as new kinds of risks, such as hallucinations. These models can do many different kinds of tasks without being retrained on a new dataset. For example, a simple text instruction will change the model’s behavior. Prompts such as “Write this note for a specialist consultant” and “Write this note for the patient’s mother” will produce markedly different content. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Foundation models and generative AI represent a major revolution in AI’s capabilities, ffering tremendous potential to improve care. Health care leaders are making decisions about AI today. While any heuristic omits details and loses nuance, the framework of AI 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 may be helpful to decision-makers because each epoch has fundamentally different capabilities and risks.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>38227029</pmid><doi>10.1001/jama.2023.25057</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-7484
ispartof JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2024-01, Vol.331 (3), p.242-244
issn 0098-7484
1538-3598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2915569654
source American Medical Association Journals
subjects Artificial intelligence
Deep learning
Generative artificial intelligence
Health care
Machine learning
Mathematical models
Probabilistic models
title Three Epochs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A24%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three%20Epochs%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20in%20Health%20Care&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Howell,%20Michael%20D&rft.date=2024-01-16&rft.volume=331&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=242&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=242-244&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft.eissn=1538-3598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jama.2023.25057&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919857875%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919857875&rft_id=info:pmid/38227029&rft_ama_id=2813874&rfr_iscdi=true