Three Epochs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care
IMPORTANCE: Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) has reached an all-time high, and health care leaders across the ecosystem are faced with questions about where, when, and how to deploy AI and how to understand its risks, problems, and possibilities. OBSERVATIONS: While AI as a concept has exist...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2024-01, Vol.331 (3), p.242-244 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 244 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 242 |
container_title | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association |
container_volume | 331 |
creator | Howell, Michael D Corrado, Greg S DeSalvo, Karen B |
description | IMPORTANCE: Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) has reached an all-time high, and health care leaders across the ecosystem are faced with questions about where, when, and how to deploy AI and how to understand its risks, problems, and possibilities. OBSERVATIONS: While AI as a concept has existed since the 1950s, all AI is not the same. Capabilities and risks of various kinds of AI differ markedly, and on examination 3 epochs of AI emerge. AI 1.0 includes symbolic AI, which attempts to encode human knowledge into computational rules, as well as probabilistic models. The era of AI 2.0 began with deep learning, in which models learn from examples labeled with ground truth. This era brought about many advances both in people’s daily lives and in health care. Deep learning models are task-specific, meaning they do one thing at a time, and they primarily focus on classification and prediction. AI 3.0 is the era of foundation models and generative AI. Models in AI 3.0 have fundamentally new (and potentially transformative) capabilities, as well as new kinds of risks, such as hallucinations. These models can do many different kinds of tasks without being retrained on a new dataset. For example, a simple text instruction will change the model’s behavior. Prompts such as “Write this note for a specialist consultant” and “Write this note for the patient’s mother” will produce markedly different content. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Foundation models and generative AI represent a major revolution in AI’s capabilities, ffering tremendous potential to improve care. Health care leaders are making decisions about AI today. While any heuristic omits details and loses nuance, the framework of AI 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 may be helpful to decision-makers because each epoch has fundamentally different capabilities and risks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jama.2023.25057 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2915569654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2813874</ama_id><sourcerecordid>2919857875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a259t-4f75dd4aea7f02962c46b8432121c7badf2aaaa6998c7ea39c3349e36e0f27ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwIzGgSCwsaf0Z22NVFVqpEkuZLde50FT5KHYy8O9xKGXglhvuubtXD0L3BE8JxmR2sLWdUkzZlAos5AUaE8FUyoRWl2iMsVap5IqP0E0IBxyLMHmNRkxRKjHVY5Rt9x4gWR5btw9JWyRz35VF6UpbJeumg6oqP6BxkJRNsgJbdftkYT3coqvCVgHufvsEvb8st4tVunl7XS_mm9RSobuUF1LkObdgZRHfZdTxbKc4o4QSJ3c2L6iNlWmtnATLtGOMa2AZ4IJKm7MJej7dPfr2s4fQmboMLqayDbR9MFQTITKdCR7Rp3_ooe19E9MNlFZCKikiNTtRzrcheCjM0Ze19V-GYDMoNYNSMyg1P0rjxuPv3X5XQ_7Hnx1G4OEEDIvnKVWEKcnZN4L5eGY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919857875</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three Epochs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care</title><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Howell, Michael D ; Corrado, Greg S ; DeSalvo, Karen B</creator><creatorcontrib>Howell, Michael D ; Corrado, Greg S ; DeSalvo, Karen B</creatorcontrib><description>IMPORTANCE: Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) has reached an all-time high, and health care leaders across the ecosystem are faced with questions about where, when, and how to deploy AI and how to understand its risks, problems, and possibilities. OBSERVATIONS: While AI as a concept has existed since the 1950s, all AI is not the same. Capabilities and risks of various kinds of AI differ markedly, and on examination 3 epochs of AI emerge. AI 1.0 includes symbolic AI, which attempts to encode human knowledge into computational rules, as well as probabilistic models. The era of AI 2.0 began with deep learning, in which models learn from examples labeled with ground truth. This era brought about many advances both in people’s daily lives and in health care. Deep learning models are task-specific, meaning they do one thing at a time, and they primarily focus on classification and prediction. AI 3.0 is the era of foundation models and generative AI. Models in AI 3.0 have fundamentally new (and potentially transformative) capabilities, as well as new kinds of risks, such as hallucinations. These models can do many different kinds of tasks without being retrained on a new dataset. For example, a simple text instruction will change the model’s behavior. Prompts such as “Write this note for a specialist consultant” and “Write this note for the patient’s mother” will produce markedly different content. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Foundation models and generative AI represent a major revolution in AI’s capabilities, ffering tremendous potential to improve care. Health care leaders are making decisions about AI today. While any heuristic omits details and loses nuance, the framework of AI 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 may be helpful to decision-makers because each epoch has fundamentally different capabilities and risks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.25057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38227029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Deep learning ; Generative artificial intelligence ; Health care ; Machine learning ; Mathematical models ; Probabilistic models</subject><ispartof>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2024-01, Vol.331 (3), p.242-244</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Jan 16, 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a259t-4f75dd4aea7f02962c46b8432121c7badf2aaaa6998c7ea39c3349e36e0f27ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a259t-4f75dd4aea7f02962c46b8432121c7badf2aaaa6998c7ea39c3349e36e0f27ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/10.1001/jama.2023.25057$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2023.25057$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,780,784,3338,27923,27924,76260,76263</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38227029$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howell, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corrado, Greg S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeSalvo, Karen B</creatorcontrib><title>Three Epochs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care</title><title>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</title><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><description>IMPORTANCE: Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) has reached an all-time high, and health care leaders across the ecosystem are faced with questions about where, when, and how to deploy AI and how to understand its risks, problems, and possibilities. OBSERVATIONS: While AI as a concept has existed since the 1950s, all AI is not the same. Capabilities and risks of various kinds of AI differ markedly, and on examination 3 epochs of AI emerge. AI 1.0 includes symbolic AI, which attempts to encode human knowledge into computational rules, as well as probabilistic models. The era of AI 2.0 began with deep learning, in which models learn from examples labeled with ground truth. This era brought about many advances both in people’s daily lives and in health care. Deep learning models are task-specific, meaning they do one thing at a time, and they primarily focus on classification and prediction. AI 3.0 is the era of foundation models and generative AI. Models in AI 3.0 have fundamentally new (and potentially transformative) capabilities, as well as new kinds of risks, such as hallucinations. These models can do many different kinds of tasks without being retrained on a new dataset. For example, a simple text instruction will change the model’s behavior. Prompts such as “Write this note for a specialist consultant” and “Write this note for the patient’s mother” will produce markedly different content. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Foundation models and generative AI represent a major revolution in AI’s capabilities, ffering tremendous potential to improve care. Health care leaders are making decisions about AI today. While any heuristic omits details and loses nuance, the framework of AI 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 may be helpful to decision-makers because each epoch has fundamentally different capabilities and risks.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Generative artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Probabilistic models</subject><issn>0098-7484</issn><issn>1538-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwIzGgSCwsaf0Z22NVFVqpEkuZLde50FT5KHYy8O9xKGXglhvuubtXD0L3BE8JxmR2sLWdUkzZlAos5AUaE8FUyoRWl2iMsVap5IqP0E0IBxyLMHmNRkxRKjHVY5Rt9x4gWR5btw9JWyRz35VF6UpbJeumg6oqP6BxkJRNsgJbdftkYT3coqvCVgHufvsEvb8st4tVunl7XS_mm9RSobuUF1LkObdgZRHfZdTxbKc4o4QSJ3c2L6iNlWmtnATLtGOMa2AZ4IJKm7MJej7dPfr2s4fQmboMLqayDbR9MFQTITKdCR7Rp3_ooe19E9MNlFZCKikiNTtRzrcheCjM0Ze19V-GYDMoNYNSMyg1P0rjxuPv3X5XQ_7Hnx1G4OEEDIvnKVWEKcnZN4L5eGY</recordid><startdate>20240116</startdate><enddate>20240116</enddate><creator>Howell, Michael D</creator><creator>Corrado, Greg S</creator><creator>DeSalvo, Karen B</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240116</creationdate><title>Three Epochs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care</title><author>Howell, Michael D ; Corrado, Greg S ; DeSalvo, Karen B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a259t-4f75dd4aea7f02962c46b8432121c7badf2aaaa6998c7ea39c3349e36e0f27ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Generative artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Probabilistic models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howell, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corrado, Greg S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeSalvo, Karen B</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howell, Michael D</au><au>Corrado, Greg S</au><au>DeSalvo, Karen B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three Epochs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care</atitle><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><date>2024-01-16</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>331</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>242</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>242-244</pages><issn>0098-7484</issn><eissn>1538-3598</eissn><abstract>IMPORTANCE: Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) has reached an all-time high, and health care leaders across the ecosystem are faced with questions about where, when, and how to deploy AI and how to understand its risks, problems, and possibilities. OBSERVATIONS: While AI as a concept has existed since the 1950s, all AI is not the same. Capabilities and risks of various kinds of AI differ markedly, and on examination 3 epochs of AI emerge. AI 1.0 includes symbolic AI, which attempts to encode human knowledge into computational rules, as well as probabilistic models. The era of AI 2.0 began with deep learning, in which models learn from examples labeled with ground truth. This era brought about many advances both in people’s daily lives and in health care. Deep learning models are task-specific, meaning they do one thing at a time, and they primarily focus on classification and prediction. AI 3.0 is the era of foundation models and generative AI. Models in AI 3.0 have fundamentally new (and potentially transformative) capabilities, as well as new kinds of risks, such as hallucinations. These models can do many different kinds of tasks without being retrained on a new dataset. For example, a simple text instruction will change the model’s behavior. Prompts such as “Write this note for a specialist consultant” and “Write this note for the patient’s mother” will produce markedly different content. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Foundation models and generative AI represent a major revolution in AI’s capabilities, ffering tremendous potential to improve care. Health care leaders are making decisions about AI today. While any heuristic omits details and loses nuance, the framework of AI 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 may be helpful to decision-makers because each epoch has fundamentally different capabilities and risks.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>38227029</pmid><doi>10.1001/jama.2023.25057</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-7484 |
ispartof | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2024-01, Vol.331 (3), p.242-244 |
issn | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2915569654 |
source | American Medical Association Journals |
subjects | Artificial intelligence Deep learning Generative artificial intelligence Health care Machine learning Mathematical models Probabilistic models |
title | Three Epochs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A24%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three%20Epochs%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20in%20Health%20Care&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Howell,%20Michael%20D&rft.date=2024-01-16&rft.volume=331&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=242&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=242-244&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft.eissn=1538-3598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jama.2023.25057&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919857875%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919857875&rft_id=info:pmid/38227029&rft_ama_id=2813874&rfr_iscdi=true |