Utility of nifedipine use for Doppler ultrasound early after liver transplantation to predict short-term complications and long-term outcomes

Purpose To evaluate the response to nifedipine administration measured by changes in hepatic arterial (HA) flow on post-operative Doppler ultrasound (US) to predict short-term complications and long-term outcomes in liver transplant (LT) patients. Methods Patients who underwent LT with post-operativ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Abdominal imaging 2024-04, Vol.49 (4), p.1103-1112
Hauptverfasser: Kadaba, Priyanka, Beitia, Laura, Rosen, Ally, Weinberg, Alan, Lewis, Sara, Simpson, William L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1112
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1103
container_title Abdominal imaging
container_volume 49
creator Kadaba, Priyanka
Beitia, Laura
Rosen, Ally
Weinberg, Alan
Lewis, Sara
Simpson, William L.
description Purpose To evaluate the response to nifedipine administration measured by changes in hepatic arterial (HA) flow on post-operative Doppler ultrasound (US) to predict short-term complications and long-term outcomes in liver transplant (LT) patients. Methods Patients who underwent LT with post-operative Doppler US within 3 days between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015 were included in this retrospective single center study. The patients who received and did not receive nifedipine during the Doppler US comprised the study and control groups, respectively. A positive response to nifedipine was defined as the detection of HA flow when none was present initially or a reduction in HA resistive index (RI) ≥ 0.1 after nifedipine administration. The rates of re-transplantation, re-operation, percutaneous intervention (PCI), and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association of clinic-demographic variables and Doppler findings with the outcome measures. Results 444 LT patients (305 M/139F, mean age 51.7 ± 17.4 years, mean interval between LT-Doppler US 1.12 ± 0.9 days) are presented. 220 patients comprised the nifedipine study group [ n  = 157/220 (71.4%) responder, n  = 63/220 (28.6%) nonresponder] and 224 patients comprised the control group. There was no difference in re-transplantation or PCI rates between the groups (all p -values ≥ 0.2 and ≥ 0.08, respectively). The responder group had a lower rate of re-operation vs. the control group (15.9% vs. 24.1%, p  = 0.03) and nonresponder group (15.9% vs. 31.8%, p  = 0.004). 1-year and 2-year OS were similar between the groups (all p -values > 0.37). Conclusion Short-term complication rates and long-term outcomes for patients with liver transplant who responded to nifedipine administration on Doppler US are similar to those who did not require nifedipine administration. A lack of response to nifedipine was associated with a higher re-operation rate.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00261-023-04152-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2914255919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2969405424</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d132e2aac7ff54036f1aa5b34cc170bd29cfa0e24576d4e0afe89ed0c76697f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctq3TAQhkVpSUKaF8iiCLrpxuno6uNlSa8QyCZZCx15lCrIlivJhfMQeeeqcXqhi240Qv83_2j4CTlncMEA-rcFgGvWARcdSKZ4B8_ICRdadwBq9_yv-zE5K-UeAJhWjHF1RI7FjrOBK3FCHm5riKEeaPJ0Dh7HsIQZ6VqQ-pTp-7QsETNdY822pHUeKdocD9T62p5j-N7OJs1liXautoY005rokpuTq7R8Tbl2DZ2oS9MSg3tECrXNKab5btPSWpuM5SV54W0sePZUT8ntxw83l5-7q-tPXy7fXXVOcF27kQmO3FrXe68kCO2ZtWovpHOsh_3IB-ctIJeq16NEsB53A47geq2H3vfilLzZfJecvq1YqplCcRjbDpjWYvjAJFdqYENDX_-D3qc1z-13jdKDBCW5bBTfKJdTKRm9WXKYbD4YBuZnXmbLy7S8zGNeBlrTqyfrdT_h-LvlVzoNEBtQmjTfYf4z-z-2PwAxwKOE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2969405424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of nifedipine use for Doppler ultrasound early after liver transplantation to predict short-term complications and long-term outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Kadaba, Priyanka ; Beitia, Laura ; Rosen, Ally ; Weinberg, Alan ; Lewis, Sara ; Simpson, William L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kadaba, Priyanka ; Beitia, Laura ; Rosen, Ally ; Weinberg, Alan ; Lewis, Sara ; Simpson, William L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To evaluate the response to nifedipine administration measured by changes in hepatic arterial (HA) flow on post-operative Doppler ultrasound (US) to predict short-term complications and long-term outcomes in liver transplant (LT) patients. Methods Patients who underwent LT with post-operative Doppler US within 3 days between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015 were included in this retrospective single center study. The patients who received and did not receive nifedipine during the Doppler US comprised the study and control groups, respectively. A positive response to nifedipine was defined as the detection of HA flow when none was present initially or a reduction in HA resistive index (RI) ≥ 0.1 after nifedipine administration. The rates of re-transplantation, re-operation, percutaneous intervention (PCI), and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association of clinic-demographic variables and Doppler findings with the outcome measures. Results 444 LT patients (305 M/139F, mean age 51.7 ± 17.4 years, mean interval between LT-Doppler US 1.12 ± 0.9 days) are presented. 220 patients comprised the nifedipine study group [ n  = 157/220 (71.4%) responder, n  = 63/220 (28.6%) nonresponder] and 224 patients comprised the control group. There was no difference in re-transplantation or PCI rates between the groups (all p -values ≥ 0.2 and ≥ 0.08, respectively). The responder group had a lower rate of re-operation vs. the control group (15.9% vs. 24.1%, p  = 0.03) and nonresponder group (15.9% vs. 31.8%, p  = 0.004). 1-year and 2-year OS were similar between the groups (all p -values &gt; 0.37). Conclusion Short-term complication rates and long-term outcomes for patients with liver transplant who responded to nifedipine administration on Doppler US are similar to those who did not require nifedipine administration. A lack of response to nifedipine was associated with a higher re-operation rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2366-0058</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2366-004X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2366-0058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04152-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38219253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Demographic variables ; Doppler effect ; Gastroenterology ; Hepatic Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Hepatobiliary ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Imaging ; Infant ; Liver ; Liver transplantation ; Liver Transplantation - adverse effects ; Liver transplants ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nifedipine ; Nifedipine - therapeutic use ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Percutaneous treatment ; Radiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Transplantation ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Doppler ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Abdominal imaging, 2024-04, Vol.49 (4), p.1103-1112</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d132e2aac7ff54036f1aa5b34cc170bd29cfa0e24576d4e0afe89ed0c76697f73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2756-2519</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00261-023-04152-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00261-023-04152-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38219253$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kadaba, Priyanka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beitia, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Ally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, William L.</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of nifedipine use for Doppler ultrasound early after liver transplantation to predict short-term complications and long-term outcomes</title><title>Abdominal imaging</title><addtitle>Abdom Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Abdom Radiol (NY)</addtitle><description>Purpose To evaluate the response to nifedipine administration measured by changes in hepatic arterial (HA) flow on post-operative Doppler ultrasound (US) to predict short-term complications and long-term outcomes in liver transplant (LT) patients. Methods Patients who underwent LT with post-operative Doppler US within 3 days between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015 were included in this retrospective single center study. The patients who received and did not receive nifedipine during the Doppler US comprised the study and control groups, respectively. A positive response to nifedipine was defined as the detection of HA flow when none was present initially or a reduction in HA resistive index (RI) ≥ 0.1 after nifedipine administration. The rates of re-transplantation, re-operation, percutaneous intervention (PCI), and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association of clinic-demographic variables and Doppler findings with the outcome measures. Results 444 LT patients (305 M/139F, mean age 51.7 ± 17.4 years, mean interval between LT-Doppler US 1.12 ± 0.9 days) are presented. 220 patients comprised the nifedipine study group [ n  = 157/220 (71.4%) responder, n  = 63/220 (28.6%) nonresponder] and 224 patients comprised the control group. There was no difference in re-transplantation or PCI rates between the groups (all p -values ≥ 0.2 and ≥ 0.08, respectively). The responder group had a lower rate of re-operation vs. the control group (15.9% vs. 24.1%, p  = 0.03) and nonresponder group (15.9% vs. 31.8%, p  = 0.004). 1-year and 2-year OS were similar between the groups (all p -values &gt; 0.37). Conclusion Short-term complication rates and long-term outcomes for patients with liver transplant who responded to nifedipine administration on Doppler US are similar to those who did not require nifedipine administration. A lack of response to nifedipine was associated with a higher re-operation rate.</description><subject>Demographic variables</subject><subject>Doppler effect</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Hepatic Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hepatobiliary</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver transplantation</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Liver transplants</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nifedipine</subject><subject>Nifedipine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention</subject><subject>Percutaneous treatment</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>2366-0058</issn><issn>2366-004X</issn><issn>2366-0058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctq3TAQhkVpSUKaF8iiCLrpxuno6uNlSa8QyCZZCx15lCrIlivJhfMQeeeqcXqhi240Qv83_2j4CTlncMEA-rcFgGvWARcdSKZ4B8_ICRdadwBq9_yv-zE5K-UeAJhWjHF1RI7FjrOBK3FCHm5riKEeaPJ0Dh7HsIQZ6VqQ-pTp-7QsETNdY822pHUeKdocD9T62p5j-N7OJs1liXautoY005rokpuTq7R8Tbl2DZ2oS9MSg3tECrXNKab5btPSWpuM5SV54W0sePZUT8ntxw83l5-7q-tPXy7fXXVOcF27kQmO3FrXe68kCO2ZtWovpHOsh_3IB-ctIJeq16NEsB53A47geq2H3vfilLzZfJecvq1YqplCcRjbDpjWYvjAJFdqYENDX_-D3qc1z-13jdKDBCW5bBTfKJdTKRm9WXKYbD4YBuZnXmbLy7S8zGNeBlrTqyfrdT_h-LvlVzoNEBtQmjTfYf4z-z-2PwAxwKOE</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Kadaba, Priyanka</creator><creator>Beitia, Laura</creator><creator>Rosen, Ally</creator><creator>Weinberg, Alan</creator><creator>Lewis, Sara</creator><creator>Simpson, William L.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2756-2519</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Utility of nifedipine use for Doppler ultrasound early after liver transplantation to predict short-term complications and long-term outcomes</title><author>Kadaba, Priyanka ; Beitia, Laura ; Rosen, Ally ; Weinberg, Alan ; Lewis, Sara ; Simpson, William L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-d132e2aac7ff54036f1aa5b34cc170bd29cfa0e24576d4e0afe89ed0c76697f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Demographic variables</topic><topic>Doppler effect</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Hepatic Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hepatobiliary</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver transplantation</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Liver transplants</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nifedipine</topic><topic>Nifedipine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention</topic><topic>Percutaneous treatment</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kadaba, Priyanka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beitia, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Ally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, William L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kadaba, Priyanka</au><au>Beitia, Laura</au><au>Rosen, Ally</au><au>Weinberg, Alan</au><au>Lewis, Sara</au><au>Simpson, William L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of nifedipine use for Doppler ultrasound early after liver transplantation to predict short-term complications and long-term outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Abdominal imaging</jtitle><stitle>Abdom Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Abdom Radiol (NY)</addtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1103</spage><epage>1112</epage><pages>1103-1112</pages><issn>2366-0058</issn><issn>2366-004X</issn><eissn>2366-0058</eissn><abstract>Purpose To evaluate the response to nifedipine administration measured by changes in hepatic arterial (HA) flow on post-operative Doppler ultrasound (US) to predict short-term complications and long-term outcomes in liver transplant (LT) patients. Methods Patients who underwent LT with post-operative Doppler US within 3 days between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015 were included in this retrospective single center study. The patients who received and did not receive nifedipine during the Doppler US comprised the study and control groups, respectively. A positive response to nifedipine was defined as the detection of HA flow when none was present initially or a reduction in HA resistive index (RI) ≥ 0.1 after nifedipine administration. The rates of re-transplantation, re-operation, percutaneous intervention (PCI), and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association of clinic-demographic variables and Doppler findings with the outcome measures. Results 444 LT patients (305 M/139F, mean age 51.7 ± 17.4 years, mean interval between LT-Doppler US 1.12 ± 0.9 days) are presented. 220 patients comprised the nifedipine study group [ n  = 157/220 (71.4%) responder, n  = 63/220 (28.6%) nonresponder] and 224 patients comprised the control group. There was no difference in re-transplantation or PCI rates between the groups (all p -values ≥ 0.2 and ≥ 0.08, respectively). The responder group had a lower rate of re-operation vs. the control group (15.9% vs. 24.1%, p  = 0.03) and nonresponder group (15.9% vs. 31.8%, p  = 0.004). 1-year and 2-year OS were similar between the groups (all p -values &gt; 0.37). Conclusion Short-term complication rates and long-term outcomes for patients with liver transplant who responded to nifedipine administration on Doppler US are similar to those who did not require nifedipine administration. A lack of response to nifedipine was associated with a higher re-operation rate.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>38219253</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00261-023-04152-0</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2756-2519</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2366-0058
ispartof Abdominal imaging, 2024-04, Vol.49 (4), p.1103-1112
issn 2366-0058
2366-004X
2366-0058
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2914255919
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Demographic variables
Doppler effect
Gastroenterology
Hepatic Artery - diagnostic imaging
Hepatobiliary
Hepatology
Humans
Imaging
Infant
Liver
Liver transplantation
Liver Transplantation - adverse effects
Liver transplants
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nifedipine
Nifedipine - therapeutic use
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Percutaneous treatment
Radiology
Retrospective Studies
Transplantation
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography, Doppler
Ultrasound
title Utility of nifedipine use for Doppler ultrasound early after liver transplantation to predict short-term complications and long-term outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A18%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20nifedipine%20use%20for%20Doppler%20ultrasound%20early%20after%20liver%20transplantation%20to%20predict%20short-term%20complications%20and%20long-term%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Abdominal%20imaging&rft.au=Kadaba,%20Priyanka&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1103&rft.epage=1112&rft.pages=1103-1112&rft.issn=2366-0058&rft.eissn=2366-0058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00261-023-04152-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2969405424%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2969405424&rft_id=info:pmid/38219253&rfr_iscdi=true