Preventing Static Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus on Different Types of Surfaces Using Microbubbles

Bacterial fouling and biofilm formation on surfaces have been ongoing problems in real life as well as in the medical field. Different approaches have been taken to tackle the issues, from costly surface modification to antibiotic-delivering strategies. In this study, we examined the potential of us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Langmuir 2024-01, Vol.40 (3), p.1698-1706
Hauptverfasser: Le, Khoa C. M., Tran, Anh T. Q., Vu, Mai P., Duong, Phuong V. Q., Nguyen, Khoi T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1706
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1698
container_title Langmuir
container_volume 40
creator Le, Khoa C. M.
Tran, Anh T. Q.
Vu, Mai P.
Duong, Phuong V. Q.
Nguyen, Khoi T.
description Bacterial fouling and biofilm formation on surfaces have been ongoing problems in real life as well as in the medical field. Different approaches have been taken to tackle the issues, from costly surface modification to antibiotic-delivering strategies. In this study, we examined the potential of using stabilized microbubbles (MBs) to shield against bacterial adhesion. Three types of surfaces were tested: hydrophilic glass (hydrophilic surface), neutral hydrophobic polystyrene (PS)-coated surfaces, and negatively charged hydrophobic octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS)-coated surfaces. By evaluating the colony-forming unit (CFU) values from each surface, MBs stabilized by 0.05 mM SDS were shown to only produce significant reduction of Staphylococcus aureus adhesion on PS surfaces, up to 60.29 and 82.32% compared to no-MB PS surfaces, and no-MB uncoated surfaces, correspondingly, due to the appropriate size, stability, and negative charges of the MB shielding layer. On the other hand, OTS coatings had an intrinsic antiadhesion effect (69.83% compared to uncoated surface), given that the negatively charged OTS-aqueous interface or surface porosity nature of the coating prohibited the attachment of MBs, leading to the elimination of the antifouling effect of MBs. Ultimately, MBs gave better shielding results than surface modification when compared to uncoated surfaces and hence can be applied more widely.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02773
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2913444735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2913444735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a348t-8ed6dcf6f4ae7727c7e67ca775f0dceb04e9da8f0fb771f96ecbf781931188813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOwzAQRC0EoqXwBwjlyCXFjt3YOUKhgAQCifYcOc66uEriYsdI_Xtc2nLktKvdmbH3IXRJ8JjgjNxI5ceN7JZtMG5MFc44p0doSCYZTici48doiDmjKWc5HaAz71cY44Ky4hQNqCCFyIUYou7dwTd0vemWyUcve6OSO2O1adpkZl0bB7ZLrN7u1p-bxiqrVPCJDA5iibt7ozW4mJDMN2vwv9rgtFSxX_ht7KtRzlahqhrw5-hEy8bDxb6O0GL2MJ8-pS9vj8_T25dUUib6VECd10rnmkngPOOKQ86V5Hyica2gwgyKWgqNdcU50UUOqtI8HkUJEUIQOkLXu9y1s18BfF-2xitoIjCwwZdZQShjjNNJlLKdNP7Sewe6XDvTSrcpCS63pMtIujyQLveko-1q_0KoWqj_TAe0UYB3gq19ZYPr4sH_Z_4ADaSQqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2913444735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preventing Static Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus on Different Types of Surfaces Using Microbubbles</title><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Le, Khoa C. M. ; Tran, Anh T. Q. ; Vu, Mai P. ; Duong, Phuong V. Q. ; Nguyen, Khoi T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Le, Khoa C. M. ; Tran, Anh T. Q. ; Vu, Mai P. ; Duong, Phuong V. Q. ; Nguyen, Khoi T.</creatorcontrib><description>Bacterial fouling and biofilm formation on surfaces have been ongoing problems in real life as well as in the medical field. Different approaches have been taken to tackle the issues, from costly surface modification to antibiotic-delivering strategies. In this study, we examined the potential of using stabilized microbubbles (MBs) to shield against bacterial adhesion. Three types of surfaces were tested: hydrophilic glass (hydrophilic surface), neutral hydrophobic polystyrene (PS)-coated surfaces, and negatively charged hydrophobic octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS)-coated surfaces. By evaluating the colony-forming unit (CFU) values from each surface, MBs stabilized by 0.05 mM SDS were shown to only produce significant reduction of Staphylococcus aureus adhesion on PS surfaces, up to 60.29 and 82.32% compared to no-MB PS surfaces, and no-MB uncoated surfaces, correspondingly, due to the appropriate size, stability, and negative charges of the MB shielding layer. On the other hand, OTS coatings had an intrinsic antiadhesion effect (69.83% compared to uncoated surface), given that the negatively charged OTS-aqueous interface or surface porosity nature of the coating prohibited the attachment of MBs, leading to the elimination of the antifouling effect of MBs. Ultimately, MBs gave better shielding results than surface modification when compared to uncoated surfaces and hence can be applied more widely.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0743-7463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02773</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38198688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>Langmuir, 2024-01, Vol.40 (3), p.1698-1706</ispartof><rights>2024 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a348t-8ed6dcf6f4ae7727c7e67ca775f0dceb04e9da8f0fb771f96ecbf781931188813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a348t-8ed6dcf6f4ae7727c7e67ca775f0dceb04e9da8f0fb771f96ecbf781931188813</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-8647-0816 ; 0000-0003-3934-0371</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02773$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02773$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38198688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Le, Khoa C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Anh T. Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vu, Mai P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duong, Phuong V. Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Khoi T.</creatorcontrib><title>Preventing Static Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus on Different Types of Surfaces Using Microbubbles</title><title>Langmuir</title><addtitle>Langmuir</addtitle><description>Bacterial fouling and biofilm formation on surfaces have been ongoing problems in real life as well as in the medical field. Different approaches have been taken to tackle the issues, from costly surface modification to antibiotic-delivering strategies. In this study, we examined the potential of using stabilized microbubbles (MBs) to shield against bacterial adhesion. Three types of surfaces were tested: hydrophilic glass (hydrophilic surface), neutral hydrophobic polystyrene (PS)-coated surfaces, and negatively charged hydrophobic octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS)-coated surfaces. By evaluating the colony-forming unit (CFU) values from each surface, MBs stabilized by 0.05 mM SDS were shown to only produce significant reduction of Staphylococcus aureus adhesion on PS surfaces, up to 60.29 and 82.32% compared to no-MB PS surfaces, and no-MB uncoated surfaces, correspondingly, due to the appropriate size, stability, and negative charges of the MB shielding layer. On the other hand, OTS coatings had an intrinsic antiadhesion effect (69.83% compared to uncoated surface), given that the negatively charged OTS-aqueous interface or surface porosity nature of the coating prohibited the attachment of MBs, leading to the elimination of the antifouling effect of MBs. Ultimately, MBs gave better shielding results than surface modification when compared to uncoated surfaces and hence can be applied more widely.</description><issn>0743-7463</issn><issn>1520-5827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFOwzAQRC0EoqXwBwjlyCXFjt3YOUKhgAQCifYcOc66uEriYsdI_Xtc2nLktKvdmbH3IXRJ8JjgjNxI5ceN7JZtMG5MFc44p0doSCYZTici48doiDmjKWc5HaAz71cY44Ky4hQNqCCFyIUYou7dwTd0vemWyUcve6OSO2O1adpkZl0bB7ZLrN7u1p-bxiqrVPCJDA5iibt7ozW4mJDMN2vwv9rgtFSxX_ht7KtRzlahqhrw5-hEy8bDxb6O0GL2MJ8-pS9vj8_T25dUUib6VECd10rnmkngPOOKQ86V5Hyica2gwgyKWgqNdcU50UUOqtI8HkUJEUIQOkLXu9y1s18BfF-2xitoIjCwwZdZQShjjNNJlLKdNP7Sewe6XDvTSrcpCS63pMtIujyQLveko-1q_0KoWqj_TAe0UYB3gq19ZYPr4sH_Z_4ADaSQqQ</recordid><startdate>20240123</startdate><enddate>20240123</enddate><creator>Le, Khoa C. M.</creator><creator>Tran, Anh T. Q.</creator><creator>Vu, Mai P.</creator><creator>Duong, Phuong V. Q.</creator><creator>Nguyen, Khoi T.</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8647-0816</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3934-0371</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240123</creationdate><title>Preventing Static Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus on Different Types of Surfaces Using Microbubbles</title><author>Le, Khoa C. M. ; Tran, Anh T. Q. ; Vu, Mai P. ; Duong, Phuong V. Q. ; Nguyen, Khoi T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a348t-8ed6dcf6f4ae7727c7e67ca775f0dceb04e9da8f0fb771f96ecbf781931188813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Le, Khoa C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Anh T. Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vu, Mai P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duong, Phuong V. Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Khoi T.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Langmuir</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Le, Khoa C. M.</au><au>Tran, Anh T. Q.</au><au>Vu, Mai P.</au><au>Duong, Phuong V. Q.</au><au>Nguyen, Khoi T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preventing Static Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus on Different Types of Surfaces Using Microbubbles</atitle><jtitle>Langmuir</jtitle><addtitle>Langmuir</addtitle><date>2024-01-23</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1698</spage><epage>1706</epage><pages>1698-1706</pages><issn>0743-7463</issn><eissn>1520-5827</eissn><abstract>Bacterial fouling and biofilm formation on surfaces have been ongoing problems in real life as well as in the medical field. Different approaches have been taken to tackle the issues, from costly surface modification to antibiotic-delivering strategies. In this study, we examined the potential of using stabilized microbubbles (MBs) to shield against bacterial adhesion. Three types of surfaces were tested: hydrophilic glass (hydrophilic surface), neutral hydrophobic polystyrene (PS)-coated surfaces, and negatively charged hydrophobic octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS)-coated surfaces. By evaluating the colony-forming unit (CFU) values from each surface, MBs stabilized by 0.05 mM SDS were shown to only produce significant reduction of Staphylococcus aureus adhesion on PS surfaces, up to 60.29 and 82.32% compared to no-MB PS surfaces, and no-MB uncoated surfaces, correspondingly, due to the appropriate size, stability, and negative charges of the MB shielding layer. On the other hand, OTS coatings had an intrinsic antiadhesion effect (69.83% compared to uncoated surface), given that the negatively charged OTS-aqueous interface or surface porosity nature of the coating prohibited the attachment of MBs, leading to the elimination of the antifouling effect of MBs. Ultimately, MBs gave better shielding results than surface modification when compared to uncoated surfaces and hence can be applied more widely.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>38198688</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02773</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8647-0816</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3934-0371</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0743-7463
ispartof Langmuir, 2024-01, Vol.40 (3), p.1698-1706
issn 0743-7463
1520-5827
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2913444735
source American Chemical Society Journals
title Preventing Static Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus on Different Types of Surfaces Using Microbubbles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A06%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preventing%20Static%20Biofilm%20Formation%20of%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20on%20Different%20Types%20of%20Surfaces%20Using%20Microbubbles&rft.jtitle=Langmuir&rft.au=Le,%20Khoa%20C.%20M.&rft.date=2024-01-23&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1698&rft.epage=1706&rft.pages=1698-1706&rft.issn=0743-7463&rft.eissn=1520-5827&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02773&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2913444735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2913444735&rft_id=info:pmid/38198688&rfr_iscdi=true