Real or MADE-up: Investigating Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) as an emerging syndrome

Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) has emerged as a consequence of widespread face mask usage during the Covid-19 pandemic. This review critically assesses the available evidence. A comprehensive search on PUBMED and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies on MADE, which were then categorized based on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eye (London) 2024-04, Vol.38 (6), p.1091-1096
Hauptverfasser: Teo, Michelle Ai Ling, Sullivan, Eoin O’, Patel, Bhupendra C. K., Malhotra, Raman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1096
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1091
container_title Eye (London)
container_volume 38
creator Teo, Michelle Ai Ling
Sullivan, Eoin O’
Patel, Bhupendra C. K.
Malhotra, Raman
description Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) has emerged as a consequence of widespread face mask usage during the Covid-19 pandemic. This review critically assesses the available evidence. A comprehensive search on PUBMED and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies on MADE, which were then categorized based on their design. A total of 26 studies were critically appraised, with the majority exhibiting poor study design quality. Investigating the impact of mask use on ocular surface irritation faced challenges due to global mask mandates, pandemic-related behavioural changes, and a lack of validated methods to measure the response to mask wear. Among the 15 studies, 12 reported a statistically significant reduction in TBUT associated with mask wear; however, the median decrease of 1.3 s was considered clinically insignificant. Results from Schirmer’s test in 8 studies varied, with 5 studies reporting a decrease, contradicting the hypothesis of misdirected airflow. Out of 7 studies on corneal and conjunctival staining, 6 indicated a worsening associated with mask wear. Five studies investigating OSDI scores reported an increase following mask wear, but 3 studies repeated the survey too soon. Limited evidence suggests that masks may cause mild ocular surface irritation, but the quality and certainty of this evidence remain low. Methodological limitations were prevalent across the majority of studies, and the observed changes were minimal. Therefore, it is unlikely that significant ocular surface pathology will develop in the majority of mask wearers. Currently, there is insufficient data to support the establishment of a new syndrome.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41433-023-02847-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2912525231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3037198128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-f991d08e53b520dfe0687af18f3109269a23981f21fb085534bf919500e2ad6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBcS8GZeRPPRtIl3Y5sfsCGIA-9C2iajc21nsgr796Z2KnghIeTiPOc9Jw8A5wRfE8zEjY9IxBjCtL0iSpA4AH0SJTHiEY8OQR9LjhGl9LUHTrxfYRyKCT4GPSaIJDGXfbB4NnoNawfno8kUNZtb-Fh9GL8tlnpbVEs41_4Njbyvs0JvTQ4nbgenOwOHLX8FtYe6gqY0btnSflflri7NKTiyeu3N2f4dgMXd9GX8gGZP94_j0QxljMZbZKUkORaGs5RTnFuDY5FoS4RlBEsaS02ZFMRSYlMsOGdRaiUJn8KG6jzO2AAMu9yNq9-bsLYqC5-Z9VpXpm68opJQHg4jAb38g67qxlVhO8UwS0iYQ0WgaEdlrvbeGas2rii12ymCVStdddJVkK6-pKu26WIf3aSlyX9avi0HgHWAD6Vqadzv7H9iPwE2aokQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3037198128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Real or MADE-up: Investigating Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) as an emerging syndrome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Teo, Michelle Ai Ling ; Sullivan, Eoin O’ ; Patel, Bhupendra C. K. ; Malhotra, Raman</creator><creatorcontrib>Teo, Michelle Ai Ling ; Sullivan, Eoin O’ ; Patel, Bhupendra C. K. ; Malhotra, Raman</creatorcontrib><description>Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) has emerged as a consequence of widespread face mask usage during the Covid-19 pandemic. This review critically assesses the available evidence. A comprehensive search on PUBMED and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies on MADE, which were then categorized based on their design. A total of 26 studies were critically appraised, with the majority exhibiting poor study design quality. Investigating the impact of mask use on ocular surface irritation faced challenges due to global mask mandates, pandemic-related behavioural changes, and a lack of validated methods to measure the response to mask wear. Among the 15 studies, 12 reported a statistically significant reduction in TBUT associated with mask wear; however, the median decrease of 1.3 s was considered clinically insignificant. Results from Schirmer’s test in 8 studies varied, with 5 studies reporting a decrease, contradicting the hypothesis of misdirected airflow. Out of 7 studies on corneal and conjunctival staining, 6 indicated a worsening associated with mask wear. Five studies investigating OSDI scores reported an increase following mask wear, but 3 studies repeated the survey too soon. Limited evidence suggests that masks may cause mild ocular surface irritation, but the quality and certainty of this evidence remain low. Methodological limitations were prevalent across the majority of studies, and the observed changes were minimal. Therefore, it is unlikely that significant ocular surface pathology will develop in the majority of mask wearers. Currently, there is insufficient data to support the establishment of a new syndrome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-222X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1476-5454</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5454</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02847-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38191659</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/1807/1482 ; 692/699/3161/3163 ; Cornea ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology ; Humans ; Irritation ; Laboratory Medicine ; Masks ; Masks - adverse effects ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Ophthalmology ; Pandemics ; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology ; Review Article ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Tears - physiology</subject><ispartof>Eye (London), 2024-04, Vol.38 (6), p.1091-1096</ispartof><rights>Crown 2024</rights><rights>2024. Crown.</rights><rights>Crown 2024.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-f991d08e53b520dfe0687af18f3109269a23981f21fb085534bf919500e2ad6c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2831-4557 ; 0000-0003-0483-4283</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41433-023-02847-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41433-023-02847-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38191659$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teo, Michelle Ai Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Eoin O’</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Bhupendra C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Raman</creatorcontrib><title>Real or MADE-up: Investigating Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) as an emerging syndrome</title><title>Eye (London)</title><addtitle>Eye</addtitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><description>Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) has emerged as a consequence of widespread face mask usage during the Covid-19 pandemic. This review critically assesses the available evidence. A comprehensive search on PUBMED and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies on MADE, which were then categorized based on their design. A total of 26 studies were critically appraised, with the majority exhibiting poor study design quality. Investigating the impact of mask use on ocular surface irritation faced challenges due to global mask mandates, pandemic-related behavioural changes, and a lack of validated methods to measure the response to mask wear. Among the 15 studies, 12 reported a statistically significant reduction in TBUT associated with mask wear; however, the median decrease of 1.3 s was considered clinically insignificant. Results from Schirmer’s test in 8 studies varied, with 5 studies reporting a decrease, contradicting the hypothesis of misdirected airflow. Out of 7 studies on corneal and conjunctival staining, 6 indicated a worsening associated with mask wear. Five studies investigating OSDI scores reported an increase following mask wear, but 3 studies repeated the survey too soon. Limited evidence suggests that masks may cause mild ocular surface irritation, but the quality and certainty of this evidence remain low. Methodological limitations were prevalent across the majority of studies, and the observed changes were minimal. Therefore, it is unlikely that significant ocular surface pathology will develop in the majority of mask wearers. Currently, there is insufficient data to support the establishment of a new syndrome.</description><subject>692/1807/1482</subject><subject>692/699/3161/3163</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irritation</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Masks</subject><subject>Masks - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Tears - physiology</subject><issn>0950-222X</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBcS8GZeRPPRtIl3Y5sfsCGIA-9C2iajc21nsgr796Z2KnghIeTiPOc9Jw8A5wRfE8zEjY9IxBjCtL0iSpA4AH0SJTHiEY8OQR9LjhGl9LUHTrxfYRyKCT4GPSaIJDGXfbB4NnoNawfno8kUNZtb-Fh9GL8tlnpbVEs41_4Njbyvs0JvTQ4nbgenOwOHLX8FtYe6gqY0btnSflflri7NKTiyeu3N2f4dgMXd9GX8gGZP94_j0QxljMZbZKUkORaGs5RTnFuDY5FoS4RlBEsaS02ZFMRSYlMsOGdRaiUJn8KG6jzO2AAMu9yNq9-bsLYqC5-Z9VpXpm68opJQHg4jAb38g67qxlVhO8UwS0iYQ0WgaEdlrvbeGas2rii12ymCVStdddJVkK6-pKu26WIf3aSlyX9avi0HgHWAD6Vqadzv7H9iPwE2aokQ</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Teo, Michelle Ai Ling</creator><creator>Sullivan, Eoin O’</creator><creator>Patel, Bhupendra C. K.</creator><creator>Malhotra, Raman</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2831-4557</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0483-4283</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Real or MADE-up: Investigating Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) as an emerging syndrome</title><author>Teo, Michelle Ai Ling ; Sullivan, Eoin O’ ; Patel, Bhupendra C. K. ; Malhotra, Raman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-f991d08e53b520dfe0687af18f3109269a23981f21fb085534bf919500e2ad6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>692/1807/1482</topic><topic>692/699/3161/3163</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irritation</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Masks</topic><topic>Masks - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Tears - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teo, Michelle Ai Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Eoin O’</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Bhupendra C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Raman</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teo, Michelle Ai Ling</au><au>Sullivan, Eoin O’</au><au>Patel, Bhupendra C. K.</au><au>Malhotra, Raman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Real or MADE-up: Investigating Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) as an emerging syndrome</atitle><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle><stitle>Eye</stitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1091</spage><epage>1096</epage><pages>1091-1096</pages><issn>0950-222X</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><eissn>1476-5454</eissn><abstract>Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) has emerged as a consequence of widespread face mask usage during the Covid-19 pandemic. This review critically assesses the available evidence. A comprehensive search on PUBMED and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies on MADE, which were then categorized based on their design. A total of 26 studies were critically appraised, with the majority exhibiting poor study design quality. Investigating the impact of mask use on ocular surface irritation faced challenges due to global mask mandates, pandemic-related behavioural changes, and a lack of validated methods to measure the response to mask wear. Among the 15 studies, 12 reported a statistically significant reduction in TBUT associated with mask wear; however, the median decrease of 1.3 s was considered clinically insignificant. Results from Schirmer’s test in 8 studies varied, with 5 studies reporting a decrease, contradicting the hypothesis of misdirected airflow. Out of 7 studies on corneal and conjunctival staining, 6 indicated a worsening associated with mask wear. Five studies investigating OSDI scores reported an increase following mask wear, but 3 studies repeated the survey too soon. Limited evidence suggests that masks may cause mild ocular surface irritation, but the quality and certainty of this evidence remain low. Methodological limitations were prevalent across the majority of studies, and the observed changes were minimal. Therefore, it is unlikely that significant ocular surface pathology will develop in the majority of mask wearers. Currently, there is insufficient data to support the establishment of a new syndrome.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>38191659</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41433-023-02847-8</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2831-4557</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0483-4283</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-222X
ispartof Eye (London), 2024-04, Vol.38 (6), p.1091-1096
issn 0950-222X
1476-5454
1476-5454
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2912525231
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects 692/1807/1482
692/699/3161/3163
Cornea
COVID-19
COVID-19 - epidemiology
Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology
Humans
Irritation
Laboratory Medicine
Masks
Masks - adverse effects
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Ophthalmology
Pandemics
Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology
Review Article
SARS-CoV-2
Statistical analysis
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Tears - physiology
title Real or MADE-up: Investigating Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) as an emerging syndrome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T11%3A34%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Real%20or%20MADE-up:%20Investigating%20Mask-Associated%20Dry%20Eye%20(MADE)%20as%20an%20emerging%20syndrome&rft.jtitle=Eye%20(London)&rft.au=Teo,%20Michelle%20Ai%20Ling&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1091&rft.epage=1096&rft.pages=1091-1096&rft.issn=0950-222X&rft.eissn=1476-5454&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41433-023-02847-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3037198128%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3037198128&rft_id=info:pmid/38191659&rfr_iscdi=true