Real or MADE-up: Investigating Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) as an emerging syndrome
Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) has emerged as a consequence of widespread face mask usage during the Covid-19 pandemic. This review critically assesses the available evidence. A comprehensive search on PUBMED and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies on MADE, which were then categorized based on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Eye (London) 2024-04, Vol.38 (6), p.1091-1096 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1096 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1091 |
container_title | Eye (London) |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Teo, Michelle Ai Ling Sullivan, Eoin O’ Patel, Bhupendra C. K. Malhotra, Raman |
description | Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) has emerged as a consequence of widespread face mask usage during the Covid-19 pandemic. This review critically assesses the available evidence. A comprehensive search on PUBMED and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies on MADE, which were then categorized based on their design. A total of 26 studies were critically appraised, with the majority exhibiting poor study design quality. Investigating the impact of mask use on ocular surface irritation faced challenges due to global mask mandates, pandemic-related behavioural changes, and a lack of validated methods to measure the response to mask wear. Among the 15 studies, 12 reported a statistically significant reduction in TBUT associated with mask wear; however, the median decrease of 1.3 s was considered clinically insignificant. Results from Schirmer’s test in 8 studies varied, with 5 studies reporting a decrease, contradicting the hypothesis of misdirected airflow. Out of 7 studies on corneal and conjunctival staining, 6 indicated a worsening associated with mask wear. Five studies investigating OSDI scores reported an increase following mask wear, but 3 studies repeated the survey too soon. Limited evidence suggests that masks may cause mild ocular surface irritation, but the quality and certainty of this evidence remain low. Methodological limitations were prevalent across the majority of studies, and the observed changes were minimal. Therefore, it is unlikely that significant ocular surface pathology will develop in the majority of mask wearers. Currently, there is insufficient data to support the establishment of a new syndrome. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41433-023-02847-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2912525231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3037198128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-f991d08e53b520dfe0687af18f3109269a23981f21fb085534bf919500e2ad6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBcS8GZeRPPRtIl3Y5sfsCGIA-9C2iajc21nsgr796Z2KnghIeTiPOc9Jw8A5wRfE8zEjY9IxBjCtL0iSpA4AH0SJTHiEY8OQR9LjhGl9LUHTrxfYRyKCT4GPSaIJDGXfbB4NnoNawfno8kUNZtb-Fh9GL8tlnpbVEs41_4Njbyvs0JvTQ4nbgenOwOHLX8FtYe6gqY0btnSflflri7NKTiyeu3N2f4dgMXd9GX8gGZP94_j0QxljMZbZKUkORaGs5RTnFuDY5FoS4RlBEsaS02ZFMRSYlMsOGdRaiUJn8KG6jzO2AAMu9yNq9-bsLYqC5-Z9VpXpm68opJQHg4jAb38g67qxlVhO8UwS0iYQ0WgaEdlrvbeGas2rii12ymCVStdddJVkK6-pKu26WIf3aSlyX9avi0HgHWAD6Vqadzv7H9iPwE2aokQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3037198128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Real or MADE-up: Investigating Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) as an emerging syndrome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Teo, Michelle Ai Ling ; Sullivan, Eoin O’ ; Patel, Bhupendra C. K. ; Malhotra, Raman</creator><creatorcontrib>Teo, Michelle Ai Ling ; Sullivan, Eoin O’ ; Patel, Bhupendra C. K. ; Malhotra, Raman</creatorcontrib><description>Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) has emerged as a consequence of widespread face mask usage during the Covid-19 pandemic. This review critically assesses the available evidence. A comprehensive search on PUBMED and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies on MADE, which were then categorized based on their design. A total of 26 studies were critically appraised, with the majority exhibiting poor study design quality. Investigating the impact of mask use on ocular surface irritation faced challenges due to global mask mandates, pandemic-related behavioural changes, and a lack of validated methods to measure the response to mask wear. Among the 15 studies, 12 reported a statistically significant reduction in TBUT associated with mask wear; however, the median decrease of 1.3 s was considered clinically insignificant. Results from Schirmer’s test in 8 studies varied, with 5 studies reporting a decrease, contradicting the hypothesis of misdirected airflow. Out of 7 studies on corneal and conjunctival staining, 6 indicated a worsening associated with mask wear. Five studies investigating OSDI scores reported an increase following mask wear, but 3 studies repeated the survey too soon. Limited evidence suggests that masks may cause mild ocular surface irritation, but the quality and certainty of this evidence remain low. Methodological limitations were prevalent across the majority of studies, and the observed changes were minimal. Therefore, it is unlikely that significant ocular surface pathology will develop in the majority of mask wearers. Currently, there is insufficient data to support the establishment of a new syndrome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-222X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1476-5454</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5454</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02847-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38191659</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/1807/1482 ; 692/699/3161/3163 ; Cornea ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology ; Humans ; Irritation ; Laboratory Medicine ; Masks ; Masks - adverse effects ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Ophthalmology ; Pandemics ; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology ; Review Article ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Tears - physiology</subject><ispartof>Eye (London), 2024-04, Vol.38 (6), p.1091-1096</ispartof><rights>Crown 2024</rights><rights>2024. Crown.</rights><rights>Crown 2024.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-f991d08e53b520dfe0687af18f3109269a23981f21fb085534bf919500e2ad6c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2831-4557 ; 0000-0003-0483-4283</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41433-023-02847-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41433-023-02847-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38191659$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teo, Michelle Ai Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Eoin O’</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Bhupendra C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Raman</creatorcontrib><title>Real or MADE-up: Investigating Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) as an emerging syndrome</title><title>Eye (London)</title><addtitle>Eye</addtitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><description>Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) has emerged as a consequence of widespread face mask usage during the Covid-19 pandemic. This review critically assesses the available evidence. A comprehensive search on PUBMED and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies on MADE, which were then categorized based on their design. A total of 26 studies were critically appraised, with the majority exhibiting poor study design quality. Investigating the impact of mask use on ocular surface irritation faced challenges due to global mask mandates, pandemic-related behavioural changes, and a lack of validated methods to measure the response to mask wear. Among the 15 studies, 12 reported a statistically significant reduction in TBUT associated with mask wear; however, the median decrease of 1.3 s was considered clinically insignificant. Results from Schirmer’s test in 8 studies varied, with 5 studies reporting a decrease, contradicting the hypothesis of misdirected airflow. Out of 7 studies on corneal and conjunctival staining, 6 indicated a worsening associated with mask wear. Five studies investigating OSDI scores reported an increase following mask wear, but 3 studies repeated the survey too soon. Limited evidence suggests that masks may cause mild ocular surface irritation, but the quality and certainty of this evidence remain low. Methodological limitations were prevalent across the majority of studies, and the observed changes were minimal. Therefore, it is unlikely that significant ocular surface pathology will develop in the majority of mask wearers. Currently, there is insufficient data to support the establishment of a new syndrome.</description><subject>692/1807/1482</subject><subject>692/699/3161/3163</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irritation</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Masks</subject><subject>Masks - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Tears - physiology</subject><issn>0950-222X</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBcS8GZeRPPRtIl3Y5sfsCGIA-9C2iajc21nsgr796Z2KnghIeTiPOc9Jw8A5wRfE8zEjY9IxBjCtL0iSpA4AH0SJTHiEY8OQR9LjhGl9LUHTrxfYRyKCT4GPSaIJDGXfbB4NnoNawfno8kUNZtb-Fh9GL8tlnpbVEs41_4Njbyvs0JvTQ4nbgenOwOHLX8FtYe6gqY0btnSflflri7NKTiyeu3N2f4dgMXd9GX8gGZP94_j0QxljMZbZKUkORaGs5RTnFuDY5FoS4RlBEsaS02ZFMRSYlMsOGdRaiUJn8KG6jzO2AAMu9yNq9-bsLYqC5-Z9VpXpm68opJQHg4jAb38g67qxlVhO8UwS0iYQ0WgaEdlrvbeGas2rii12ymCVStdddJVkK6-pKu26WIf3aSlyX9avi0HgHWAD6Vqadzv7H9iPwE2aokQ</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Teo, Michelle Ai Ling</creator><creator>Sullivan, Eoin O’</creator><creator>Patel, Bhupendra C. K.</creator><creator>Malhotra, Raman</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2831-4557</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0483-4283</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Real or MADE-up: Investigating Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) as an emerging syndrome</title><author>Teo, Michelle Ai Ling ; Sullivan, Eoin O’ ; Patel, Bhupendra C. K. ; Malhotra, Raman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-f991d08e53b520dfe0687af18f3109269a23981f21fb085534bf919500e2ad6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>692/1807/1482</topic><topic>692/699/3161/3163</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irritation</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Masks</topic><topic>Masks - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Tears - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teo, Michelle Ai Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Eoin O’</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Bhupendra C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Raman</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teo, Michelle Ai Ling</au><au>Sullivan, Eoin O’</au><au>Patel, Bhupendra C. K.</au><au>Malhotra, Raman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Real or MADE-up: Investigating Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) as an emerging syndrome</atitle><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle><stitle>Eye</stitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1091</spage><epage>1096</epage><pages>1091-1096</pages><issn>0950-222X</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><eissn>1476-5454</eissn><abstract>Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) has emerged as a consequence of widespread face mask usage during the Covid-19 pandemic. This review critically assesses the available evidence. A comprehensive search on PUBMED and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies on MADE, which were then categorized based on their design. A total of 26 studies were critically appraised, with the majority exhibiting poor study design quality. Investigating the impact of mask use on ocular surface irritation faced challenges due to global mask mandates, pandemic-related behavioural changes, and a lack of validated methods to measure the response to mask wear. Among the 15 studies, 12 reported a statistically significant reduction in TBUT associated with mask wear; however, the median decrease of 1.3 s was considered clinically insignificant. Results from Schirmer’s test in 8 studies varied, with 5 studies reporting a decrease, contradicting the hypothesis of misdirected airflow. Out of 7 studies on corneal and conjunctival staining, 6 indicated a worsening associated with mask wear. Five studies investigating OSDI scores reported an increase following mask wear, but 3 studies repeated the survey too soon. Limited evidence suggests that masks may cause mild ocular surface irritation, but the quality and certainty of this evidence remain low. Methodological limitations were prevalent across the majority of studies, and the observed changes were minimal. Therefore, it is unlikely that significant ocular surface pathology will develop in the majority of mask wearers. Currently, there is insufficient data to support the establishment of a new syndrome.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>38191659</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41433-023-02847-8</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2831-4557</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0483-4283</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-222X |
ispartof | Eye (London), 2024-04, Vol.38 (6), p.1091-1096 |
issn | 0950-222X 1476-5454 1476-5454 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2912525231 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | 692/1807/1482 692/699/3161/3163 Cornea COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology Humans Irritation Laboratory Medicine Masks Masks - adverse effects Medicine Medicine & Public Health Ophthalmology Pandemics Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology Review Article SARS-CoV-2 Statistical analysis Surgery Surgical Oncology Tears - physiology |
title | Real or MADE-up: Investigating Mask-Associated Dry Eye (MADE) as an emerging syndrome |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T11%3A34%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Real%20or%20MADE-up:%20Investigating%20Mask-Associated%20Dry%20Eye%20(MADE)%20as%20an%20emerging%20syndrome&rft.jtitle=Eye%20(London)&rft.au=Teo,%20Michelle%20Ai%20Ling&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1091&rft.epage=1096&rft.pages=1091-1096&rft.issn=0950-222X&rft.eissn=1476-5454&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41433-023-02847-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3037198128%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3037198128&rft_id=info:pmid/38191659&rfr_iscdi=true |