Comparison between a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor

An operation of a membrane bioreactor in sequencing batch mode named a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor (SBMBR) was investigated for enhancing nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Its performance was compared with a conventional membrane bioreactor (CMBR) at various influent COD/TN ratios of 3.4–28....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Process biochemistry (1991) 2006, Vol.41 (1), p.87-95
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Han-Min, Xiao, Jing-Ni, Cheng, Ying-Jun, Liu, Li-Fen, Zhang, Xing-Wen, Yang, Feng-Lin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 95
container_issue 1
container_start_page 87
container_title Process biochemistry (1991)
container_volume 41
creator Zhang, Han-Min
Xiao, Jing-Ni
Cheng, Ying-Jun
Liu, Li-Fen
Zhang, Xing-Wen
Yang, Feng-Lin
description An operation of a membrane bioreactor in sequencing batch mode named a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor (SBMBR) was investigated for enhancing nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Its performance was compared with a conventional membrane bioreactor (CMBR) at various influent COD/TN ratios of 3.4–28.2. The operational parameters were optimized to increase the treatment efficiency. COD removal averaged at 94.9 and 97.7%, respectively, for SBMBR and CMBR during the 8 months experimental period. The SBMBR system demonstrated good performance on nitrogen and phosphorus removal at different COD/TN ratios. When COD/TN was 6.3 and the total nitrogen (TN) load was 0.22 kg/(m 3 days), the TN and ammonium nitrogen removals of the SBMBR were maintained over 65 and 90%, respectively. Total phosphorus (TP) removal of the SBMBR was approximately 90% during most of the experimental time. In comparison, the CMBR did not perform so well. Its effluent TN concentration was close to that in the influent at COD/TN = 6.3 and TP removal was not stable. The specific nitrification rate test showed that pH value affected the activity of nitrifiers but no irreversible harm was induced. Furthermore, the sequencing batch mode operation of MBR retarded membrane fouling according to the monitoring of trans-membrane pressure (TMP).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.072
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29106477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1359511305002485</els_id><sourcerecordid>29106477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-fecd0f93588ccfef7f838b7b698a51ee05735bda1faf742b03d04d5783a8dbb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEuXxE5By4pZgx3XsnBCqeEmVuMDZ-LEGV4ld7LSIf4-r9ojEafcwMzv7IXRFcEMw6W5WzTpFo31sWoxZg2mDeXuEZkRwWtO2F8dlp6yvGSH0FJ3lvMKYEkLwDL0v4rhWyecYKg3TN0CoVJXhawPB-PBRaTWZz2qEUScVoCpXEigzxVSpYIvUxLCFMPkY1PCX7AKdODVkuDzMc_T2cP-6eKqXL4_Pi7tlbSjnU-3AWOx6yoQwxoHjTlChue56oRgBwIxTpq0iTjk-bzWmFs8t44IqYbXu6Dm63ucWFqV8nuTos4FhKHXiJsu2J7ibc16EbC80KeacwMl18qNKP5JgueMpV_LAU-54Skxl4Vl8t3sflC-2HpLMxhdIYH0CM0kb_T8Jv1T7hCs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29106477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Han-Min ; Xiao, Jing-Ni ; Cheng, Ying-Jun ; Liu, Li-Fen ; Zhang, Xing-Wen ; Yang, Feng-Lin</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Han-Min ; Xiao, Jing-Ni ; Cheng, Ying-Jun ; Liu, Li-Fen ; Zhang, Xing-Wen ; Yang, Feng-Lin</creatorcontrib><description>An operation of a membrane bioreactor in sequencing batch mode named a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor (SBMBR) was investigated for enhancing nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Its performance was compared with a conventional membrane bioreactor (CMBR) at various influent COD/TN ratios of 3.4–28.2. The operational parameters were optimized to increase the treatment efficiency. COD removal averaged at 94.9 and 97.7%, respectively, for SBMBR and CMBR during the 8 months experimental period. The SBMBR system demonstrated good performance on nitrogen and phosphorus removal at different COD/TN ratios. When COD/TN was 6.3 and the total nitrogen (TN) load was 0.22 kg/(m 3 days), the TN and ammonium nitrogen removals of the SBMBR were maintained over 65 and 90%, respectively. Total phosphorus (TP) removal of the SBMBR was approximately 90% during most of the experimental time. In comparison, the CMBR did not perform so well. Its effluent TN concentration was close to that in the influent at COD/TN = 6.3 and TP removal was not stable. The specific nitrification rate test showed that pH value affected the activity of nitrifiers but no irreversible harm was induced. Furthermore, the sequencing batch mode operation of MBR retarded membrane fouling according to the monitoring of trans-membrane pressure (TMP).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-5113</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Conventional membrane bioreactor (CMBR) ; Membrane fouling ; Nitrogen and phosphorus removal ; Sequencing batch membrane bioreactor (SBMBR) ; Specific nitrification rate</subject><ispartof>Process biochemistry (1991), 2006, Vol.41 (1), p.87-95</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-fecd0f93588ccfef7f838b7b698a51ee05735bda1faf742b03d04d5783a8dbb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-fecd0f93588ccfef7f838b7b698a51ee05735bda1faf742b03d04d5783a8dbb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.072$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,4012,27906,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Han-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Jing-Ni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Ying-Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Li-Fen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xing-Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Feng-Lin</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor</title><title>Process biochemistry (1991)</title><description>An operation of a membrane bioreactor in sequencing batch mode named a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor (SBMBR) was investigated for enhancing nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Its performance was compared with a conventional membrane bioreactor (CMBR) at various influent COD/TN ratios of 3.4–28.2. The operational parameters were optimized to increase the treatment efficiency. COD removal averaged at 94.9 and 97.7%, respectively, for SBMBR and CMBR during the 8 months experimental period. The SBMBR system demonstrated good performance on nitrogen and phosphorus removal at different COD/TN ratios. When COD/TN was 6.3 and the total nitrogen (TN) load was 0.22 kg/(m 3 days), the TN and ammonium nitrogen removals of the SBMBR were maintained over 65 and 90%, respectively. Total phosphorus (TP) removal of the SBMBR was approximately 90% during most of the experimental time. In comparison, the CMBR did not perform so well. Its effluent TN concentration was close to that in the influent at COD/TN = 6.3 and TP removal was not stable. The specific nitrification rate test showed that pH value affected the activity of nitrifiers but no irreversible harm was induced. Furthermore, the sequencing batch mode operation of MBR retarded membrane fouling according to the monitoring of trans-membrane pressure (TMP).</description><subject>Conventional membrane bioreactor (CMBR)</subject><subject>Membrane fouling</subject><subject>Nitrogen and phosphorus removal</subject><subject>Sequencing batch membrane bioreactor (SBMBR)</subject><subject>Specific nitrification rate</subject><issn>1359-5113</issn><issn>1873-3298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEuXxE5By4pZgx3XsnBCqeEmVuMDZ-LEGV4ld7LSIf4-r9ojEafcwMzv7IXRFcEMw6W5WzTpFo31sWoxZg2mDeXuEZkRwWtO2F8dlp6yvGSH0FJ3lvMKYEkLwDL0v4rhWyecYKg3TN0CoVJXhawPB-PBRaTWZz2qEUScVoCpXEigzxVSpYIvUxLCFMPkY1PCX7AKdODVkuDzMc_T2cP-6eKqXL4_Pi7tlbSjnU-3AWOx6yoQwxoHjTlChue56oRgBwIxTpq0iTjk-bzWmFs8t44IqYbXu6Dm63ucWFqV8nuTos4FhKHXiJsu2J7ibc16EbC80KeacwMl18qNKP5JgueMpV_LAU-54Skxl4Vl8t3sflC-2HpLMxhdIYH0CM0kb_T8Jv1T7hCs</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Zhang, Han-Min</creator><creator>Xiao, Jing-Ni</creator><creator>Cheng, Ying-Jun</creator><creator>Liu, Li-Fen</creator><creator>Zhang, Xing-Wen</creator><creator>Yang, Feng-Lin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Comparison between a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor</title><author>Zhang, Han-Min ; Xiao, Jing-Ni ; Cheng, Ying-Jun ; Liu, Li-Fen ; Zhang, Xing-Wen ; Yang, Feng-Lin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-fecd0f93588ccfef7f838b7b698a51ee05735bda1faf742b03d04d5783a8dbb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Conventional membrane bioreactor (CMBR)</topic><topic>Membrane fouling</topic><topic>Nitrogen and phosphorus removal</topic><topic>Sequencing batch membrane bioreactor (SBMBR)</topic><topic>Specific nitrification rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Han-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Jing-Ni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Ying-Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Li-Fen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xing-Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Feng-Lin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Process biochemistry (1991)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Han-Min</au><au>Xiao, Jing-Ni</au><au>Cheng, Ying-Jun</au><au>Liu, Li-Fen</au><au>Zhang, Xing-Wen</au><au>Yang, Feng-Lin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor</atitle><jtitle>Process biochemistry (1991)</jtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>87-95</pages><issn>1359-5113</issn><eissn>1873-3298</eissn><abstract>An operation of a membrane bioreactor in sequencing batch mode named a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor (SBMBR) was investigated for enhancing nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Its performance was compared with a conventional membrane bioreactor (CMBR) at various influent COD/TN ratios of 3.4–28.2. The operational parameters were optimized to increase the treatment efficiency. COD removal averaged at 94.9 and 97.7%, respectively, for SBMBR and CMBR during the 8 months experimental period. The SBMBR system demonstrated good performance on nitrogen and phosphorus removal at different COD/TN ratios. When COD/TN was 6.3 and the total nitrogen (TN) load was 0.22 kg/(m 3 days), the TN and ammonium nitrogen removals of the SBMBR were maintained over 65 and 90%, respectively. Total phosphorus (TP) removal of the SBMBR was approximately 90% during most of the experimental time. In comparison, the CMBR did not perform so well. Its effluent TN concentration was close to that in the influent at COD/TN = 6.3 and TP removal was not stable. The specific nitrification rate test showed that pH value affected the activity of nitrifiers but no irreversible harm was induced. Furthermore, the sequencing batch mode operation of MBR retarded membrane fouling according to the monitoring of trans-membrane pressure (TMP).</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.072</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1359-5113
ispartof Process biochemistry (1991), 2006, Vol.41 (1), p.87-95
issn 1359-5113
1873-3298
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29106477
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Conventional membrane bioreactor (CMBR)
Membrane fouling
Nitrogen and phosphorus removal
Sequencing batch membrane bioreactor (SBMBR)
Specific nitrification rate
title Comparison between a sequencing batch membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T00%3A52%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20a%20sequencing%20batch%20membrane%20bioreactor%20and%20a%20conventional%20membrane%20bioreactor&rft.jtitle=Process%20biochemistry%20(1991)&rft.au=Zhang,%20Han-Min&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=87-95&rft.issn=1359-5113&rft.eissn=1873-3298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29106477%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29106477&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1359511305002485&rfr_iscdi=true