FLOW: Flow dysfunction of hemodialysis vascular access: A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of surveillance of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts
Introduction: It is assumed that identification and correction of asymptomatic stenoses in the vascular access circuit will prevent thrombosis that would require urgent intervention to continue hemodialysis treatment. However, the evidence base for this assumption is limited. Recent international cl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of vascular access 2024-11, Vol.25 (6), p.2007-2017 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2017 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2007 |
container_title | The journal of vascular access |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Zomer, Bianca Ruiter, Matthijs S Dekker, Friedo W Goertz, Ellen GD de Haan, Michiel W Hemmelder, Marc HH Hiligsmann, Mickaël JC Konijn, Wanda S van Loon, Magda M Maessen, José MC Mees, Barend ME Rotmans, Joris I Schurink, Geert WH Vleugels, Marie-José JPJ Snoeijs, Maarten GJ |
description | Introduction:
It is assumed that identification and correction of asymptomatic stenoses in the vascular access circuit will prevent thrombosis that would require urgent intervention to continue hemodialysis treatment. However, the evidence base for this assumption is limited. Recent international clinical practice guidelines reach different conclusions on the use of surveillance for vascular access flow dysfunction and recommend further research to inform clinical practice.
Methods:
The FLOW trial is a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 individual participant treatment allocation ratio over two study arms. In the intervention group, only symptomatic vascular access stenoses detected by clinical monitoring are treated, whereas in the comparison group asymptomatic stenoses detected by surveillance using monthly dilution flow measurements are treated as well. Hemodialysis patients with a functional arteriovenous vascular access are enrolled. The primary outcome is the access-related intervention rate that will be analyzed using a general linear model with Poisson distribution. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, access-related serious adverse events, and quality of the surveillance process. A cost effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis will also be conducted. The study requires 828 patient-years of follow-up in 417 participants to detect a difference of 0.25 access-related interventions per year between study groups.
Discussion:
As one of the largest randomized controlled trials assessing the clinical impact of vascular access surveillance using a strong double-blinded study design, we believe the FLOW trial will provide much-needed evidence to improve vascular access care for hemodialysis patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/11297298231212754 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2909609196</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_11297298231212754</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2909609196</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-9e6629e7a2d7054586fbcc33f54130ec1bb7d400bd61c99e0a09ea268864e393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb9u2zAQh4kgQf61D9Cl4JhFLklJlOgtCOqmgAEvBjIKFHV0GEiiy6NcOC_TVy0Fu10KdOIR9_0-HnGEfOJswXlVfeFcqEqoWuRccFGVxQW55ZUoMslycZnq1M9m4IbcIb4xJlTJi2tyk9dcypLVt-TXar15WdJV73_S7oh2Gk10fqTe0lcYfOd0f0SH9KDRTL0OVBsDiEv6SIMeOz-4d-io8WMMvu9TGUOK0GSIr0DBWki-A4wpMztxCgdwfa9HA_NdhwjB-QT4Cal1GNMjSJOZ7oK2ET-QK6t7hI_n855sV1-3T8_ZevPt-9PjOjN5XsZMgZRCQaVFV7GyKGtpW5Natix4zsDwtq26grG2k9woBUwzBVrIupYF5Cq_Jw8n7T74HxNgbAaHBuZBIU3WCMWUZIormVB-Qk3wiAFssw9u0OHYcNbMa2n-WUvKfD7rp3aA7m_izx4SsDgBqHfQvPkpjOm3_zH-BsWrmFM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2909609196</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FLOW: Flow dysfunction of hemodialysis vascular access: A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of surveillance of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Zomer, Bianca ; Ruiter, Matthijs S ; Dekker, Friedo W ; Goertz, Ellen GD ; de Haan, Michiel W ; Hemmelder, Marc HH ; Hiligsmann, Mickaël JC ; Konijn, Wanda S ; van Loon, Magda M ; Maessen, José MC ; Mees, Barend ME ; Rotmans, Joris I ; Schurink, Geert WH ; Vleugels, Marie-José JPJ ; Snoeijs, Maarten GJ</creator><creatorcontrib>Zomer, Bianca ; Ruiter, Matthijs S ; Dekker, Friedo W ; Goertz, Ellen GD ; de Haan, Michiel W ; Hemmelder, Marc HH ; Hiligsmann, Mickaël JC ; Konijn, Wanda S ; van Loon, Magda M ; Maessen, José MC ; Mees, Barend ME ; Rotmans, Joris I ; Schurink, Geert WH ; Vleugels, Marie-José JPJ ; Snoeijs, Maarten GJ</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction:
It is assumed that identification and correction of asymptomatic stenoses in the vascular access circuit will prevent thrombosis that would require urgent intervention to continue hemodialysis treatment. However, the evidence base for this assumption is limited. Recent international clinical practice guidelines reach different conclusions on the use of surveillance for vascular access flow dysfunction and recommend further research to inform clinical practice.
Methods:
The FLOW trial is a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 individual participant treatment allocation ratio over two study arms. In the intervention group, only symptomatic vascular access stenoses detected by clinical monitoring are treated, whereas in the comparison group asymptomatic stenoses detected by surveillance using monthly dilution flow measurements are treated as well. Hemodialysis patients with a functional arteriovenous vascular access are enrolled. The primary outcome is the access-related intervention rate that will be analyzed using a general linear model with Poisson distribution. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, access-related serious adverse events, and quality of the surveillance process. A cost effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis will also be conducted. The study requires 828 patient-years of follow-up in 417 participants to detect a difference of 0.25 access-related interventions per year between study groups.
Discussion:
As one of the largest randomized controlled trials assessing the clinical impact of vascular access surveillance using a strong double-blinded study design, we believe the FLOW trial will provide much-needed evidence to improve vascular access care for hemodialysis patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1129-7298</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1724-6032</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/11297298231212754</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38166508</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - adverse effects ; Blood Flow Velocity ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Double-Blind Method ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - physiopathology ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - therapy ; Humans ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Regional Blood Flow ; Renal Dialysis ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Patency</subject><ispartof>The journal of vascular access, 2024-11, Vol.25 (6), p.2007-2017</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-9e6629e7a2d7054586fbcc33f54130ec1bb7d400bd61c99e0a09ea268864e393</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4834-4561 ; 0000-0001-9682-6234 ; 0000-0002-4551-2451 ; 0000-0002-5427-7123</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/11297298231212754$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/11297298231212754$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38166508$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zomer, Bianca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiter, Matthijs S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekker, Friedo W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goertz, Ellen GD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Haan, Michiel W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemmelder, Marc HH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiligsmann, Mickaël JC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konijn, Wanda S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Loon, Magda M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maessen, José MC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mees, Barend ME</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotmans, Joris I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schurink, Geert WH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vleugels, Marie-José JPJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snoeijs, Maarten GJ</creatorcontrib><title>FLOW: Flow dysfunction of hemodialysis vascular access: A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of surveillance of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts</title><title>The journal of vascular access</title><addtitle>J Vasc Access</addtitle><description>Introduction:
It is assumed that identification and correction of asymptomatic stenoses in the vascular access circuit will prevent thrombosis that would require urgent intervention to continue hemodialysis treatment. However, the evidence base for this assumption is limited. Recent international clinical practice guidelines reach different conclusions on the use of surveillance for vascular access flow dysfunction and recommend further research to inform clinical practice.
Methods:
The FLOW trial is a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 individual participant treatment allocation ratio over two study arms. In the intervention group, only symptomatic vascular access stenoses detected by clinical monitoring are treated, whereas in the comparison group asymptomatic stenoses detected by surveillance using monthly dilution flow measurements are treated as well. Hemodialysis patients with a functional arteriovenous vascular access are enrolled. The primary outcome is the access-related intervention rate that will be analyzed using a general linear model with Poisson distribution. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, access-related serious adverse events, and quality of the surveillance process. A cost effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis will also be conducted. The study requires 828 patient-years of follow-up in 417 participants to detect a difference of 0.25 access-related interventions per year between study groups.
Discussion:
As one of the largest randomized controlled trials assessing the clinical impact of vascular access surveillance using a strong double-blinded study design, we believe the FLOW trial will provide much-needed evidence to improve vascular access care for hemodialysis patients.</description><subject>Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - physiopathology</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Regional Blood Flow</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Patency</subject><issn>1129-7298</issn><issn>1724-6032</issn><issn>1724-6032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kb9u2zAQh4kgQf61D9Cl4JhFLklJlOgtCOqmgAEvBjIKFHV0GEiiy6NcOC_TVy0Fu10KdOIR9_0-HnGEfOJswXlVfeFcqEqoWuRccFGVxQW55ZUoMslycZnq1M9m4IbcIb4xJlTJi2tyk9dcypLVt-TXar15WdJV73_S7oh2Gk10fqTe0lcYfOd0f0SH9KDRTL0OVBsDiEv6SIMeOz-4d-io8WMMvu9TGUOK0GSIr0DBWki-A4wpMztxCgdwfa9HA_NdhwjB-QT4Cal1GNMjSJOZ7oK2ET-QK6t7hI_n855sV1-3T8_ZevPt-9PjOjN5XsZMgZRCQaVFV7GyKGtpW5Natix4zsDwtq26grG2k9woBUwzBVrIupYF5Cq_Jw8n7T74HxNgbAaHBuZBIU3WCMWUZIormVB-Qk3wiAFssw9u0OHYcNbMa2n-WUvKfD7rp3aA7m_izx4SsDgBqHfQvPkpjOm3_zH-BsWrmFM</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Zomer, Bianca</creator><creator>Ruiter, Matthijs S</creator><creator>Dekker, Friedo W</creator><creator>Goertz, Ellen GD</creator><creator>de Haan, Michiel W</creator><creator>Hemmelder, Marc HH</creator><creator>Hiligsmann, Mickaël JC</creator><creator>Konijn, Wanda S</creator><creator>van Loon, Magda M</creator><creator>Maessen, José MC</creator><creator>Mees, Barend ME</creator><creator>Rotmans, Joris I</creator><creator>Schurink, Geert WH</creator><creator>Vleugels, Marie-José JPJ</creator><creator>Snoeijs, Maarten GJ</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4834-4561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9682-6234</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4551-2451</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5427-7123</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>FLOW: Flow dysfunction of hemodialysis vascular access: A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of surveillance of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts</title><author>Zomer, Bianca ; Ruiter, Matthijs S ; Dekker, Friedo W ; Goertz, Ellen GD ; de Haan, Michiel W ; Hemmelder, Marc HH ; Hiligsmann, Mickaël JC ; Konijn, Wanda S ; van Loon, Magda M ; Maessen, José MC ; Mees, Barend ME ; Rotmans, Joris I ; Schurink, Geert WH ; Vleugels, Marie-José JPJ ; Snoeijs, Maarten GJ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-9e6629e7a2d7054586fbcc33f54130ec1bb7d400bd61c99e0a09ea268864e393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - physiopathology</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Regional Blood Flow</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Patency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zomer, Bianca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiter, Matthijs S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekker, Friedo W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goertz, Ellen GD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Haan, Michiel W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemmelder, Marc HH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiligsmann, Mickaël JC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konijn, Wanda S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Loon, Magda M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maessen, José MC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mees, Barend ME</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotmans, Joris I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schurink, Geert WH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vleugels, Marie-José JPJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snoeijs, Maarten GJ</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of vascular access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zomer, Bianca</au><au>Ruiter, Matthijs S</au><au>Dekker, Friedo W</au><au>Goertz, Ellen GD</au><au>de Haan, Michiel W</au><au>Hemmelder, Marc HH</au><au>Hiligsmann, Mickaël JC</au><au>Konijn, Wanda S</au><au>van Loon, Magda M</au><au>Maessen, José MC</au><au>Mees, Barend ME</au><au>Rotmans, Joris I</au><au>Schurink, Geert WH</au><au>Vleugels, Marie-José JPJ</au><au>Snoeijs, Maarten GJ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FLOW: Flow dysfunction of hemodialysis vascular access: A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of surveillance of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts</atitle><jtitle>The journal of vascular access</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Access</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2007</spage><epage>2017</epage><pages>2007-2017</pages><issn>1129-7298</issn><issn>1724-6032</issn><eissn>1724-6032</eissn><abstract>Introduction:
It is assumed that identification and correction of asymptomatic stenoses in the vascular access circuit will prevent thrombosis that would require urgent intervention to continue hemodialysis treatment. However, the evidence base for this assumption is limited. Recent international clinical practice guidelines reach different conclusions on the use of surveillance for vascular access flow dysfunction and recommend further research to inform clinical practice.
Methods:
The FLOW trial is a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 individual participant treatment allocation ratio over two study arms. In the intervention group, only symptomatic vascular access stenoses detected by clinical monitoring are treated, whereas in the comparison group asymptomatic stenoses detected by surveillance using monthly dilution flow measurements are treated as well. Hemodialysis patients with a functional arteriovenous vascular access are enrolled. The primary outcome is the access-related intervention rate that will be analyzed using a general linear model with Poisson distribution. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, access-related serious adverse events, and quality of the surveillance process. A cost effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis will also be conducted. The study requires 828 patient-years of follow-up in 417 participants to detect a difference of 0.25 access-related interventions per year between study groups.
Discussion:
As one of the largest randomized controlled trials assessing the clinical impact of vascular access surveillance using a strong double-blinded study design, we believe the FLOW trial will provide much-needed evidence to improve vascular access care for hemodialysis patients.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>38166508</pmid><doi>10.1177/11297298231212754</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4834-4561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9682-6234</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4551-2451</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5427-7123</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1129-7298 |
ispartof | The journal of vascular access, 2024-11, Vol.25 (6), p.2007-2017 |
issn | 1129-7298 1724-6032 1724-6032 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2909609196 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - adverse effects Blood Flow Velocity Blood Vessel Prosthesis Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects Cost-Benefit Analysis Double-Blind Method Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology Graft Occlusion, Vascular - physiopathology Graft Occlusion, Vascular - therapy Humans Multicenter Studies as Topic Predictive Value of Tests Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Regional Blood Flow Renal Dialysis Time Factors Treatment Outcome Vascular Patency |
title | FLOW: Flow dysfunction of hemodialysis vascular access: A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of surveillance of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T00%3A58%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FLOW:%20Flow%20dysfunction%20of%20hemodialysis%20vascular%20access:%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial%20on%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20surveillance%20of%20arteriovenous%20fistulas%20and%20grafts&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20vascular%20access&rft.au=Zomer,%20Bianca&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2007&rft.epage=2017&rft.pages=2007-2017&rft.issn=1129-7298&rft.eissn=1724-6032&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/11297298231212754&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2909609196%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2909609196&rft_id=info:pmid/38166508&rft_sage_id=10.1177_11297298231212754&rfr_iscdi=true |