Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing and Skin Sparing Mastectomy in Breast Augmented Patients: Prepectoral or Submuscular Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction?

Patients with breast augmentation facing a breast cancer diagnosis pose unique challenges for both breast and plastic surgeons in terms of treatment and reconstruction. Traditional submuscular direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction is often considered the standard approach, regardless of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aesthetic surgery journal 2024-04, Vol.44 (5), p.503-515
Hauptverfasser: Salgarello, Marzia, Fabbri, Mariachiara, Visconti, Giuseppe, Liliana, Barone Adesi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 515
container_issue 5
container_start_page 503
container_title Aesthetic surgery journal
container_volume 44
creator Salgarello, Marzia
Fabbri, Mariachiara
Visconti, Giuseppe
Liliana, Barone Adesi
description Patients with breast augmentation facing a breast cancer diagnosis pose unique challenges for both breast and plastic surgeons in terms of treatment and reconstruction. Traditional submuscular direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction is often considered the standard approach, regardless of the previous implant pocket. However, recent trends in prepectoral reconstruction provide an innovative solution for patients with prior subglandular and submuscular implants. This study aims to share our experiences with DTI breast reconstruction in patients with a history of breast augmentation, with a specific focus on the viability of prepectoral reconstruction. A retrospective review was conducted on 38 patients with prior breast augmentation who underwent either skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) for breast cancer, followed by DTI reconstruction between January 2015 and July 2023. Our analysis considered various factors, including previous implant positioning, capsular and implant status, and mastectomy flap thickness (MFT), offering insights into the rationale behind choosing the new implant positioning. Patients with a history of subglandular breast augmentation and an MFT greater than 1 cm were candidates for prepectoral reconstruction. When MFT was less than 1 cm but flap vascularity was sufficient, a prepectoral reconstruction was performed; otherwise, retropectoral reconstruction was preferred. Patients with submuscular breast augmentation were evaluated similarly, with submuscular reconstruction chosen when MFT was less than 1 cm and prepectoral reconstruction preferred when MFT exceeded 1 cm. Immediate prepectoral DTI reconstruction represents a feasible option for specific patients with a history of breast augmentation. Decisions regarding the reconstructive approach are influenced by variables such as mastectomy flap thickness, implant status, and capsular conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/asj/sjad383
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2906774487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2906774487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-6ef841d339a70cca7c3a9c215dc1d047c5f930a7f34bb8b8686a8db6b64fb11c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctOwzAQRS0EoqWwYo-8REKhdpzGDhvUllelAhUFqbto4jhVSl7YzqJfxS_iqoEFqxnNnLm6o4vQOSXXlERsCGYzNBtImWAHqE9HPvcYI6tD15OIeMInqx46MWZDiMPD4Bj1mKAj4kd-H33PyqaAynoTMCrFE63AWPymZF0Zq1tp87rC48wqjV_ypikUXjag82qNoUrx8jOv_gbP7lJJW5db7Kad0rhdl6qyTnoBNneducELrZodqKHAtcbLNilbI9sCNL7Ltdt4tvY6X_-s3J6iowwKo866OkAfD_fv0ydv_vo4m47nnvQDbr1QZSKgKWMRcCIlcMkgkj4dpZKmJOBylEWMAM9YkCQiEaEIQaRJmIRBllAq2QBd7nUbXX-1yti4zI1UhfOk6tbEfkRCzoNAcIde7VGpa2O0yuJG5yXobUxJvEsodgnFXUKOvuiE3dsq_WN_I2E_4DGSWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2906774487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing and Skin Sparing Mastectomy in Breast Augmented Patients: Prepectoral or Submuscular Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction?</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Salgarello, Marzia ; Fabbri, Mariachiara ; Visconti, Giuseppe ; Liliana, Barone Adesi</creator><creatorcontrib>Salgarello, Marzia ; Fabbri, Mariachiara ; Visconti, Giuseppe ; Liliana, Barone Adesi</creatorcontrib><description>Patients with breast augmentation facing a breast cancer diagnosis pose unique challenges for both breast and plastic surgeons in terms of treatment and reconstruction. Traditional submuscular direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction is often considered the standard approach, regardless of the previous implant pocket. However, recent trends in prepectoral reconstruction provide an innovative solution for patients with prior subglandular and submuscular implants. This study aims to share our experiences with DTI breast reconstruction in patients with a history of breast augmentation, with a specific focus on the viability of prepectoral reconstruction. A retrospective review was conducted on 38 patients with prior breast augmentation who underwent either skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) for breast cancer, followed by DTI reconstruction between January 2015 and July 2023. Our analysis considered various factors, including previous implant positioning, capsular and implant status, and mastectomy flap thickness (MFT), offering insights into the rationale behind choosing the new implant positioning. Patients with a history of subglandular breast augmentation and an MFT greater than 1 cm were candidates for prepectoral reconstruction. When MFT was less than 1 cm but flap vascularity was sufficient, a prepectoral reconstruction was performed; otherwise, retropectoral reconstruction was preferred. Patients with submuscular breast augmentation were evaluated similarly, with submuscular reconstruction chosen when MFT was less than 1 cm and prepectoral reconstruction preferred when MFT exceeded 1 cm. Immediate prepectoral DTI reconstruction represents a feasible option for specific patients with a history of breast augmentation. Decisions regarding the reconstructive approach are influenced by variables such as mastectomy flap thickness, implant status, and capsular conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-820X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-330X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjad383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38150292</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Aesthetic surgery journal, 2024-04, Vol.44 (5), p.503-515</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-6ef841d339a70cca7c3a9c215dc1d047c5f930a7f34bb8b8686a8db6b64fb11c3</cites><orcidid>0009-0008-5049-9440</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38150292$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salgarello, Marzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabbri, Mariachiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visconti, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liliana, Barone Adesi</creatorcontrib><title>Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing and Skin Sparing Mastectomy in Breast Augmented Patients: Prepectoral or Submuscular Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction?</title><title>Aesthetic surgery journal</title><addtitle>Aesthet Surg J</addtitle><description>Patients with breast augmentation facing a breast cancer diagnosis pose unique challenges for both breast and plastic surgeons in terms of treatment and reconstruction. Traditional submuscular direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction is often considered the standard approach, regardless of the previous implant pocket. However, recent trends in prepectoral reconstruction provide an innovative solution for patients with prior subglandular and submuscular implants. This study aims to share our experiences with DTI breast reconstruction in patients with a history of breast augmentation, with a specific focus on the viability of prepectoral reconstruction. A retrospective review was conducted on 38 patients with prior breast augmentation who underwent either skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) for breast cancer, followed by DTI reconstruction between January 2015 and July 2023. Our analysis considered various factors, including previous implant positioning, capsular and implant status, and mastectomy flap thickness (MFT), offering insights into the rationale behind choosing the new implant positioning. Patients with a history of subglandular breast augmentation and an MFT greater than 1 cm were candidates for prepectoral reconstruction. When MFT was less than 1 cm but flap vascularity was sufficient, a prepectoral reconstruction was performed; otherwise, retropectoral reconstruction was preferred. Patients with submuscular breast augmentation were evaluated similarly, with submuscular reconstruction chosen when MFT was less than 1 cm and prepectoral reconstruction preferred when MFT exceeded 1 cm. Immediate prepectoral DTI reconstruction represents a feasible option for specific patients with a history of breast augmentation. Decisions regarding the reconstructive approach are influenced by variables such as mastectomy flap thickness, implant status, and capsular conditions.</description><issn>1090-820X</issn><issn>1527-330X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkctOwzAQRS0EoqWwYo-8REKhdpzGDhvUllelAhUFqbto4jhVSl7YzqJfxS_iqoEFqxnNnLm6o4vQOSXXlERsCGYzNBtImWAHqE9HPvcYI6tD15OIeMInqx46MWZDiMPD4Bj1mKAj4kd-H33PyqaAynoTMCrFE63AWPymZF0Zq1tp87rC48wqjV_ypikUXjag82qNoUrx8jOv_gbP7lJJW5db7Kad0rhdl6qyTnoBNneducELrZodqKHAtcbLNilbI9sCNL7Ltdt4tvY6X_-s3J6iowwKo866OkAfD_fv0ydv_vo4m47nnvQDbr1QZSKgKWMRcCIlcMkgkj4dpZKmJOBylEWMAM9YkCQiEaEIQaRJmIRBllAq2QBd7nUbXX-1yti4zI1UhfOk6tbEfkRCzoNAcIde7VGpa2O0yuJG5yXobUxJvEsodgnFXUKOvuiE3dsq_WN_I2E_4DGSWA</recordid><startdate>20240404</startdate><enddate>20240404</enddate><creator>Salgarello, Marzia</creator><creator>Fabbri, Mariachiara</creator><creator>Visconti, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Liliana, Barone Adesi</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5049-9440</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240404</creationdate><title>Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing and Skin Sparing Mastectomy in Breast Augmented Patients: Prepectoral or Submuscular Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction?</title><author>Salgarello, Marzia ; Fabbri, Mariachiara ; Visconti, Giuseppe ; Liliana, Barone Adesi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-6ef841d339a70cca7c3a9c215dc1d047c5f930a7f34bb8b8686a8db6b64fb11c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salgarello, Marzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabbri, Mariachiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visconti, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liliana, Barone Adesi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic surgery journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salgarello, Marzia</au><au>Fabbri, Mariachiara</au><au>Visconti, Giuseppe</au><au>Liliana, Barone Adesi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing and Skin Sparing Mastectomy in Breast Augmented Patients: Prepectoral or Submuscular Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction?</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic surgery journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aesthet Surg J</addtitle><date>2024-04-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>515</epage><pages>503-515</pages><issn>1090-820X</issn><eissn>1527-330X</eissn><abstract>Patients with breast augmentation facing a breast cancer diagnosis pose unique challenges for both breast and plastic surgeons in terms of treatment and reconstruction. Traditional submuscular direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction is often considered the standard approach, regardless of the previous implant pocket. However, recent trends in prepectoral reconstruction provide an innovative solution for patients with prior subglandular and submuscular implants. This study aims to share our experiences with DTI breast reconstruction in patients with a history of breast augmentation, with a specific focus on the viability of prepectoral reconstruction. A retrospective review was conducted on 38 patients with prior breast augmentation who underwent either skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) for breast cancer, followed by DTI reconstruction between January 2015 and July 2023. Our analysis considered various factors, including previous implant positioning, capsular and implant status, and mastectomy flap thickness (MFT), offering insights into the rationale behind choosing the new implant positioning. Patients with a history of subglandular breast augmentation and an MFT greater than 1 cm were candidates for prepectoral reconstruction. When MFT was less than 1 cm but flap vascularity was sufficient, a prepectoral reconstruction was performed; otherwise, retropectoral reconstruction was preferred. Patients with submuscular breast augmentation were evaluated similarly, with submuscular reconstruction chosen when MFT was less than 1 cm and prepectoral reconstruction preferred when MFT exceeded 1 cm. Immediate prepectoral DTI reconstruction represents a feasible option for specific patients with a history of breast augmentation. Decisions regarding the reconstructive approach are influenced by variables such as mastectomy flap thickness, implant status, and capsular conditions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>38150292</pmid><doi>10.1093/asj/sjad383</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5049-9440</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-820X
ispartof Aesthetic surgery journal, 2024-04, Vol.44 (5), p.503-515
issn 1090-820X
1527-330X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2906774487
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing and Skin Sparing Mastectomy in Breast Augmented Patients: Prepectoral or Submuscular Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A25%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implant-Based%20Breast%20Reconstruction%20After%20Nipple%20Sparing%20and%20Skin%20Sparing%20Mastectomy%20in%20Breast%20Augmented%20Patients:%20Prepectoral%20or%20Submuscular%20Direct-to-Implant%20Reconstruction?&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20surgery%20journal&rft.au=Salgarello,%20Marzia&rft.date=2024-04-04&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=515&rft.pages=503-515&rft.issn=1090-820X&rft.eissn=1527-330X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/asj/sjad383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2906774487%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2906774487&rft_id=info:pmid/38150292&rfr_iscdi=true