Performance analysis of three pilot‐scale multi‐compartment anaerobic baffled reactors treating domestic wastewater at psychrophilic temperatures in Colorado
A transition from inefficient aerobic wastewater treatment methods to sustainable approaches is needed. Anaerobic bioreactors are a viable solution as they consume less energy, reduce biosolid production, and provide a source of renewable methane‐rich biogas. A barrier to widespread implementation o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water environment research 2023-12, Vol.95 (12), p.e10957-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e10957 |
container_title | Water environment research |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Callahan, Jennie L. Pfluger, Andrew R. Coffey, Carolyn L. Figueroa, Linda A. Munakata‐Marr, Junko |
description | A transition from inefficient aerobic wastewater treatment methods to sustainable approaches is needed. Anaerobic bioreactors are a viable solution as they consume less energy, reduce biosolid production, and provide a source of renewable methane‐rich biogas. A barrier to widespread implementation of anaerobic technologies is the lack of design guidance, especially in colder climates. This study bridges this knowledge gap by deriving design principles from three long‐running pilot‐scale anaerobic baffled reactors (ABRs) operating under psychrophilic conditions. The ABRs removed an average of 56% and 80% chemical oxygen demand (COD) and suspended solids, respectively, with a methane yield of 0.21 L CH4/g CODrem. Methane production may be improved with increased influent sCOD concentrations and decreased sulfate concentrations. Results suggest that ABRs can treat a range of wastewater strengths accompanied by useable methane production. Despite sharing location, temperature, and HRT, the ABRs displayed distinct performances, highlighting the significance of influent wastewater characteristics.
Practitioner Points
ABRs achieved 56% and 80% removal efficiencies for COD and suspended solids.
Average biogas was 63% methane, and methane yield was 0.21 L CH4/g CODrem.
Volumetric methane production was positively correlated with the influent sCOD/sulfate ratio and negatively correlated with influent sulfate loading.
Three pilot‐scale anaerobic baffled reactors treating domestic wastewater at psychrophilic temperatures in Colorado average 56% chemical oxygen demand (COD) and 80% suspended solids removal efficiencies while generating 0.21 L CH4/g CODrem. This performance is enhanced with higher soluble COD and lower sulfate concentrations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/wer.10957 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2905525987</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2905525987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3137-9056c4b86e89ba3010593ee6041510acc0e5b1663e72d7be80385d7a5053463b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0Eou3AghdAlti0i9DjOM5liUblIlUCIRDLyHFOGFd2HI4djWbHI_AKvBpPgtspLJBY-bf8-TuWf8aeCXgpAMrLPVIOnWoesFOhVFU0SoqHOUMtikqCPGFnMd4AiLKE6jE7ka0ou65qT9nPD0hTIK9ng1zP2h2ijTxMPO0IkS_WhfTr-49otEPuV5ds3pngF03J45xu7yCFwRo-6GlyOHJCbVKgyFNOyc5f-Rg8xpSRvY4J9zohcZ34Eg9mR2HZWZfPEvoFSaeVMHI7821wgfQYnrBHk3YRn96vG_b59dWn7dvi-v2bd9tX14WRQjZFB6o21dDW2HaDliBAdRKxhkooAdoYQDWIupbYlGMzYAuyVWOjFShZ1XKQG3Z-9C4Uvq35vb230aBzesawxr7ME1SpurbJ6It_0JuwUv68O6puKgXZumEXR8pQiJFw6heyXtOhF9Df9tbn3vq73jL7_N64Dh7Hv-SfojJweQT21uHh_6b-y9XHo_I3TxOnIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2906745005</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance analysis of three pilot‐scale multi‐compartment anaerobic baffled reactors treating domestic wastewater at psychrophilic temperatures in Colorado</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Callahan, Jennie L. ; Pfluger, Andrew R. ; Coffey, Carolyn L. ; Figueroa, Linda A. ; Munakata‐Marr, Junko</creator><creatorcontrib>Callahan, Jennie L. ; Pfluger, Andrew R. ; Coffey, Carolyn L. ; Figueroa, Linda A. ; Munakata‐Marr, Junko</creatorcontrib><description>A transition from inefficient aerobic wastewater treatment methods to sustainable approaches is needed. Anaerobic bioreactors are a viable solution as they consume less energy, reduce biosolid production, and provide a source of renewable methane‐rich biogas. A barrier to widespread implementation of anaerobic technologies is the lack of design guidance, especially in colder climates. This study bridges this knowledge gap by deriving design principles from three long‐running pilot‐scale anaerobic baffled reactors (ABRs) operating under psychrophilic conditions. The ABRs removed an average of 56% and 80% chemical oxygen demand (COD) and suspended solids, respectively, with a methane yield of 0.21 L CH4/g CODrem. Methane production may be improved with increased influent sCOD concentrations and decreased sulfate concentrations. Results suggest that ABRs can treat a range of wastewater strengths accompanied by useable methane production. Despite sharing location, temperature, and HRT, the ABRs displayed distinct performances, highlighting the significance of influent wastewater characteristics.
Practitioner Points
ABRs achieved 56% and 80% removal efficiencies for COD and suspended solids.
Average biogas was 63% methane, and methane yield was 0.21 L CH4/g CODrem.
Volumetric methane production was positively correlated with the influent sCOD/sulfate ratio and negatively correlated with influent sulfate loading.
Three pilot‐scale anaerobic baffled reactors treating domestic wastewater at psychrophilic temperatures in Colorado average 56% chemical oxygen demand (COD) and 80% suspended solids removal efficiencies while generating 0.21 L CH4/g CODrem. This performance is enhanced with higher soluble COD and lower sulfate concentrations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-4303</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-7531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wer.10957</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38129948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerobic treatment ; anaerobic baffled reactor ; Anaerobic conditions ; Anaerobic treatment ; Biogas ; Bioreactors ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Design ; Domestic wastewater ; Influents ; Methane ; methane production ; Oxygen requirement ; Reactors ; Solid suspensions ; statistical analysis ; Sulfates ; Suspended particulate matter ; Suspended solids ; Wastewater treatment</subject><ispartof>Water environment research, 2023-12, Vol.95 (12), p.e10957-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 Water Environment Federation.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3137-9056c4b86e89ba3010593ee6041510acc0e5b1663e72d7be80385d7a5053463b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9378-5884</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fwer.10957$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fwer.10957$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38129948$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Callahan, Jennie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfluger, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffey, Carolyn L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueroa, Linda A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munakata‐Marr, Junko</creatorcontrib><title>Performance analysis of three pilot‐scale multi‐compartment anaerobic baffled reactors treating domestic wastewater at psychrophilic temperatures in Colorado</title><title>Water environment research</title><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><description>A transition from inefficient aerobic wastewater treatment methods to sustainable approaches is needed. Anaerobic bioreactors are a viable solution as they consume less energy, reduce biosolid production, and provide a source of renewable methane‐rich biogas. A barrier to widespread implementation of anaerobic technologies is the lack of design guidance, especially in colder climates. This study bridges this knowledge gap by deriving design principles from three long‐running pilot‐scale anaerobic baffled reactors (ABRs) operating under psychrophilic conditions. The ABRs removed an average of 56% and 80% chemical oxygen demand (COD) and suspended solids, respectively, with a methane yield of 0.21 L CH4/g CODrem. Methane production may be improved with increased influent sCOD concentrations and decreased sulfate concentrations. Results suggest that ABRs can treat a range of wastewater strengths accompanied by useable methane production. Despite sharing location, temperature, and HRT, the ABRs displayed distinct performances, highlighting the significance of influent wastewater characteristics.
Practitioner Points
ABRs achieved 56% and 80% removal efficiencies for COD and suspended solids.
Average biogas was 63% methane, and methane yield was 0.21 L CH4/g CODrem.
Volumetric methane production was positively correlated with the influent sCOD/sulfate ratio and negatively correlated with influent sulfate loading.
Three pilot‐scale anaerobic baffled reactors treating domestic wastewater at psychrophilic temperatures in Colorado average 56% chemical oxygen demand (COD) and 80% suspended solids removal efficiencies while generating 0.21 L CH4/g CODrem. This performance is enhanced with higher soluble COD and lower sulfate concentrations.</description><subject>Aerobic treatment</subject><subject>anaerobic baffled reactor</subject><subject>Anaerobic conditions</subject><subject>Anaerobic treatment</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Domestic wastewater</subject><subject>Influents</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>methane production</subject><subject>Oxygen requirement</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Solid suspensions</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Suspended particulate matter</subject><subject>Suspended solids</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><issn>1061-4303</issn><issn>1554-7531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0Eou3AghdAlti0i9DjOM5liUblIlUCIRDLyHFOGFd2HI4djWbHI_AKvBpPgtspLJBY-bf8-TuWf8aeCXgpAMrLPVIOnWoesFOhVFU0SoqHOUMtikqCPGFnMd4AiLKE6jE7ka0ou65qT9nPD0hTIK9ng1zP2h2ijTxMPO0IkS_WhfTr-49otEPuV5ds3pngF03J45xu7yCFwRo-6GlyOHJCbVKgyFNOyc5f-Rg8xpSRvY4J9zohcZ34Eg9mR2HZWZfPEvoFSaeVMHI7821wgfQYnrBHk3YRn96vG_b59dWn7dvi-v2bd9tX14WRQjZFB6o21dDW2HaDliBAdRKxhkooAdoYQDWIupbYlGMzYAuyVWOjFShZ1XKQG3Z-9C4Uvq35vb230aBzesawxr7ME1SpurbJ6It_0JuwUv68O6puKgXZumEXR8pQiJFw6heyXtOhF9Df9tbn3vq73jL7_N64Dh7Hv-SfojJweQT21uHh_6b-y9XHo_I3TxOnIg</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Callahan, Jennie L.</creator><creator>Pfluger, Andrew R.</creator><creator>Coffey, Carolyn L.</creator><creator>Figueroa, Linda A.</creator><creator>Munakata‐Marr, Junko</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9378-5884</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Performance analysis of three pilot‐scale multi‐compartment anaerobic baffled reactors treating domestic wastewater at psychrophilic temperatures in Colorado</title><author>Callahan, Jennie L. ; Pfluger, Andrew R. ; Coffey, Carolyn L. ; Figueroa, Linda A. ; Munakata‐Marr, Junko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3137-9056c4b86e89ba3010593ee6041510acc0e5b1663e72d7be80385d7a5053463b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aerobic treatment</topic><topic>anaerobic baffled reactor</topic><topic>Anaerobic conditions</topic><topic>Anaerobic treatment</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Domestic wastewater</topic><topic>Influents</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>methane production</topic><topic>Oxygen requirement</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Solid suspensions</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Suspended particulate matter</topic><topic>Suspended solids</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Callahan, Jennie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfluger, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffey, Carolyn L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueroa, Linda A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munakata‐Marr, Junko</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Callahan, Jennie L.</au><au>Pfluger, Andrew R.</au><au>Coffey, Carolyn L.</au><au>Figueroa, Linda A.</au><au>Munakata‐Marr, Junko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance analysis of three pilot‐scale multi‐compartment anaerobic baffled reactors treating domestic wastewater at psychrophilic temperatures in Colorado</atitle><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e10957</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e10957-n/a</pages><issn>1061-4303</issn><eissn>1554-7531</eissn><abstract>A transition from inefficient aerobic wastewater treatment methods to sustainable approaches is needed. Anaerobic bioreactors are a viable solution as they consume less energy, reduce biosolid production, and provide a source of renewable methane‐rich biogas. A barrier to widespread implementation of anaerobic technologies is the lack of design guidance, especially in colder climates. This study bridges this knowledge gap by deriving design principles from three long‐running pilot‐scale anaerobic baffled reactors (ABRs) operating under psychrophilic conditions. The ABRs removed an average of 56% and 80% chemical oxygen demand (COD) and suspended solids, respectively, with a methane yield of 0.21 L CH4/g CODrem. Methane production may be improved with increased influent sCOD concentrations and decreased sulfate concentrations. Results suggest that ABRs can treat a range of wastewater strengths accompanied by useable methane production. Despite sharing location, temperature, and HRT, the ABRs displayed distinct performances, highlighting the significance of influent wastewater characteristics.
Practitioner Points
ABRs achieved 56% and 80% removal efficiencies for COD and suspended solids.
Average biogas was 63% methane, and methane yield was 0.21 L CH4/g CODrem.
Volumetric methane production was positively correlated with the influent sCOD/sulfate ratio and negatively correlated with influent sulfate loading.
Three pilot‐scale anaerobic baffled reactors treating domestic wastewater at psychrophilic temperatures in Colorado average 56% chemical oxygen demand (COD) and 80% suspended solids removal efficiencies while generating 0.21 L CH4/g CODrem. This performance is enhanced with higher soluble COD and lower sulfate concentrations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>38129948</pmid><doi>10.1002/wer.10957</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9378-5884</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1061-4303 |
ispartof | Water environment research, 2023-12, Vol.95 (12), p.e10957-n/a |
issn | 1061-4303 1554-7531 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2905525987 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aerobic treatment anaerobic baffled reactor Anaerobic conditions Anaerobic treatment Biogas Bioreactors Chemical oxygen demand Design Domestic wastewater Influents Methane methane production Oxygen requirement Reactors Solid suspensions statistical analysis Sulfates Suspended particulate matter Suspended solids Wastewater treatment |
title | Performance analysis of three pilot‐scale multi‐compartment anaerobic baffled reactors treating domestic wastewater at psychrophilic temperatures in Colorado |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A54%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20analysis%20of%20three%20pilot%E2%80%90scale%20multi%E2%80%90compartment%20anaerobic%20baffled%20reactors%20treating%20domestic%20wastewater%20at%20psychrophilic%20temperatures%20in%20Colorado&rft.jtitle=Water%20environment%20research&rft.au=Callahan,%20Jennie%20L.&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e10957&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e10957-n/a&rft.issn=1061-4303&rft.eissn=1554-7531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wer.10957&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2905525987%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2906745005&rft_id=info:pmid/38129948&rfr_iscdi=true |