High-protein home parenteral nutrition in malnourished oncology patients: a systematic literature review

Introduction Up to 83% of oncology patients are affected by cancer-related malnutrition, depending on tumour location and patient age. Parenteral nutrition can be used to manage malnutrition, but there is no clear consensus as to the optimal protein dosage. The objective of this systematic literatur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2024-01, Vol.32 (1), p.52, Article 52
Hauptverfasser: Cotogni, Paolo, Shaw, Clare, Jimenez-Fonseca, Paula, Partridge, Dominic, Pritchett, David, Webb, Neil, Crompton, Amy, Garcia-Lorda, Pilar, Shepelev, Julian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 52
container_title Supportive care in cancer
container_volume 32
creator Cotogni, Paolo
Shaw, Clare
Jimenez-Fonseca, Paula
Partridge, Dominic
Pritchett, David
Webb, Neil
Crompton, Amy
Garcia-Lorda, Pilar
Shepelev, Julian
description Introduction Up to 83% of oncology patients are affected by cancer-related malnutrition, depending on tumour location and patient age. Parenteral nutrition can be used to manage malnutrition, but there is no clear consensus as to the optimal protein dosage. The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to identify studies on malnourished oncology patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) where protein or amino acid delivery was reported in g/kg bodyweight/day, and to compare outcomes between patients receiving low ( 1.5 g/kg/day). Methods Literature searches were performed on 5 th October 2021 in Embase, MEDLINE, and five Cochrane Library and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases. Searches were complemented by hand-searching of conference proceedings, a clinical trial registry, and bibliographic reference lists of included studies and relevant SLRs/meta-analyses. Results Nineteen publications were included; sixteen investigated standard protein, two reported low protein, and one included both, but none assessed high-protein doses. Only one randomised controlled trial (RCT) was identified; all other studies were observational studies. The only study to compare two protein doses reported significantly greater weight gain in patients receiving 1.15 g/kg/day than those receiving 0.77 g/kg/day. Conclusion At present, there is insufficient evidence to determine the optimal protein dosage for malnourished oncology patients receiving HPN. Data from non-HPN studies and critically ill patients indicate that high-protein interventions are associated with increased overall survival and quality of life; further studies are needed to establish whether the same applies in malnourished oncology patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00520-023-08218-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2905517298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2904460451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-7e1f83699aa767a8888137ad855ffaed62fda9665c385b39dd14feeef8f34c303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9vFSEUxYmpaZ-1X8CFIenGDcqfYYDuTKOtSRM3uiZ05vIezQw8gal5_fTy-mqbuJANCed3z72Xg9A7Rj8yStWnQqnklFAuCNWcafLwCq1YJwRRQpgjtKKmY6QTUp6gN6XcUcqUkvwYnQjNuJFKr9DmOqw3ZJtThRDxJs2Aty5DrJDdhONSc6ghRdzE2U0xLTmUDYw4xSFNab1rdA0NLxfY4bIrFeb2MOAp7B3qkgFnuA_w-y167d1U4OzpPkU_v375cXlNbr5ffbv8fEMGoWglCpjXojfGOdUrp9thQrlRS-m9g7HnfnSm7-UgtLwVZhxZ5wHAay-6QVBxij4cfNtOvxYo1c6hDDBNLkJaiuWGSskUN7qh5_-gd22_2KbbU13X006yRvEDNeRUSgZvtznMLu8so3afgz3kYFsO9jEH-9CK3j9ZL7czjM8lfz--AeIAlCbFNeSX3v-x_QMLKZXY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2904460451</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High-protein home parenteral nutrition in malnourished oncology patients: a systematic literature review</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Cotogni, Paolo ; Shaw, Clare ; Jimenez-Fonseca, Paula ; Partridge, Dominic ; Pritchett, David ; Webb, Neil ; Crompton, Amy ; Garcia-Lorda, Pilar ; Shepelev, Julian</creator><creatorcontrib>Cotogni, Paolo ; Shaw, Clare ; Jimenez-Fonseca, Paula ; Partridge, Dominic ; Pritchett, David ; Webb, Neil ; Crompton, Amy ; Garcia-Lorda, Pilar ; Shepelev, Julian</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Up to 83% of oncology patients are affected by cancer-related malnutrition, depending on tumour location and patient age. Parenteral nutrition can be used to manage malnutrition, but there is no clear consensus as to the optimal protein dosage. The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to identify studies on malnourished oncology patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) where protein or amino acid delivery was reported in g/kg bodyweight/day, and to compare outcomes between patients receiving low (&lt; 1 g/kg bodyweight/day), standard (1–1.5 g/kg/day), and high-protein doses (&gt; 1.5 g/kg/day). Methods Literature searches were performed on 5 th October 2021 in Embase, MEDLINE, and five Cochrane Library and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases. Searches were complemented by hand-searching of conference proceedings, a clinical trial registry, and bibliographic reference lists of included studies and relevant SLRs/meta-analyses. Results Nineteen publications were included; sixteen investigated standard protein, two reported low protein, and one included both, but none assessed high-protein doses. Only one randomised controlled trial (RCT) was identified; all other studies were observational studies. The only study to compare two protein doses reported significantly greater weight gain in patients receiving 1.15 g/kg/day than those receiving 0.77 g/kg/day. Conclusion At present, there is insufficient evidence to determine the optimal protein dosage for malnourished oncology patients receiving HPN. Data from non-HPN studies and critically ill patients indicate that high-protein interventions are associated with increased overall survival and quality of life; further studies are needed to establish whether the same applies in malnourished oncology patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08218-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38129578</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Literature reviews ; Malnutrition ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Nutrition ; Oncology ; Pain Medicine ; Parenteral nutrition ; Proteins ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Review ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2024-01, Vol.32 (1), p.52, Article 52</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-7e1f83699aa767a8888137ad855ffaed62fda9665c385b39dd14feeef8f34c303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-023-08218-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-023-08218-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38129578$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cotogni, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez-Fonseca, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partridge, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pritchett, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crompton, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Lorda, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepelev, Julian</creatorcontrib><title>High-protein home parenteral nutrition in malnourished oncology patients: a systematic literature review</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Introduction Up to 83% of oncology patients are affected by cancer-related malnutrition, depending on tumour location and patient age. Parenteral nutrition can be used to manage malnutrition, but there is no clear consensus as to the optimal protein dosage. The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to identify studies on malnourished oncology patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) where protein or amino acid delivery was reported in g/kg bodyweight/day, and to compare outcomes between patients receiving low (&lt; 1 g/kg bodyweight/day), standard (1–1.5 g/kg/day), and high-protein doses (&gt; 1.5 g/kg/day). Methods Literature searches were performed on 5 th October 2021 in Embase, MEDLINE, and five Cochrane Library and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases. Searches were complemented by hand-searching of conference proceedings, a clinical trial registry, and bibliographic reference lists of included studies and relevant SLRs/meta-analyses. Results Nineteen publications were included; sixteen investigated standard protein, two reported low protein, and one included both, but none assessed high-protein doses. Only one randomised controlled trial (RCT) was identified; all other studies were observational studies. The only study to compare two protein doses reported significantly greater weight gain in patients receiving 1.15 g/kg/day than those receiving 0.77 g/kg/day. Conclusion At present, there is insufficient evidence to determine the optimal protein dosage for malnourished oncology patients receiving HPN. Data from non-HPN studies and critically ill patients indicate that high-protein interventions are associated with increased overall survival and quality of life; further studies are needed to establish whether the same applies in malnourished oncology patients.</description><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Malnutrition</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Parenteral nutrition</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9vFSEUxYmpaZ-1X8CFIenGDcqfYYDuTKOtSRM3uiZ05vIezQw8gal5_fTy-mqbuJANCed3z72Xg9A7Rj8yStWnQqnklFAuCNWcafLwCq1YJwRRQpgjtKKmY6QTUp6gN6XcUcqUkvwYnQjNuJFKr9DmOqw3ZJtThRDxJs2Aty5DrJDdhONSc6ghRdzE2U0xLTmUDYw4xSFNab1rdA0NLxfY4bIrFeb2MOAp7B3qkgFnuA_w-y167d1U4OzpPkU_v375cXlNbr5ffbv8fEMGoWglCpjXojfGOdUrp9thQrlRS-m9g7HnfnSm7-UgtLwVZhxZ5wHAay-6QVBxij4cfNtOvxYo1c6hDDBNLkJaiuWGSskUN7qh5_-gd22_2KbbU13X006yRvEDNeRUSgZvtznMLu8so3afgz3kYFsO9jEH-9CK3j9ZL7czjM8lfz--AeIAlCbFNeSX3v-x_QMLKZXY</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Cotogni, Paolo</creator><creator>Shaw, Clare</creator><creator>Jimenez-Fonseca, Paula</creator><creator>Partridge, Dominic</creator><creator>Pritchett, David</creator><creator>Webb, Neil</creator><creator>Crompton, Amy</creator><creator>Garcia-Lorda, Pilar</creator><creator>Shepelev, Julian</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>High-protein home parenteral nutrition in malnourished oncology patients: a systematic literature review</title><author>Cotogni, Paolo ; Shaw, Clare ; Jimenez-Fonseca, Paula ; Partridge, Dominic ; Pritchett, David ; Webb, Neil ; Crompton, Amy ; Garcia-Lorda, Pilar ; Shepelev, Julian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-7e1f83699aa767a8888137ad855ffaed62fda9665c385b39dd14feeef8f34c303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Malnutrition</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Parenteral nutrition</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cotogni, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez-Fonseca, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partridge, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pritchett, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crompton, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Lorda, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepelev, Julian</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cotogni, Paolo</au><au>Shaw, Clare</au><au>Jimenez-Fonseca, Paula</au><au>Partridge, Dominic</au><au>Pritchett, David</au><au>Webb, Neil</au><au>Crompton, Amy</au><au>Garcia-Lorda, Pilar</au><au>Shepelev, Julian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High-protein home parenteral nutrition in malnourished oncology patients: a systematic literature review</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>52</spage><pages>52-</pages><artnum>52</artnum><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Introduction Up to 83% of oncology patients are affected by cancer-related malnutrition, depending on tumour location and patient age. Parenteral nutrition can be used to manage malnutrition, but there is no clear consensus as to the optimal protein dosage. The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to identify studies on malnourished oncology patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) where protein or amino acid delivery was reported in g/kg bodyweight/day, and to compare outcomes between patients receiving low (&lt; 1 g/kg bodyweight/day), standard (1–1.5 g/kg/day), and high-protein doses (&gt; 1.5 g/kg/day). Methods Literature searches were performed on 5 th October 2021 in Embase, MEDLINE, and five Cochrane Library and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases. Searches were complemented by hand-searching of conference proceedings, a clinical trial registry, and bibliographic reference lists of included studies and relevant SLRs/meta-analyses. Results Nineteen publications were included; sixteen investigated standard protein, two reported low protein, and one included both, but none assessed high-protein doses. Only one randomised controlled trial (RCT) was identified; all other studies were observational studies. The only study to compare two protein doses reported significantly greater weight gain in patients receiving 1.15 g/kg/day than those receiving 0.77 g/kg/day. Conclusion At present, there is insufficient evidence to determine the optimal protein dosage for malnourished oncology patients receiving HPN. Data from non-HPN studies and critically ill patients indicate that high-protein interventions are associated with increased overall survival and quality of life; further studies are needed to establish whether the same applies in malnourished oncology patients.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>38129578</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-023-08218-z</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-4355
ispartof Supportive care in cancer, 2024-01, Vol.32 (1), p.52, Article 52
issn 0941-4355
1433-7339
1433-7339
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2905517298
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Literature reviews
Malnutrition
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nursing
Nursing Research
Nutrition
Oncology
Pain Medicine
Parenteral nutrition
Proteins
Rehabilitation Medicine
Review
Systematic review
title High-protein home parenteral nutrition in malnourished oncology patients: a systematic literature review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T04%3A49%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High-protein%20home%20parenteral%20nutrition%20in%20malnourished%20oncology%20patients:%20a%20systematic%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Cotogni,%20Paolo&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=52&rft.pages=52-&rft.artnum=52&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-023-08218-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2904460451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2904460451&rft_id=info:pmid/38129578&rfr_iscdi=true