Utilization of Immunization Information Systems (IIS) among independently owned community pharmacies: A national survey
Immunization information systems (IIS) consolidate provider-submitted immunization information. We reassessed independently owned community pharmacies’ IIS enrollment, verification of immunizations needs via IIS records retrieval, and immunization records reporting to IISs following post-pandemic sh...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2024-01, Vol.42 (2), p.65-68 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 68 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 65 |
| container_title | Vaccine |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Meininger, Christopher Ezeala, Oluchukwu McCormick, Nicholas Fish, Hannah Beckner, John Ha, David Westrick, Salisa C. |
| description | Immunization information systems (IIS) consolidate provider-submitted immunization information. We reassessed independently owned community pharmacies’ IIS enrollment, verification of immunizations needs via IIS records retrieval, and immunization records reporting to IISs following post-pandemic shifts in community pharmacy operations.
A cross-sectional online survey of National Community Pharmacists Association pharmacist, pharmacy owner, and pharmacy technician members was conducted in Fall 2022.
202 complete responses were analyzed. Margin of error was an estimated 7 %. Respondents were: 53.2 % female, ∼87 % White, 69.8 % managers, and 86.1 % practicing in standalone community pharmacies. Almost all (91.6 %) were enrolled in IIS. About two-thirds frequently or always utilized IIS to retrieve immunization records prior to immunization. On average, 81.2 % of influenza and 83.5 % of non-COVID/non-influenza vaccination records were submitted.
Enrollment rates are high among studied pharmacies, as are records reporting rates. However, records retrieval rates are suboptimal. Future work should focus on addressing suboptimal retrieval rates within immunization-providing pharmacies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.12.040 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2903326709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X2301486X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2903326709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-616001dfad05a76544367b1216455b851e6aaf884c174151ac3b0dd0cc9388b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EokPhJ4AssSmLBF-_krCpqopHpEosSiV2luM44FFiD3YyVfj1uDNTFmxYXF9b-s651j0IvQZSAgH5flvutTHO25ISykqgJeHkCdpAXbGCCqifog2hkhccyPcz9CKlLSFEMGieozNWA2GNFBt0fze70f3WswsehwG307T4x3frhxCn4_12TbOdEr5o29t3WE_B_8DO93Zn8-HnccXh3tsem3BwmFe8-6mz2DibPuAr7A82esRpiXu7vkTPBj0m--rUz9Hdp4_frr8UN18_t9dXN4VhHOZCgiQE-kH3ROhKCs6ZrDqgILkQXS3ASq2HuuYGKg4CtGEd6XtiTMPqupPsHF0cfXcx_FpsmtXkkrHjqL0NS1K0IYxRWZEmo2__QbdhifnLB6qCXIxnShwpE0NK0Q5qF92k46qAqIdk1FadklEPySigKieTdW9O7ks32f6v6jGKDFweAZvXsXc2qpR3543tXbRmVn1w_xnxB3OrokA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2907190734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utilization of Immunization Information Systems (IIS) among independently owned community pharmacies: A national survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Meininger, Christopher ; Ezeala, Oluchukwu ; McCormick, Nicholas ; Fish, Hannah ; Beckner, John ; Ha, David ; Westrick, Salisa C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meininger, Christopher ; Ezeala, Oluchukwu ; McCormick, Nicholas ; Fish, Hannah ; Beckner, John ; Ha, David ; Westrick, Salisa C.</creatorcontrib><description>Immunization information systems (IIS) consolidate provider-submitted immunization information. We reassessed independently owned community pharmacies’ IIS enrollment, verification of immunizations needs via IIS records retrieval, and immunization records reporting to IISs following post-pandemic shifts in community pharmacy operations.
A cross-sectional online survey of National Community Pharmacists Association pharmacist, pharmacy owner, and pharmacy technician members was conducted in Fall 2022.
202 complete responses were analyzed. Margin of error was an estimated 7 %. Respondents were: 53.2 % female, ∼87 % White, 69.8 % managers, and 86.1 % practicing in standalone community pharmacies. Almost all (91.6 %) were enrolled in IIS. About two-thirds frequently or always utilized IIS to retrieve immunization records prior to immunization. On average, 81.2 % of influenza and 83.5 % of non-COVID/non-influenza vaccination records were submitted.
Enrollment rates are high among studied pharmacies, as are records reporting rates. However, records retrieval rates are suboptimal. Future work should focus on addressing suboptimal retrieval rates within immunization-providing pharmacies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.12.040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38103965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Community pharmacy ; Community Pharmacy Services ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Drug stores ; Error analysis ; Female ; Humans ; IIS ; Immunisation Information System ; Immunisation registry ; Immunization ; Influenza ; Information processing ; Information Systems ; Male ; Pharmacies ; Pharmacist ; Pharmacists ; Retrieval ; Surveys ; Vaccination ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2024-01, Vol.42 (2), p.65-68</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-616001dfad05a76544367b1216455b851e6aaf884c174151ac3b0dd0cc9388b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3497-0406</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2907190734?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38103965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meininger, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezeala, Oluchukwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fish, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckner, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westrick, Salisa C.</creatorcontrib><title>Utilization of Immunization Information Systems (IIS) among independently owned community pharmacies: A national survey</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Immunization information systems (IIS) consolidate provider-submitted immunization information. We reassessed independently owned community pharmacies’ IIS enrollment, verification of immunizations needs via IIS records retrieval, and immunization records reporting to IISs following post-pandemic shifts in community pharmacy operations.
A cross-sectional online survey of National Community Pharmacists Association pharmacist, pharmacy owner, and pharmacy technician members was conducted in Fall 2022.
202 complete responses were analyzed. Margin of error was an estimated 7 %. Respondents were: 53.2 % female, ∼87 % White, 69.8 % managers, and 86.1 % practicing in standalone community pharmacies. Almost all (91.6 %) were enrolled in IIS. About two-thirds frequently or always utilized IIS to retrieve immunization records prior to immunization. On average, 81.2 % of influenza and 83.5 % of non-COVID/non-influenza vaccination records were submitted.
Enrollment rates are high among studied pharmacies, as are records reporting rates. However, records retrieval rates are suboptimal. Future work should focus on addressing suboptimal retrieval rates within immunization-providing pharmacies.</description><subject>Community pharmacy</subject><subject>Community Pharmacy Services</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IIS</subject><subject>Immunisation Information System</subject><subject>Immunisation registry</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Information Systems</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pharmacies</subject><subject>Pharmacist</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Retrieval</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EokPhJ4AssSmLBF-_krCpqopHpEosSiV2luM44FFiD3YyVfj1uDNTFmxYXF9b-s651j0IvQZSAgH5flvutTHO25ISykqgJeHkCdpAXbGCCqifog2hkhccyPcz9CKlLSFEMGieozNWA2GNFBt0fze70f3WswsehwG307T4x3frhxCn4_12TbOdEr5o29t3WE_B_8DO93Zn8-HnccXh3tsem3BwmFe8-6mz2DibPuAr7A82esRpiXu7vkTPBj0m--rUz9Hdp4_frr8UN18_t9dXN4VhHOZCgiQE-kH3ROhKCs6ZrDqgILkQXS3ASq2HuuYGKg4CtGEd6XtiTMPqupPsHF0cfXcx_FpsmtXkkrHjqL0NS1K0IYxRWZEmo2__QbdhifnLB6qCXIxnShwpE0NK0Q5qF92k46qAqIdk1FadklEPySigKieTdW9O7ks32f6v6jGKDFweAZvXsXc2qpR3543tXbRmVn1w_xnxB3OrokA</recordid><startdate>20240112</startdate><enddate>20240112</enddate><creator>Meininger, Christopher</creator><creator>Ezeala, Oluchukwu</creator><creator>McCormick, Nicholas</creator><creator>Fish, Hannah</creator><creator>Beckner, John</creator><creator>Ha, David</creator><creator>Westrick, Salisa C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3497-0406</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240112</creationdate><title>Utilization of Immunization Information Systems (IIS) among independently owned community pharmacies: A national survey</title><author>Meininger, Christopher ; Ezeala, Oluchukwu ; McCormick, Nicholas ; Fish, Hannah ; Beckner, John ; Ha, David ; Westrick, Salisa C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-616001dfad05a76544367b1216455b851e6aaf884c174151ac3b0dd0cc9388b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Community pharmacy</topic><topic>Community Pharmacy Services</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IIS</topic><topic>Immunisation Information System</topic><topic>Immunisation registry</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Information Systems</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pharmacies</topic><topic>Pharmacist</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Retrieval</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meininger, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezeala, Oluchukwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fish, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckner, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westrick, Salisa C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meininger, Christopher</au><au>Ezeala, Oluchukwu</au><au>McCormick, Nicholas</au><au>Fish, Hannah</au><au>Beckner, John</au><au>Ha, David</au><au>Westrick, Salisa C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utilization of Immunization Information Systems (IIS) among independently owned community pharmacies: A national survey</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2024-01-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>65-68</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Immunization information systems (IIS) consolidate provider-submitted immunization information. We reassessed independently owned community pharmacies’ IIS enrollment, verification of immunizations needs via IIS records retrieval, and immunization records reporting to IISs following post-pandemic shifts in community pharmacy operations.
A cross-sectional online survey of National Community Pharmacists Association pharmacist, pharmacy owner, and pharmacy technician members was conducted in Fall 2022.
202 complete responses were analyzed. Margin of error was an estimated 7 %. Respondents were: 53.2 % female, ∼87 % White, 69.8 % managers, and 86.1 % practicing in standalone community pharmacies. Almost all (91.6 %) were enrolled in IIS. About two-thirds frequently or always utilized IIS to retrieve immunization records prior to immunization. On average, 81.2 % of influenza and 83.5 % of non-COVID/non-influenza vaccination records were submitted.
Enrollment rates are high among studied pharmacies, as are records reporting rates. However, records retrieval rates are suboptimal. Future work should focus on addressing suboptimal retrieval rates within immunization-providing pharmacies.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38103965</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.12.040</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3497-0406</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
| ispartof | Vaccine, 2024-01, Vol.42 (2), p.65-68 |
| issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2903326709 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Community pharmacy Community Pharmacy Services COVID-19 vaccines Cross-Sectional Studies Drug stores Error analysis Female Humans IIS Immunisation Information System Immunisation registry Immunization Influenza Information processing Information Systems Male Pharmacies Pharmacist Pharmacists Retrieval Surveys Vaccination Vaccines |
| title | Utilization of Immunization Information Systems (IIS) among independently owned community pharmacies: A national survey |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A24%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utilization%20of%20Immunization%20Information%20Systems%20(IIS)%20among%20independently%20owned%20community%20pharmacies:%20A%20national%20survey&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Meininger,%20Christopher&rft.date=2024-01-12&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=65-68&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.12.040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2903326709%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2907190734&rft_id=info:pmid/38103965&rft_els_id=S0264410X2301486X&rfr_iscdi=true |