Motivators of and barriers to drug checking engagement in British Columbia, Canada: Findings from a cross-sectional study

Responding to increasing rates of illicit drug toxicity mortality in British Columbia, regional health authorities introduced various types and models of drug checking services starting in 2016. Uptake has been gradual yet consistent, but motivators and barriers of service use have not been well-des...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International journal of drug policy 2024-01, Vol.123, p.104290-104290, Article 104290
Hauptverfasser: Tobias, Samuel, Ferguson, Max, Palis, Heather, Burmeister, Charlene, McDougall, Jenny, Liu, Lisa, Graham, Brittany, Ti, Lianping, Buxton, Jane A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104290
container_issue
container_start_page 104290
container_title The International journal of drug policy
container_volume 123
creator Tobias, Samuel
Ferguson, Max
Palis, Heather
Burmeister, Charlene
McDougall, Jenny
Liu, Lisa
Graham, Brittany
Ti, Lianping
Buxton, Jane A
description Responding to increasing rates of illicit drug toxicity mortality in British Columbia, regional health authorities introduced various types and models of drug checking services starting in 2016. Uptake has been gradual yet consistent, but motivators and barriers of service use have not been well-described. The British Columbia Harm Reduction Client Survey is a cross-sectional survey conducted at harm reduction sites across British Columbia. Data for the present findings were collected between March 2021 and January 2022. Participants (n = 537) were asked about their use of drug checking services and what prevented them from using available services. Responses were analyzed with descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression. Of all participants, 519 (96.6 %) answered the survey question on drug checking with 144 (27.7 %) reporting having used services within six months. Participants highlighted barriers such as not knowing where to access services (21.0 %), or not having services in their area (10.0 %). Among people who did not report recent use of fentanyl, 49.6 % stated they would not use their drugs if they tested positive for fentanyl. Other harm reduction behaviors were positively associated with drug checking, such as use of overdose prevention sites (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.75, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.65, 4.59) and having a naloxone kit (AOR: 2.67, 95 %CI: 1.14, 6.28). Receipt of opioid agonist therapy in the previous six months was also positively associated with drug checking (AOR: 1.72, 95 %CI: 1.05, 2.83). Drug checking uptake remains low in British Columbia, however this study identified desire for services among participants, suggesting a need for expanded drug checking services. Behavioral change was reported among a high proportion of people who said they would not use their drugs if they tested positive for fentanyl, meaning that immunoassay strips alone have utility in the context of a pervasive fentanyl supply.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104290
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2902967443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2902967443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-db68de134df68ccf670288bfc005524ab0571fee042b5305cb8d96f7882109b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtP6zAQhS0EgvL4B-jKSxak2LGdOOy4FS8JxAbWlp_FvYldbOdK_fekFFiNZnTOmZkPgHOM5hjh5mo1N2lcruO8RjWZRrTu0B6YYd6SiraM74MZ6hirSMe6I3Cc8wohRDHFh-CI8CmibtkMbJ5j8f9liSnD6KAMBiqZkrdTXyLcroD63ep_PiyhDUu5tIMNBfoA_yZffH6Hi9iPg_LyEi5kkEZewzsfzKTP0KU4QAl1ijlX2eriY5A9zGU0m1Nw4GSf7dl3PQFvd7evi4fq6eX-cXHzVGnCSKmMarixmFDjGq61a1pUc66cRoixmkqFWIudtdP_ihHEtOKma1zLeY1Rpzg5ARe73HWKH6PNRQw-a9v3Mtg4ZjFhq7umpZRMUrqTfh2crBPr5AeZNgIjsYUuVmIHXWyhix30yfbne8OoBmt-TT-UySelQoCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2902967443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Motivators of and barriers to drug checking engagement in British Columbia, Canada: Findings from a cross-sectional study</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tobias, Samuel ; Ferguson, Max ; Palis, Heather ; Burmeister, Charlene ; McDougall, Jenny ; Liu, Lisa ; Graham, Brittany ; Ti, Lianping ; Buxton, Jane A</creator><creatorcontrib>Tobias, Samuel ; Ferguson, Max ; Palis, Heather ; Burmeister, Charlene ; McDougall, Jenny ; Liu, Lisa ; Graham, Brittany ; Ti, Lianping ; Buxton, Jane A</creatorcontrib><description>Responding to increasing rates of illicit drug toxicity mortality in British Columbia, regional health authorities introduced various types and models of drug checking services starting in 2016. Uptake has been gradual yet consistent, but motivators and barriers of service use have not been well-described. The British Columbia Harm Reduction Client Survey is a cross-sectional survey conducted at harm reduction sites across British Columbia. Data for the present findings were collected between March 2021 and January 2022. Participants (n = 537) were asked about their use of drug checking services and what prevented them from using available services. Responses were analyzed with descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression. Of all participants, 519 (96.6 %) answered the survey question on drug checking with 144 (27.7 %) reporting having used services within six months. Participants highlighted barriers such as not knowing where to access services (21.0 %), or not having services in their area (10.0 %). Among people who did not report recent use of fentanyl, 49.6 % stated they would not use their drugs if they tested positive for fentanyl. Other harm reduction behaviors were positively associated with drug checking, such as use of overdose prevention sites (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.75, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.65, 4.59) and having a naloxone kit (AOR: 2.67, 95 %CI: 1.14, 6.28). Receipt of opioid agonist therapy in the previous six months was also positively associated with drug checking (AOR: 1.72, 95 %CI: 1.05, 2.83). Drug checking uptake remains low in British Columbia, however this study identified desire for services among participants, suggesting a need for expanded drug checking services. Behavioral change was reported among a high proportion of people who said they would not use their drugs if they tested positive for fentanyl, meaning that immunoassay strips alone have utility in the context of a pervasive fentanyl supply.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-3959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104290</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38101275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><ispartof>The International journal of drug policy, 2024-01, Vol.123, p.104290-104290, Article 104290</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-db68de134df68ccf670288bfc005524ab0571fee042b5305cb8d96f7882109b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-db68de134df68ccf670288bfc005524ab0571fee042b5305cb8d96f7882109b83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6051-8950 ; 0000-0002-9808-266X ; 0000-0002-1911-0117 ; 0000-0003-2295-393X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38101275$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tobias, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palis, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burmeister, Charlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDougall, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Brittany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ti, Lianping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buxton, Jane A</creatorcontrib><title>Motivators of and barriers to drug checking engagement in British Columbia, Canada: Findings from a cross-sectional study</title><title>The International journal of drug policy</title><addtitle>Int J Drug Policy</addtitle><description>Responding to increasing rates of illicit drug toxicity mortality in British Columbia, regional health authorities introduced various types and models of drug checking services starting in 2016. Uptake has been gradual yet consistent, but motivators and barriers of service use have not been well-described. The British Columbia Harm Reduction Client Survey is a cross-sectional survey conducted at harm reduction sites across British Columbia. Data for the present findings were collected between March 2021 and January 2022. Participants (n = 537) were asked about their use of drug checking services and what prevented them from using available services. Responses were analyzed with descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression. Of all participants, 519 (96.6 %) answered the survey question on drug checking with 144 (27.7 %) reporting having used services within six months. Participants highlighted barriers such as not knowing where to access services (21.0 %), or not having services in their area (10.0 %). Among people who did not report recent use of fentanyl, 49.6 % stated they would not use their drugs if they tested positive for fentanyl. Other harm reduction behaviors were positively associated with drug checking, such as use of overdose prevention sites (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.75, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.65, 4.59) and having a naloxone kit (AOR: 2.67, 95 %CI: 1.14, 6.28). Receipt of opioid agonist therapy in the previous six months was also positively associated with drug checking (AOR: 1.72, 95 %CI: 1.05, 2.83). Drug checking uptake remains low in British Columbia, however this study identified desire for services among participants, suggesting a need for expanded drug checking services. Behavioral change was reported among a high proportion of people who said they would not use their drugs if they tested positive for fentanyl, meaning that immunoassay strips alone have utility in the context of a pervasive fentanyl supply.</description><issn>0955-3959</issn><issn>1873-4758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtP6zAQhS0EgvL4B-jKSxak2LGdOOy4FS8JxAbWlp_FvYldbOdK_fekFFiNZnTOmZkPgHOM5hjh5mo1N2lcruO8RjWZRrTu0B6YYd6SiraM74MZ6hirSMe6I3Cc8wohRDHFh-CI8CmibtkMbJ5j8f9liSnD6KAMBiqZkrdTXyLcroD63ep_PiyhDUu5tIMNBfoA_yZffH6Hi9iPg_LyEi5kkEZewzsfzKTP0KU4QAl1ijlX2eriY5A9zGU0m1Nw4GSf7dl3PQFvd7evi4fq6eX-cXHzVGnCSKmMarixmFDjGq61a1pUc66cRoixmkqFWIudtdP_ihHEtOKma1zLeY1Rpzg5ARe73HWKH6PNRQw-a9v3Mtg4ZjFhq7umpZRMUrqTfh2crBPr5AeZNgIjsYUuVmIHXWyhix30yfbne8OoBmt-TT-UySelQoCg</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Tobias, Samuel</creator><creator>Ferguson, Max</creator><creator>Palis, Heather</creator><creator>Burmeister, Charlene</creator><creator>McDougall, Jenny</creator><creator>Liu, Lisa</creator><creator>Graham, Brittany</creator><creator>Ti, Lianping</creator><creator>Buxton, Jane A</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6051-8950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9808-266X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1911-0117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2295-393X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Motivators of and barriers to drug checking engagement in British Columbia, Canada: Findings from a cross-sectional study</title><author>Tobias, Samuel ; Ferguson, Max ; Palis, Heather ; Burmeister, Charlene ; McDougall, Jenny ; Liu, Lisa ; Graham, Brittany ; Ti, Lianping ; Buxton, Jane A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-db68de134df68ccf670288bfc005524ab0571fee042b5305cb8d96f7882109b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tobias, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palis, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burmeister, Charlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDougall, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Brittany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ti, Lianping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buxton, Jane A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The International journal of drug policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tobias, Samuel</au><au>Ferguson, Max</au><au>Palis, Heather</au><au>Burmeister, Charlene</au><au>McDougall, Jenny</au><au>Liu, Lisa</au><au>Graham, Brittany</au><au>Ti, Lianping</au><au>Buxton, Jane A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Motivators of and barriers to drug checking engagement in British Columbia, Canada: Findings from a cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>The International journal of drug policy</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Drug Policy</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>123</volume><spage>104290</spage><epage>104290</epage><pages>104290-104290</pages><artnum>104290</artnum><issn>0955-3959</issn><eissn>1873-4758</eissn><abstract>Responding to increasing rates of illicit drug toxicity mortality in British Columbia, regional health authorities introduced various types and models of drug checking services starting in 2016. Uptake has been gradual yet consistent, but motivators and barriers of service use have not been well-described. The British Columbia Harm Reduction Client Survey is a cross-sectional survey conducted at harm reduction sites across British Columbia. Data for the present findings were collected between March 2021 and January 2022. Participants (n = 537) were asked about their use of drug checking services and what prevented them from using available services. Responses were analyzed with descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression. Of all participants, 519 (96.6 %) answered the survey question on drug checking with 144 (27.7 %) reporting having used services within six months. Participants highlighted barriers such as not knowing where to access services (21.0 %), or not having services in their area (10.0 %). Among people who did not report recent use of fentanyl, 49.6 % stated they would not use their drugs if they tested positive for fentanyl. Other harm reduction behaviors were positively associated with drug checking, such as use of overdose prevention sites (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.75, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.65, 4.59) and having a naloxone kit (AOR: 2.67, 95 %CI: 1.14, 6.28). Receipt of opioid agonist therapy in the previous six months was also positively associated with drug checking (AOR: 1.72, 95 %CI: 1.05, 2.83). Drug checking uptake remains low in British Columbia, however this study identified desire for services among participants, suggesting a need for expanded drug checking services. Behavioral change was reported among a high proportion of people who said they would not use their drugs if they tested positive for fentanyl, meaning that immunoassay strips alone have utility in the context of a pervasive fentanyl supply.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>38101275</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104290</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6051-8950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9808-266X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1911-0117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2295-393X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0955-3959
ispartof The International journal of drug policy, 2024-01, Vol.123, p.104290-104290, Article 104290
issn 0955-3959
1873-4758
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2902967443
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
title Motivators of and barriers to drug checking engagement in British Columbia, Canada: Findings from a cross-sectional study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A42%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Motivators%20of%20and%20barriers%20to%20drug%20checking%20engagement%20in%20British%20Columbia,%20Canada:%20Findings%20from%20a%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20journal%20of%20drug%20policy&rft.au=Tobias,%20Samuel&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=123&rft.spage=104290&rft.epage=104290&rft.pages=104290-104290&rft.artnum=104290&rft.issn=0955-3959&rft.eissn=1873-4758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104290&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2902967443%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2902967443&rft_id=info:pmid/38101275&rfr_iscdi=true