Considerations of breast cancer survivors to return for embryo transfer after fertility preservation: A qualitative study

•First qualitative research of considerations of women after fertility preservation.•Women are strongly motivated to try natural conception after fertility preservation.•Perceived time pressure is an important motivator for embryo transfer.•Wish for pre-implantation genetic testing is a reason for e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2024-02, Vol.293, p.27-31
Hauptverfasser: ter Welle - Butalid, Maria Elena, van Osch, Liesbeth, van Bree, Bo E., Vriens, Ingeborg J.H., Derhaag, Josien G., de Die - Smulders, Christine E.M., Tjan - Heijnen, Vivianne C.G., van Golde, Ron J.T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue
container_start_page 27
container_title European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology
container_volume 293
creator ter Welle - Butalid, Maria Elena
van Osch, Liesbeth
van Bree, Bo E.
Vriens, Ingeborg J.H.
Derhaag, Josien G.
de Die - Smulders, Christine E.M.
Tjan - Heijnen, Vivianne C.G.
van Golde, Ron J.T.
description •First qualitative research of considerations of women after fertility preservation.•Women are strongly motivated to try natural conception after fertility preservation.•Perceived time pressure is an important motivator for embryo transfer.•Wish for pre-implantation genetic testing is a reason for embryo transfer.•Physician’s advice highly influences the decision on mode of conception. To gain insight into the considerations of breast cancer survivors to return or not for embryo transfer after the use of fertility preservation. This is a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews. The interviews were planned until saturation of themes had been achieved. Content analysis was used to analyze the data. Sixteen out of 35 approached women took part in this study. Interviews were conducted with women who had oocytes or embryos cryopreserved prior to breast cancer treatment at the Maastricht University Medical Center between 2008 and 2016. All women who had cryopreservation more than two years ago were invited for the interviews. Women who had recurrence of disease were excluded. In the interviews we hypothesized the situation ‘suppose the menses would have been recovered completely’ for women who still had chemotherapy-induced menopause or used an GnRH (Gonadotropin-releasing hormone) analogue. Most women had a strong intrinsic motivation to pursue natural conception over the use of earlier cryopreserved oocytes or embryos. Time pressure was the most mentioned consideration to use cryopreserved oocytes or embryos. The wish to use pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) in the presence of a germline BRCA1/2 mutation was another consideration to opt for embryo transfer. Furthermore, the physician’s advice was an important motivation to choose for either natural conception or the use of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos. Multiple considerations influence women’s decision making on the mode of conception after breast cancer. Although it concerned a single-center study in a highly-selected population, insight into these considerations can help physicians to address these important topics in counseling these women.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.12.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2902967284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301211523008539</els_id><sourcerecordid>2902967284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-10b82e4b652c7f50eb0621d166189559acd403a4aa870503456b3f20349c1df23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVISTbb_IMQdMzFrj4sf-QQCEubFgK9tGchy6OgZdfajGSD_3203aTH6CC9Es_MoIeQG85Kznj9bVvCNrxgXwomZMlFyVh3Rla8bUTR1Ko6JysmGS8E5-qSXMW4ZXlJ2V2QS9nyTMt2RZZNGKMfAE3yOdHgaI9gYqLWjBaQxglnPweMNAWKkCYcqQtIYd_jEmhCM0aXOeNS3nNKfufTQg8IEXD-1_aePtLXyeT3fJ2BxjQNy1fyxZldhOv3c03-_vj-Z_OzeP799Gvz-FxYqZpUcNa3Aqq-VsI2TjHoWS34wOuat51SnbFDxaSpjGkbppisVN1LJ3LoLB-ckGtyd-p7wPA6QUx676OF3c6MEKaoRcdEVzeirTJanVCLIUYEpw_o9wYXzZk-StdbfZKuj9I1F_qocU1u3ydM_R6G_0UfljPwcAIg_3P2gDpaD1nv4BFs0kPwn094A7LYls4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2902967284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Considerations of breast cancer survivors to return for embryo transfer after fertility preservation: A qualitative study</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>ter Welle - Butalid, Maria Elena ; van Osch, Liesbeth ; van Bree, Bo E. ; Vriens, Ingeborg J.H. ; Derhaag, Josien G. ; de Die - Smulders, Christine E.M. ; Tjan - Heijnen, Vivianne C.G. ; van Golde, Ron J.T.</creator><creatorcontrib>ter Welle - Butalid, Maria Elena ; van Osch, Liesbeth ; van Bree, Bo E. ; Vriens, Ingeborg J.H. ; Derhaag, Josien G. ; de Die - Smulders, Christine E.M. ; Tjan - Heijnen, Vivianne C.G. ; van Golde, Ron J.T.</creatorcontrib><description>•First qualitative research of considerations of women after fertility preservation.•Women are strongly motivated to try natural conception after fertility preservation.•Perceived time pressure is an important motivator for embryo transfer.•Wish for pre-implantation genetic testing is a reason for embryo transfer.•Physician’s advice highly influences the decision on mode of conception. To gain insight into the considerations of breast cancer survivors to return or not for embryo transfer after the use of fertility preservation. This is a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews. The interviews were planned until saturation of themes had been achieved. Content analysis was used to analyze the data. Sixteen out of 35 approached women took part in this study. Interviews were conducted with women who had oocytes or embryos cryopreserved prior to breast cancer treatment at the Maastricht University Medical Center between 2008 and 2016. All women who had cryopreservation more than two years ago were invited for the interviews. Women who had recurrence of disease were excluded. In the interviews we hypothesized the situation ‘suppose the menses would have been recovered completely’ for women who still had chemotherapy-induced menopause or used an GnRH (Gonadotropin-releasing hormone) analogue. Most women had a strong intrinsic motivation to pursue natural conception over the use of earlier cryopreserved oocytes or embryos. Time pressure was the most mentioned consideration to use cryopreserved oocytes or embryos. The wish to use pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) in the presence of a germline BRCA1/2 mutation was another consideration to opt for embryo transfer. Furthermore, the physician’s advice was an important motivation to choose for either natural conception or the use of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos. Multiple considerations influence women’s decision making on the mode of conception after breast cancer. Although it concerned a single-center study in a highly-selected population, insight into these considerations can help physicians to address these important topics in counseling these women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.12.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38100938</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; Considerations ; Evaluation ; Fertility preservation</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology, 2024-02, Vol.293, p.27-31</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-10b82e4b652c7f50eb0621d166189559acd403a4aa870503456b3f20349c1df23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.12.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38100938$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ter Welle - Butalid, Maria Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Osch, Liesbeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Bree, Bo E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vriens, Ingeborg J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derhaag, Josien G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Die - Smulders, Christine E.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tjan - Heijnen, Vivianne C.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Golde, Ron J.T.</creatorcontrib><title>Considerations of breast cancer survivors to return for embryo transfer after fertility preservation: A qualitative study</title><title>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>•First qualitative research of considerations of women after fertility preservation.•Women are strongly motivated to try natural conception after fertility preservation.•Perceived time pressure is an important motivator for embryo transfer.•Wish for pre-implantation genetic testing is a reason for embryo transfer.•Physician’s advice highly influences the decision on mode of conception. To gain insight into the considerations of breast cancer survivors to return or not for embryo transfer after the use of fertility preservation. This is a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews. The interviews were planned until saturation of themes had been achieved. Content analysis was used to analyze the data. Sixteen out of 35 approached women took part in this study. Interviews were conducted with women who had oocytes or embryos cryopreserved prior to breast cancer treatment at the Maastricht University Medical Center between 2008 and 2016. All women who had cryopreservation more than two years ago were invited for the interviews. Women who had recurrence of disease were excluded. In the interviews we hypothesized the situation ‘suppose the menses would have been recovered completely’ for women who still had chemotherapy-induced menopause or used an GnRH (Gonadotropin-releasing hormone) analogue. Most women had a strong intrinsic motivation to pursue natural conception over the use of earlier cryopreserved oocytes or embryos. Time pressure was the most mentioned consideration to use cryopreserved oocytes or embryos. The wish to use pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) in the presence of a germline BRCA1/2 mutation was another consideration to opt for embryo transfer. Furthermore, the physician’s advice was an important motivation to choose for either natural conception or the use of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos. Multiple considerations influence women’s decision making on the mode of conception after breast cancer. Although it concerned a single-center study in a highly-selected population, insight into these considerations can help physicians to address these important topics in counseling these women.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Considerations</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fertility preservation</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVISTbb_IMQdMzFrj4sf-QQCEubFgK9tGchy6OgZdfajGSD_3203aTH6CC9Es_MoIeQG85Kznj9bVvCNrxgXwomZMlFyVh3Rla8bUTR1Ko6JysmGS8E5-qSXMW4ZXlJ2V2QS9nyTMt2RZZNGKMfAE3yOdHgaI9gYqLWjBaQxglnPweMNAWKkCYcqQtIYd_jEmhCM0aXOeNS3nNKfufTQg8IEXD-1_aePtLXyeT3fJ2BxjQNy1fyxZldhOv3c03-_vj-Z_OzeP799Gvz-FxYqZpUcNa3Aqq-VsI2TjHoWS34wOuat51SnbFDxaSpjGkbppisVN1LJ3LoLB-ckGtyd-p7wPA6QUx676OF3c6MEKaoRcdEVzeirTJanVCLIUYEpw_o9wYXzZk-StdbfZKuj9I1F_qocU1u3ydM_R6G_0UfljPwcAIg_3P2gDpaD1nv4BFs0kPwn094A7LYls4</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>ter Welle - Butalid, Maria Elena</creator><creator>van Osch, Liesbeth</creator><creator>van Bree, Bo E.</creator><creator>Vriens, Ingeborg J.H.</creator><creator>Derhaag, Josien G.</creator><creator>de Die - Smulders, Christine E.M.</creator><creator>Tjan - Heijnen, Vivianne C.G.</creator><creator>van Golde, Ron J.T.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>Considerations of breast cancer survivors to return for embryo transfer after fertility preservation: A qualitative study</title><author>ter Welle - Butalid, Maria Elena ; van Osch, Liesbeth ; van Bree, Bo E. ; Vriens, Ingeborg J.H. ; Derhaag, Josien G. ; de Die - Smulders, Christine E.M. ; Tjan - Heijnen, Vivianne C.G. ; van Golde, Ron J.T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-10b82e4b652c7f50eb0621d166189559acd403a4aa870503456b3f20349c1df23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Considerations</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fertility preservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ter Welle - Butalid, Maria Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Osch, Liesbeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Bree, Bo E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vriens, Ingeborg J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derhaag, Josien G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Die - Smulders, Christine E.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tjan - Heijnen, Vivianne C.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Golde, Ron J.T.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ter Welle - Butalid, Maria Elena</au><au>van Osch, Liesbeth</au><au>van Bree, Bo E.</au><au>Vriens, Ingeborg J.H.</au><au>Derhaag, Josien G.</au><au>de Die - Smulders, Christine E.M.</au><au>Tjan - Heijnen, Vivianne C.G.</au><au>van Golde, Ron J.T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Considerations of breast cancer survivors to return for embryo transfer after fertility preservation: A qualitative study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>293</volume><spage>27</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>27-31</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><abstract>•First qualitative research of considerations of women after fertility preservation.•Women are strongly motivated to try natural conception after fertility preservation.•Perceived time pressure is an important motivator for embryo transfer.•Wish for pre-implantation genetic testing is a reason for embryo transfer.•Physician’s advice highly influences the decision on mode of conception. To gain insight into the considerations of breast cancer survivors to return or not for embryo transfer after the use of fertility preservation. This is a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews. The interviews were planned until saturation of themes had been achieved. Content analysis was used to analyze the data. Sixteen out of 35 approached women took part in this study. Interviews were conducted with women who had oocytes or embryos cryopreserved prior to breast cancer treatment at the Maastricht University Medical Center between 2008 and 2016. All women who had cryopreservation more than two years ago were invited for the interviews. Women who had recurrence of disease were excluded. In the interviews we hypothesized the situation ‘suppose the menses would have been recovered completely’ for women who still had chemotherapy-induced menopause or used an GnRH (Gonadotropin-releasing hormone) analogue. Most women had a strong intrinsic motivation to pursue natural conception over the use of earlier cryopreserved oocytes or embryos. Time pressure was the most mentioned consideration to use cryopreserved oocytes or embryos. The wish to use pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) in the presence of a germline BRCA1/2 mutation was another consideration to opt for embryo transfer. Furthermore, the physician’s advice was an important motivation to choose for either natural conception or the use of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos. Multiple considerations influence women’s decision making on the mode of conception after breast cancer. Although it concerned a single-center study in a highly-selected population, insight into these considerations can help physicians to address these important topics in counseling these women.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>38100938</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.12.009</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-2115
ispartof European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2024-02, Vol.293, p.27-31
issn 0301-2115
1872-7654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2902967284
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Breast cancer
Considerations
Evaluation
Fertility preservation
title Considerations of breast cancer survivors to return for embryo transfer after fertility preservation: A qualitative study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T07%3A50%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Considerations%20of%20breast%20cancer%20survivors%20to%20return%20for%20embryo%20transfer%20after%20fertility%20preservation:%20A%20qualitative%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=ter%20Welle%20-%20Butalid,%20Maria%20Elena&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=293&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=27-31&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.12.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2902967284%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2902967284&rft_id=info:pmid/38100938&rft_els_id=S0301211523008539&rfr_iscdi=true