Methane Emissions from Non-producing Oil and Gas Wells and the Potential Role of Seismic Activity: A Case Study in Northeast British Columbia, Canada

Increasing seismic activity due to fluid injections for oil and gas production may be contributing to leakage along non-producing oil and gas wells and emitting methane, a potent greenhouse gas. However, the extent to which nearby seismicity may drive or exacerbate methane emissions and cause well i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2023-12, Vol.57 (51), p.21673-21680
Hauptverfasser: Pozzobon, Cassandra, Liu, Yajing, Kirkpatrick, James D., Chesnaux, Romain, Kang, Mary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21680
container_issue 51
container_start_page 21673
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 57
creator Pozzobon, Cassandra
Liu, Yajing
Kirkpatrick, James D.
Chesnaux, Romain
Kang, Mary
description Increasing seismic activity due to fluid injections for oil and gas production may be contributing to leakage along non-producing oil and gas wells and emitting methane, a potent greenhouse gas. However, the extent to which nearby seismicity may drive or exacerbate methane emissions and cause well integrity issues is unknown. Therefore, we analyze field evaluations at 448 non-producing oil and gas wells in Northeast British Columbia (NEBC) and geospatially analyze oil and gas well and fluid injection data alongside locations of 3515 earthquakes from 2001 to 2021 and 130 faults. Through analysis of ground and helicopter-based field evaluations of non-producing wells in NEBC, we show that methane emission rates of non-producing wells average at 8301 mg/h/well but vary by 10 orders of magnitude. We find that higher methane emission rates (milligrams of methane/h/well) are observed at wells with larger flowing pressures at the wellhead during completion (kPa) and with shorter distances (m) to earthquakes, particularly at plugged wells. These results imply that seismicity may increase the likelihood of non-producing well integrity issues and methane leakage, thereby also exacerbating groundwater contamination and environmental degradation risks.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.est.3c06062
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2902943513</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2908807376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-e8da62b00491a6af34ae15bdbac4929f31e0f48632043bdb759a5e1847373b523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS0EotvCmRuyxAUJsh3bsdfpbVmVUqlQREFwiyaJw7pK7GI7lfaH9P_W2116QOJk2fre88x7hLxiMGfA2TG2cW5imosWFCj-hMyY5FBILdlTMgNgoqiE-nVADmO8BgAuQD8nB0KDllKoGbn7bNIanaGno43RehdpH_xIv3hX3ATfTa11v-mlHSi6jp5hpD_NMMSHW1ob-tUn45LFgX7zg6G-p1fGxtG2dNkme2vT5oQu6QqjoVdp6jbUuuwdshRjoh-CTTau6coP09hYfJ9Jhx2-IM96HKJ5uT-PyI-Pp99Xn4qLy7Pz1fKiQKFYKozuUPEGoKwYKuxFiYbJpmuwLSte9YIZ6EutBIdS5OeFrFAapsuFWIhGcnFE3u5886p_phxknVNo84I5ET_FmlfAq1JIJjL65h_02k_B5em2lNaQPVWmjndUG3yMwfT1TbAjhk3NoN42VufG6q1631hWvN77Ts1oukf-b0UZeLcDtsrHP_9ndw-GJKDT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2908807376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methane Emissions from Non-producing Oil and Gas Wells and the Potential Role of Seismic Activity: A Case Study in Northeast British Columbia, Canada</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Pozzobon, Cassandra ; Liu, Yajing ; Kirkpatrick, James D. ; Chesnaux, Romain ; Kang, Mary</creator><creatorcontrib>Pozzobon, Cassandra ; Liu, Yajing ; Kirkpatrick, James D. ; Chesnaux, Romain ; Kang, Mary</creatorcontrib><description>Increasing seismic activity due to fluid injections for oil and gas production may be contributing to leakage along non-producing oil and gas wells and emitting methane, a potent greenhouse gas. However, the extent to which nearby seismicity may drive or exacerbate methane emissions and cause well integrity issues is unknown. Therefore, we analyze field evaluations at 448 non-producing oil and gas wells in Northeast British Columbia (NEBC) and geospatially analyze oil and gas well and fluid injection data alongside locations of 3515 earthquakes from 2001 to 2021 and 130 faults. Through analysis of ground and helicopter-based field evaluations of non-producing wells in NEBC, we show that methane emission rates of non-producing wells average at 8301 mg/h/well but vary by 10 orders of magnitude. We find that higher methane emission rates (milligrams of methane/h/well) are observed at wells with larger flowing pressures at the wellhead during completion (kPa) and with shorter distances (m) to earthquakes, particularly at plugged wells. These results imply that seismicity may increase the likelihood of non-producing well integrity issues and methane leakage, thereby also exacerbating groundwater contamination and environmental degradation risks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c06062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38085536</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Contamination ; Earthquakes ; Emission analysis ; Emissions ; Energy and Climate ; Environmental degradation ; Fluid injection ; Gas production ; Gas wells ; Greenhouse gases ; Groundwater pollution ; Helicopters ; Integrity ; Leakage ; Methane ; Oil and gas production ; Oils &amp; fats ; Seismic activity ; Seismicity ; Wells</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2023-12, Vol.57 (51), p.21673-21680</ispartof><rights>2023 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Dec 26, 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-e8da62b00491a6af34ae15bdbac4929f31e0f48632043bdb759a5e1847373b523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-e8da62b00491a6af34ae15bdbac4929f31e0f48632043bdb759a5e1847373b523</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9142-384X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.3c06062$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c06062$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38085536$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pozzobon, Cassandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yajing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesnaux, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Mary</creatorcontrib><title>Methane Emissions from Non-producing Oil and Gas Wells and the Potential Role of Seismic Activity: A Case Study in Northeast British Columbia, Canada</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Increasing seismic activity due to fluid injections for oil and gas production may be contributing to leakage along non-producing oil and gas wells and emitting methane, a potent greenhouse gas. However, the extent to which nearby seismicity may drive or exacerbate methane emissions and cause well integrity issues is unknown. Therefore, we analyze field evaluations at 448 non-producing oil and gas wells in Northeast British Columbia (NEBC) and geospatially analyze oil and gas well and fluid injection data alongside locations of 3515 earthquakes from 2001 to 2021 and 130 faults. Through analysis of ground and helicopter-based field evaluations of non-producing wells in NEBC, we show that methane emission rates of non-producing wells average at 8301 mg/h/well but vary by 10 orders of magnitude. We find that higher methane emission rates (milligrams of methane/h/well) are observed at wells with larger flowing pressures at the wellhead during completion (kPa) and with shorter distances (m) to earthquakes, particularly at plugged wells. These results imply that seismicity may increase the likelihood of non-producing well integrity issues and methane leakage, thereby also exacerbating groundwater contamination and environmental degradation risks.</description><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy and Climate</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Fluid injection</subject><subject>Gas production</subject><subject>Gas wells</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Groundwater pollution</subject><subject>Helicopters</subject><subject>Integrity</subject><subject>Leakage</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Oil and gas production</subject><subject>Oils &amp; fats</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismicity</subject><subject>Wells</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS0EotvCmRuyxAUJsh3bsdfpbVmVUqlQREFwiyaJw7pK7GI7lfaH9P_W2116QOJk2fre88x7hLxiMGfA2TG2cW5imosWFCj-hMyY5FBILdlTMgNgoqiE-nVADmO8BgAuQD8nB0KDllKoGbn7bNIanaGno43RehdpH_xIv3hX3ATfTa11v-mlHSi6jp5hpD_NMMSHW1ob-tUn45LFgX7zg6G-p1fGxtG2dNkme2vT5oQu6QqjoVdp6jbUuuwdshRjoh-CTTau6coP09hYfJ9Jhx2-IM96HKJ5uT-PyI-Pp99Xn4qLy7Pz1fKiQKFYKozuUPEGoKwYKuxFiYbJpmuwLSte9YIZ6EutBIdS5OeFrFAapsuFWIhGcnFE3u5886p_phxknVNo84I5ET_FmlfAq1JIJjL65h_02k_B5em2lNaQPVWmjndUG3yMwfT1TbAjhk3NoN42VufG6q1631hWvN77Ts1oukf-b0UZeLcDtsrHP_9ndw-GJKDT</recordid><startdate>20231226</startdate><enddate>20231226</enddate><creator>Pozzobon, Cassandra</creator><creator>Liu, Yajing</creator><creator>Kirkpatrick, James D.</creator><creator>Chesnaux, Romain</creator><creator>Kang, Mary</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9142-384X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231226</creationdate><title>Methane Emissions from Non-producing Oil and Gas Wells and the Potential Role of Seismic Activity: A Case Study in Northeast British Columbia, Canada</title><author>Pozzobon, Cassandra ; Liu, Yajing ; Kirkpatrick, James D. ; Chesnaux, Romain ; Kang, Mary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-e8da62b00491a6af34ae15bdbac4929f31e0f48632043bdb759a5e1847373b523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy and Climate</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Fluid injection</topic><topic>Gas production</topic><topic>Gas wells</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Groundwater pollution</topic><topic>Helicopters</topic><topic>Integrity</topic><topic>Leakage</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Oil and gas production</topic><topic>Oils &amp; fats</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismicity</topic><topic>Wells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pozzobon, Cassandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yajing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesnaux, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Mary</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pozzobon, Cassandra</au><au>Liu, Yajing</au><au>Kirkpatrick, James D.</au><au>Chesnaux, Romain</au><au>Kang, Mary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methane Emissions from Non-producing Oil and Gas Wells and the Potential Role of Seismic Activity: A Case Study in Northeast British Columbia, Canada</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2023-12-26</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>51</issue><spage>21673</spage><epage>21680</epage><pages>21673-21680</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><abstract>Increasing seismic activity due to fluid injections for oil and gas production may be contributing to leakage along non-producing oil and gas wells and emitting methane, a potent greenhouse gas. However, the extent to which nearby seismicity may drive or exacerbate methane emissions and cause well integrity issues is unknown. Therefore, we analyze field evaluations at 448 non-producing oil and gas wells in Northeast British Columbia (NEBC) and geospatially analyze oil and gas well and fluid injection data alongside locations of 3515 earthquakes from 2001 to 2021 and 130 faults. Through analysis of ground and helicopter-based field evaluations of non-producing wells in NEBC, we show that methane emission rates of non-producing wells average at 8301 mg/h/well but vary by 10 orders of magnitude. We find that higher methane emission rates (milligrams of methane/h/well) are observed at wells with larger flowing pressures at the wellhead during completion (kPa) and with shorter distances (m) to earthquakes, particularly at plugged wells. These results imply that seismicity may increase the likelihood of non-producing well integrity issues and methane leakage, thereby also exacerbating groundwater contamination and environmental degradation risks.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>38085536</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.3c06062</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9142-384X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2023-12, Vol.57 (51), p.21673-21680
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2902943513
source ACS Publications
subjects Contamination
Earthquakes
Emission analysis
Emissions
Energy and Climate
Environmental degradation
Fluid injection
Gas production
Gas wells
Greenhouse gases
Groundwater pollution
Helicopters
Integrity
Leakage
Methane
Oil and gas production
Oils & fats
Seismic activity
Seismicity
Wells
title Methane Emissions from Non-producing Oil and Gas Wells and the Potential Role of Seismic Activity: A Case Study in Northeast British Columbia, Canada
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A27%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methane%20Emissions%20from%20Non-producing%20Oil%20and%20Gas%20Wells%20and%20the%20Potential%20Role%20of%20Seismic%20Activity:%20A%20Case%20Study%20in%20Northeast%20British%20Columbia,%20Canada&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Pozzobon,%20Cassandra&rft.date=2023-12-26&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=51&rft.spage=21673&rft.epage=21680&rft.pages=21673-21680&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c06062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2908807376%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2908807376&rft_id=info:pmid/38085536&rfr_iscdi=true