An Arctic springtime mixed-phase cloudy boundary layer observed during SHEBA

The microphysical characteristics, radiative impact, and life cycle of a long-lived, surface-based mixed-layer, mixed-phase cloud with an average temperature of approximately -20'C are presented and discussed. The cloud was observed during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic experiment (SHEBA...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the atmospheric sciences 2005, Vol.62 (1), p.160-176
Hauptverfasser: ZUIDEMA, P, BAKER, B, HAN, Y, INTRIERI, J, KEY, J, LAWSON, P, MATROSOV, S, SHUPE, M, STONE, R, VITAL, T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 176
container_issue 1
container_start_page 160
container_title Journal of the atmospheric sciences
container_volume 62
creator ZUIDEMA, P
BAKER, B
HAN, Y
INTRIERI, J
KEY, J
LAWSON, P
MATROSOV, S
SHUPE, M
STONE, R
VITAL, T
description The microphysical characteristics, radiative impact, and life cycle of a long-lived, surface-based mixed-layer, mixed-phase cloud with an average temperature of approximately -20'C are presented and discussed. The cloud was observed during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic experiment (SHEBA) from 1 to 10 May 1998. Vertically resolved properties of the liquid and ice phases are retrieved using surface-based remote sensors, utilize the adiabatic assumption for the liquid component, and are aided by and validated with aircraft measurements from 4 and 7 May. The cloud radar ice microphysical retrievals, originally developed for all-ice clouds, compare well with aircraft measurements despite the presence of much greater liquid water contents than ice water contents. The retrieved time-mean liquid cloud optical depth of 10.1 c 7.8 far surpasses the mean ice cloud optical depth of 0.2, so that the liquid phase is primarily responsible for the cloud's radiative (flux) impact. The ice phase, in turn, regulates the overall cloud optical depth through two mechanisms: sedimentation from a thin upper ice cloud, and a local ice production mechanism with a time scale of a few hours, thought to reflect a preferred freezing of the larger liquid drops. The liquid water paths replenish within half a day or less after their uptake by ice, attesting to strong water vapor fluxes. Deeper boundary layer depths and higher cloud optical depths coincide with large-scale rising motion at 850 hPa, but the synoptic activity is also associated with upper-level ice clouds. Interestingly, the local ice formation mechanism appears to be more active when the large-scale subsidence rate implies increased cloud-top entrainment. Strong cloud-top radiative cooling rates promote cloud longevity when the cloud is optically thick. The radiative impact of the cloud upon the surface is significant: a time-mean positive net cloud forcing of 41 W m-2 with a diurnal amplitude of 620 W m-2. This is primarily because a high surface reflectance (0.86) reduces the solar cooling influence. The net cloud forcing is primarily sensitive to cloud optical depth for the low-optical-depth cloudy columns and to the surface reflectance for the high-optical-depth cloudy columns. Any projected increase in the springtime cloud optical depth at this location (76'N, 165'W) is not expected to significantly alter the surface radiation budget, because clouds were almost always present, and almost 60% of the cloudy colum
doi_str_mv 10.1175/jas-3368.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28990474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28593209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-bf6139ce447bedd1b7465c2fd5aba3ece3bb9653658f8b7bb38b8ec5b972d69d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLw0AUhQdRsFY3_oJB0IUQnXcyy1iqVQouquthXtGUPOpMIvbfm9CC4Ebv5m6-c-CcA8A5RjcYp_x2rWNCqchu8AGYYE5QgpiQh2CCECEJkyQ7BicxrtFwJMUTsMwbmAfblRbGTSibt66sPazLL--SzbuOHtqq7d0WmrZvnA5bWOmtD7A10YdP76DrRxVcLeZ3-Sk4KnQV_dn-T8Hr_fxltkiWzw-Ps3yZWJbRLjGFwFRaz1hqvHPYpExwSwrHtdHUW0-NkYJTwbMiM6kxNDOZt9zIlDghHZ2Cq53vJrQfvY-dqstofVXpxrd9VCSTErGU_QPkkhIk_wRxKjAWCA_gxS9w3fahGdIqQgWjnDI0QNc7yIY2xuALNVRbD-UpjNS4k3rKV2rcSY2Ol3tHHa2uiqAbW8YfheBc4CHLN0cIkc0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>236435340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Arctic springtime mixed-phase cloudy boundary layer observed during SHEBA</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>ZUIDEMA, P ; BAKER, B ; HAN, Y ; INTRIERI, J ; KEY, J ; LAWSON, P ; MATROSOV, S ; SHUPE, M ; STONE, R ; VITAL, T</creator><creatorcontrib>ZUIDEMA, P ; BAKER, B ; HAN, Y ; INTRIERI, J ; KEY, J ; LAWSON, P ; MATROSOV, S ; SHUPE, M ; STONE, R ; VITAL, T</creatorcontrib><description>The microphysical characteristics, radiative impact, and life cycle of a long-lived, surface-based mixed-layer, mixed-phase cloud with an average temperature of approximately -20'C are presented and discussed. The cloud was observed during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic experiment (SHEBA) from 1 to 10 May 1998. Vertically resolved properties of the liquid and ice phases are retrieved using surface-based remote sensors, utilize the adiabatic assumption for the liquid component, and are aided by and validated with aircraft measurements from 4 and 7 May. The cloud radar ice microphysical retrievals, originally developed for all-ice clouds, compare well with aircraft measurements despite the presence of much greater liquid water contents than ice water contents. The retrieved time-mean liquid cloud optical depth of 10.1 c 7.8 far surpasses the mean ice cloud optical depth of 0.2, so that the liquid phase is primarily responsible for the cloud's radiative (flux) impact. The ice phase, in turn, regulates the overall cloud optical depth through two mechanisms: sedimentation from a thin upper ice cloud, and a local ice production mechanism with a time scale of a few hours, thought to reflect a preferred freezing of the larger liquid drops. The liquid water paths replenish within half a day or less after their uptake by ice, attesting to strong water vapor fluxes. Deeper boundary layer depths and higher cloud optical depths coincide with large-scale rising motion at 850 hPa, but the synoptic activity is also associated with upper-level ice clouds. Interestingly, the local ice formation mechanism appears to be more active when the large-scale subsidence rate implies increased cloud-top entrainment. Strong cloud-top radiative cooling rates promote cloud longevity when the cloud is optically thick. The radiative impact of the cloud upon the surface is significant: a time-mean positive net cloud forcing of 41 W m-2 with a diurnal amplitude of 620 W m-2. This is primarily because a high surface reflectance (0.86) reduces the solar cooling influence. The net cloud forcing is primarily sensitive to cloud optical depth for the low-optical-depth cloudy columns and to the surface reflectance for the high-optical-depth cloudy columns. Any projected increase in the springtime cloud optical depth at this location (76'N, 165'W) is not expected to significantly alter the surface radiation budget, because clouds were almost always present, and almost 60% of the cloudy columns had optical depths &gt; 6.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4928</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/jas-3368.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAHSAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Aircraft ; Atmospheric circulation ; Boundary layers ; Climate change ; Clouds ; Cooling ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Freezing ; Heat budget ; Ice ; Ice formation ; Meteorology ; Optical analysis ; Reflectance ; Remote sensors ; Temperature ; Water depth ; Water vapor</subject><ispartof>Journal of the atmospheric sciences, 2005, Vol.62 (1), p.160-176</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Jan 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-bf6139ce447bedd1b7465c2fd5aba3ece3bb9653658f8b7bb38b8ec5b972d69d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-bf6139ce447bedd1b7465c2fd5aba3ece3bb9653658f8b7bb38b8ec5b972d69d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3680,4023,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16556174$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ZUIDEMA, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAKER, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAN, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INTRIERI, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEY, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAWSON, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATROSOV, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHUPE, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STONE, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VITAL, T</creatorcontrib><title>An Arctic springtime mixed-phase cloudy boundary layer observed during SHEBA</title><title>Journal of the atmospheric sciences</title><description>The microphysical characteristics, radiative impact, and life cycle of a long-lived, surface-based mixed-layer, mixed-phase cloud with an average temperature of approximately -20'C are presented and discussed. The cloud was observed during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic experiment (SHEBA) from 1 to 10 May 1998. Vertically resolved properties of the liquid and ice phases are retrieved using surface-based remote sensors, utilize the adiabatic assumption for the liquid component, and are aided by and validated with aircraft measurements from 4 and 7 May. The cloud radar ice microphysical retrievals, originally developed for all-ice clouds, compare well with aircraft measurements despite the presence of much greater liquid water contents than ice water contents. The retrieved time-mean liquid cloud optical depth of 10.1 c 7.8 far surpasses the mean ice cloud optical depth of 0.2, so that the liquid phase is primarily responsible for the cloud's radiative (flux) impact. The ice phase, in turn, regulates the overall cloud optical depth through two mechanisms: sedimentation from a thin upper ice cloud, and a local ice production mechanism with a time scale of a few hours, thought to reflect a preferred freezing of the larger liquid drops. The liquid water paths replenish within half a day or less after their uptake by ice, attesting to strong water vapor fluxes. Deeper boundary layer depths and higher cloud optical depths coincide with large-scale rising motion at 850 hPa, but the synoptic activity is also associated with upper-level ice clouds. Interestingly, the local ice formation mechanism appears to be more active when the large-scale subsidence rate implies increased cloud-top entrainment. Strong cloud-top radiative cooling rates promote cloud longevity when the cloud is optically thick. The radiative impact of the cloud upon the surface is significant: a time-mean positive net cloud forcing of 41 W m-2 with a diurnal amplitude of 620 W m-2. This is primarily because a high surface reflectance (0.86) reduces the solar cooling influence. The net cloud forcing is primarily sensitive to cloud optical depth for the low-optical-depth cloudy columns and to the surface reflectance for the high-optical-depth cloudy columns. Any projected increase in the springtime cloud optical depth at this location (76'N, 165'W) is not expected to significantly alter the surface radiation budget, because clouds were almost always present, and almost 60% of the cloudy columns had optical depths &gt; 6.</description><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Atmospheric circulation</subject><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Heat budget</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Ice formation</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Optical analysis</subject><subject>Reflectance</subject><subject>Remote sensors</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Water depth</subject><subject>Water vapor</subject><issn>0022-4928</issn><issn>1520-0469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLw0AUhQdRsFY3_oJB0IUQnXcyy1iqVQouquthXtGUPOpMIvbfm9CC4Ebv5m6-c-CcA8A5RjcYp_x2rWNCqchu8AGYYE5QgpiQh2CCECEJkyQ7BicxrtFwJMUTsMwbmAfblRbGTSibt66sPazLL--SzbuOHtqq7d0WmrZvnA5bWOmtD7A10YdP76DrRxVcLeZ3-Sk4KnQV_dn-T8Hr_fxltkiWzw-Ps3yZWJbRLjGFwFRaz1hqvHPYpExwSwrHtdHUW0-NkYJTwbMiM6kxNDOZt9zIlDghHZ2Cq53vJrQfvY-dqstofVXpxrd9VCSTErGU_QPkkhIk_wRxKjAWCA_gxS9w3fahGdIqQgWjnDI0QNc7yIY2xuALNVRbD-UpjNS4k3rKV2rcSY2Ol3tHHa2uiqAbW8YfheBc4CHLN0cIkc0</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>ZUIDEMA, P</creator><creator>BAKER, B</creator><creator>HAN, Y</creator><creator>INTRIERI, J</creator><creator>KEY, J</creator><creator>LAWSON, P</creator><creator>MATROSOV, S</creator><creator>SHUPE, M</creator><creator>STONE, R</creator><creator>VITAL, T</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7U5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>An Arctic springtime mixed-phase cloudy boundary layer observed during SHEBA</title><author>ZUIDEMA, P ; BAKER, B ; HAN, Y ; INTRIERI, J ; KEY, J ; LAWSON, P ; MATROSOV, S ; SHUPE, M ; STONE, R ; VITAL, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-bf6139ce447bedd1b7465c2fd5aba3ece3bb9653658f8b7bb38b8ec5b972d69d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Atmospheric circulation</topic><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Heat budget</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Ice formation</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Optical analysis</topic><topic>Reflectance</topic><topic>Remote sensors</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Water depth</topic><topic>Water vapor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ZUIDEMA, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAKER, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAN, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INTRIERI, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEY, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAWSON, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATROSOV, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHUPE, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STONE, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VITAL, T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of the atmospheric sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ZUIDEMA, P</au><au>BAKER, B</au><au>HAN, Y</au><au>INTRIERI, J</au><au>KEY, J</au><au>LAWSON, P</au><au>MATROSOV, S</au><au>SHUPE, M</au><au>STONE, R</au><au>VITAL, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Arctic springtime mixed-phase cloudy boundary layer observed during SHEBA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the atmospheric sciences</jtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>160</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>160-176</pages><issn>0022-4928</issn><eissn>1520-0469</eissn><coden>JAHSAK</coden><abstract>The microphysical characteristics, radiative impact, and life cycle of a long-lived, surface-based mixed-layer, mixed-phase cloud with an average temperature of approximately -20'C are presented and discussed. The cloud was observed during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic experiment (SHEBA) from 1 to 10 May 1998. Vertically resolved properties of the liquid and ice phases are retrieved using surface-based remote sensors, utilize the adiabatic assumption for the liquid component, and are aided by and validated with aircraft measurements from 4 and 7 May. The cloud radar ice microphysical retrievals, originally developed for all-ice clouds, compare well with aircraft measurements despite the presence of much greater liquid water contents than ice water contents. The retrieved time-mean liquid cloud optical depth of 10.1 c 7.8 far surpasses the mean ice cloud optical depth of 0.2, so that the liquid phase is primarily responsible for the cloud's radiative (flux) impact. The ice phase, in turn, regulates the overall cloud optical depth through two mechanisms: sedimentation from a thin upper ice cloud, and a local ice production mechanism with a time scale of a few hours, thought to reflect a preferred freezing of the larger liquid drops. The liquid water paths replenish within half a day or less after their uptake by ice, attesting to strong water vapor fluxes. Deeper boundary layer depths and higher cloud optical depths coincide with large-scale rising motion at 850 hPa, but the synoptic activity is also associated with upper-level ice clouds. Interestingly, the local ice formation mechanism appears to be more active when the large-scale subsidence rate implies increased cloud-top entrainment. Strong cloud-top radiative cooling rates promote cloud longevity when the cloud is optically thick. The radiative impact of the cloud upon the surface is significant: a time-mean positive net cloud forcing of 41 W m-2 with a diurnal amplitude of 620 W m-2. This is primarily because a high surface reflectance (0.86) reduces the solar cooling influence. The net cloud forcing is primarily sensitive to cloud optical depth for the low-optical-depth cloudy columns and to the surface reflectance for the high-optical-depth cloudy columns. Any projected increase in the springtime cloud optical depth at this location (76'N, 165'W) is not expected to significantly alter the surface radiation budget, because clouds were almost always present, and almost 60% of the cloudy columns had optical depths &gt; 6.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/jas-3368.1</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4928
ispartof Journal of the atmospheric sciences, 2005, Vol.62 (1), p.160-176
issn 0022-4928
1520-0469
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28990474
source American Meteorological Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aircraft
Atmospheric circulation
Boundary layers
Climate change
Clouds
Cooling
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Freezing
Heat budget
Ice
Ice formation
Meteorology
Optical analysis
Reflectance
Remote sensors
Temperature
Water depth
Water vapor
title An Arctic springtime mixed-phase cloudy boundary layer observed during SHEBA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T10%3A11%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Arctic%20springtime%20mixed-phase%20cloudy%20boundary%20layer%20observed%20during%20SHEBA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20atmospheric%20sciences&rft.au=ZUIDEMA,%20P&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=160-176&rft.issn=0022-4928&rft.eissn=1520-0469&rft.coden=JAHSAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/jas-3368.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28593209%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236435340&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true