Entry descent and landing systems for small planetary missions: Parametric comparison of parachutes and inflatable systems for the proposed Vanguard Mars mission
Here, the feasibility of a post-Beagle2 robotic Mars mission of modest size, mass and cost with a high scientific return is assessed. Based on a triad of robotics comprising a lander, a rover and three penetrating moles, the mission is astrobiology focussed, but also provides a platform for technolo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta astronautica 2006-10, Vol.59 (8), p.911-922 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 922 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 911 |
container_title | Acta astronautica |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Allouis, E. Ellery, A. Welch, C.S. |
description | Here, the feasibility of a post-Beagle2 robotic Mars mission of modest size, mass and cost with a high scientific return is assessed. Based on a triad of robotics comprising a lander, a rover and three penetrating moles, the mission is astrobiology focussed, but also provides a platform for technology demonstration. The study is investigating two Entry, Descent and Landing Systems (EDLS) for the 120
kg—mission based on the conventional heatshield/parachute duo and on the use of inflatable technologies as demonstrated by the IRDT/IRDT2 projects. Moreover, to make use of existing aerodynamic databases, both EDLS are considered with two geometries: the Mars pathfinder (MPF) and Huygens/Beagle2 (B2) configurations. A versatile EDL model has been developed to provide a preliminary sizing for the different EDL systems such as heatshield, parachute, and inflatables for small to medium planetary missions. With a landed mass of 65
kg, a preliminary mass is derived for each system of the mission to provide a terminal velocity compatible with the use of airbags. On both conventional and inflatable options, the MPF configuration performs slightly better mass-wise since its cone half-angle is flatter at
70
∘
. Overall, the inflatable braking device (IBD) option performs better than the conventional one and would provide in this particular case a decrease in mass of the EDLS of about 15–18% that can be redistributed to the payload. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.07.051 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28987865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0094576505002493</els_id><sourcerecordid>28987865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8730d2a21941a73fb7f1d06a002db8284cc0b5f6c427600795657c669a7d85d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiNEJZaWZ8AnbgljJ7YTblVVClIrONBerVnbab1K4uDxIvVxeFO8bEHiVC62Jf_zzcz_V9VbDg0Hrt7vGrQZkXKKjQCQDegGJH9RbXivh1pACy-rDcDQ1VIr-ap6TbQDAC36YVP9vFxyemTOk_VLZrg4NpUjLPeMHin7mdgYE6MZp4mt5ctnLPo5EIW40Af2FRPOPqdgmY3ziilQXFgcWXmifdhnT7-pYRknzLid_D_g_ODZmuIayTt2h8v9HpNjN5joT4-z6mTEifybp_u0uv14-e3iU3395erzxfl1bTvoc93rFpxAwYeOo27HrR65A4UAwm170XfWwlaOynZCq7L9IJXUVqkBteulk-1p9e7ILeN833vKpgxg_XTYOe7JFLt63av_EZZ2AtTzQhDD0LYHoj4KbYpEyY9mTWEuPhsO5hCy2Zm_IZtDyAa0KSGXyvNjpS_O_Ag-GbLBL9a7kLzNxsXwLOMX52e4RA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20299335</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Entry descent and landing systems for small planetary missions: Parametric comparison of parachutes and inflatable systems for the proposed Vanguard Mars mission</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Allouis, E. ; Ellery, A. ; Welch, C.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allouis, E. ; Ellery, A. ; Welch, C.S.</creatorcontrib><description>Here, the feasibility of a post-Beagle2 robotic Mars mission of modest size, mass and cost with a high scientific return is assessed. Based on a triad of robotics comprising a lander, a rover and three penetrating moles, the mission is astrobiology focussed, but also provides a platform for technology demonstration. The study is investigating two Entry, Descent and Landing Systems (EDLS) for the 120
kg—mission based on the conventional heatshield/parachute duo and on the use of inflatable technologies as demonstrated by the IRDT/IRDT2 projects. Moreover, to make use of existing aerodynamic databases, both EDLS are considered with two geometries: the Mars pathfinder (MPF) and Huygens/Beagle2 (B2) configurations. A versatile EDL model has been developed to provide a preliminary sizing for the different EDL systems such as heatshield, parachute, and inflatables for small to medium planetary missions. With a landed mass of 65
kg, a preliminary mass is derived for each system of the mission to provide a terminal velocity compatible with the use of airbags. On both conventional and inflatable options, the MPF configuration performs slightly better mass-wise since its cone half-angle is flatter at
70
∘
. Overall, the inflatable braking device (IBD) option performs better than the conventional one and would provide in this particular case a decrease in mass of the EDLS of about 15–18% that can be redistributed to the payload.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-5765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.07.051</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Acta astronautica, 2006-10, Vol.59 (8), p.911-922</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8730d2a21941a73fb7f1d06a002db8284cc0b5f6c427600795657c669a7d85d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8730d2a21941a73fb7f1d06a002db8284cc0b5f6c427600795657c669a7d85d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576505002493$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allouis, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellery, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, C.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Entry descent and landing systems for small planetary missions: Parametric comparison of parachutes and inflatable systems for the proposed Vanguard Mars mission</title><title>Acta astronautica</title><description>Here, the feasibility of a post-Beagle2 robotic Mars mission of modest size, mass and cost with a high scientific return is assessed. Based on a triad of robotics comprising a lander, a rover and three penetrating moles, the mission is astrobiology focussed, but also provides a platform for technology demonstration. The study is investigating two Entry, Descent and Landing Systems (EDLS) for the 120
kg—mission based on the conventional heatshield/parachute duo and on the use of inflatable technologies as demonstrated by the IRDT/IRDT2 projects. Moreover, to make use of existing aerodynamic databases, both EDLS are considered with two geometries: the Mars pathfinder (MPF) and Huygens/Beagle2 (B2) configurations. A versatile EDL model has been developed to provide a preliminary sizing for the different EDL systems such as heatshield, parachute, and inflatables for small to medium planetary missions. With a landed mass of 65
kg, a preliminary mass is derived for each system of the mission to provide a terminal velocity compatible with the use of airbags. On both conventional and inflatable options, the MPF configuration performs slightly better mass-wise since its cone half-angle is flatter at
70
∘
. Overall, the inflatable braking device (IBD) option performs better than the conventional one and would provide in this particular case a decrease in mass of the EDLS of about 15–18% that can be redistributed to the payload.</description><issn>0094-5765</issn><issn>1879-2030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiNEJZaWZ8AnbgljJ7YTblVVClIrONBerVnbab1K4uDxIvVxeFO8bEHiVC62Jf_zzcz_V9VbDg0Hrt7vGrQZkXKKjQCQDegGJH9RbXivh1pACy-rDcDQ1VIr-ap6TbQDAC36YVP9vFxyemTOk_VLZrg4NpUjLPeMHin7mdgYE6MZp4mt5ctnLPo5EIW40Af2FRPOPqdgmY3ziilQXFgcWXmifdhnT7-pYRknzLid_D_g_ODZmuIayTt2h8v9HpNjN5joT4-z6mTEifybp_u0uv14-e3iU3395erzxfl1bTvoc93rFpxAwYeOo27HrR65A4UAwm170XfWwlaOynZCq7L9IJXUVqkBteulk-1p9e7ILeN833vKpgxg_XTYOe7JFLt63av_EZZ2AtTzQhDD0LYHoj4KbYpEyY9mTWEuPhsO5hCy2Zm_IZtDyAa0KSGXyvNjpS_O_Ag-GbLBL9a7kLzNxsXwLOMX52e4RA</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Allouis, E.</creator><creator>Ellery, A.</creator><creator>Welch, C.S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Entry descent and landing systems for small planetary missions: Parametric comparison of parachutes and inflatable systems for the proposed Vanguard Mars mission</title><author>Allouis, E. ; Ellery, A. ; Welch, C.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8730d2a21941a73fb7f1d06a002db8284cc0b5f6c427600795657c669a7d85d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allouis, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellery, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, C.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Acta astronautica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allouis, E.</au><au>Ellery, A.</au><au>Welch, C.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Entry descent and landing systems for small planetary missions: Parametric comparison of parachutes and inflatable systems for the proposed Vanguard Mars mission</atitle><jtitle>Acta astronautica</jtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>911</spage><epage>922</epage><pages>911-922</pages><issn>0094-5765</issn><eissn>1879-2030</eissn><abstract>Here, the feasibility of a post-Beagle2 robotic Mars mission of modest size, mass and cost with a high scientific return is assessed. Based on a triad of robotics comprising a lander, a rover and three penetrating moles, the mission is astrobiology focussed, but also provides a platform for technology demonstration. The study is investigating two Entry, Descent and Landing Systems (EDLS) for the 120
kg—mission based on the conventional heatshield/parachute duo and on the use of inflatable technologies as demonstrated by the IRDT/IRDT2 projects. Moreover, to make use of existing aerodynamic databases, both EDLS are considered with two geometries: the Mars pathfinder (MPF) and Huygens/Beagle2 (B2) configurations. A versatile EDL model has been developed to provide a preliminary sizing for the different EDL systems such as heatshield, parachute, and inflatables for small to medium planetary missions. With a landed mass of 65
kg, a preliminary mass is derived for each system of the mission to provide a terminal velocity compatible with the use of airbags. On both conventional and inflatable options, the MPF configuration performs slightly better mass-wise since its cone half-angle is flatter at
70
∘
. Overall, the inflatable braking device (IBD) option performs better than the conventional one and would provide in this particular case a decrease in mass of the EDLS of about 15–18% that can be redistributed to the payload.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.07.051</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-5765 |
ispartof | Acta astronautica, 2006-10, Vol.59 (8), p.911-922 |
issn | 0094-5765 1879-2030 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28987865 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
title | Entry descent and landing systems for small planetary missions: Parametric comparison of parachutes and inflatable systems for the proposed Vanguard Mars mission |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T15%3A01%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Entry%20descent%20and%20landing%20systems%20for%20small%20planetary%20missions:%20Parametric%20comparison%20of%20parachutes%20and%20inflatable%20systems%20for%20the%20proposed%20Vanguard%20Mars%20mission&rft.jtitle=Acta%20astronautica&rft.au=Allouis,%20E.&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=911&rft.epage=922&rft.pages=911-922&rft.issn=0094-5765&rft.eissn=1879-2030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.07.051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28987865%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20299335&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0094576505002493&rfr_iscdi=true |