How Well Does the EQ-5D-Y-5L Describe Children With Intellectual Disability?: “There’s a Lot More to My Child Than That She Can’t Wash or Dress Herself.”

The EQ-5D-5L is a generic health utility instrument for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with self-report and proxy report versions for children (EQ-5D-Y-5L). Children with intellectual disability (ID) are a heterogeneous population whose impairments and comorbidities place them at...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Value in health 2024-02, Vol.27 (2), p.190-198
Hauptverfasser: Blackmore, A. Marie, Mulhern, Brendan, Norman, Richard, Reddihough, Dinah, Choong, Catherine S., Jacoby, Peter, Downs, Jenny
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 198
container_issue 2
container_start_page 190
container_title Value in health
container_volume 27
creator Blackmore, A. Marie
Mulhern, Brendan
Norman, Richard
Reddihough, Dinah
Choong, Catherine S.
Jacoby, Peter
Downs, Jenny
description The EQ-5D-5L is a generic health utility instrument for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with self-report and proxy report versions for children (EQ-5D-Y-5L). Children with intellectual disability (ID) are a heterogeneous population whose impairments and comorbidities place them at risk of poor HRQoL. This study aimed to describe the content validity and suitability for children with ID of a proxy report version of the EQ-5D-Y-5L as seen by their caregivers. A proxy report EQ-5D-Y-5L was administered to caregivers of children with ID. Using cognitive think-aloud interviewing, participants were encouraged to provide the reasoning for their choices, assess the questions’ relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness, and comment on the tool’s strengths and weaknesses. Qualitative content analysis used both directed (deductive) and conventional (inductive) methods. There were 28 interviews with 30 caregivers of children with ID (aged 8-22 years, 17 boys, with autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, and rare genetic disorders). The EQ-5D-Y-5L was considered clear, concise, and largely relevant, but insufficiently comprehensive for this population. Interviewees sought clarification of the definition of HRQoL, whether it included unchanging impairments (vs fluctuating health states), and what basis of comparison to use (child or peer). Many interviewees suggested inclusion of questions for other domains, including communication and social engagement, equipment and human supports required, and a wider range of mental health questions. The study suggests that further work is required to ensure accurate responses to the EQ-5D-Y-5L from caregivers of children with ID and to describe these children adequately. •The EQ-5D is a widely used scale for measuring health-related quality of life, with established reliability and validity in a diversity of adult and pediatric populations. It is used to assign economic value to changes in health status.•Use of the EQ-5D-Y-5L presents challenges for carers of children with intellectual disability (ID), particularly in regard to the influence of unchanging impairments, variable expectations for children with ID compared with typically developing children, the omission of questions about supports required by children, and difficulties for parents reporting on behalf of their children, particularly about pain.•Healthcare decision making, if based on a current version of the EQ-5D-Y-5L, is li
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jval.2023.11.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2897489702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S109830152306196X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2897489702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3df9a949f71c8d7f66ab3bbed62432685249098cc4fc8cf887ea9268b71811693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhS0EoiXwAizQXbKZqT2eHw9CQigpTaVUVUVQxMryeO5oHE3GxXaKsstrIMGCV8uT4CiFJQv_yDrnWPd8hLxmNGWUlRfrdP2ghjSjGU8ZSyktnpBzVmR5klecP413WouEU1ackRferymlJc-K5-SMC5rzivFz8ntuv8MKhwFmFj2EHuHyLilmydekWMAMvXamQZj2ZmgdjrAyoYfrMUQH6rBV0We8asxgwu7DOzjsfy57dHjY__CgYGED3FiHECzc7E4psOzVeNwCfI6_TdUYxQFWyvdgHcwceg9zdB6HLj3sf70kzzo1eHz1eE7Il0-Xy-k8WdxeXU8_LhLNizIkvO1qVed1VzEt2qorS9XwpsG2zHKelSLWUsc6tM47LXQnRIWqju9NxQRjZc0n5O0p997Zb1v0QW6M13FONaLdepmJusrjim1PSHaSame9d9jJe2c2yu0ko_KIRq7lEY08opGMyYgmmt485m-bDbb_LH9ZRMH7kwDjlA8GnfTa4KixNS52LVtr_pf_B8FXoVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2897489702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Well Does the EQ-5D-Y-5L Describe Children With Intellectual Disability?: “There’s a Lot More to My Child Than That She Can’t Wash or Dress Herself.”</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Blackmore, A. Marie ; Mulhern, Brendan ; Norman, Richard ; Reddihough, Dinah ; Choong, Catherine S. ; Jacoby, Peter ; Downs, Jenny</creator><creatorcontrib>Blackmore, A. Marie ; Mulhern, Brendan ; Norman, Richard ; Reddihough, Dinah ; Choong, Catherine S. ; Jacoby, Peter ; Downs, Jenny</creatorcontrib><description>The EQ-5D-5L is a generic health utility instrument for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with self-report and proxy report versions for children (EQ-5D-Y-5L). Children with intellectual disability (ID) are a heterogeneous population whose impairments and comorbidities place them at risk of poor HRQoL. This study aimed to describe the content validity and suitability for children with ID of a proxy report version of the EQ-5D-Y-5L as seen by their caregivers. A proxy report EQ-5D-Y-5L was administered to caregivers of children with ID. Using cognitive think-aloud interviewing, participants were encouraged to provide the reasoning for their choices, assess the questions’ relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness, and comment on the tool’s strengths and weaknesses. Qualitative content analysis used both directed (deductive) and conventional (inductive) methods. There were 28 interviews with 30 caregivers of children with ID (aged 8-22 years, 17 boys, with autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, and rare genetic disorders). The EQ-5D-Y-5L was considered clear, concise, and largely relevant, but insufficiently comprehensive for this population. Interviewees sought clarification of the definition of HRQoL, whether it included unchanging impairments (vs fluctuating health states), and what basis of comparison to use (child or peer). Many interviewees suggested inclusion of questions for other domains, including communication and social engagement, equipment and human supports required, and a wider range of mental health questions. The study suggests that further work is required to ensure accurate responses to the EQ-5D-Y-5L from caregivers of children with ID and to describe these children adequately. •The EQ-5D is a widely used scale for measuring health-related quality of life, with established reliability and validity in a diversity of adult and pediatric populations. It is used to assign economic value to changes in health status.•Use of the EQ-5D-Y-5L presents challenges for carers of children with intellectual disability (ID), particularly in regard to the influence of unchanging impairments, variable expectations for children with ID compared with typically developing children, the omission of questions about supports required by children, and difficulties for parents reporting on behalf of their children, particularly about pain.•Healthcare decision making, if based on a current version of the EQ-5D-Y-5L, is likely to overestimate health-related quality of life in children with ID, because most caregivers assume the availability of support (person or equipment or both) when answering the questions and because expectations for children with ID are different from expectations of neurotypical children and answers are adjusted to take into account these limitations. Comparison of EQ-5D-Y-5L results between children with ID and neurotypical children may be invalid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.11.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38043713</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Autism Spectrum Disorder ; Child ; cognitive interview ; content validity ; disability ; EQ-5D-5L ; Female ; health and wellbeing ; health-related quality of life ; Humans ; Intellectual Disability ; Male ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Value in health, 2024-02, Vol.27 (2), p.190-198</ispartof><rights>2023 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3df9a949f71c8d7f66ab3bbed62432685249098cc4fc8cf887ea9268b71811693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3df9a949f71c8d7f66ab3bbed62432685249098cc4fc8cf887ea9268b71811693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.11.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38043713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blackmore, A. Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulhern, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddihough, Dinah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choong, Catherine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacoby, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downs, Jenny</creatorcontrib><title>How Well Does the EQ-5D-Y-5L Describe Children With Intellectual Disability?: “There’s a Lot More to My Child Than That She Can’t Wash or Dress Herself.”</title><title>Value in health</title><addtitle>Value Health</addtitle><description>The EQ-5D-5L is a generic health utility instrument for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with self-report and proxy report versions for children (EQ-5D-Y-5L). Children with intellectual disability (ID) are a heterogeneous population whose impairments and comorbidities place them at risk of poor HRQoL. This study aimed to describe the content validity and suitability for children with ID of a proxy report version of the EQ-5D-Y-5L as seen by their caregivers. A proxy report EQ-5D-Y-5L was administered to caregivers of children with ID. Using cognitive think-aloud interviewing, participants were encouraged to provide the reasoning for their choices, assess the questions’ relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness, and comment on the tool’s strengths and weaknesses. Qualitative content analysis used both directed (deductive) and conventional (inductive) methods. There were 28 interviews with 30 caregivers of children with ID (aged 8-22 years, 17 boys, with autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, and rare genetic disorders). The EQ-5D-Y-5L was considered clear, concise, and largely relevant, but insufficiently comprehensive for this population. Interviewees sought clarification of the definition of HRQoL, whether it included unchanging impairments (vs fluctuating health states), and what basis of comparison to use (child or peer). Many interviewees suggested inclusion of questions for other domains, including communication and social engagement, equipment and human supports required, and a wider range of mental health questions. The study suggests that further work is required to ensure accurate responses to the EQ-5D-Y-5L from caregivers of children with ID and to describe these children adequately. •The EQ-5D is a widely used scale for measuring health-related quality of life, with established reliability and validity in a diversity of adult and pediatric populations. It is used to assign economic value to changes in health status.•Use of the EQ-5D-Y-5L presents challenges for carers of children with intellectual disability (ID), particularly in regard to the influence of unchanging impairments, variable expectations for children with ID compared with typically developing children, the omission of questions about supports required by children, and difficulties for parents reporting on behalf of their children, particularly about pain.•Healthcare decision making, if based on a current version of the EQ-5D-Y-5L, is likely to overestimate health-related quality of life in children with ID, because most caregivers assume the availability of support (person or equipment or both) when answering the questions and because expectations for children with ID are different from expectations of neurotypical children and answers are adjusted to take into account these limitations. Comparison of EQ-5D-Y-5L results between children with ID and neurotypical children may be invalid.</description><subject>Autism Spectrum Disorder</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>cognitive interview</subject><subject>content validity</subject><subject>disability</subject><subject>EQ-5D-5L</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>health and wellbeing</subject><subject>health-related quality of life</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1098-3015</issn><issn>1524-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhS0EoiXwAizQXbKZqT2eHw9CQigpTaVUVUVQxMryeO5oHE3GxXaKsstrIMGCV8uT4CiFJQv_yDrnWPd8hLxmNGWUlRfrdP2ghjSjGU8ZSyktnpBzVmR5klecP413WouEU1ackRferymlJc-K5-SMC5rzivFz8ntuv8MKhwFmFj2EHuHyLilmydekWMAMvXamQZj2ZmgdjrAyoYfrMUQH6rBV0We8asxgwu7DOzjsfy57dHjY__CgYGED3FiHECzc7E4psOzVeNwCfI6_TdUYxQFWyvdgHcwceg9zdB6HLj3sf70kzzo1eHz1eE7Il0-Xy-k8WdxeXU8_LhLNizIkvO1qVed1VzEt2qorS9XwpsG2zHKelSLWUsc6tM47LXQnRIWqju9NxQRjZc0n5O0p997Zb1v0QW6M13FONaLdepmJusrjim1PSHaSame9d9jJe2c2yu0ko_KIRq7lEY08opGMyYgmmt485m-bDbb_LH9ZRMH7kwDjlA8GnfTa4KixNS52LVtr_pf_B8FXoVg</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Blackmore, A. Marie</creator><creator>Mulhern, Brendan</creator><creator>Norman, Richard</creator><creator>Reddihough, Dinah</creator><creator>Choong, Catherine S.</creator><creator>Jacoby, Peter</creator><creator>Downs, Jenny</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>How Well Does the EQ-5D-Y-5L Describe Children With Intellectual Disability?: “There’s a Lot More to My Child Than That She Can’t Wash or Dress Herself.”</title><author>Blackmore, A. Marie ; Mulhern, Brendan ; Norman, Richard ; Reddihough, Dinah ; Choong, Catherine S. ; Jacoby, Peter ; Downs, Jenny</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3df9a949f71c8d7f66ab3bbed62432685249098cc4fc8cf887ea9268b71811693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Autism Spectrum Disorder</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>cognitive interview</topic><topic>content validity</topic><topic>disability</topic><topic>EQ-5D-5L</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>health and wellbeing</topic><topic>health-related quality of life</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blackmore, A. Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulhern, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddihough, Dinah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choong, Catherine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacoby, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downs, Jenny</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blackmore, A. Marie</au><au>Mulhern, Brendan</au><au>Norman, Richard</au><au>Reddihough, Dinah</au><au>Choong, Catherine S.</au><au>Jacoby, Peter</au><au>Downs, Jenny</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Well Does the EQ-5D-Y-5L Describe Children With Intellectual Disability?: “There’s a Lot More to My Child Than That She Can’t Wash or Dress Herself.”</atitle><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle><addtitle>Value Health</addtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>190</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>190-198</pages><issn>1098-3015</issn><eissn>1524-4733</eissn><abstract>The EQ-5D-5L is a generic health utility instrument for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with self-report and proxy report versions for children (EQ-5D-Y-5L). Children with intellectual disability (ID) are a heterogeneous population whose impairments and comorbidities place them at risk of poor HRQoL. This study aimed to describe the content validity and suitability for children with ID of a proxy report version of the EQ-5D-Y-5L as seen by their caregivers. A proxy report EQ-5D-Y-5L was administered to caregivers of children with ID. Using cognitive think-aloud interviewing, participants were encouraged to provide the reasoning for their choices, assess the questions’ relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness, and comment on the tool’s strengths and weaknesses. Qualitative content analysis used both directed (deductive) and conventional (inductive) methods. There were 28 interviews with 30 caregivers of children with ID (aged 8-22 years, 17 boys, with autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, and rare genetic disorders). The EQ-5D-Y-5L was considered clear, concise, and largely relevant, but insufficiently comprehensive for this population. Interviewees sought clarification of the definition of HRQoL, whether it included unchanging impairments (vs fluctuating health states), and what basis of comparison to use (child or peer). Many interviewees suggested inclusion of questions for other domains, including communication and social engagement, equipment and human supports required, and a wider range of mental health questions. The study suggests that further work is required to ensure accurate responses to the EQ-5D-Y-5L from caregivers of children with ID and to describe these children adequately. •The EQ-5D is a widely used scale for measuring health-related quality of life, with established reliability and validity in a diversity of adult and pediatric populations. It is used to assign economic value to changes in health status.•Use of the EQ-5D-Y-5L presents challenges for carers of children with intellectual disability (ID), particularly in regard to the influence of unchanging impairments, variable expectations for children with ID compared with typically developing children, the omission of questions about supports required by children, and difficulties for parents reporting on behalf of their children, particularly about pain.•Healthcare decision making, if based on a current version of the EQ-5D-Y-5L, is likely to overestimate health-related quality of life in children with ID, because most caregivers assume the availability of support (person or equipment or both) when answering the questions and because expectations for children with ID are different from expectations of neurotypical children and answers are adjusted to take into account these limitations. Comparison of EQ-5D-Y-5L results between children with ID and neurotypical children may be invalid.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38043713</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jval.2023.11.005</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-3015
ispartof Value in health, 2024-02, Vol.27 (2), p.190-198
issn 1098-3015
1524-4733
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2897489702
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Autism Spectrum Disorder
Child
cognitive interview
content validity
disability
EQ-5D-5L
Female
health and wellbeing
health-related quality of life
Humans
Intellectual Disability
Male
Psychometrics
Quality of Life - psychology
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
title How Well Does the EQ-5D-Y-5L Describe Children With Intellectual Disability?: “There’s a Lot More to My Child Than That She Can’t Wash or Dress Herself.”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A40%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Well%20Does%20the%20EQ-5D-Y-5L%20Describe%20Children%20With%20Intellectual%20Disability?:%20%E2%80%9CThere%E2%80%99s%20a%20Lot%20More%20to%20My%20Child%20Than%20That%20She%20Can%E2%80%99t%20Wash%20or%20Dress%20Herself.%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Value%20in%20health&rft.au=Blackmore,%20A.%20Marie&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=190&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=190-198&rft.issn=1098-3015&rft.eissn=1524-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jval.2023.11.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2897489702%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2897489702&rft_id=info:pmid/38043713&rft_els_id=S109830152306196X&rfr_iscdi=true