Deep learning‐based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation
Objectives To investigate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning in automatic graft material segmentation after maxillary sinus augmentation (SA) from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods One hundred paired CBCT scans (a preoperative scan and a postoperative scan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2024-08, Vol.35 (8), p.964-972 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 972 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 964 |
container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Tao, Baoxin Xu, Jiangchang Gao, Jie He, Shamin Jiang, Shuanglin Wang, Feng Chen, Xiaojun Wu, Yiqun |
description | Objectives
To investigate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning in automatic graft material segmentation after maxillary sinus augmentation (SA) from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.
Materials and Methods
One hundred paired CBCT scans (a preoperative scan and a postoperative scan) were collected and randomly allocated to training (n = 82) and testing (n = 18) subsets. The ground truths of graft materials were labeled by three observers together (two experienced surgeons and a computer engineer). A deep learning model including a 3D V‐Net and a 3D Attention V‐Net was developed. The overall performance of the model was assessed through the testing data set. The comparative accuracy and inference time consumption of the model‐driven and manual segmentation (by two surgeons with 3 years of experience in dental implant surgery) were conducted on 10 CBCT scans from the test samples.
Results
The deep learning model had a Dice coefficient (Dice) of 90.36 ± 2.53%, a 95% Hausdorff distance (HD) of 1.59 ± 0.82 mm, and an average surface distance (ASD) of 0.38 ± 0.11 mm. The proposed model only needed 7.2 s, while the surgeon took 19.15 min on average to complete a segmentation task. The overall performances of the model were significantly superior to those of surgeons.
Conclusions
The proposed deep learning model yielded a more accurate and efficient performance of automatic segmentation of graft material after SA than that of the two surgeons. The proposed model could facilitate a powerful system for volumetric change evaluation, dental implant planning, and digital dentistry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/clr.14221 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2896803156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2896803156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-d270d6d71cd1c04db880a3f112f055b854a188e3842f609a72159015ae41ed963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxTAQhoMoerwsfAEJuNFFdaZp2mQpxyscEETXIW2nh0ovx6RF3fkIPqNPYvR4AcFsJgPf_Mx8jO0iHGF4x0XjjjCJY1xhE0wBIpCAq2wCGmSUYYobbNP7ewBItdLrbEMoEAKVnrDqlGjBG7Kuq7v528trbj2V3I5D39qhLrineUvdEP59x_uK531HfO5sNfAAkKttw0NDLrRPddNY98x93Y0-ZPxObrO1yjaedr7qFrs7P7udXkaz64ur6cksKoQUGJVxBmVaZliUWEBS5kqBFRViXIGUuZKJRaVIqCSuUtA2i1FqQGkpQSp1KrbYwTJ34fqHkfxg2toXFNbqqB-9iZVOw-0oP9D9P-h9P7oubGdEEAdaQyYDdbikCtd776gyC1e34UiDYD7kmyDffMoP7N5X4pi3VP6Q37YDcLwEHuuGnv9PMtPZzTLyHV4tjrE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090099075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deep learning‐based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Tao, Baoxin ; Xu, Jiangchang ; Gao, Jie ; He, Shamin ; Jiang, Shuanglin ; Wang, Feng ; Chen, Xiaojun ; Wu, Yiqun</creator><creatorcontrib>Tao, Baoxin ; Xu, Jiangchang ; Gao, Jie ; He, Shamin ; Jiang, Shuanglin ; Wang, Feng ; Chen, Xiaojun ; Wu, Yiqun</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To investigate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning in automatic graft material segmentation after maxillary sinus augmentation (SA) from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.
Materials and Methods
One hundred paired CBCT scans (a preoperative scan and a postoperative scan) were collected and randomly allocated to training (n = 82) and testing (n = 18) subsets. The ground truths of graft materials were labeled by three observers together (two experienced surgeons and a computer engineer). A deep learning model including a 3D V‐Net and a 3D Attention V‐Net was developed. The overall performance of the model was assessed through the testing data set. The comparative accuracy and inference time consumption of the model‐driven and manual segmentation (by two surgeons with 3 years of experience in dental implant surgery) were conducted on 10 CBCT scans from the test samples.
Results
The deep learning model had a Dice coefficient (Dice) of 90.36 ± 2.53%, a 95% Hausdorff distance (HD) of 1.59 ± 0.82 mm, and an average surface distance (ASD) of 0.38 ± 0.11 mm. The proposed model only needed 7.2 s, while the surgeon took 19.15 min on average to complete a segmentation task. The overall performances of the model were significantly superior to those of surgeons.
Conclusions
The proposed deep learning model yielded a more accurate and efficient performance of automatic segmentation of graft material after SA than that of the two surgeons. The proposed model could facilitate a powerful system for volumetric change evaluation, dental implant planning, and digital dentistry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.14221</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38033189</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; artificial intelligence ; Bone grafts ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Computed tomography ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods ; Deep Learning ; Dental implants ; Dentistry ; digital dentistry ; Female ; Grafting ; Grafts ; Humans ; Image processing ; Image segmentation ; Male ; Maxillary sinus ; Maxillary Sinus - diagnostic imaging ; Maxillary Sinus - surgery ; Metric space ; Middle Aged ; neural networks ; Observational learning ; Performance evaluation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Segmentation ; sinus augmentation ; Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods ; Substitute bone ; Surgeons</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2024-08, Vol.35 (8), p.964-972</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-d270d6d71cd1c04db880a3f112f055b854a188e3842f609a72159015ae41ed963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-d270d6d71cd1c04db880a3f112f055b854a188e3842f609a72159015ae41ed963</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0066-5470</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.14221$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.14221$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033189$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tao, Baoxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jiangchang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Shamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Shuanglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yiqun</creatorcontrib><title>Deep learning‐based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Objectives
To investigate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning in automatic graft material segmentation after maxillary sinus augmentation (SA) from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.
Materials and Methods
One hundred paired CBCT scans (a preoperative scan and a postoperative scan) were collected and randomly allocated to training (n = 82) and testing (n = 18) subsets. The ground truths of graft materials were labeled by three observers together (two experienced surgeons and a computer engineer). A deep learning model including a 3D V‐Net and a 3D Attention V‐Net was developed. The overall performance of the model was assessed through the testing data set. The comparative accuracy and inference time consumption of the model‐driven and manual segmentation (by two surgeons with 3 years of experience in dental implant surgery) were conducted on 10 CBCT scans from the test samples.
Results
The deep learning model had a Dice coefficient (Dice) of 90.36 ± 2.53%, a 95% Hausdorff distance (HD) of 1.59 ± 0.82 mm, and an average surface distance (ASD) of 0.38 ± 0.11 mm. The proposed model only needed 7.2 s, while the surgeon took 19.15 min on average to complete a segmentation task. The overall performances of the model were significantly superior to those of surgeons.
Conclusions
The proposed deep learning model yielded a more accurate and efficient performance of automatic segmentation of graft material after SA than that of the two surgeons. The proposed model could facilitate a powerful system for volumetric change evaluation, dental implant planning, and digital dentistry.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Bone grafts</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>digital dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grafting</subject><subject>Grafts</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Image segmentation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxillary sinus</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Metric space</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>neural networks</subject><subject>Observational learning</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>sinus augmentation</subject><subject>Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods</subject><subject>Substitute bone</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxTAQhoMoerwsfAEJuNFFdaZp2mQpxyscEETXIW2nh0ovx6RF3fkIPqNPYvR4AcFsJgPf_Mx8jO0iHGF4x0XjjjCJY1xhE0wBIpCAq2wCGmSUYYobbNP7ewBItdLrbEMoEAKVnrDqlGjBG7Kuq7v528trbj2V3I5D39qhLrineUvdEP59x_uK531HfO5sNfAAkKttw0NDLrRPddNY98x93Y0-ZPxObrO1yjaedr7qFrs7P7udXkaz64ur6cksKoQUGJVxBmVaZliUWEBS5kqBFRViXIGUuZKJRaVIqCSuUtA2i1FqQGkpQSp1KrbYwTJ34fqHkfxg2toXFNbqqB-9iZVOw-0oP9D9P-h9P7oubGdEEAdaQyYDdbikCtd776gyC1e34UiDYD7kmyDffMoP7N5X4pi3VP6Q37YDcLwEHuuGnv9PMtPZzTLyHV4tjrE</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Tao, Baoxin</creator><creator>Xu, Jiangchang</creator><creator>Gao, Jie</creator><creator>He, Shamin</creator><creator>Jiang, Shuanglin</creator><creator>Wang, Feng</creator><creator>Chen, Xiaojun</creator><creator>Wu, Yiqun</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0066-5470</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Deep learning‐based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation</title><author>Tao, Baoxin ; Xu, Jiangchang ; Gao, Jie ; He, Shamin ; Jiang, Shuanglin ; Wang, Feng ; Chen, Xiaojun ; Wu, Yiqun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-d270d6d71cd1c04db880a3f112f055b854a188e3842f609a72159015ae41ed963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Bone grafts</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>digital dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grafting</topic><topic>Grafts</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Image segmentation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxillary sinus</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Metric space</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>neural networks</topic><topic>Observational learning</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>sinus augmentation</topic><topic>Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods</topic><topic>Substitute bone</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tao, Baoxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jiangchang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Shamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Shuanglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yiqun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tao, Baoxin</au><au>Xu, Jiangchang</au><au>Gao, Jie</au><au>He, Shamin</au><au>Jiang, Shuanglin</au><au>Wang, Feng</au><au>Chen, Xiaojun</au><au>Wu, Yiqun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deep learning‐based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>964</spage><epage>972</epage><pages>964-972</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To investigate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning in automatic graft material segmentation after maxillary sinus augmentation (SA) from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.
Materials and Methods
One hundred paired CBCT scans (a preoperative scan and a postoperative scan) were collected and randomly allocated to training (n = 82) and testing (n = 18) subsets. The ground truths of graft materials were labeled by three observers together (two experienced surgeons and a computer engineer). A deep learning model including a 3D V‐Net and a 3D Attention V‐Net was developed. The overall performance of the model was assessed through the testing data set. The comparative accuracy and inference time consumption of the model‐driven and manual segmentation (by two surgeons with 3 years of experience in dental implant surgery) were conducted on 10 CBCT scans from the test samples.
Results
The deep learning model had a Dice coefficient (Dice) of 90.36 ± 2.53%, a 95% Hausdorff distance (HD) of 1.59 ± 0.82 mm, and an average surface distance (ASD) of 0.38 ± 0.11 mm. The proposed model only needed 7.2 s, while the surgeon took 19.15 min on average to complete a segmentation task. The overall performances of the model were significantly superior to those of surgeons.
Conclusions
The proposed deep learning model yielded a more accurate and efficient performance of automatic segmentation of graft material after SA than that of the two surgeons. The proposed model could facilitate a powerful system for volumetric change evaluation, dental implant planning, and digital dentistry.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38033189</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.14221</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0066-5470</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2024-08, Vol.35 (8), p.964-972 |
issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 1600-0501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2896803156 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Accuracy artificial intelligence Bone grafts Bone Transplantation - methods Computed tomography Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods Deep Learning Dental implants Dentistry digital dentistry Female Grafting Grafts Humans Image processing Image segmentation Male Maxillary sinus Maxillary Sinus - diagnostic imaging Maxillary Sinus - surgery Metric space Middle Aged neural networks Observational learning Performance evaluation Reproducibility of Results Segmentation sinus augmentation Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods Substitute bone Surgeons |
title | Deep learning‐based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T13%3A20%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep%20learning%E2%80%90based%20automatic%20segmentation%20of%20bone%20graft%20material%20after%20maxillary%20sinus%20augmentation&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Tao,%20Baoxin&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=964&rft.epage=972&rft.pages=964-972&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.14221&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2896803156%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090099075&rft_id=info:pmid/38033189&rfr_iscdi=true |