Deep learning‐based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation

Objectives To investigate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning in automatic graft material segmentation after maxillary sinus augmentation (SA) from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods One hundred paired CBCT scans (a preoperative scan and a postoperative scan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral implants research 2024-08, Vol.35 (8), p.964-972
Hauptverfasser: Tao, Baoxin, Xu, Jiangchang, Gao, Jie, He, Shamin, Jiang, Shuanglin, Wang, Feng, Chen, Xiaojun, Wu, Yiqun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 972
container_issue 8
container_start_page 964
container_title Clinical oral implants research
container_volume 35
creator Tao, Baoxin
Xu, Jiangchang
Gao, Jie
He, Shamin
Jiang, Shuanglin
Wang, Feng
Chen, Xiaojun
Wu, Yiqun
description Objectives To investigate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning in automatic graft material segmentation after maxillary sinus augmentation (SA) from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods One hundred paired CBCT scans (a preoperative scan and a postoperative scan) were collected and randomly allocated to training (n = 82) and testing (n = 18) subsets. The ground truths of graft materials were labeled by three observers together (two experienced surgeons and a computer engineer). A deep learning model including a 3D V‐Net and a 3D Attention V‐Net was developed. The overall performance of the model was assessed through the testing data set. The comparative accuracy and inference time consumption of the model‐driven and manual segmentation (by two surgeons with 3 years of experience in dental implant surgery) were conducted on 10 CBCT scans from the test samples. Results The deep learning model had a Dice coefficient (Dice) of 90.36 ± 2.53%, a 95% Hausdorff distance (HD) of 1.59 ± 0.82 mm, and an average surface distance (ASD) of 0.38 ± 0.11 mm. The proposed model only needed 7.2 s, while the surgeon took 19.15 min on average to complete a segmentation task. The overall performances of the model were significantly superior to those of surgeons. Conclusions The proposed deep learning model yielded a more accurate and efficient performance of automatic segmentation of graft material after SA than that of the two surgeons. The proposed model could facilitate a powerful system for volumetric change evaluation, dental implant planning, and digital dentistry.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/clr.14221
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2896803156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2896803156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-d270d6d71cd1c04db880a3f112f055b854a188e3842f609a72159015ae41ed963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxTAQhoMoerwsfAEJuNFFdaZp2mQpxyscEETXIW2nh0ovx6RF3fkIPqNPYvR4AcFsJgPf_Mx8jO0iHGF4x0XjjjCJY1xhE0wBIpCAq2wCGmSUYYobbNP7ewBItdLrbEMoEAKVnrDqlGjBG7Kuq7v528trbj2V3I5D39qhLrineUvdEP59x_uK531HfO5sNfAAkKttw0NDLrRPddNY98x93Y0-ZPxObrO1yjaedr7qFrs7P7udXkaz64ur6cksKoQUGJVxBmVaZliUWEBS5kqBFRViXIGUuZKJRaVIqCSuUtA2i1FqQGkpQSp1KrbYwTJ34fqHkfxg2toXFNbqqB-9iZVOw-0oP9D9P-h9P7oubGdEEAdaQyYDdbikCtd776gyC1e34UiDYD7kmyDffMoP7N5X4pi3VP6Q37YDcLwEHuuGnv9PMtPZzTLyHV4tjrE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090099075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deep learning‐based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Tao, Baoxin ; Xu, Jiangchang ; Gao, Jie ; He, Shamin ; Jiang, Shuanglin ; Wang, Feng ; Chen, Xiaojun ; Wu, Yiqun</creator><creatorcontrib>Tao, Baoxin ; Xu, Jiangchang ; Gao, Jie ; He, Shamin ; Jiang, Shuanglin ; Wang, Feng ; Chen, Xiaojun ; Wu, Yiqun</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To investigate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning in automatic graft material segmentation after maxillary sinus augmentation (SA) from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods One hundred paired CBCT scans (a preoperative scan and a postoperative scan) were collected and randomly allocated to training (n = 82) and testing (n = 18) subsets. The ground truths of graft materials were labeled by three observers together (two experienced surgeons and a computer engineer). A deep learning model including a 3D V‐Net and a 3D Attention V‐Net was developed. The overall performance of the model was assessed through the testing data set. The comparative accuracy and inference time consumption of the model‐driven and manual segmentation (by two surgeons with 3 years of experience in dental implant surgery) were conducted on 10 CBCT scans from the test samples. Results The deep learning model had a Dice coefficient (Dice) of 90.36 ± 2.53%, a 95% Hausdorff distance (HD) of 1.59 ± 0.82 mm, and an average surface distance (ASD) of 0.38 ± 0.11 mm. The proposed model only needed 7.2 s, while the surgeon took 19.15 min on average to complete a segmentation task. The overall performances of the model were significantly superior to those of surgeons. Conclusions The proposed deep learning model yielded a more accurate and efficient performance of automatic segmentation of graft material after SA than that of the two surgeons. The proposed model could facilitate a powerful system for volumetric change evaluation, dental implant planning, and digital dentistry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.14221</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38033189</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; artificial intelligence ; Bone grafts ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Computed tomography ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods ; Deep Learning ; Dental implants ; Dentistry ; digital dentistry ; Female ; Grafting ; Grafts ; Humans ; Image processing ; Image segmentation ; Male ; Maxillary sinus ; Maxillary Sinus - diagnostic imaging ; Maxillary Sinus - surgery ; Metric space ; Middle Aged ; neural networks ; Observational learning ; Performance evaluation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Segmentation ; sinus augmentation ; Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods ; Substitute bone ; Surgeons</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2024-08, Vol.35 (8), p.964-972</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-d270d6d71cd1c04db880a3f112f055b854a188e3842f609a72159015ae41ed963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-d270d6d71cd1c04db880a3f112f055b854a188e3842f609a72159015ae41ed963</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0066-5470</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.14221$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.14221$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033189$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tao, Baoxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jiangchang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Shamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Shuanglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yiqun</creatorcontrib><title>Deep learning‐based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Objectives To investigate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning in automatic graft material segmentation after maxillary sinus augmentation (SA) from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods One hundred paired CBCT scans (a preoperative scan and a postoperative scan) were collected and randomly allocated to training (n = 82) and testing (n = 18) subsets. The ground truths of graft materials were labeled by three observers together (two experienced surgeons and a computer engineer). A deep learning model including a 3D V‐Net and a 3D Attention V‐Net was developed. The overall performance of the model was assessed through the testing data set. The comparative accuracy and inference time consumption of the model‐driven and manual segmentation (by two surgeons with 3 years of experience in dental implant surgery) were conducted on 10 CBCT scans from the test samples. Results The deep learning model had a Dice coefficient (Dice) of 90.36 ± 2.53%, a 95% Hausdorff distance (HD) of 1.59 ± 0.82 mm, and an average surface distance (ASD) of 0.38 ± 0.11 mm. The proposed model only needed 7.2 s, while the surgeon took 19.15 min on average to complete a segmentation task. The overall performances of the model were significantly superior to those of surgeons. Conclusions The proposed deep learning model yielded a more accurate and efficient performance of automatic segmentation of graft material after SA than that of the two surgeons. The proposed model could facilitate a powerful system for volumetric change evaluation, dental implant planning, and digital dentistry.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Bone grafts</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>digital dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grafting</subject><subject>Grafts</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Image segmentation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxillary sinus</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Metric space</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>neural networks</subject><subject>Observational learning</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>sinus augmentation</subject><subject>Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods</subject><subject>Substitute bone</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxTAQhoMoerwsfAEJuNFFdaZp2mQpxyscEETXIW2nh0ovx6RF3fkIPqNPYvR4AcFsJgPf_Mx8jO0iHGF4x0XjjjCJY1xhE0wBIpCAq2wCGmSUYYobbNP7ewBItdLrbEMoEAKVnrDqlGjBG7Kuq7v528trbj2V3I5D39qhLrineUvdEP59x_uK531HfO5sNfAAkKttw0NDLrRPddNY98x93Y0-ZPxObrO1yjaedr7qFrs7P7udXkaz64ur6cksKoQUGJVxBmVaZliUWEBS5kqBFRViXIGUuZKJRaVIqCSuUtA2i1FqQGkpQSp1KrbYwTJ34fqHkfxg2toXFNbqqB-9iZVOw-0oP9D9P-h9P7oubGdEEAdaQyYDdbikCtd776gyC1e34UiDYD7kmyDffMoP7N5X4pi3VP6Q37YDcLwEHuuGnv9PMtPZzTLyHV4tjrE</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Tao, Baoxin</creator><creator>Xu, Jiangchang</creator><creator>Gao, Jie</creator><creator>He, Shamin</creator><creator>Jiang, Shuanglin</creator><creator>Wang, Feng</creator><creator>Chen, Xiaojun</creator><creator>Wu, Yiqun</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0066-5470</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Deep learning‐based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation</title><author>Tao, Baoxin ; Xu, Jiangchang ; Gao, Jie ; He, Shamin ; Jiang, Shuanglin ; Wang, Feng ; Chen, Xiaojun ; Wu, Yiqun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-d270d6d71cd1c04db880a3f112f055b854a188e3842f609a72159015ae41ed963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Bone grafts</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>digital dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grafting</topic><topic>Grafts</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Image segmentation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxillary sinus</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Metric space</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>neural networks</topic><topic>Observational learning</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>sinus augmentation</topic><topic>Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods</topic><topic>Substitute bone</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tao, Baoxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jiangchang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Shamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Shuanglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yiqun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tao, Baoxin</au><au>Xu, Jiangchang</au><au>Gao, Jie</au><au>He, Shamin</au><au>Jiang, Shuanglin</au><au>Wang, Feng</au><au>Chen, Xiaojun</au><au>Wu, Yiqun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deep learning‐based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>964</spage><epage>972</epage><pages>964-972</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives To investigate the accuracy and reliability of deep learning in automatic graft material segmentation after maxillary sinus augmentation (SA) from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods One hundred paired CBCT scans (a preoperative scan and a postoperative scan) were collected and randomly allocated to training (n = 82) and testing (n = 18) subsets. The ground truths of graft materials were labeled by three observers together (two experienced surgeons and a computer engineer). A deep learning model including a 3D V‐Net and a 3D Attention V‐Net was developed. The overall performance of the model was assessed through the testing data set. The comparative accuracy and inference time consumption of the model‐driven and manual segmentation (by two surgeons with 3 years of experience in dental implant surgery) were conducted on 10 CBCT scans from the test samples. Results The deep learning model had a Dice coefficient (Dice) of 90.36 ± 2.53%, a 95% Hausdorff distance (HD) of 1.59 ± 0.82 mm, and an average surface distance (ASD) of 0.38 ± 0.11 mm. The proposed model only needed 7.2 s, while the surgeon took 19.15 min on average to complete a segmentation task. The overall performances of the model were significantly superior to those of surgeons. Conclusions The proposed deep learning model yielded a more accurate and efficient performance of automatic segmentation of graft material after SA than that of the two surgeons. The proposed model could facilitate a powerful system for volumetric change evaluation, dental implant planning, and digital dentistry.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38033189</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.14221</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0066-5470</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-7161
ispartof Clinical oral implants research, 2024-08, Vol.35 (8), p.964-972
issn 0905-7161
1600-0501
1600-0501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2896803156
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Accuracy
artificial intelligence
Bone grafts
Bone Transplantation - methods
Computed tomography
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods
Deep Learning
Dental implants
Dentistry
digital dentistry
Female
Grafting
Grafts
Humans
Image processing
Image segmentation
Male
Maxillary sinus
Maxillary Sinus - diagnostic imaging
Maxillary Sinus - surgery
Metric space
Middle Aged
neural networks
Observational learning
Performance evaluation
Reproducibility of Results
Segmentation
sinus augmentation
Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods
Substitute bone
Surgeons
title Deep learning‐based automatic segmentation of bone graft material after maxillary sinus augmentation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T13%3A20%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep%20learning%E2%80%90based%20automatic%20segmentation%20of%20bone%20graft%20material%20after%20maxillary%20sinus%20augmentation&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Tao,%20Baoxin&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=964&rft.epage=972&rft.pages=964-972&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.14221&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2896803156%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090099075&rft_id=info:pmid/38033189&rfr_iscdi=true