Electrocoagulation in wastewater containing arsenic: Comparing different process designs

Arsenic removal from wastewater is a key problem for copper smelters. This work shows results of electrocoagulation of aqueous solutions containing arsenic with three different process designs and operating parameters. Three types of electrocoagulation reactors were tested and compared: (a) a modifi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Electrochimica acta 2007-02, Vol.52 (10), p.3464-3470
Hauptverfasser: Hansen, Henrik K, Nunez, Patricio, Raboy, Deborah, Schippacasse, Italo, Grandon, Rodrigo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3470
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3464
container_title Electrochimica acta
container_volume 52
creator Hansen, Henrik K
Nunez, Patricio
Raboy, Deborah
Schippacasse, Italo
Grandon, Rodrigo
description Arsenic removal from wastewater is a key problem for copper smelters. This work shows results of electrocoagulation of aqueous solutions containing arsenic with three different process designs and operating parameters. Three types of electrocoagulation reactors were tested and compared: (a) a modified flow continuous reactor. (b) a turbulent flow reactor and (c) an airlift reactor. All used iron as sacrificial anodes. The results showed that the electrocoagulation process of a 100 mg/L As(V) solution could decrease the arsenic concentration to less than 2 mg/L in the effluent with a current density of 1.2 A/dm2 with both the modified flow and the airlift reactor. The removal of arsenic with the turbulent flow reactor did not reach the same level but the Fe-to-As ratio (mol/mol) achieved in the coagulation process was in this case lower (approximately 7) than with the other two reactors. In addition, it seems that increasing the current density beyond a maximum value, the electrocoagulation process would not improve any further. This could probably be explained by passivation of the anode.
doi_str_mv 10.1010/j.electacta.2006.01.090
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28967860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28967860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_289678603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjEGKAjEQRbNQUGfmDGblzkxFJd26FYc5wCxmJ0WsbtKkK5pK4_VtwQMIHx583v9KLS0YCxa-O0ORfMExZgPgDFgDe5ioOYDdrneudjO1EOkAoHIVzNX_6TnIySdsh4glJNaB9R2l0B0LZe0TFwwcuNWYhTj4gz6m_or5WV1C01AmLvo6npCIvpCEluVTTRuMQl8vfqjVz-nv-LsevdtAUs59EE8xIlMa5Lyp966qHWzfFh8C8k4q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>28967860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrocoagulation in wastewater containing arsenic: Comparing different process designs</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hansen, Henrik K ; Nunez, Patricio ; Raboy, Deborah ; Schippacasse, Italo ; Grandon, Rodrigo</creator><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Henrik K ; Nunez, Patricio ; Raboy, Deborah ; Schippacasse, Italo ; Grandon, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><description>Arsenic removal from wastewater is a key problem for copper smelters. This work shows results of electrocoagulation of aqueous solutions containing arsenic with three different process designs and operating parameters. Three types of electrocoagulation reactors were tested and compared: (a) a modified flow continuous reactor. (b) a turbulent flow reactor and (c) an airlift reactor. All used iron as sacrificial anodes. The results showed that the electrocoagulation process of a 100 mg/L As(V) solution could decrease the arsenic concentration to less than 2 mg/L in the effluent with a current density of 1.2 A/dm2 with both the modified flow and the airlift reactor. The removal of arsenic with the turbulent flow reactor did not reach the same level but the Fe-to-As ratio (mol/mol) achieved in the coagulation process was in this case lower (approximately 7) than with the other two reactors. In addition, it seems that increasing the current density beyond a maximum value, the electrocoagulation process would not improve any further. This could probably be explained by passivation of the anode.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-4686</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1010/j.electacta.2006.01.090</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Electrochimica acta, 2007-02, Vol.52 (10), p.3464-3470</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Henrik K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunez, Patricio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raboy, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schippacasse, Italo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandon, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><title>Electrocoagulation in wastewater containing arsenic: Comparing different process designs</title><title>Electrochimica acta</title><description>Arsenic removal from wastewater is a key problem for copper smelters. This work shows results of electrocoagulation of aqueous solutions containing arsenic with three different process designs and operating parameters. Three types of electrocoagulation reactors were tested and compared: (a) a modified flow continuous reactor. (b) a turbulent flow reactor and (c) an airlift reactor. All used iron as sacrificial anodes. The results showed that the electrocoagulation process of a 100 mg/L As(V) solution could decrease the arsenic concentration to less than 2 mg/L in the effluent with a current density of 1.2 A/dm2 with both the modified flow and the airlift reactor. The removal of arsenic with the turbulent flow reactor did not reach the same level but the Fe-to-As ratio (mol/mol) achieved in the coagulation process was in this case lower (approximately 7) than with the other two reactors. In addition, it seems that increasing the current density beyond a maximum value, the electrocoagulation process would not improve any further. This could probably be explained by passivation of the anode.</description><issn>0013-4686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjEGKAjEQRbNQUGfmDGblzkxFJd26FYc5wCxmJ0WsbtKkK5pK4_VtwQMIHx583v9KLS0YCxa-O0ORfMExZgPgDFgDe5ioOYDdrneudjO1EOkAoHIVzNX_6TnIySdsh4glJNaB9R2l0B0LZe0TFwwcuNWYhTj4gz6m_or5WV1C01AmLvo6npCIvpCEluVTTRuMQl8vfqjVz-nv-LsevdtAUs59EE8xIlMa5Lyp966qHWzfFh8C8k4q</recordid><startdate>20070225</startdate><enddate>20070225</enddate><creator>Hansen, Henrik K</creator><creator>Nunez, Patricio</creator><creator>Raboy, Deborah</creator><creator>Schippacasse, Italo</creator><creator>Grandon, Rodrigo</creator><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070225</creationdate><title>Electrocoagulation in wastewater containing arsenic: Comparing different process designs</title><author>Hansen, Henrik K ; Nunez, Patricio ; Raboy, Deborah ; Schippacasse, Italo ; Grandon, Rodrigo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_289678603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Henrik K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunez, Patricio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raboy, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schippacasse, Italo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandon, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Electrochimica acta</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hansen, Henrik K</au><au>Nunez, Patricio</au><au>Raboy, Deborah</au><au>Schippacasse, Italo</au><au>Grandon, Rodrigo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrocoagulation in wastewater containing arsenic: Comparing different process designs</atitle><jtitle>Electrochimica acta</jtitle><date>2007-02-25</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3464</spage><epage>3470</epage><pages>3464-3470</pages><issn>0013-4686</issn><abstract>Arsenic removal from wastewater is a key problem for copper smelters. This work shows results of electrocoagulation of aqueous solutions containing arsenic with three different process designs and operating parameters. Three types of electrocoagulation reactors were tested and compared: (a) a modified flow continuous reactor. (b) a turbulent flow reactor and (c) an airlift reactor. All used iron as sacrificial anodes. The results showed that the electrocoagulation process of a 100 mg/L As(V) solution could decrease the arsenic concentration to less than 2 mg/L in the effluent with a current density of 1.2 A/dm2 with both the modified flow and the airlift reactor. The removal of arsenic with the turbulent flow reactor did not reach the same level but the Fe-to-As ratio (mol/mol) achieved in the coagulation process was in this case lower (approximately 7) than with the other two reactors. In addition, it seems that increasing the current density beyond a maximum value, the electrocoagulation process would not improve any further. This could probably be explained by passivation of the anode.</abstract><doi>10.1010/j.electacta.2006.01.090</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-4686
ispartof Electrochimica acta, 2007-02, Vol.52 (10), p.3464-3470
issn 0013-4686
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28967860
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title Electrocoagulation in wastewater containing arsenic: Comparing different process designs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T05%3A32%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrocoagulation%20in%20wastewater%20containing%20arsenic:%20Comparing%20different%20process%20designs&rft.jtitle=Electrochimica%20acta&rft.au=Hansen,%20Henrik%20K&rft.date=2007-02-25&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3464&rft.epage=3470&rft.pages=3464-3470&rft.issn=0013-4686&rft_id=info:doi/10.1010/j.electacta.2006.01.090&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E28967860%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=28967860&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true