Mesoscale modeling of Central American smoke transport to the United States: 1. "Top-down" assessment of emission strength and diurnal variation impacts
As is typical in the Northern Hemisphere spring, during 20 April to 21 May 2003, significant biomass burning smoke from Central America was transported to the southeastern United States (SEUS). A coupled aerosol, radiation, and meteorology model that is built upon the heritage of the Regional Atmosp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres 2006-03, Vol.111 (D5), p.np-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | D5 |
container_start_page | np |
container_title | Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Wang, Jun Christopher, Sundar A. Nair, U. S. Reid, Jeffrey S. Prins, Elaine M. Szykman, James Hand, Jenny L. |
description | As is typical in the Northern Hemisphere spring, during 20 April to 21 May 2003, significant biomass burning smoke from Central America was transported to the southeastern United States (SEUS). A coupled aerosol, radiation, and meteorology model that is built upon the heritage of the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS), having newly developed capabilities of Assimilation and Radiation Online Modeling of Aerosols (AROMA) algorithm, was used to simulate the smoke transport and quantify the smoke radiative impacts on surface energetics, boundary layer, and other atmospheric processes. This paper, the first of a two‐part series, describes the model and examines the ability of RAMS‐AROMA to simulate the smoke transport. Because biomass‐burning fire activities have distinct diurnal variations, the FLAMBE hourly smoke emission inventory that is derived from the geostationary satellite (GOES) fire products was assimilated into the model. In the “top‐down” analysis, ground‐based observations were used to evaluate the model performance, and the comparisons with model‐simulated results were used to estimate emission uncertainties. Qualitatively, a 30‐day simulation of smoke spatial distribution as well as the timing and location of the smoke fronts are consistent with those identified from the PM2.5 observation network, local air quality reports, and the measurements of aerosol optical thickness (AOT) and aerosol vertical profiles from the Southern Great Plains (SGP) Atmospheric Radiation Measurements (ARM) site in Oklahoma. Quantitatively, the model‐simulated daily mean near‐surface dry smoke mass correlates well with PM2.5 mass at 34 locations in Texas and with the total carbon mass and nonsoil potassium mass (KNON) at three IMPROVE sites along the smoke pathway (with linear correlation coefficients R = 0.77, 0.74, and 0.69 at the significance level larger than 0.99, respectively). The top‐down sensitivity analysis indicates that the total smoke particle emission during the study period is about 1.3 ± 0.2 Tg. The results further indicate that the simulation with a daily smoke emission inventory provides a slightly better correlation with measurements in the downwind region on daily scales but gives an unrealistic diurnal variation of AOT in the smoke source region. This study suggests that the assimilation of emission inventories from geostationary satellites is superior to that of polar orbiting satellites and has important implications for the modeling of |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2005JD006416 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28952742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1654665145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5905-69b7e6c8e4c1cab3e846a17b5037e84ce52f9ca4d750040a164b1f6d6288312a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uFDEMx0cIJFalNx4g6gFxYEqSyccMt3YLC1UpiLbqMcpmPG3oTLLE2X68CY9LVosQp4Ivtuyf_7blqnrJ6D6jvHvLKZXHR5QqwdSTasaZVDXnlD-tZpSJtqac6-fVLuJ3WkxIJSibVT8_A0Z0dgQyxR5GH65IHMgcQk52JAcTJO9sIDjFGyAlF3AVUyY5knwN5CL4DD05yzYDviNsn-ydx1Xdx7uwRywiIE5FaiMJk0f0sUjlBOEqXxMbetL7dQpl0K1N3uZN2U8r6zK-qJ4NdkTY_e13qosP78_nH-uTL4tP84OT2smOylp1Sw3KtSAcc3bZQCuUZXopaaNL7EDyoXNW9FqWo6llSizZoHrF27Zh3DY71aut7irFH2vAbMqeDsbRBohrNLztJNeC_wdIG9V27T9BppnuBGcFfP04qKRQSjIhC_pmi7oUERMMZpX8ZNODYdRs3m_-fn_Bmy1-50d4eJQ1x4tvR4wLvRlSb7s8Zrj_02XTjVG60dJcni5Mc3h5dniqvhrR_AKMYMBK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1654665145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mesoscale modeling of Central American smoke transport to the United States: 1. "Top-down" assessment of emission strength and diurnal variation impacts</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wang, Jun ; Christopher, Sundar A. ; Nair, U. S. ; Reid, Jeffrey S. ; Prins, Elaine M. ; Szykman, James ; Hand, Jenny L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jun ; Christopher, Sundar A. ; Nair, U. S. ; Reid, Jeffrey S. ; Prins, Elaine M. ; Szykman, James ; Hand, Jenny L.</creatorcontrib><description>As is typical in the Northern Hemisphere spring, during 20 April to 21 May 2003, significant biomass burning smoke from Central America was transported to the southeastern United States (SEUS). A coupled aerosol, radiation, and meteorology model that is built upon the heritage of the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS), having newly developed capabilities of Assimilation and Radiation Online Modeling of Aerosols (AROMA) algorithm, was used to simulate the smoke transport and quantify the smoke radiative impacts on surface energetics, boundary layer, and other atmospheric processes. This paper, the first of a two‐part series, describes the model and examines the ability of RAMS‐AROMA to simulate the smoke transport. Because biomass‐burning fire activities have distinct diurnal variations, the FLAMBE hourly smoke emission inventory that is derived from the geostationary satellite (GOES) fire products was assimilated into the model. In the “top‐down” analysis, ground‐based observations were used to evaluate the model performance, and the comparisons with model‐simulated results were used to estimate emission uncertainties. Qualitatively, a 30‐day simulation of smoke spatial distribution as well as the timing and location of the smoke fronts are consistent with those identified from the PM2.5 observation network, local air quality reports, and the measurements of aerosol optical thickness (AOT) and aerosol vertical profiles from the Southern Great Plains (SGP) Atmospheric Radiation Measurements (ARM) site in Oklahoma. Quantitatively, the model‐simulated daily mean near‐surface dry smoke mass correlates well with PM2.5 mass at 34 locations in Texas and with the total carbon mass and nonsoil potassium mass (KNON) at three IMPROVE sites along the smoke pathway (with linear correlation coefficients R = 0.77, 0.74, and 0.69 at the significance level larger than 0.99, respectively). The top‐down sensitivity analysis indicates that the total smoke particle emission during the study period is about 1.3 ± 0.2 Tg. The results further indicate that the simulation with a daily smoke emission inventory provides a slightly better correlation with measurements in the downwind region on daily scales but gives an unrealistic diurnal variation of AOT in the smoke source region. This study suggests that the assimilation of emission inventories from geostationary satellites is superior to that of polar orbiting satellites and has important implications for the modeling of air quality in areas influenced by fire‐related pollutants from distant sources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Air quality ; Assimilation ; Atmospherics ; Carbon ; Computer simulation ; diurnal variation ; Diurnal variations ; Emission analysis ; emission uncertainty analysis ; Fires ; Geostationary satellites ; Inventories ; Mathematical models ; Meteorology ; Position (location) ; Potassium ; Smoke ; smoke transport modeling ; Springs ; Stockpiling ; Transport</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2006-03, Vol.111 (D5), p.np-n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5905-69b7e6c8e4c1cab3e846a17b5037e84ce52f9ca4d750040a164b1f6d6288312a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5905-69b7e6c8e4c1cab3e846a17b5037e84ce52f9ca4d750040a164b1f6d6288312a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2005JD006416$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2005JD006416$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,11495,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46449,46814,46873</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopher, Sundar A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, U. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prins, Elaine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szykman, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hand, Jenny L.</creatorcontrib><title>Mesoscale modeling of Central American smoke transport to the United States: 1. "Top-down" assessment of emission strength and diurnal variation impacts</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>As is typical in the Northern Hemisphere spring, during 20 April to 21 May 2003, significant biomass burning smoke from Central America was transported to the southeastern United States (SEUS). A coupled aerosol, radiation, and meteorology model that is built upon the heritage of the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS), having newly developed capabilities of Assimilation and Radiation Online Modeling of Aerosols (AROMA) algorithm, was used to simulate the smoke transport and quantify the smoke radiative impacts on surface energetics, boundary layer, and other atmospheric processes. This paper, the first of a two‐part series, describes the model and examines the ability of RAMS‐AROMA to simulate the smoke transport. Because biomass‐burning fire activities have distinct diurnal variations, the FLAMBE hourly smoke emission inventory that is derived from the geostationary satellite (GOES) fire products was assimilated into the model. In the “top‐down” analysis, ground‐based observations were used to evaluate the model performance, and the comparisons with model‐simulated results were used to estimate emission uncertainties. Qualitatively, a 30‐day simulation of smoke spatial distribution as well as the timing and location of the smoke fronts are consistent with those identified from the PM2.5 observation network, local air quality reports, and the measurements of aerosol optical thickness (AOT) and aerosol vertical profiles from the Southern Great Plains (SGP) Atmospheric Radiation Measurements (ARM) site in Oklahoma. Quantitatively, the model‐simulated daily mean near‐surface dry smoke mass correlates well with PM2.5 mass at 34 locations in Texas and with the total carbon mass and nonsoil potassium mass (KNON) at three IMPROVE sites along the smoke pathway (with linear correlation coefficients R = 0.77, 0.74, and 0.69 at the significance level larger than 0.99, respectively). The top‐down sensitivity analysis indicates that the total smoke particle emission during the study period is about 1.3 ± 0.2 Tg. The results further indicate that the simulation with a daily smoke emission inventory provides a slightly better correlation with measurements in the downwind region on daily scales but gives an unrealistic diurnal variation of AOT in the smoke source region. This study suggests that the assimilation of emission inventories from geostationary satellites is superior to that of polar orbiting satellites and has important implications for the modeling of air quality in areas influenced by fire‐related pollutants from distant sources.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Assimilation</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>diurnal variation</subject><subject>Diurnal variations</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>emission uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Geostationary satellites</subject><subject>Inventories</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Position (location)</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Smoke</subject><subject>smoke transport modeling</subject><subject>Springs</subject><subject>Stockpiling</subject><subject>Transport</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1uFDEMx0cIJFalNx4g6gFxYEqSyccMt3YLC1UpiLbqMcpmPG3oTLLE2X68CY9LVosQp4Ivtuyf_7blqnrJ6D6jvHvLKZXHR5QqwdSTasaZVDXnlD-tZpSJtqac6-fVLuJ3WkxIJSibVT8_A0Z0dgQyxR5GH65IHMgcQk52JAcTJO9sIDjFGyAlF3AVUyY5knwN5CL4DD05yzYDviNsn-ydx1Xdx7uwRywiIE5FaiMJk0f0sUjlBOEqXxMbetL7dQpl0K1N3uZN2U8r6zK-qJ4NdkTY_e13qosP78_nH-uTL4tP84OT2smOylp1Sw3KtSAcc3bZQCuUZXopaaNL7EDyoXNW9FqWo6llSizZoHrF27Zh3DY71aut7irFH2vAbMqeDsbRBohrNLztJNeC_wdIG9V27T9BppnuBGcFfP04qKRQSjIhC_pmi7oUERMMZpX8ZNODYdRs3m_-fn_Bmy1-50d4eJQ1x4tvR4wLvRlSb7s8Zrj_02XTjVG60dJcni5Mc3h5dniqvhrR_AKMYMBK</recordid><startdate>20060316</startdate><enddate>20060316</enddate><creator>Wang, Jun</creator><creator>Christopher, Sundar A.</creator><creator>Nair, U. S.</creator><creator>Reid, Jeffrey S.</creator><creator>Prins, Elaine M.</creator><creator>Szykman, James</creator><creator>Hand, Jenny L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060316</creationdate><title>Mesoscale modeling of Central American smoke transport to the United States: 1. "Top-down" assessment of emission strength and diurnal variation impacts</title><author>Wang, Jun ; Christopher, Sundar A. ; Nair, U. S. ; Reid, Jeffrey S. ; Prins, Elaine M. ; Szykman, James ; Hand, Jenny L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5905-69b7e6c8e4c1cab3e846a17b5037e84ce52f9ca4d750040a164b1f6d6288312a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Assimilation</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>diurnal variation</topic><topic>Diurnal variations</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>emission uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Geostationary satellites</topic><topic>Inventories</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Position (location)</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Smoke</topic><topic>smoke transport modeling</topic><topic>Springs</topic><topic>Stockpiling</topic><topic>Transport</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopher, Sundar A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, U. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prins, Elaine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szykman, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hand, Jenny L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Jun</au><au>Christopher, Sundar A.</au><au>Nair, U. S.</au><au>Reid, Jeffrey S.</au><au>Prins, Elaine M.</au><au>Szykman, James</au><au>Hand, Jenny L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mesoscale modeling of Central American smoke transport to the United States: 1. "Top-down" assessment of emission strength and diurnal variation impacts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2006-03-16</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>D5</issue><spage>np</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>np-n/a</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>As is typical in the Northern Hemisphere spring, during 20 April to 21 May 2003, significant biomass burning smoke from Central America was transported to the southeastern United States (SEUS). A coupled aerosol, radiation, and meteorology model that is built upon the heritage of the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS), having newly developed capabilities of Assimilation and Radiation Online Modeling of Aerosols (AROMA) algorithm, was used to simulate the smoke transport and quantify the smoke radiative impacts on surface energetics, boundary layer, and other atmospheric processes. This paper, the first of a two‐part series, describes the model and examines the ability of RAMS‐AROMA to simulate the smoke transport. Because biomass‐burning fire activities have distinct diurnal variations, the FLAMBE hourly smoke emission inventory that is derived from the geostationary satellite (GOES) fire products was assimilated into the model. In the “top‐down” analysis, ground‐based observations were used to evaluate the model performance, and the comparisons with model‐simulated results were used to estimate emission uncertainties. Qualitatively, a 30‐day simulation of smoke spatial distribution as well as the timing and location of the smoke fronts are consistent with those identified from the PM2.5 observation network, local air quality reports, and the measurements of aerosol optical thickness (AOT) and aerosol vertical profiles from the Southern Great Plains (SGP) Atmospheric Radiation Measurements (ARM) site in Oklahoma. Quantitatively, the model‐simulated daily mean near‐surface dry smoke mass correlates well with PM2.5 mass at 34 locations in Texas and with the total carbon mass and nonsoil potassium mass (KNON) at three IMPROVE sites along the smoke pathway (with linear correlation coefficients R = 0.77, 0.74, and 0.69 at the significance level larger than 0.99, respectively). The top‐down sensitivity analysis indicates that the total smoke particle emission during the study period is about 1.3 ± 0.2 Tg. The results further indicate that the simulation with a daily smoke emission inventory provides a slightly better correlation with measurements in the downwind region on daily scales but gives an unrealistic diurnal variation of AOT in the smoke source region. This study suggests that the assimilation of emission inventories from geostationary satellites is superior to that of polar orbiting satellites and has important implications for the modeling of air quality in areas influenced by fire‐related pollutants from distant sources.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2005JD006416</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-0227 |
ispartof | Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2006-03, Vol.111 (D5), p.np-n/a |
issn | 0148-0227 2156-2202 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28952742 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aerosols Air quality Assimilation Atmospherics Carbon Computer simulation diurnal variation Diurnal variations Emission analysis emission uncertainty analysis Fires Geostationary satellites Inventories Mathematical models Meteorology Position (location) Potassium Smoke smoke transport modeling Springs Stockpiling Transport |
title | Mesoscale modeling of Central American smoke transport to the United States: 1. "Top-down" assessment of emission strength and diurnal variation impacts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A19%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mesoscale%20modeling%20of%20Central%20American%20smoke%20transport%20to%20the%20United%20States:%201.%20%22Top-down%22%20assessment%20of%20emission%20strength%20and%20diurnal%20variation%20impacts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research.%20D.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Wang,%20Jun&rft.date=2006-03-16&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=D5&rft.spage=np&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=np-n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2005JD006416&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1654665145%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1654665145&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |