Peroneus longus tendon autograft versus allograft in revision ACLR: A retrospective comparison

The use of peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has increased recently, but there is a lack of research on its use in revision ACLR. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications between revision ACLR using allograf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research surgery & research, 2024-06, Vol.110 (4), p.103775-103775, Article 103775
Hauptverfasser: Selcuk, Huseyin, Baz, Ali Bulent, Egerci, Omer Faruk, Kose, Ozkan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 103775
container_issue 4
container_start_page 103775
container_title Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research
container_volume 110
creator Selcuk, Huseyin
Baz, Ali Bulent
Egerci, Omer Faruk
Kose, Ozkan
description The use of peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has increased recently, but there is a lack of research on its use in revision ACLR. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications between revision ACLR using allografts and PLT autografts. Fifty-nine patients who underwent arthroscopic revision of ACLR with complete clinical follow-ups between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Allograft was used in 44 of these patients, and PLT autograft was used in 15 of them. Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity score, Lachman, and anterior drawer tests were performed after a mean follow-up of 60months (range: 19–116). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale was used to evaluate the donor ankle functions. Clinical outcomes and complications were compared between groups. Both groups showed significantly improved functional outcomes compared to their preoperative assessments. However, both groups had similar clinical results at the final follow-up, including Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, knee range of motion, return to sports, time to return to daily activities, and rate of re-rupture. No major complications were seen in any of the patients. The AOFAS score was 99.13±2.64 in the PLT autograft group without loss of ankle muscle strength, deformity, instability, and permanent iatrogenic neurovascular injuries. The cumulative cost of the allograft group was significantly higher than the PLT autograft group. The PLT autograft might be an alternative autograft option to allografts due to similar clinical outcomes, low donor site morbidity, and reduced cost in ACLR revisions, especially if the primary ACLR was performed using grafts harvested around the knee. III; retrospective comparative study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103775
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2894725287</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1877056823003274</els_id><sourcerecordid>2894725287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-674e4ca45ae7f60e8ee9b8ba08ea2fd8323469fa57aea2005e5251b2f82164e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoTqd_wAvppTed-WiaTLwZwy8YKKK3hjQ9HRltM5O24L83o1O88uqEl-e85DwIXRA8I5jk15uZ64KfUUxZDJgQ_ACdEClEinkuD_-8J-g0hA3GeU4YPUYTJjFhGMsT9PEC3rXQh6R27TqODtrStYnuO7f2uuqSAXyIua7rfWDbxMNgg43YYrl6vUkWMei8C1swnR0gMa7Zam-Da8_QUaXrAOf7OUXv93dvy8d09fzwtFysUsOw6NJcZJAZnXENosoxSIB5IQuNJWhalZJRluXzSnOhY4AxB045KWglKckz4GyKrsberXefPYRONTYYqGvdguuDonKeCcqpFBGlI2rij4OHSm29bbT_UgSrnVe1UTuvaudVjV7j0uW-vy8aKH9XfkRG4HYEIF45WPAqGAutgdL6aEWVzv7X_w2KLYrH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2894725287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peroneus longus tendon autograft versus allograft in revision ACLR: A retrospective comparison</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Selcuk, Huseyin ; Baz, Ali Bulent ; Egerci, Omer Faruk ; Kose, Ozkan</creator><creatorcontrib>Selcuk, Huseyin ; Baz, Ali Bulent ; Egerci, Omer Faruk ; Kose, Ozkan</creatorcontrib><description>The use of peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has increased recently, but there is a lack of research on its use in revision ACLR. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications between revision ACLR using allografts and PLT autografts. Fifty-nine patients who underwent arthroscopic revision of ACLR with complete clinical follow-ups between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Allograft was used in 44 of these patients, and PLT autograft was used in 15 of them. Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity score, Lachman, and anterior drawer tests were performed after a mean follow-up of 60months (range: 19–116). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale was used to evaluate the donor ankle functions. Clinical outcomes and complications were compared between groups. Both groups showed significantly improved functional outcomes compared to their preoperative assessments. However, both groups had similar clinical results at the final follow-up, including Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, knee range of motion, return to sports, time to return to daily activities, and rate of re-rupture. No major complications were seen in any of the patients. The AOFAS score was 99.13±2.64 in the PLT autograft group without loss of ankle muscle strength, deformity, instability, and permanent iatrogenic neurovascular injuries. The cumulative cost of the allograft group was significantly higher than the PLT autograft group. The PLT autograft might be an alternative autograft option to allografts due to similar clinical outcomes, low donor site morbidity, and reduced cost in ACLR revisions, especially if the primary ACLR was performed using grafts harvested around the knee. III; retrospective comparative study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103775</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38013008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Allograft ; Allografts ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery ; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods ; Autograft ; Autografts ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Peroneus longus tendon ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Tendons - transplantation ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research, 2024-06, Vol.110 (4), p.103775-103775, Article 103775</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-674e4ca45ae7f60e8ee9b8ba08ea2fd8323469fa57aea2005e5251b2f82164e53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5281-6429 ; 0000-0002-2661-7581 ; 0000-0002-0135-2599 ; 0000-0002-7679-9635</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103775$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38013008$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Selcuk, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baz, Ali Bulent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egerci, Omer Faruk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kose, Ozkan</creatorcontrib><title>Peroneus longus tendon autograft versus allograft in revision ACLR: A retrospective comparison</title><title>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</title><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><description>The use of peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has increased recently, but there is a lack of research on its use in revision ACLR. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications between revision ACLR using allografts and PLT autografts. Fifty-nine patients who underwent arthroscopic revision of ACLR with complete clinical follow-ups between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Allograft was used in 44 of these patients, and PLT autograft was used in 15 of them. Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity score, Lachman, and anterior drawer tests were performed after a mean follow-up of 60months (range: 19–116). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale was used to evaluate the donor ankle functions. Clinical outcomes and complications were compared between groups. Both groups showed significantly improved functional outcomes compared to their preoperative assessments. However, both groups had similar clinical results at the final follow-up, including Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, knee range of motion, return to sports, time to return to daily activities, and rate of re-rupture. No major complications were seen in any of the patients. The AOFAS score was 99.13±2.64 in the PLT autograft group without loss of ankle muscle strength, deformity, instability, and permanent iatrogenic neurovascular injuries. The cumulative cost of the allograft group was significantly higher than the PLT autograft group. The PLT autograft might be an alternative autograft option to allografts due to similar clinical outcomes, low donor site morbidity, and reduced cost in ACLR revisions, especially if the primary ACLR was performed using grafts harvested around the knee. III; retrospective comparative study.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Allograft</subject><subject>Allografts</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods</subject><subject>Autograft</subject><subject>Autografts</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Peroneus longus tendon</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tendons - transplantation</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1877-0568</issn><issn>1877-0568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoTqd_wAvppTed-WiaTLwZwy8YKKK3hjQ9HRltM5O24L83o1O88uqEl-e85DwIXRA8I5jk15uZ64KfUUxZDJgQ_ACdEClEinkuD_-8J-g0hA3GeU4YPUYTJjFhGMsT9PEC3rXQh6R27TqODtrStYnuO7f2uuqSAXyIua7rfWDbxMNgg43YYrl6vUkWMei8C1swnR0gMa7Zam-Da8_QUaXrAOf7OUXv93dvy8d09fzwtFysUsOw6NJcZJAZnXENosoxSIB5IQuNJWhalZJRluXzSnOhY4AxB045KWglKckz4GyKrsberXefPYRONTYYqGvdguuDonKeCcqpFBGlI2rij4OHSm29bbT_UgSrnVe1UTuvaudVjV7j0uW-vy8aKH9XfkRG4HYEIF45WPAqGAutgdL6aEWVzv7X_w2KLYrH</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Selcuk, Huseyin</creator><creator>Baz, Ali Bulent</creator><creator>Egerci, Omer Faruk</creator><creator>Kose, Ozkan</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5281-6429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2661-7581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-2599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7679-9635</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Peroneus longus tendon autograft versus allograft in revision ACLR: A retrospective comparison</title><author>Selcuk, Huseyin ; Baz, Ali Bulent ; Egerci, Omer Faruk ; Kose, Ozkan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-674e4ca45ae7f60e8ee9b8ba08ea2fd8323469fa57aea2005e5251b2f82164e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Allograft</topic><topic>Allografts</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods</topic><topic>Autograft</topic><topic>Autografts</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Peroneus longus tendon</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tendons - transplantation</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Selcuk, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baz, Ali Bulent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egerci, Omer Faruk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kose, Ozkan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Selcuk, Huseyin</au><au>Baz, Ali Bulent</au><au>Egerci, Omer Faruk</au><au>Kose, Ozkan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peroneus longus tendon autograft versus allograft in revision ACLR: A retrospective comparison</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</jtitle><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>103775</spage><epage>103775</epage><pages>103775-103775</pages><artnum>103775</artnum><issn>1877-0568</issn><eissn>1877-0568</eissn><abstract>The use of peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has increased recently, but there is a lack of research on its use in revision ACLR. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications between revision ACLR using allografts and PLT autografts. Fifty-nine patients who underwent arthroscopic revision of ACLR with complete clinical follow-ups between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Allograft was used in 44 of these patients, and PLT autograft was used in 15 of them. Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity score, Lachman, and anterior drawer tests were performed after a mean follow-up of 60months (range: 19–116). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale was used to evaluate the donor ankle functions. Clinical outcomes and complications were compared between groups. Both groups showed significantly improved functional outcomes compared to their preoperative assessments. However, both groups had similar clinical results at the final follow-up, including Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, knee range of motion, return to sports, time to return to daily activities, and rate of re-rupture. No major complications were seen in any of the patients. The AOFAS score was 99.13±2.64 in the PLT autograft group without loss of ankle muscle strength, deformity, instability, and permanent iatrogenic neurovascular injuries. The cumulative cost of the allograft group was significantly higher than the PLT autograft group. The PLT autograft might be an alternative autograft option to allografts due to similar clinical outcomes, low donor site morbidity, and reduced cost in ACLR revisions, especially if the primary ACLR was performed using grafts harvested around the knee. III; retrospective comparative study.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>38013008</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103775</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5281-6429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2661-7581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-2599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7679-9635</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1877-0568
ispartof Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research, 2024-06, Vol.110 (4), p.103775-103775, Article 103775
issn 1877-0568
1877-0568
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2894725287
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Allograft
Allografts
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods
Autograft
Autografts
Female
Humans
Male
Peroneus longus tendon
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Tendons - transplantation
Transplantation, Autologous
Transplantation, Homologous
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Peroneus longus tendon autograft versus allograft in revision ACLR: A retrospective comparison
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A08%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peroneus%20longus%20tendon%20autograft%20versus%20allograft%20in%20revision%20ACLR:%20A%20retrospective%20comparison&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedics%20&%20traumatology,%20surgery%20&%20research&rft.au=Selcuk,%20Huseyin&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=103775&rft.epage=103775&rft.pages=103775-103775&rft.artnum=103775&rft.issn=1877-0568&rft.eissn=1877-0568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103775&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2894725287%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2894725287&rft_id=info:pmid/38013008&rft_els_id=S1877056823003274&rfr_iscdi=true