A framework for event-based software integration

Although event-based software integration is one of the most prevalent approaches to loose integration, no consistent model for describing it exists. As a result, there is no uniform way to discuss event-based integration, compare approaches and implementations, specify new event-based approaches, o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology 1996-10, Vol.5 (4), p.378-421
Hauptverfasser: Barrett, Daniel J., Clarke, Lori A., Tarr, Peri L., Wise, Alexander E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 421
container_issue 4
container_start_page 378
container_title ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology
container_volume 5
creator Barrett, Daniel J.
Clarke, Lori A.
Tarr, Peri L.
Wise, Alexander E.
description Although event-based software integration is one of the most prevalent approaches to loose integration, no consistent model for describing it exists. As a result, there is no uniform way to discuss event-based integration, compare approaches and implementations, specify new event-based approaches, or match user requirements with the capabilities of event-based integration systems. We attempt to address these shortcomings by specifying a generic framework for event-based integration, the EBI framework, that provides a flexible, object-oriented model for discussing and comparing event-based integration approaches. The EBI framework can model dynamic and static specification, composition, and decomposition and can be instantiated to describe the features of most common event-based integration approaches. We demonstrate how to use the framework as a reference model by comparing and contrasting three well-known integration systems: FIELD, Polylith, and CORBA.
doi_str_mv 10.1145/235321.235324
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28933640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28933640</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2694-399c713b50ea3ab3d364e2623c5061f752a783d4a2cf94cf9f38ea6aa900c90a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EEqUwMrBlYnOxfXYSj1UFBakSC0hs0dU9o0ASFzul4t8TSMXKcPpOep_e8Bi7lGImpTY3CgwoOfuFPmITaUzBC7DqePiFthxAvpyys5TehJAglJ4wMc98xJb2Ib5nPsSMPqnr-RoTbbIUfL_HSFnd9fQasa9Dd85OPDaJLg6csue726fFPV89Lh8W8xVHlVvNwVpXSFgbQQi4hg3kmlSuwBmRS18YhUUJG43KeauH81AS5ohWCGcFwpRdj73bGD52lPqqrZOjpsGOwi5VqrQwdIr_xVxqKws1iHwUXQwpRfLVNtYtxq9KiupnwGoccIQe_KvRR9f-qYfsGwvaaUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26149172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A framework for event-based software integration</title><source>ACM Digital Library Complete</source><creator>Barrett, Daniel J. ; Clarke, Lori A. ; Tarr, Peri L. ; Wise, Alexander E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Daniel J. ; Clarke, Lori A. ; Tarr, Peri L. ; Wise, Alexander E.</creatorcontrib><description>Although event-based software integration is one of the most prevalent approaches to loose integration, no consistent model for describing it exists. As a result, there is no uniform way to discuss event-based integration, compare approaches and implementations, specify new event-based approaches, or match user requirements with the capabilities of event-based integration systems. We attempt to address these shortcomings by specifying a generic framework for event-based integration, the EBI framework, that provides a flexible, object-oriented model for discussing and comparing event-based integration approaches. The EBI framework can model dynamic and static specification, composition, and decomposition and can be instantiated to describe the features of most common event-based integration approaches. We demonstrate how to use the framework as a reference model by comparing and contrasting three well-known integration systems: FIELD, Polylith, and CORBA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-331X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1145/235321.235324</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY, USA: ACM</publisher><subject>Designing software ; Requirements analysis ; Software and its engineering ; Software creation and management ; Software design techniques ; Software development process management ; Software implementation planning</subject><ispartof>ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology, 1996-10, Vol.5 (4), p.378-421</ispartof><rights>ACM</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2694-399c713b50ea3ab3d364e2623c5061f752a783d4a2cf94cf9f38ea6aa900c90a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2694-399c713b50ea3ab3d364e2623c5061f752a783d4a2cf94cf9f38ea6aa900c90a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/235321.235324$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacm$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2282,27924,27925,40196,76228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Lori A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarr, Peri L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Alexander E.</creatorcontrib><title>A framework for event-based software integration</title><title>ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology</title><addtitle>ACM TOSEM</addtitle><description>Although event-based software integration is one of the most prevalent approaches to loose integration, no consistent model for describing it exists. As a result, there is no uniform way to discuss event-based integration, compare approaches and implementations, specify new event-based approaches, or match user requirements with the capabilities of event-based integration systems. We attempt to address these shortcomings by specifying a generic framework for event-based integration, the EBI framework, that provides a flexible, object-oriented model for discussing and comparing event-based integration approaches. The EBI framework can model dynamic and static specification, composition, and decomposition and can be instantiated to describe the features of most common event-based integration approaches. We demonstrate how to use the framework as a reference model by comparing and contrasting three well-known integration systems: FIELD, Polylith, and CORBA.</description><subject>Designing software</subject><subject>Requirements analysis</subject><subject>Software and its engineering</subject><subject>Software creation and management</subject><subject>Software design techniques</subject><subject>Software development process management</subject><subject>Software implementation planning</subject><issn>1049-331X</issn><issn>1557-7392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EEqUwMrBlYnOxfXYSj1UFBakSC0hs0dU9o0ASFzul4t8TSMXKcPpOep_e8Bi7lGImpTY3CgwoOfuFPmITaUzBC7DqePiFthxAvpyys5TehJAglJ4wMc98xJb2Ib5nPsSMPqnr-RoTbbIUfL_HSFnd9fQasa9Dd85OPDaJLg6csue726fFPV89Lh8W8xVHlVvNwVpXSFgbQQi4hg3kmlSuwBmRS18YhUUJG43KeauH81AS5ohWCGcFwpRdj73bGD52lPqqrZOjpsGOwi5VqrQwdIr_xVxqKws1iHwUXQwpRfLVNtYtxq9KiupnwGoccIQe_KvRR9f-qYfsGwvaaUQ</recordid><startdate>19961001</startdate><enddate>19961001</enddate><creator>Barrett, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Clarke, Lori A.</creator><creator>Tarr, Peri L.</creator><creator>Wise, Alexander E.</creator><general>ACM</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961001</creationdate><title>A framework for event-based software integration</title><author>Barrett, Daniel J. ; Clarke, Lori A. ; Tarr, Peri L. ; Wise, Alexander E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a2694-399c713b50ea3ab3d364e2623c5061f752a783d4a2cf94cf9f38ea6aa900c90a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Designing software</topic><topic>Requirements analysis</topic><topic>Software and its engineering</topic><topic>Software creation and management</topic><topic>Software design techniques</topic><topic>Software development process management</topic><topic>Software implementation planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Lori A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarr, Peri L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, Alexander E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barrett, Daniel J.</au><au>Clarke, Lori A.</au><au>Tarr, Peri L.</au><au>Wise, Alexander E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A framework for event-based software integration</atitle><jtitle>ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology</jtitle><stitle>ACM TOSEM</stitle><date>1996-10-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>378</spage><epage>421</epage><pages>378-421</pages><issn>1049-331X</issn><eissn>1557-7392</eissn><abstract>Although event-based software integration is one of the most prevalent approaches to loose integration, no consistent model for describing it exists. As a result, there is no uniform way to discuss event-based integration, compare approaches and implementations, specify new event-based approaches, or match user requirements with the capabilities of event-based integration systems. We attempt to address these shortcomings by specifying a generic framework for event-based integration, the EBI framework, that provides a flexible, object-oriented model for discussing and comparing event-based integration approaches. The EBI framework can model dynamic and static specification, composition, and decomposition and can be instantiated to describe the features of most common event-based integration approaches. We demonstrate how to use the framework as a reference model by comparing and contrasting three well-known integration systems: FIELD, Polylith, and CORBA.</abstract><cop>New York, NY, USA</cop><pub>ACM</pub><doi>10.1145/235321.235324</doi><tpages>44</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-331X
ispartof ACM transactions on software engineering and methodology, 1996-10, Vol.5 (4), p.378-421
issn 1049-331X
1557-7392
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28933640
source ACM Digital Library Complete
subjects Designing software
Requirements analysis
Software and its engineering
Software creation and management
Software design techniques
Software development process management
Software implementation planning
title A framework for event-based software integration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T00%3A54%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20framework%20for%20event-based%20software%20integration&rft.jtitle=ACM%20transactions%20on%20software%20engineering%20and%20methodology&rft.au=Barrett,%20Daniel%20J.&rft.date=1996-10-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=378&rft.epage=421&rft.pages=378-421&rft.issn=1049-331X&rft.eissn=1557-7392&rft_id=info:doi/10.1145/235321.235324&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28933640%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26149172&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true