Modeling regional haze during the BRAVO study using CMAQ-MADRID: 2. Source region attribution of particulate sulfate compounds

Regional source attribution is conducted for fine particulate sulfate at Big Bend National Park, Texas, using a comprehensive regional air quality model, Community Multiscale Air Quality model augmented with the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (CMAQ‐MADRID), as part o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres 2006-03, Vol.111 (D6), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Knipping, Eladio M., Kumar, Naresh, Pun, Betty K., Seigneur, Christian, Wu, Shiang-Yuh, Schichtel, Bret A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue D6
container_start_page
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres
container_volume 111
creator Knipping, Eladio M.
Kumar, Naresh
Pun, Betty K.
Seigneur, Christian
Wu, Shiang-Yuh
Schichtel, Bret A.
description Regional source attribution is conducted for fine particulate sulfate at Big Bend National Park, Texas, using a comprehensive regional air quality model, Community Multiscale Air Quality model augmented with the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (CMAQ‐MADRID), as part of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational (BRAVO) Study. The overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 31% to Mexico, 19% to Texas, 39% to the eastern United States, 6% to the western United States, and 5% to areas outside the modeling domain (boundary conditions). The arithmetic mean of the daily PM2.5 sulfate loads at BBNP over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 42% to Mexico, 14% to Texas, 27% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 7% to areas outside the modeling domain. These results illustrate the potential for significant contributions from distant sources to regional haze in remote areas. An examination of source contributions and model performance by month and for specific episodes shows that model performance can affect the results of a source attribution. Therefore caution is advised when interpreting the results of source attribution obtained using Eulerian air quality models. In lieu of estimating the uncertainty of the apportionment procedures, source region attribution results obtained for sulfate using CMAQ‐MADRID are refined using an inverse modeling technique. Comparison of original attribution results with refined attribution estimates obtained using inverse modeling techniques shows that these methods can reduce in part the biases introduced in the model by uncertainties and errors in the emissions, meteorology, and chemical transport modeling. The refined attribution estimates of overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period using inverse modeling are 37% to Mexico, 17% to Texas, 31% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 6% to areas outside the modeling domain.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2004JD005609
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28933158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17189197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4783-ffea6ef8440b7c1ff2c0838e1b92e8ea46a0ec6cef4055a7aa8a80313075ee6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUuP0zAUhSMEEtXM7PgB3sCKzFw_YjvsSgNlHmWgPHeW617PBNKk2LGgLPjtJGoFrIC7OVdH3zmbk2UPKJxSYOUZAxAXFUAhobyTTRgtZM4YsLvZBKjQOTCm7mcnMX6C4UQhBdBJ9mPRrbGp2xsS8KbuWtuQW_sdyTqF0exvkTxdTt9fk9in9Y6kOLqzxfR1vphWy_PqCWGn5E2XgsNDA7F9H-pV6se_82RrQ1-71NgeSUyNH9V1m22X2nU8zu5520Q8OehR9u75s7ezF_nV9fx8Nr3KnVCa596jlei1ELBSjnrPHGiuka5KhhqtkBbQSYdeQFFYZa22GjjloApEueJH2aN97zZ0XxLG3mzq6LBpbItdiobpknNa6P8AgXMl4J8gVVSXtFQD-HgPutDFGNCbbag3NuwMBTMuZ_5cbsAfHnptdLbxwbaujr8zSjFVMjpwfM99rRvc_bXTXMyXFaWl5EMq36fq2OO3XykbPhupuCrMh5dzI159FJfyUpiK_wQokbWP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17189197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling regional haze during the BRAVO study using CMAQ-MADRID: 2. Source region attribution of particulate sulfate compounds</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library AGU Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Knipping, Eladio M. ; Kumar, Naresh ; Pun, Betty K. ; Seigneur, Christian ; Wu, Shiang-Yuh ; Schichtel, Bret A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Knipping, Eladio M. ; Kumar, Naresh ; Pun, Betty K. ; Seigneur, Christian ; Wu, Shiang-Yuh ; Schichtel, Bret A.</creatorcontrib><description>Regional source attribution is conducted for fine particulate sulfate at Big Bend National Park, Texas, using a comprehensive regional air quality model, Community Multiscale Air Quality model augmented with the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (CMAQ‐MADRID), as part of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational (BRAVO) Study. The overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 31% to Mexico, 19% to Texas, 39% to the eastern United States, 6% to the western United States, and 5% to areas outside the modeling domain (boundary conditions). The arithmetic mean of the daily PM2.5 sulfate loads at BBNP over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 42% to Mexico, 14% to Texas, 27% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 7% to areas outside the modeling domain. These results illustrate the potential for significant contributions from distant sources to regional haze in remote areas. An examination of source contributions and model performance by month and for specific episodes shows that model performance can affect the results of a source attribution. Therefore caution is advised when interpreting the results of source attribution obtained using Eulerian air quality models. In lieu of estimating the uncertainty of the apportionment procedures, source region attribution results obtained for sulfate using CMAQ‐MADRID are refined using an inverse modeling technique. Comparison of original attribution results with refined attribution estimates obtained using inverse modeling techniques shows that these methods can reduce in part the biases introduced in the model by uncertainties and errors in the emissions, meteorology, and chemical transport modeling. The refined attribution estimates of overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period using inverse modeling are 37% to Mexico, 17% to Texas, 31% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 6% to areas outside the modeling domain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2004JD005609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Air quality ; Aircraft components ; Arithmetic ; Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study ; Dissolution ; Dynamic tests ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Eastern ; Errors ; Estimates ; Estimating ; Exact sciences and technology ; Haze ; Inverse ; inverse modeling ; Meteorology ; National parks ; Regional ; source attribution ; Sulfates ; Uncertainty ; Visibility ; Western</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2006-03, Vol.111 (D6), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4783-ffea6ef8440b7c1ff2c0838e1b92e8ea46a0ec6cef4055a7aa8a80313075ee6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4783-ffea6ef8440b7c1ff2c0838e1b92e8ea46a0ec6cef4055a7aa8a80313075ee6b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2004JD005609$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2004JD005609$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11494,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46447,46812,46871</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17727921$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knipping, Eladio M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Naresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pun, Betty K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seigneur, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Shiang-Yuh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schichtel, Bret A.</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling regional haze during the BRAVO study using CMAQ-MADRID: 2. Source region attribution of particulate sulfate compounds</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Regional source attribution is conducted for fine particulate sulfate at Big Bend National Park, Texas, using a comprehensive regional air quality model, Community Multiscale Air Quality model augmented with the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (CMAQ‐MADRID), as part of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational (BRAVO) Study. The overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 31% to Mexico, 19% to Texas, 39% to the eastern United States, 6% to the western United States, and 5% to areas outside the modeling domain (boundary conditions). The arithmetic mean of the daily PM2.5 sulfate loads at BBNP over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 42% to Mexico, 14% to Texas, 27% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 7% to areas outside the modeling domain. These results illustrate the potential for significant contributions from distant sources to regional haze in remote areas. An examination of source contributions and model performance by month and for specific episodes shows that model performance can affect the results of a source attribution. Therefore caution is advised when interpreting the results of source attribution obtained using Eulerian air quality models. In lieu of estimating the uncertainty of the apportionment procedures, source region attribution results obtained for sulfate using CMAQ‐MADRID are refined using an inverse modeling technique. Comparison of original attribution results with refined attribution estimates obtained using inverse modeling techniques shows that these methods can reduce in part the biases introduced in the model by uncertainties and errors in the emissions, meteorology, and chemical transport modeling. The refined attribution estimates of overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period using inverse modeling are 37% to Mexico, 17% to Texas, 31% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 6% to areas outside the modeling domain.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Aircraft components</subject><subject>Arithmetic</subject><subject>Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study</subject><subject>Dissolution</subject><subject>Dynamic tests</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Eastern</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Estimating</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Haze</subject><subject>Inverse</subject><subject>inverse modeling</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Regional</subject><subject>source attribution</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Visibility</subject><subject>Western</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUuP0zAUhSMEEtXM7PgB3sCKzFw_YjvsSgNlHmWgPHeW617PBNKk2LGgLPjtJGoFrIC7OVdH3zmbk2UPKJxSYOUZAxAXFUAhobyTTRgtZM4YsLvZBKjQOTCm7mcnMX6C4UQhBdBJ9mPRrbGp2xsS8KbuWtuQW_sdyTqF0exvkTxdTt9fk9in9Y6kOLqzxfR1vphWy_PqCWGn5E2XgsNDA7F9H-pV6se_82RrQ1-71NgeSUyNH9V1m22X2nU8zu5520Q8OehR9u75s7ezF_nV9fx8Nr3KnVCa596jlei1ELBSjnrPHGiuka5KhhqtkBbQSYdeQFFYZa22GjjloApEueJH2aN97zZ0XxLG3mzq6LBpbItdiobpknNa6P8AgXMl4J8gVVSXtFQD-HgPutDFGNCbbag3NuwMBTMuZ_5cbsAfHnptdLbxwbaujr8zSjFVMjpwfM99rRvc_bXTXMyXFaWl5EMq36fq2OO3XykbPhupuCrMh5dzI159FJfyUpiK_wQokbWP</recordid><startdate>20060327</startdate><enddate>20060327</enddate><creator>Knipping, Eladio M.</creator><creator>Kumar, Naresh</creator><creator>Pun, Betty K.</creator><creator>Seigneur, Christian</creator><creator>Wu, Shiang-Yuh</creator><creator>Schichtel, Bret A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060327</creationdate><title>Modeling regional haze during the BRAVO study using CMAQ-MADRID: 2. Source region attribution of particulate sulfate compounds</title><author>Knipping, Eladio M. ; Kumar, Naresh ; Pun, Betty K. ; Seigneur, Christian ; Wu, Shiang-Yuh ; Schichtel, Bret A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4783-ffea6ef8440b7c1ff2c0838e1b92e8ea46a0ec6cef4055a7aa8a80313075ee6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Aircraft components</topic><topic>Arithmetic</topic><topic>Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study</topic><topic>Dissolution</topic><topic>Dynamic tests</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Eastern</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Estimating</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Haze</topic><topic>Inverse</topic><topic>inverse modeling</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Regional</topic><topic>source attribution</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Visibility</topic><topic>Western</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knipping, Eladio M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Naresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pun, Betty K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seigneur, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Shiang-Yuh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schichtel, Bret A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knipping, Eladio M.</au><au>Kumar, Naresh</au><au>Pun, Betty K.</au><au>Seigneur, Christian</au><au>Wu, Shiang-Yuh</au><au>Schichtel, Bret A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling regional haze during the BRAVO study using CMAQ-MADRID: 2. Source region attribution of particulate sulfate compounds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2006-03-27</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>D6</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>Regional source attribution is conducted for fine particulate sulfate at Big Bend National Park, Texas, using a comprehensive regional air quality model, Community Multiscale Air Quality model augmented with the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (CMAQ‐MADRID), as part of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational (BRAVO) Study. The overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 31% to Mexico, 19% to Texas, 39% to the eastern United States, 6% to the western United States, and 5% to areas outside the modeling domain (boundary conditions). The arithmetic mean of the daily PM2.5 sulfate loads at BBNP over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 42% to Mexico, 14% to Texas, 27% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 7% to areas outside the modeling domain. These results illustrate the potential for significant contributions from distant sources to regional haze in remote areas. An examination of source contributions and model performance by month and for specific episodes shows that model performance can affect the results of a source attribution. Therefore caution is advised when interpreting the results of source attribution obtained using Eulerian air quality models. In lieu of estimating the uncertainty of the apportionment procedures, source region attribution results obtained for sulfate using CMAQ‐MADRID are refined using an inverse modeling technique. Comparison of original attribution results with refined attribution estimates obtained using inverse modeling techniques shows that these methods can reduce in part the biases introduced in the model by uncertainties and errors in the emissions, meteorology, and chemical transport modeling. The refined attribution estimates of overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period using inverse modeling are 37% to Mexico, 17% to Texas, 31% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 6% to areas outside the modeling domain.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2004JD005609</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2006-03, Vol.111 (D6), p.n/a
issn 0148-0227
2156-2202
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28933158
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Wiley Online Library AGU Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aerosols
Air quality
Aircraft components
Arithmetic
Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study
Dissolution
Dynamic tests
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Eastern
Errors
Estimates
Estimating
Exact sciences and technology
Haze
Inverse
inverse modeling
Meteorology
National parks
Regional
source attribution
Sulfates
Uncertainty
Visibility
Western
title Modeling regional haze during the BRAVO study using CMAQ-MADRID: 2. Source region attribution of particulate sulfate compounds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T10%3A34%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20regional%20haze%20during%20the%20BRAVO%20study%20using%20CMAQ-MADRID:%202.%20Source%20region%20attribution%20of%20particulate%20sulfate%20compounds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research.%20D.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Knipping,%20Eladio%20M.&rft.date=2006-03-27&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=D6&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2004JD005609&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17189197%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17189197&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true