Modeling regional haze during the BRAVO study using CMAQ-MADRID: 2. Source region attribution of particulate sulfate compounds
Regional source attribution is conducted for fine particulate sulfate at Big Bend National Park, Texas, using a comprehensive regional air quality model, Community Multiscale Air Quality model augmented with the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (CMAQ‐MADRID), as part o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres 2006-03, Vol.111 (D6), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | D6 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Knipping, Eladio M. Kumar, Naresh Pun, Betty K. Seigneur, Christian Wu, Shiang-Yuh Schichtel, Bret A. |
description | Regional source attribution is conducted for fine particulate sulfate at Big Bend National Park, Texas, using a comprehensive regional air quality model, Community Multiscale Air Quality model augmented with the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (CMAQ‐MADRID), as part of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational (BRAVO) Study. The overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 31% to Mexico, 19% to Texas, 39% to the eastern United States, 6% to the western United States, and 5% to areas outside the modeling domain (boundary conditions). The arithmetic mean of the daily PM2.5 sulfate loads at BBNP over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 42% to Mexico, 14% to Texas, 27% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 7% to areas outside the modeling domain. These results illustrate the potential for significant contributions from distant sources to regional haze in remote areas. An examination of source contributions and model performance by month and for specific episodes shows that model performance can affect the results of a source attribution. Therefore caution is advised when interpreting the results of source attribution obtained using Eulerian air quality models. In lieu of estimating the uncertainty of the apportionment procedures, source region attribution results obtained for sulfate using CMAQ‐MADRID are refined using an inverse modeling technique. Comparison of original attribution results with refined attribution estimates obtained using inverse modeling techniques shows that these methods can reduce in part the biases introduced in the model by uncertainties and errors in the emissions, meteorology, and chemical transport modeling. The refined attribution estimates of overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period using inverse modeling are 37% to Mexico, 17% to Texas, 31% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 6% to areas outside the modeling domain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2004JD005609 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28933158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17189197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4783-ffea6ef8440b7c1ff2c0838e1b92e8ea46a0ec6cef4055a7aa8a80313075ee6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUuP0zAUhSMEEtXM7PgB3sCKzFw_YjvsSgNlHmWgPHeW617PBNKk2LGgLPjtJGoFrIC7OVdH3zmbk2UPKJxSYOUZAxAXFUAhobyTTRgtZM4YsLvZBKjQOTCm7mcnMX6C4UQhBdBJ9mPRrbGp2xsS8KbuWtuQW_sdyTqF0exvkTxdTt9fk9in9Y6kOLqzxfR1vphWy_PqCWGn5E2XgsNDA7F9H-pV6se_82RrQ1-71NgeSUyNH9V1m22X2nU8zu5520Q8OehR9u75s7ezF_nV9fx8Nr3KnVCa596jlei1ELBSjnrPHGiuka5KhhqtkBbQSYdeQFFYZa22GjjloApEueJH2aN97zZ0XxLG3mzq6LBpbItdiobpknNa6P8AgXMl4J8gVVSXtFQD-HgPutDFGNCbbag3NuwMBTMuZ_5cbsAfHnptdLbxwbaujr8zSjFVMjpwfM99rRvc_bXTXMyXFaWl5EMq36fq2OO3XykbPhupuCrMh5dzI159FJfyUpiK_wQokbWP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17189197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling regional haze during the BRAVO study using CMAQ-MADRID: 2. Source region attribution of particulate sulfate compounds</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library AGU Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Knipping, Eladio M. ; Kumar, Naresh ; Pun, Betty K. ; Seigneur, Christian ; Wu, Shiang-Yuh ; Schichtel, Bret A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Knipping, Eladio M. ; Kumar, Naresh ; Pun, Betty K. ; Seigneur, Christian ; Wu, Shiang-Yuh ; Schichtel, Bret A.</creatorcontrib><description>Regional source attribution is conducted for fine particulate sulfate at Big Bend National Park, Texas, using a comprehensive regional air quality model, Community Multiscale Air Quality model augmented with the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (CMAQ‐MADRID), as part of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational (BRAVO) Study. The overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 31% to Mexico, 19% to Texas, 39% to the eastern United States, 6% to the western United States, and 5% to areas outside the modeling domain (boundary conditions). The arithmetic mean of the daily PM2.5 sulfate loads at BBNP over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 42% to Mexico, 14% to Texas, 27% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 7% to areas outside the modeling domain. These results illustrate the potential for significant contributions from distant sources to regional haze in remote areas. An examination of source contributions and model performance by month and for specific episodes shows that model performance can affect the results of a source attribution. Therefore caution is advised when interpreting the results of source attribution obtained using Eulerian air quality models. In lieu of estimating the uncertainty of the apportionment procedures, source region attribution results obtained for sulfate using CMAQ‐MADRID are refined using an inverse modeling technique. Comparison of original attribution results with refined attribution estimates obtained using inverse modeling techniques shows that these methods can reduce in part the biases introduced in the model by uncertainties and errors in the emissions, meteorology, and chemical transport modeling. The refined attribution estimates of overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period using inverse modeling are 37% to Mexico, 17% to Texas, 31% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 6% to areas outside the modeling domain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2004JD005609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Air quality ; Aircraft components ; Arithmetic ; Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study ; Dissolution ; Dynamic tests ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Eastern ; Errors ; Estimates ; Estimating ; Exact sciences and technology ; Haze ; Inverse ; inverse modeling ; Meteorology ; National parks ; Regional ; source attribution ; Sulfates ; Uncertainty ; Visibility ; Western</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2006-03, Vol.111 (D6), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4783-ffea6ef8440b7c1ff2c0838e1b92e8ea46a0ec6cef4055a7aa8a80313075ee6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4783-ffea6ef8440b7c1ff2c0838e1b92e8ea46a0ec6cef4055a7aa8a80313075ee6b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2004JD005609$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2004JD005609$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11494,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46447,46812,46871</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17727921$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knipping, Eladio M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Naresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pun, Betty K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seigneur, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Shiang-Yuh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schichtel, Bret A.</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling regional haze during the BRAVO study using CMAQ-MADRID: 2. Source region attribution of particulate sulfate compounds</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Regional source attribution is conducted for fine particulate sulfate at Big Bend National Park, Texas, using a comprehensive regional air quality model, Community Multiscale Air Quality model augmented with the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (CMAQ‐MADRID), as part of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational (BRAVO) Study. The overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 31% to Mexico, 19% to Texas, 39% to the eastern United States, 6% to the western United States, and 5% to areas outside the modeling domain (boundary conditions). The arithmetic mean of the daily PM2.5 sulfate loads at BBNP over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 42% to Mexico, 14% to Texas, 27% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 7% to areas outside the modeling domain. These results illustrate the potential for significant contributions from distant sources to regional haze in remote areas. An examination of source contributions and model performance by month and for specific episodes shows that model performance can affect the results of a source attribution. Therefore caution is advised when interpreting the results of source attribution obtained using Eulerian air quality models. In lieu of estimating the uncertainty of the apportionment procedures, source region attribution results obtained for sulfate using CMAQ‐MADRID are refined using an inverse modeling technique. Comparison of original attribution results with refined attribution estimates obtained using inverse modeling techniques shows that these methods can reduce in part the biases introduced in the model by uncertainties and errors in the emissions, meteorology, and chemical transport modeling. The refined attribution estimates of overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period using inverse modeling are 37% to Mexico, 17% to Texas, 31% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 6% to areas outside the modeling domain.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Aircraft components</subject><subject>Arithmetic</subject><subject>Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study</subject><subject>Dissolution</subject><subject>Dynamic tests</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Eastern</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Estimating</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Haze</subject><subject>Inverse</subject><subject>inverse modeling</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Regional</subject><subject>source attribution</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Visibility</subject><subject>Western</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUuP0zAUhSMEEtXM7PgB3sCKzFw_YjvsSgNlHmWgPHeW617PBNKk2LGgLPjtJGoFrIC7OVdH3zmbk2UPKJxSYOUZAxAXFUAhobyTTRgtZM4YsLvZBKjQOTCm7mcnMX6C4UQhBdBJ9mPRrbGp2xsS8KbuWtuQW_sdyTqF0exvkTxdTt9fk9in9Y6kOLqzxfR1vphWy_PqCWGn5E2XgsNDA7F9H-pV6se_82RrQ1-71NgeSUyNH9V1m22X2nU8zu5520Q8OehR9u75s7ezF_nV9fx8Nr3KnVCa596jlei1ELBSjnrPHGiuka5KhhqtkBbQSYdeQFFYZa22GjjloApEueJH2aN97zZ0XxLG3mzq6LBpbItdiobpknNa6P8AgXMl4J8gVVSXtFQD-HgPutDFGNCbbag3NuwMBTMuZ_5cbsAfHnptdLbxwbaujr8zSjFVMjpwfM99rRvc_bXTXMyXFaWl5EMq36fq2OO3XykbPhupuCrMh5dzI159FJfyUpiK_wQokbWP</recordid><startdate>20060327</startdate><enddate>20060327</enddate><creator>Knipping, Eladio M.</creator><creator>Kumar, Naresh</creator><creator>Pun, Betty K.</creator><creator>Seigneur, Christian</creator><creator>Wu, Shiang-Yuh</creator><creator>Schichtel, Bret A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060327</creationdate><title>Modeling regional haze during the BRAVO study using CMAQ-MADRID: 2. Source region attribution of particulate sulfate compounds</title><author>Knipping, Eladio M. ; Kumar, Naresh ; Pun, Betty K. ; Seigneur, Christian ; Wu, Shiang-Yuh ; Schichtel, Bret A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4783-ffea6ef8440b7c1ff2c0838e1b92e8ea46a0ec6cef4055a7aa8a80313075ee6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Aircraft components</topic><topic>Arithmetic</topic><topic>Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study</topic><topic>Dissolution</topic><topic>Dynamic tests</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Eastern</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Estimating</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Haze</topic><topic>Inverse</topic><topic>inverse modeling</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Regional</topic><topic>source attribution</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Visibility</topic><topic>Western</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knipping, Eladio M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Naresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pun, Betty K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seigneur, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Shiang-Yuh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schichtel, Bret A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knipping, Eladio M.</au><au>Kumar, Naresh</au><au>Pun, Betty K.</au><au>Seigneur, Christian</au><au>Wu, Shiang-Yuh</au><au>Schichtel, Bret A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling regional haze during the BRAVO study using CMAQ-MADRID: 2. Source region attribution of particulate sulfate compounds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2006-03-27</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>D6</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>Regional source attribution is conducted for fine particulate sulfate at Big Bend National Park, Texas, using a comprehensive regional air quality model, Community Multiscale Air Quality model augmented with the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (CMAQ‐MADRID), as part of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational (BRAVO) Study. The overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 31% to Mexico, 19% to Texas, 39% to the eastern United States, 6% to the western United States, and 5% to areas outside the modeling domain (boundary conditions). The arithmetic mean of the daily PM2.5 sulfate loads at BBNP over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period is attributed as follows: 42% to Mexico, 14% to Texas, 27% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 7% to areas outside the modeling domain. These results illustrate the potential for significant contributions from distant sources to regional haze in remote areas. An examination of source contributions and model performance by month and for specific episodes shows that model performance can affect the results of a source attribution. Therefore caution is advised when interpreting the results of source attribution obtained using Eulerian air quality models. In lieu of estimating the uncertainty of the apportionment procedures, source region attribution results obtained for sulfate using CMAQ‐MADRID are refined using an inverse modeling technique. Comparison of original attribution results with refined attribution estimates obtained using inverse modeling techniques shows that these methods can reduce in part the biases introduced in the model by uncertainties and errors in the emissions, meteorology, and chemical transport modeling. The refined attribution estimates of overall PM2.5 sulfate load at Big Bend National Park over the 9 July to 28 October 1999 period using inverse modeling are 37% to Mexico, 17% to Texas, 31% to the eastern United States, 9% to the western United States, and 6% to areas outside the modeling domain.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2004JD005609</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-0227 |
ispartof | Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2006-03, Vol.111 (D6), p.n/a |
issn | 0148-0227 2156-2202 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28933158 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Wiley Online Library AGU Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aerosols Air quality Aircraft components Arithmetic Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study Dissolution Dynamic tests Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Eastern Errors Estimates Estimating Exact sciences and technology Haze Inverse inverse modeling Meteorology National parks Regional source attribution Sulfates Uncertainty Visibility Western |
title | Modeling regional haze during the BRAVO study using CMAQ-MADRID: 2. Source region attribution of particulate sulfate compounds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T10%3A34%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20regional%20haze%20during%20the%20BRAVO%20study%20using%20CMAQ-MADRID:%202.%20Source%20region%20attribution%20of%20particulate%20sulfate%20compounds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research.%20D.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Knipping,%20Eladio%20M.&rft.date=2006-03-27&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=D6&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2004JD005609&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17189197%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17189197&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |