A novel diagnostic gene region for distinguishing between two pest fruit flies: Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) and Bactrocera neohumeralis (Hardy) (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera neohumeralis are morphologically similar sibling pest fruit fly species that possess different biological attributes, geographic distributions, and host ranges. The need to differentiate between the two species is critical for accurate pest status assessment, managem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Insect science 2024-08, Vol.31 (4), p.1285-1295
Hauptverfasser: Starkie, Melissa L., Fowler, Elizabeth V., Piper, Alexander M., Zhu, Xiaocheng, Wyatt, Pauline, Gopurenko, David, Krosch, Matt N., Strutt, Francesca, Armstrong, Karen F., Patrick, Hamish, Schutze, Mark K., Blacket, Mark J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1295
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1285
container_title Insect science
container_volume 31
creator Starkie, Melissa L.
Fowler, Elizabeth V.
Piper, Alexander M.
Zhu, Xiaocheng
Wyatt, Pauline
Gopurenko, David
Krosch, Matt N.
Strutt, Francesca
Armstrong, Karen F.
Patrick, Hamish
Schutze, Mark K.
Blacket, Mark J.
description Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera neohumeralis are morphologically similar sibling pest fruit fly species that possess different biological attributes, geographic distributions, and host ranges. The need to differentiate between the two species is critical for accurate pest status assessment, management, biosecurity, and maintenance of reference colonies. While morphologically similar, adults may be separated based on subtle characters; however, some characters exhibit intraspecific variability, creating overlap between the two species. Additionally, there is currently no single molecular marker or rapid diagnostic assay that can reliably distinguish between B. neohumeralis and B. tryoni; therefore, ambiguous samples remain undiagnosed. Here we report the first molecular marker that can consistently distinguish between B. tryoni and B. neohumeralis. Our diagnostic region consists of two adjacent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the pangolin (pan) gene region. We confirmed the genotypes of each species are consistent across their distributional range, then developed a tetra‐primer amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) PCR assay for rapid diagnosis of the species. The assay utilizes four primers in multiplex, with two outer universal primers, and two internal primers: one designed to target two adjacent SNPs (AA) present in B. tryoni and the other targeting adjacent SNPs present in B. neohumeralis (GG). The assay accurately discriminates between the two species, but their SNP genotypes are shared with other nontarget tephritid fruit fly species. Therefore, this assay is most suited to adult diagnostics where species confirmation is necessary in determining ambiguous surveillance trap catches; maintaining pure colony lines; and in Sterile Insect Technique management responses. Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera neohumeralis are morphologically similar sibling pest fruit fly species. Whilst morphologically similar, adults may be separated based on subtle characters; however, some characters exhibit intraspecific variability, creating overlap between the two species. Here we report the first molecular marker that can consistently distinguish between B. tryoni and B. neohumeralis. The assay utilises four primers in multiplex, with two outer universal primers, and two internal primers; one designed to target the SNPs present in B. tryoni, and the other targeting B. neohumeralis. This assay will likely be most useful for adult diagnostics in si
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1744-7917.13299
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892659197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3092139434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3999-721bfc0330de53571d9421847a637fc89b2593ec9e66a1be75b9ca2b4e63e80e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxSMEoqVw5oYscdk9pPWfJM70VgqllSo4UM6W40yyrrL2Yjus9hPxNfGypUJc6oNn9PybJ49eUbxl9JTlc8ZkVZUSmDxlggM8K44flee5byQvoaFwVLyK8Z5SARz4y-JISAAKNTsufl0Q53_iRHqrR-djsoaM6JAEHK13ZPAhP2XZjbONq1xIh2mL6EjaerLBmMgQZpvvyWI8Jx-0ScEbDJqksPPOksVV8OOoU1oS7fp_AYd-Na9zN9lIFtc69LslWXy0m5S1c3KHm1WwyfYal6-LF4OeIr55qCfF96tPd5fX5e3XzzeXF7elEQBQSs66wVAhaI-1qCXroeKsraRuhBxMCx2vQaABbBrNOpR1B0bzrsJGYEtRnBSLg-8m-B9z3k6tbTQ4TTp_do5KsFq0QtK2ehLlLfCmBgYyo-__Q-_9HFxeRAkKnAmoxN7w7ECZ4GMMOKhNsGsddopRtY9b7cNV-3DVn7jzxLsH37lbY__I_803A_UB2NoJd0_5qZsv3w7GvwE9xbVe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3092139434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A novel diagnostic gene region for distinguishing between two pest fruit flies: Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) and Bactrocera neohumeralis (Hardy) (Diptera: Tephritidae)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Starkie, Melissa L. ; Fowler, Elizabeth V. ; Piper, Alexander M. ; Zhu, Xiaocheng ; Wyatt, Pauline ; Gopurenko, David ; Krosch, Matt N. ; Strutt, Francesca ; Armstrong, Karen F. ; Patrick, Hamish ; Schutze, Mark K. ; Blacket, Mark J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Starkie, Melissa L. ; Fowler, Elizabeth V. ; Piper, Alexander M. ; Zhu, Xiaocheng ; Wyatt, Pauline ; Gopurenko, David ; Krosch, Matt N. ; Strutt, Francesca ; Armstrong, Karen F. ; Patrick, Hamish ; Schutze, Mark K. ; Blacket, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><description>Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera neohumeralis are morphologically similar sibling pest fruit fly species that possess different biological attributes, geographic distributions, and host ranges. The need to differentiate between the two species is critical for accurate pest status assessment, management, biosecurity, and maintenance of reference colonies. While morphologically similar, adults may be separated based on subtle characters; however, some characters exhibit intraspecific variability, creating overlap between the two species. Additionally, there is currently no single molecular marker or rapid diagnostic assay that can reliably distinguish between B. neohumeralis and B. tryoni; therefore, ambiguous samples remain undiagnosed. Here we report the first molecular marker that can consistently distinguish between B. tryoni and B. neohumeralis. Our diagnostic region consists of two adjacent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the pangolin (pan) gene region. We confirmed the genotypes of each species are consistent across their distributional range, then developed a tetra‐primer amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) PCR assay for rapid diagnosis of the species. The assay utilizes four primers in multiplex, with two outer universal primers, and two internal primers: one designed to target two adjacent SNPs (AA) present in B. tryoni and the other targeting adjacent SNPs present in B. neohumeralis (GG). The assay accurately discriminates between the two species, but their SNP genotypes are shared with other nontarget tephritid fruit fly species. Therefore, this assay is most suited to adult diagnostics where species confirmation is necessary in determining ambiguous surveillance trap catches; maintaining pure colony lines; and in Sterile Insect Technique management responses. Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera neohumeralis are morphologically similar sibling pest fruit fly species. Whilst morphologically similar, adults may be separated based on subtle characters; however, some characters exhibit intraspecific variability, creating overlap between the two species. Here we report the first molecular marker that can consistently distinguish between B. tryoni and B. neohumeralis. The assay utilises four primers in multiplex, with two outer universal primers, and two internal primers; one designed to target the SNPs present in B. tryoni, and the other targeting B. neohumeralis. This assay will likely be most useful for adult diagnostics in situations where species confirmation is necessary in determining ambiguous surveillance trap catches, maintaining pure colony lines and in Sterile Insect Technique management responses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1672-9609</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1744-7917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.13299</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37990951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>adults ; Animals ; ARMS‐PCR ; Assaying ; Bactrocera neohumeralis ; Bactrocera tryoni ; Biosecurity ; Colonies ; colony ; Diagnostic systems ; Fruit flies ; Fruits ; genes ; Genetic Markers ; Genotypes ; Geographical distribution ; Insects ; intraspecific variation ; molecular diagnostics ; monitoring ; mutation ; Nucleotides ; pangolin ; Pest control ; Pest status ; Pests ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Primers ; Single-nucleotide polymorphism ; Species ; Species Specificity ; sterile insect technique ; Sterilized organisms ; Tephritidae - genetics ; tetra‐primer</subject><ispartof>Insect science, 2024-08, Vol.31 (4), p.1285-1295</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Insect Science published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3999-721bfc0330de53571d9421847a637fc89b2593ec9e66a1be75b9ca2b4e63e80e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4240-0032</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1744-7917.13299$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1744-7917.13299$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Starkie, Melissa L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Elizabeth V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piper, Alexander M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xiaocheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyatt, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopurenko, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krosch, Matt N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strutt, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Karen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patrick, Hamish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schutze, Mark K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blacket, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><title>A novel diagnostic gene region for distinguishing between two pest fruit flies: Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) and Bactrocera neohumeralis (Hardy) (Diptera: Tephritidae)</title><title>Insect science</title><addtitle>Insect Sci</addtitle><description>Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera neohumeralis are morphologically similar sibling pest fruit fly species that possess different biological attributes, geographic distributions, and host ranges. The need to differentiate between the two species is critical for accurate pest status assessment, management, biosecurity, and maintenance of reference colonies. While morphologically similar, adults may be separated based on subtle characters; however, some characters exhibit intraspecific variability, creating overlap between the two species. Additionally, there is currently no single molecular marker or rapid diagnostic assay that can reliably distinguish between B. neohumeralis and B. tryoni; therefore, ambiguous samples remain undiagnosed. Here we report the first molecular marker that can consistently distinguish between B. tryoni and B. neohumeralis. Our diagnostic region consists of two adjacent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the pangolin (pan) gene region. We confirmed the genotypes of each species are consistent across their distributional range, then developed a tetra‐primer amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) PCR assay for rapid diagnosis of the species. The assay utilizes four primers in multiplex, with two outer universal primers, and two internal primers: one designed to target two adjacent SNPs (AA) present in B. tryoni and the other targeting adjacent SNPs present in B. neohumeralis (GG). The assay accurately discriminates between the two species, but their SNP genotypes are shared with other nontarget tephritid fruit fly species. Therefore, this assay is most suited to adult diagnostics where species confirmation is necessary in determining ambiguous surveillance trap catches; maintaining pure colony lines; and in Sterile Insect Technique management responses. Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera neohumeralis are morphologically similar sibling pest fruit fly species. Whilst morphologically similar, adults may be separated based on subtle characters; however, some characters exhibit intraspecific variability, creating overlap between the two species. Here we report the first molecular marker that can consistently distinguish between B. tryoni and B. neohumeralis. The assay utilises four primers in multiplex, with two outer universal primers, and two internal primers; one designed to target the SNPs present in B. tryoni, and the other targeting B. neohumeralis. This assay will likely be most useful for adult diagnostics in situations where species confirmation is necessary in determining ambiguous surveillance trap catches, maintaining pure colony lines and in Sterile Insect Technique management responses.</description><subject>adults</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>ARMS‐PCR</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Bactrocera neohumeralis</subject><subject>Bactrocera tryoni</subject><subject>Biosecurity</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>colony</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Fruit flies</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>genes</subject><subject>Genetic Markers</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>intraspecific variation</subject><subject>molecular diagnostics</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>mutation</subject><subject>Nucleotides</subject><subject>pangolin</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pest status</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide</subject><subject>Primers</subject><subject>Single-nucleotide polymorphism</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>sterile insect technique</subject><subject>Sterilized organisms</subject><subject>Tephritidae - genetics</subject><subject>tetra‐primer</subject><issn>1672-9609</issn><issn>1744-7917</issn><issn>1744-7917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxSMEoqVw5oYscdk9pPWfJM70VgqllSo4UM6W40yyrrL2Yjus9hPxNfGypUJc6oNn9PybJ49eUbxl9JTlc8ZkVZUSmDxlggM8K44flee5byQvoaFwVLyK8Z5SARz4y-JISAAKNTsufl0Q53_iRHqrR-djsoaM6JAEHK13ZPAhP2XZjbONq1xIh2mL6EjaerLBmMgQZpvvyWI8Jx-0ScEbDJqksPPOksVV8OOoU1oS7fp_AYd-Na9zN9lIFtc69LslWXy0m5S1c3KHm1WwyfYal6-LF4OeIr55qCfF96tPd5fX5e3XzzeXF7elEQBQSs66wVAhaI-1qCXroeKsraRuhBxMCx2vQaABbBrNOpR1B0bzrsJGYEtRnBSLg-8m-B9z3k6tbTQ4TTp_do5KsFq0QtK2ehLlLfCmBgYyo-__Q-_9HFxeRAkKnAmoxN7w7ECZ4GMMOKhNsGsddopRtY9b7cNV-3DVn7jzxLsH37lbY__I_803A_UB2NoJd0_5qZsv3w7GvwE9xbVe</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Starkie, Melissa L.</creator><creator>Fowler, Elizabeth V.</creator><creator>Piper, Alexander M.</creator><creator>Zhu, Xiaocheng</creator><creator>Wyatt, Pauline</creator><creator>Gopurenko, David</creator><creator>Krosch, Matt N.</creator><creator>Strutt, Francesca</creator><creator>Armstrong, Karen F.</creator><creator>Patrick, Hamish</creator><creator>Schutze, Mark K.</creator><creator>Blacket, Mark J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4240-0032</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>A novel diagnostic gene region for distinguishing between two pest fruit flies: Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) and Bactrocera neohumeralis (Hardy) (Diptera: Tephritidae)</title><author>Starkie, Melissa L. ; Fowler, Elizabeth V. ; Piper, Alexander M. ; Zhu, Xiaocheng ; Wyatt, Pauline ; Gopurenko, David ; Krosch, Matt N. ; Strutt, Francesca ; Armstrong, Karen F. ; Patrick, Hamish ; Schutze, Mark K. ; Blacket, Mark J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3999-721bfc0330de53571d9421847a637fc89b2593ec9e66a1be75b9ca2b4e63e80e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>adults</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>ARMS‐PCR</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Bactrocera neohumeralis</topic><topic>Bactrocera tryoni</topic><topic>Biosecurity</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>colony</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Fruit flies</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>genes</topic><topic>Genetic Markers</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>intraspecific variation</topic><topic>molecular diagnostics</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>mutation</topic><topic>Nucleotides</topic><topic>pangolin</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pest status</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide</topic><topic>Primers</topic><topic>Single-nucleotide polymorphism</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>sterile insect technique</topic><topic>Sterilized organisms</topic><topic>Tephritidae - genetics</topic><topic>tetra‐primer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Starkie, Melissa L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Elizabeth V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piper, Alexander M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xiaocheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyatt, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopurenko, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krosch, Matt N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strutt, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Karen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patrick, Hamish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schutze, Mark K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blacket, Mark J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Insect science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Starkie, Melissa L.</au><au>Fowler, Elizabeth V.</au><au>Piper, Alexander M.</au><au>Zhu, Xiaocheng</au><au>Wyatt, Pauline</au><au>Gopurenko, David</au><au>Krosch, Matt N.</au><au>Strutt, Francesca</au><au>Armstrong, Karen F.</au><au>Patrick, Hamish</au><au>Schutze, Mark K.</au><au>Blacket, Mark J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A novel diagnostic gene region for distinguishing between two pest fruit flies: Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) and Bactrocera neohumeralis (Hardy) (Diptera: Tephritidae)</atitle><jtitle>Insect science</jtitle><addtitle>Insect Sci</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1285</spage><epage>1295</epage><pages>1285-1295</pages><issn>1672-9609</issn><issn>1744-7917</issn><eissn>1744-7917</eissn><abstract>Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera neohumeralis are morphologically similar sibling pest fruit fly species that possess different biological attributes, geographic distributions, and host ranges. The need to differentiate between the two species is critical for accurate pest status assessment, management, biosecurity, and maintenance of reference colonies. While morphologically similar, adults may be separated based on subtle characters; however, some characters exhibit intraspecific variability, creating overlap between the two species. Additionally, there is currently no single molecular marker or rapid diagnostic assay that can reliably distinguish between B. neohumeralis and B. tryoni; therefore, ambiguous samples remain undiagnosed. Here we report the first molecular marker that can consistently distinguish between B. tryoni and B. neohumeralis. Our diagnostic region consists of two adjacent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the pangolin (pan) gene region. We confirmed the genotypes of each species are consistent across their distributional range, then developed a tetra‐primer amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) PCR assay for rapid diagnosis of the species. The assay utilizes four primers in multiplex, with two outer universal primers, and two internal primers: one designed to target two adjacent SNPs (AA) present in B. tryoni and the other targeting adjacent SNPs present in B. neohumeralis (GG). The assay accurately discriminates between the two species, but their SNP genotypes are shared with other nontarget tephritid fruit fly species. Therefore, this assay is most suited to adult diagnostics where species confirmation is necessary in determining ambiguous surveillance trap catches; maintaining pure colony lines; and in Sterile Insect Technique management responses. Bactrocera tryoni and Bactrocera neohumeralis are morphologically similar sibling pest fruit fly species. Whilst morphologically similar, adults may be separated based on subtle characters; however, some characters exhibit intraspecific variability, creating overlap between the two species. Here we report the first molecular marker that can consistently distinguish between B. tryoni and B. neohumeralis. The assay utilises four primers in multiplex, with two outer universal primers, and two internal primers; one designed to target the SNPs present in B. tryoni, and the other targeting B. neohumeralis. This assay will likely be most useful for adult diagnostics in situations where species confirmation is necessary in determining ambiguous surveillance trap catches, maintaining pure colony lines and in Sterile Insect Technique management responses.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37990951</pmid><doi>10.1111/1744-7917.13299</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4240-0032</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1672-9609
ispartof Insect science, 2024-08, Vol.31 (4), p.1285-1295
issn 1672-9609
1744-7917
1744-7917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892659197
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects adults
Animals
ARMS‐PCR
Assaying
Bactrocera neohumeralis
Bactrocera tryoni
Biosecurity
Colonies
colony
Diagnostic systems
Fruit flies
Fruits
genes
Genetic Markers
Genotypes
Geographical distribution
Insects
intraspecific variation
molecular diagnostics
monitoring
mutation
Nucleotides
pangolin
Pest control
Pest status
Pests
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Primers
Single-nucleotide polymorphism
Species
Species Specificity
sterile insect technique
Sterilized organisms
Tephritidae - genetics
tetra‐primer
title A novel diagnostic gene region for distinguishing between two pest fruit flies: Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) and Bactrocera neohumeralis (Hardy) (Diptera: Tephritidae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T21%3A04%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20novel%20diagnostic%20gene%20region%20for%20distinguishing%20between%20two%20pest%20fruit%20flies:%20Bactrocera%20tryoni%20(Froggatt)%20and%20Bactrocera%20neohumeralis%20(Hardy)%20(Diptera:%20Tephritidae)&rft.jtitle=Insect%20science&rft.au=Starkie,%20Melissa%20L.&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1285&rft.epage=1295&rft.pages=1285-1295&rft.issn=1672-9609&rft.eissn=1744-7917&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1744-7917.13299&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3092139434%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3092139434&rft_id=info:pmid/37990951&rfr_iscdi=true