Learning to deep learning: statistics and a paradigm test in selecting a UNet architecture to enhance MRI

Objective This study aims to assess the statistical significance of training parameters in 240 dense UNets (DUNets) used for enhancing low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and undersampled MRI in various acquisition protocols. The objective is to determine the validity of differences between different DU...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magma (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2024-07, Vol.37 (3), p.507-528
Hauptverfasser: Sharma, Rishabh, Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis, Webb, Andrew G., Leiss, Ernst L., Tsekos, Nikolaos V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 528
container_issue 3
container_start_page 507
container_title Magma (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 37
creator Sharma, Rishabh
Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis
Webb, Andrew G.
Leiss, Ernst L.
Tsekos, Nikolaos V.
description Objective This study aims to assess the statistical significance of training parameters in 240 dense UNets (DUNets) used for enhancing low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and undersampled MRI in various acquisition protocols. The objective is to determine the validity of differences between different DUNet configurations and their impact on image quality metrics. Materials and Methods To achieve this, we trained all DUNets using the same learning rate and number of epochs, with variations in 5 acquisition protocols, 24 loss function weightings, and 2 ground truths. We calculated evaluation metrics for two metric regions of interest (ROI). We employed both Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Mixed Effects Model (MEM) to assess the statistical significance of the independent parameters, aiming to compare their efficacy in revealing differences and interactions among fixed parameters. Results ANOVA analysis showed that, except for the acquisition protocol, fixed variables were statistically insignificant. In contrast, MEM analysis revealed that all fixed parameters and their interactions held statistical significance. This emphasizes the need for advanced statistical analysis in comparative studies, where MEM can uncover finer distinctions often overlooked by ANOVA. Discussion These findings highlight the importance of utilizing appropriate statistical analysis when comparing different deep learning models. Additionally, the surprising effectiveness of the UNet architecture in enhancing various acquisition protocols underscores the potential for developing improved methods for characterizing and training deep learning models. This study serves as a stepping stone toward enhancing the transparency and comparability of deep learning techniques for medical imaging applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10334-023-01127-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892658628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2892658628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-751a186d64291b1782e0a752b1850aeec2eb2b874797234ed7aadaf7d1dd77633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0E4lH4ARbISzYBPxLbYYcQL6mAhGBtTeJpMUqdYjsL_p6UFsSK1Yxm7r2aOYQcc3bGGdPniTMpy4IJWTDOhS7UFtnnshKFUYpv_-n3yEFK74wJXjG5S_akrk1dC75P_BQhBh_mNPfUIS5ptxlc0JQh-5R9mygER4EuIYLz8wXNmDL1gSbssM0rN9DXR8wUYvvm8zgbIq4SMbxBaJE-PN8fkp0ZdAmPNnVCXm-uX67uiunT7f3V5bRoZalzoSsO3CinSlHzhmsjkIGuRMNNxQCxFdiIxuhS11rIEp0GcDDTjjuntZJyQk7XucvYfwzjoXbhU4tdBwH7IVlhaqEqo4QZpWItbWOfUsSZXUa_gPhpObMrxHaN2I6I7Tdiq0bTySZ_aBbofi0_TEeBXAvSuApzjPa9H2IYf_4v9gu-SYaZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2892658628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning to deep learning: statistics and a paradigm test in selecting a UNet architecture to enhance MRI</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><creator>Sharma, Rishabh ; Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis ; Webb, Andrew G. ; Leiss, Ernst L. ; Tsekos, Nikolaos V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Rishabh ; Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis ; Webb, Andrew G. ; Leiss, Ernst L. ; Tsekos, Nikolaos V.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective This study aims to assess the statistical significance of training parameters in 240 dense UNets (DUNets) used for enhancing low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and undersampled MRI in various acquisition protocols. The objective is to determine the validity of differences between different DUNet configurations and their impact on image quality metrics. Materials and Methods To achieve this, we trained all DUNets using the same learning rate and number of epochs, with variations in 5 acquisition protocols, 24 loss function weightings, and 2 ground truths. We calculated evaluation metrics for two metric regions of interest (ROI). We employed both Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Mixed Effects Model (MEM) to assess the statistical significance of the independent parameters, aiming to compare their efficacy in revealing differences and interactions among fixed parameters. Results ANOVA analysis showed that, except for the acquisition protocol, fixed variables were statistically insignificant. In contrast, MEM analysis revealed that all fixed parameters and their interactions held statistical significance. This emphasizes the need for advanced statistical analysis in comparative studies, where MEM can uncover finer distinctions often overlooked by ANOVA. Discussion These findings highlight the importance of utilizing appropriate statistical analysis when comparing different deep learning models. Additionally, the surprising effectiveness of the UNet architecture in enhancing various acquisition protocols underscores the potential for developing improved methods for characterizing and training deep learning models. This study serves as a stepping stone toward enhancing the transparency and comparability of deep learning techniques for medical imaging applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-8661</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1352-8661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01127-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37989921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analysis of Variance ; Basic Science - Reconstruction algorithms and artificial intelligence ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Computer Appl. in Life Sciences ; Deep Learning ; Health Informatics ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neural Networks, Computer ; Radiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Article ; Signal-To-Noise Ratio ; Solid State Physics</subject><ispartof>Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2024-07, Vol.37 (3), p.507-528</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology (ESMRMB) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology (ESMRMB).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-751a186d64291b1782e0a752b1850aeec2eb2b874797234ed7aadaf7d1dd77633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-751a186d64291b1782e0a752b1850aeec2eb2b874797234ed7aadaf7d1dd77633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10334-023-01127-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10334-023-01127-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37989921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Rishabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiss, Ernst L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsekos, Nikolaos V.</creatorcontrib><title>Learning to deep learning: statistics and a paradigm test in selecting a UNet architecture to enhance MRI</title><title>Magma (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Magn Reson Mater Phy</addtitle><addtitle>MAGMA</addtitle><description>Objective This study aims to assess the statistical significance of training parameters in 240 dense UNets (DUNets) used for enhancing low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and undersampled MRI in various acquisition protocols. The objective is to determine the validity of differences between different DUNet configurations and their impact on image quality metrics. Materials and Methods To achieve this, we trained all DUNets using the same learning rate and number of epochs, with variations in 5 acquisition protocols, 24 loss function weightings, and 2 ground truths. We calculated evaluation metrics for two metric regions of interest (ROI). We employed both Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Mixed Effects Model (MEM) to assess the statistical significance of the independent parameters, aiming to compare their efficacy in revealing differences and interactions among fixed parameters. Results ANOVA analysis showed that, except for the acquisition protocol, fixed variables were statistically insignificant. In contrast, MEM analysis revealed that all fixed parameters and their interactions held statistical significance. This emphasizes the need for advanced statistical analysis in comparative studies, where MEM can uncover finer distinctions often overlooked by ANOVA. Discussion These findings highlight the importance of utilizing appropriate statistical analysis when comparing different deep learning models. Additionally, the surprising effectiveness of the UNet architecture in enhancing various acquisition protocols underscores the potential for developing improved methods for characterizing and training deep learning models. This study serves as a stepping stone toward enhancing the transparency and comparability of deep learning techniques for medical imaging applications.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Basic Science - Reconstruction algorithms and artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Computer Appl. in Life Sciences</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neural Networks, Computer</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</subject><subject>Solid State Physics</subject><issn>1352-8661</issn><issn>1352-8661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0E4lH4ARbISzYBPxLbYYcQL6mAhGBtTeJpMUqdYjsL_p6UFsSK1Yxm7r2aOYQcc3bGGdPniTMpy4IJWTDOhS7UFtnnshKFUYpv_-n3yEFK74wJXjG5S_akrk1dC75P_BQhBh_mNPfUIS5ptxlc0JQh-5R9mygER4EuIYLz8wXNmDL1gSbssM0rN9DXR8wUYvvm8zgbIq4SMbxBaJE-PN8fkp0ZdAmPNnVCXm-uX67uiunT7f3V5bRoZalzoSsO3CinSlHzhmsjkIGuRMNNxQCxFdiIxuhS11rIEp0GcDDTjjuntZJyQk7XucvYfwzjoXbhU4tdBwH7IVlhaqEqo4QZpWItbWOfUsSZXUa_gPhpObMrxHaN2I6I7Tdiq0bTySZ_aBbofi0_TEeBXAvSuApzjPa9H2IYf_4v9gu-SYaZ</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Sharma, Rishabh</creator><creator>Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis</creator><creator>Webb, Andrew G.</creator><creator>Leiss, Ernst L.</creator><creator>Tsekos, Nikolaos V.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Learning to deep learning: statistics and a paradigm test in selecting a UNet architecture to enhance MRI</title><author>Sharma, Rishabh ; Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis ; Webb, Andrew G. ; Leiss, Ernst L. ; Tsekos, Nikolaos V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-751a186d64291b1782e0a752b1850aeec2eb2b874797234ed7aadaf7d1dd77633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Basic Science - Reconstruction algorithms and artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Computer Appl. in Life Sciences</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neural Networks, Computer</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</topic><topic>Solid State Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Rishabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiss, Ernst L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsekos, Nikolaos V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magma (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Rishabh</au><au>Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis</au><au>Webb, Andrew G.</au><au>Leiss, Ernst L.</au><au>Tsekos, Nikolaos V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Learning to deep learning: statistics and a paradigm test in selecting a UNet architecture to enhance MRI</atitle><jtitle>Magma (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><stitle>Magn Reson Mater Phy</stitle><addtitle>MAGMA</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>507-528</pages><issn>1352-8661</issn><eissn>1352-8661</eissn><abstract>Objective This study aims to assess the statistical significance of training parameters in 240 dense UNets (DUNets) used for enhancing low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and undersampled MRI in various acquisition protocols. The objective is to determine the validity of differences between different DUNet configurations and their impact on image quality metrics. Materials and Methods To achieve this, we trained all DUNets using the same learning rate and number of epochs, with variations in 5 acquisition protocols, 24 loss function weightings, and 2 ground truths. We calculated evaluation metrics for two metric regions of interest (ROI). We employed both Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Mixed Effects Model (MEM) to assess the statistical significance of the independent parameters, aiming to compare their efficacy in revealing differences and interactions among fixed parameters. Results ANOVA analysis showed that, except for the acquisition protocol, fixed variables were statistically insignificant. In contrast, MEM analysis revealed that all fixed parameters and their interactions held statistical significance. This emphasizes the need for advanced statistical analysis in comparative studies, where MEM can uncover finer distinctions often overlooked by ANOVA. Discussion These findings highlight the importance of utilizing appropriate statistical analysis when comparing different deep learning models. Additionally, the surprising effectiveness of the UNet architecture in enhancing various acquisition protocols underscores the potential for developing improved methods for characterizing and training deep learning models. This study serves as a stepping stone toward enhancing the transparency and comparability of deep learning techniques for medical imaging applications.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>37989921</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10334-023-01127-6</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1352-8661
ispartof Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2024-07, Vol.37 (3), p.507-528
issn 1352-8661
1352-8661
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892658628
source MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals Complete
subjects Algorithms
Analysis of Variance
Basic Science - Reconstruction algorithms and artificial intelligence
Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Computer Appl. in Life Sciences
Deep Learning
Health Informatics
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neural Networks, Computer
Radiology
Reproducibility of Results
Research Article
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Solid State Physics
title Learning to deep learning: statistics and a paradigm test in selecting a UNet architecture to enhance MRI
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T10%3A43%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning%20to%20deep%20learning:%20statistics%20and%20a%20paradigm%20test%20in%20selecting%20a%20UNet%20architecture%20to%20enhance%20MRI&rft.jtitle=Magma%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Sharma,%20Rishabh&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=507-528&rft.issn=1352-8661&rft.eissn=1352-8661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10334-023-01127-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2892658628%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2892658628&rft_id=info:pmid/37989921&rfr_iscdi=true