Learning to deep learning: statistics and a paradigm test in selecting a UNet architecture to enhance MRI
Objective This study aims to assess the statistical significance of training parameters in 240 dense UNets (DUNets) used for enhancing low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and undersampled MRI in various acquisition protocols. The objective is to determine the validity of differences between different DU...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Magma (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2024-07, Vol.37 (3), p.507-528 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 528 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 507 |
container_title | Magma (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Sharma, Rishabh Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis Webb, Andrew G. Leiss, Ernst L. Tsekos, Nikolaos V. |
description | Objective
This study aims to assess the statistical significance of training parameters in 240 dense UNets (DUNets) used for enhancing low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and undersampled MRI in various acquisition protocols. The objective is to determine the validity of differences between different DUNet configurations and their impact on image quality metrics.
Materials and Methods
To achieve this, we trained all DUNets using the same learning rate and number of epochs, with variations in 5 acquisition protocols, 24 loss function weightings, and 2 ground truths. We calculated evaluation metrics for two metric regions of interest (ROI). We employed both Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Mixed Effects Model (MEM) to assess the statistical significance of the independent parameters, aiming to compare their efficacy in revealing differences and interactions among fixed parameters.
Results
ANOVA analysis showed that, except for the acquisition protocol, fixed variables were statistically insignificant. In contrast, MEM analysis revealed that all fixed parameters and their interactions held statistical significance. This emphasizes the need for advanced statistical analysis in comparative studies, where MEM can uncover finer distinctions often overlooked by ANOVA.
Discussion
These findings highlight the importance of utilizing appropriate statistical analysis when comparing different deep learning models. Additionally, the surprising effectiveness of the UNet architecture in enhancing various acquisition protocols underscores the potential for developing improved methods for characterizing and training deep learning models. This study serves as a stepping stone toward enhancing the transparency and comparability of deep learning techniques for medical imaging applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10334-023-01127-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892658628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2892658628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-751a186d64291b1782e0a752b1850aeec2eb2b874797234ed7aadaf7d1dd77633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0E4lH4ARbISzYBPxLbYYcQL6mAhGBtTeJpMUqdYjsL_p6UFsSK1Yxm7r2aOYQcc3bGGdPniTMpy4IJWTDOhS7UFtnnshKFUYpv_-n3yEFK74wJXjG5S_akrk1dC75P_BQhBh_mNPfUIS5ptxlc0JQh-5R9mygER4EuIYLz8wXNmDL1gSbssM0rN9DXR8wUYvvm8zgbIq4SMbxBaJE-PN8fkp0ZdAmPNnVCXm-uX67uiunT7f3V5bRoZalzoSsO3CinSlHzhmsjkIGuRMNNxQCxFdiIxuhS11rIEp0GcDDTjjuntZJyQk7XucvYfwzjoXbhU4tdBwH7IVlhaqEqo4QZpWItbWOfUsSZXUa_gPhpObMrxHaN2I6I7Tdiq0bTySZ_aBbofi0_TEeBXAvSuApzjPa9H2IYf_4v9gu-SYaZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2892658628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning to deep learning: statistics and a paradigm test in selecting a UNet architecture to enhance MRI</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><creator>Sharma, Rishabh ; Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis ; Webb, Andrew G. ; Leiss, Ernst L. ; Tsekos, Nikolaos V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Rishabh ; Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis ; Webb, Andrew G. ; Leiss, Ernst L. ; Tsekos, Nikolaos V.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
This study aims to assess the statistical significance of training parameters in 240 dense UNets (DUNets) used for enhancing low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and undersampled MRI in various acquisition protocols. The objective is to determine the validity of differences between different DUNet configurations and their impact on image quality metrics.
Materials and Methods
To achieve this, we trained all DUNets using the same learning rate and number of epochs, with variations in 5 acquisition protocols, 24 loss function weightings, and 2 ground truths. We calculated evaluation metrics for two metric regions of interest (ROI). We employed both Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Mixed Effects Model (MEM) to assess the statistical significance of the independent parameters, aiming to compare their efficacy in revealing differences and interactions among fixed parameters.
Results
ANOVA analysis showed that, except for the acquisition protocol, fixed variables were statistically insignificant. In contrast, MEM analysis revealed that all fixed parameters and their interactions held statistical significance. This emphasizes the need for advanced statistical analysis in comparative studies, where MEM can uncover finer distinctions often overlooked by ANOVA.
Discussion
These findings highlight the importance of utilizing appropriate statistical analysis when comparing different deep learning models. Additionally, the surprising effectiveness of the UNet architecture in enhancing various acquisition protocols underscores the potential for developing improved methods for characterizing and training deep learning models. This study serves as a stepping stone toward enhancing the transparency and comparability of deep learning techniques for medical imaging applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-8661</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1352-8661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01127-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37989921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analysis of Variance ; Basic Science - Reconstruction algorithms and artificial intelligence ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Computer Appl. in Life Sciences ; Deep Learning ; Health Informatics ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neural Networks, Computer ; Radiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Article ; Signal-To-Noise Ratio ; Solid State Physics</subject><ispartof>Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2024-07, Vol.37 (3), p.507-528</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology (ESMRMB) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology (ESMRMB).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-751a186d64291b1782e0a752b1850aeec2eb2b874797234ed7aadaf7d1dd77633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-751a186d64291b1782e0a752b1850aeec2eb2b874797234ed7aadaf7d1dd77633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10334-023-01127-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10334-023-01127-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37989921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Rishabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiss, Ernst L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsekos, Nikolaos V.</creatorcontrib><title>Learning to deep learning: statistics and a paradigm test in selecting a UNet architecture to enhance MRI</title><title>Magma (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Magn Reson Mater Phy</addtitle><addtitle>MAGMA</addtitle><description>Objective
This study aims to assess the statistical significance of training parameters in 240 dense UNets (DUNets) used for enhancing low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and undersampled MRI in various acquisition protocols. The objective is to determine the validity of differences between different DUNet configurations and their impact on image quality metrics.
Materials and Methods
To achieve this, we trained all DUNets using the same learning rate and number of epochs, with variations in 5 acquisition protocols, 24 loss function weightings, and 2 ground truths. We calculated evaluation metrics for two metric regions of interest (ROI). We employed both Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Mixed Effects Model (MEM) to assess the statistical significance of the independent parameters, aiming to compare their efficacy in revealing differences and interactions among fixed parameters.
Results
ANOVA analysis showed that, except for the acquisition protocol, fixed variables were statistically insignificant. In contrast, MEM analysis revealed that all fixed parameters and their interactions held statistical significance. This emphasizes the need for advanced statistical analysis in comparative studies, where MEM can uncover finer distinctions often overlooked by ANOVA.
Discussion
These findings highlight the importance of utilizing appropriate statistical analysis when comparing different deep learning models. Additionally, the surprising effectiveness of the UNet architecture in enhancing various acquisition protocols underscores the potential for developing improved methods for characterizing and training deep learning models. This study serves as a stepping stone toward enhancing the transparency and comparability of deep learning techniques for medical imaging applications.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Basic Science - Reconstruction algorithms and artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Computer Appl. in Life Sciences</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neural Networks, Computer</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</subject><subject>Solid State Physics</subject><issn>1352-8661</issn><issn>1352-8661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0E4lH4ARbISzYBPxLbYYcQL6mAhGBtTeJpMUqdYjsL_p6UFsSK1Yxm7r2aOYQcc3bGGdPniTMpy4IJWTDOhS7UFtnnshKFUYpv_-n3yEFK74wJXjG5S_akrk1dC75P_BQhBh_mNPfUIS5ptxlc0JQh-5R9mygER4EuIYLz8wXNmDL1gSbssM0rN9DXR8wUYvvm8zgbIq4SMbxBaJE-PN8fkp0ZdAmPNnVCXm-uX67uiunT7f3V5bRoZalzoSsO3CinSlHzhmsjkIGuRMNNxQCxFdiIxuhS11rIEp0GcDDTjjuntZJyQk7XucvYfwzjoXbhU4tdBwH7IVlhaqEqo4QZpWItbWOfUsSZXUa_gPhpObMrxHaN2I6I7Tdiq0bTySZ_aBbofi0_TEeBXAvSuApzjPa9H2IYf_4v9gu-SYaZ</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Sharma, Rishabh</creator><creator>Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis</creator><creator>Webb, Andrew G.</creator><creator>Leiss, Ernst L.</creator><creator>Tsekos, Nikolaos V.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Learning to deep learning: statistics and a paradigm test in selecting a UNet architecture to enhance MRI</title><author>Sharma, Rishabh ; Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis ; Webb, Andrew G. ; Leiss, Ernst L. ; Tsekos, Nikolaos V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-751a186d64291b1782e0a752b1850aeec2eb2b874797234ed7aadaf7d1dd77633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Basic Science - Reconstruction algorithms and artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Computer Appl. in Life Sciences</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neural Networks, Computer</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</topic><topic>Solid State Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Rishabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiss, Ernst L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsekos, Nikolaos V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magma (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Rishabh</au><au>Tsiamyrtzis, Panagiotis</au><au>Webb, Andrew G.</au><au>Leiss, Ernst L.</au><au>Tsekos, Nikolaos V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Learning to deep learning: statistics and a paradigm test in selecting a UNet architecture to enhance MRI</atitle><jtitle>Magma (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><stitle>Magn Reson Mater Phy</stitle><addtitle>MAGMA</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>507-528</pages><issn>1352-8661</issn><eissn>1352-8661</eissn><abstract>Objective
This study aims to assess the statistical significance of training parameters in 240 dense UNets (DUNets) used for enhancing low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and undersampled MRI in various acquisition protocols. The objective is to determine the validity of differences between different DUNet configurations and their impact on image quality metrics.
Materials and Methods
To achieve this, we trained all DUNets using the same learning rate and number of epochs, with variations in 5 acquisition protocols, 24 loss function weightings, and 2 ground truths. We calculated evaluation metrics for two metric regions of interest (ROI). We employed both Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Mixed Effects Model (MEM) to assess the statistical significance of the independent parameters, aiming to compare their efficacy in revealing differences and interactions among fixed parameters.
Results
ANOVA analysis showed that, except for the acquisition protocol, fixed variables were statistically insignificant. In contrast, MEM analysis revealed that all fixed parameters and their interactions held statistical significance. This emphasizes the need for advanced statistical analysis in comparative studies, where MEM can uncover finer distinctions often overlooked by ANOVA.
Discussion
These findings highlight the importance of utilizing appropriate statistical analysis when comparing different deep learning models. Additionally, the surprising effectiveness of the UNet architecture in enhancing various acquisition protocols underscores the potential for developing improved methods for characterizing and training deep learning models. This study serves as a stepping stone toward enhancing the transparency and comparability of deep learning techniques for medical imaging applications.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>37989921</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10334-023-01127-6</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1352-8661 |
ispartof | Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2024-07, Vol.37 (3), p.507-528 |
issn | 1352-8661 1352-8661 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892658628 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals Complete |
subjects | Algorithms Analysis of Variance Basic Science - Reconstruction algorithms and artificial intelligence Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Brain - diagnostic imaging Computer Appl. in Life Sciences Deep Learning Health Informatics Humans Image Enhancement - methods Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neural Networks, Computer Radiology Reproducibility of Results Research Article Signal-To-Noise Ratio Solid State Physics |
title | Learning to deep learning: statistics and a paradigm test in selecting a UNet architecture to enhance MRI |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T10%3A43%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning%20to%20deep%20learning:%20statistics%20and%20a%20paradigm%20test%20in%20selecting%20a%20UNet%20architecture%20to%20enhance%20MRI&rft.jtitle=Magma%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Sharma,%20Rishabh&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=507-528&rft.issn=1352-8661&rft.eissn=1352-8661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10334-023-01127-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2892658628%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2892658628&rft_id=info:pmid/37989921&rfr_iscdi=true |