Gender differences in patients with anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis: a cohort study of 251 cases

Objective To investigate the impact of sex differences on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-positive dermatomyositis (MDA5 + DM). Methods We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 251 patients with MDA5 + DM, including 71 in the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical rheumatology 2024, Vol.43 (1), p.339-347
Hauptverfasser: Cheng, Lu, Xu, Lingxiao, Xu, Yan, Yuan, Fenghong, Li, Ju, Wu, Min, Da, Zhanyun, Wei, Hua, Zhou, Lei, Yin, Songlou, Wu, Jian, Lu, Yan, Su, Dinglei, Liu, Zhichun, Liu, Lin, Ma, Longxin, Xu, Xiaoyan, Liu, Huijie, Ren, Tianli, Zang, Yinshan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 347
container_issue 1
container_start_page 339
container_title Clinical rheumatology
container_volume 43
creator Cheng, Lu
Xu, Lingxiao
Xu, Yan
Yuan, Fenghong
Li, Ju
Wu, Min
Da, Zhanyun
Wei, Hua
Zhou, Lei
Yin, Songlou
Wu, Jian
Lu, Yan
Su, Dinglei
Liu, Zhichun
Liu, Lin
Ma, Longxin
Xu, Xiaoyan
Liu, Huijie
Ren, Tianli
Zang, Yinshan
description Objective To investigate the impact of sex differences on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-positive dermatomyositis (MDA5 + DM). Methods We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 251 patients with MDA5 + DM, including 71 in the male group and 180 in the female group. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to analyze independent risk factors for RPILD in each group. An ROC curve was drawn to evaluate the predictive value of independent risk factors. Kaplan‒Meier analysis was used to compare the cumulative survival rates, while the log-rank test was used to test for significant differences between the two groups. Results Patients in the male group had a significantly higher prevalence of heliotrope rash, V sign, severe interstitial lung disease (ILD), and rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD) than those in the female group. Anti-Ro52 positivity, high CRP level and short disease were identified as independent risk factors for RPILD in both male and female groups by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The mortality rates of males and females were 33.8% and 22.0%, respectively, and the survival time of patients in the male group was shorter than that in the female group. Conclusion Male patients with MDA5 + DM exhibit an increased risk of RPILD, elevated mortality rates and reduced overall survival time compared to their female counterparts, and anti-Ro52 positivity may be an unfavorable prognostic factor for these patients. Key Points • The prevalence of solar rash, V sign, severe interstitial lung disease (ILD) and rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD) in anti-MDA5-positive female patients was significantly lower than that in male patients. • Positive Anti-Ro52, high CRP level, and short course of disease were independent risk factors for RPILD in both men and women. • Female patients exhibited a lower mortality rate than male patients (22.0% vs 33.8%) and demonstrated longer survival time.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10067-023-06816-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892272474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153563627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-694db2e2546e17c7e3a62f060cbc11ee795d49ad4a2b00dc9fe12119aa1588f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vFSEUhonR2Gv1D7gwJG7coBw-B3dN1WpS40bXhMucsTR3hiswNfffi71VExe6gQSe9z2Bh5CnwF8C5_ZV7auxjAvJuBnAMH6PbEBJxZxT7j7ZcGs5k-CGE_Ko1mvOuRgcPCQn0rpBayk3JF7gMmKhY5omLLhErDQtdB9awqVV-j21KxqWltjHN2ea7XNNLd0g7Zk5tDwfbg_qaxpozFe5NFrbOh5onqjQQGOoWB-TB1PYVXxyt5-SL-_efj5_zy4_XXw4P7tkUfGhMePUuBUotDIINlqUwYiJGx63EQDROj0qF0YVxJbzMboJQQC4EEAPw-TkKXlx7N2X_G3F2vycasTdLiyY1-olaKmNNML-F-3_JIQVyqqOPv8Lvc5rWfpDvHAARgmwplPiSMWSay04-X1JcygHD9z_tOWPtny35W9ted5Dz-6q1-2M4-_ILz0dkEeg9qvlK5Y_s_9R-wPN3Z5U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2911642176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender differences in patients with anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis: a cohort study of 251 cases</title><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>Cheng, Lu ; Xu, Lingxiao ; Xu, Yan ; Yuan, Fenghong ; Li, Ju ; Wu, Min ; Da, Zhanyun ; Wei, Hua ; Zhou, Lei ; Yin, Songlou ; Wu, Jian ; Lu, Yan ; Su, Dinglei ; Liu, Zhichun ; Liu, Lin ; Ma, Longxin ; Xu, Xiaoyan ; Liu, Huijie ; Ren, Tianli ; Zang, Yinshan</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Lu ; Xu, Lingxiao ; Xu, Yan ; Yuan, Fenghong ; Li, Ju ; Wu, Min ; Da, Zhanyun ; Wei, Hua ; Zhou, Lei ; Yin, Songlou ; Wu, Jian ; Lu, Yan ; Su, Dinglei ; Liu, Zhichun ; Liu, Lin ; Ma, Longxin ; Xu, Xiaoyan ; Liu, Huijie ; Ren, Tianli ; Zang, Yinshan</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To investigate the impact of sex differences on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-positive dermatomyositis (MDA5 + DM). Methods We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 251 patients with MDA5 + DM, including 71 in the male group and 180 in the female group. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to analyze independent risk factors for RPILD in each group. An ROC curve was drawn to evaluate the predictive value of independent risk factors. Kaplan‒Meier analysis was used to compare the cumulative survival rates, while the log-rank test was used to test for significant differences between the two groups. Results Patients in the male group had a significantly higher prevalence of heliotrope rash, V sign, severe interstitial lung disease (ILD), and rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD) than those in the female group. Anti-Ro52 positivity, high CRP level and short disease were identified as independent risk factors for RPILD in both male and female groups by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The mortality rates of males and females were 33.8% and 22.0%, respectively, and the survival time of patients in the male group was shorter than that in the female group. Conclusion Male patients with MDA5 + DM exhibit an increased risk of RPILD, elevated mortality rates and reduced overall survival time compared to their female counterparts, and anti-Ro52 positivity may be an unfavorable prognostic factor for these patients. Key Points • The prevalence of solar rash, V sign, severe interstitial lung disease (ILD) and rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD) in anti-MDA5-positive female patients was significantly lower than that in male patients. • Positive Anti-Ro52, high CRP level, and short course of disease were independent risk factors for RPILD in both men and women. • Female patients exhibited a lower mortality rate than male patients (22.0% vs 33.8%) and demonstrated longer survival time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0770-3198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-9949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10067-023-06816-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37985533</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>cohort studies ; Dermatomyositis ; Exanthema ; Females ; Gender differences ; genes ; Heliotropium arborescens ; Lung diseases ; Males ; Medical prognosis ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Melanoma ; Mortality ; Original Article ; prognosis ; Regression analysis ; respiratory tract diseases ; Rheumatology ; risk ; Risk factors ; Sex differences ; Survival</subject><ispartof>Clinical rheumatology, 2024, Vol.43 (1), p.339-347</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-694db2e2546e17c7e3a62f060cbc11ee795d49ad4a2b00dc9fe12119aa1588f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-694db2e2546e17c7e3a62f060cbc11ee795d49ad4a2b00dc9fe12119aa1588f93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6812-8930</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10067-023-06816-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10067-023-06816-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37985533$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Lingxiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Fenghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Da, Zhanyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Songlou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Dinglei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhichun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Longxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiaoyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Tianli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zang, Yinshan</creatorcontrib><title>Gender differences in patients with anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis: a cohort study of 251 cases</title><title>Clinical rheumatology</title><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><description>Objective To investigate the impact of sex differences on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-positive dermatomyositis (MDA5 + DM). Methods We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 251 patients with MDA5 + DM, including 71 in the male group and 180 in the female group. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to analyze independent risk factors for RPILD in each group. An ROC curve was drawn to evaluate the predictive value of independent risk factors. Kaplan‒Meier analysis was used to compare the cumulative survival rates, while the log-rank test was used to test for significant differences between the two groups. Results Patients in the male group had a significantly higher prevalence of heliotrope rash, V sign, severe interstitial lung disease (ILD), and rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD) than those in the female group. Anti-Ro52 positivity, high CRP level and short disease were identified as independent risk factors for RPILD in both male and female groups by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The mortality rates of males and females were 33.8% and 22.0%, respectively, and the survival time of patients in the male group was shorter than that in the female group. Conclusion Male patients with MDA5 + DM exhibit an increased risk of RPILD, elevated mortality rates and reduced overall survival time compared to their female counterparts, and anti-Ro52 positivity may be an unfavorable prognostic factor for these patients. Key Points • The prevalence of solar rash, V sign, severe interstitial lung disease (ILD) and rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD) in anti-MDA5-positive female patients was significantly lower than that in male patients. • Positive Anti-Ro52, high CRP level, and short course of disease were independent risk factors for RPILD in both men and women. • Female patients exhibited a lower mortality rate than male patients (22.0% vs 33.8%) and demonstrated longer survival time.</description><subject>cohort studies</subject><subject>Dermatomyositis</subject><subject>Exanthema</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>genes</subject><subject>Heliotropium arborescens</subject><subject>Lung diseases</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>prognosis</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>respiratory tract diseases</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>0770-3198</issn><issn>1434-9949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1vFSEUhonR2Gv1D7gwJG7coBw-B3dN1WpS40bXhMucsTR3hiswNfffi71VExe6gQSe9z2Bh5CnwF8C5_ZV7auxjAvJuBnAMH6PbEBJxZxT7j7ZcGs5k-CGE_Ko1mvOuRgcPCQn0rpBayk3JF7gMmKhY5omLLhErDQtdB9awqVV-j21KxqWltjHN2ea7XNNLd0g7Zk5tDwfbg_qaxpozFe5NFrbOh5onqjQQGOoWB-TB1PYVXxyt5-SL-_efj5_zy4_XXw4P7tkUfGhMePUuBUotDIINlqUwYiJGx63EQDROj0qF0YVxJbzMboJQQC4EEAPw-TkKXlx7N2X_G3F2vycasTdLiyY1-olaKmNNML-F-3_JIQVyqqOPv8Lvc5rWfpDvHAARgmwplPiSMWSay04-X1JcygHD9z_tOWPtny35W9ted5Dz-6q1-2M4-_ILz0dkEeg9qvlK5Y_s_9R-wPN3Z5U</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Cheng, Lu</creator><creator>Xu, Lingxiao</creator><creator>Xu, Yan</creator><creator>Yuan, Fenghong</creator><creator>Li, Ju</creator><creator>Wu, Min</creator><creator>Da, Zhanyun</creator><creator>Wei, Hua</creator><creator>Zhou, Lei</creator><creator>Yin, Songlou</creator><creator>Wu, Jian</creator><creator>Lu, Yan</creator><creator>Su, Dinglei</creator><creator>Liu, Zhichun</creator><creator>Liu, Lin</creator><creator>Ma, Longxin</creator><creator>Xu, Xiaoyan</creator><creator>Liu, Huijie</creator><creator>Ren, Tianli</creator><creator>Zang, Yinshan</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6812-8930</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Gender differences in patients with anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis: a cohort study of 251 cases</title><author>Cheng, Lu ; Xu, Lingxiao ; Xu, Yan ; Yuan, Fenghong ; Li, Ju ; Wu, Min ; Da, Zhanyun ; Wei, Hua ; Zhou, Lei ; Yin, Songlou ; Wu, Jian ; Lu, Yan ; Su, Dinglei ; Liu, Zhichun ; Liu, Lin ; Ma, Longxin ; Xu, Xiaoyan ; Liu, Huijie ; Ren, Tianli ; Zang, Yinshan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-694db2e2546e17c7e3a62f060cbc11ee795d49ad4a2b00dc9fe12119aa1588f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>cohort studies</topic><topic>Dermatomyositis</topic><topic>Exanthema</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>genes</topic><topic>Heliotropium arborescens</topic><topic>Lung diseases</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>prognosis</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>respiratory tract diseases</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Lingxiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Fenghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Da, Zhanyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Songlou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Dinglei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhichun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Longxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiaoyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Tianli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zang, Yinshan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Lu</au><au>Xu, Lingxiao</au><au>Xu, Yan</au><au>Yuan, Fenghong</au><au>Li, Ju</au><au>Wu, Min</au><au>Da, Zhanyun</au><au>Wei, Hua</au><au>Zhou, Lei</au><au>Yin, Songlou</au><au>Wu, Jian</au><au>Lu, Yan</au><au>Su, Dinglei</au><au>Liu, Zhichun</au><au>Liu, Lin</au><au>Ma, Longxin</au><au>Xu, Xiaoyan</au><au>Liu, Huijie</au><au>Ren, Tianli</au><au>Zang, Yinshan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender differences in patients with anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis: a cohort study of 251 cases</atitle><jtitle>Clinical rheumatology</jtitle><stitle>Clin Rheumatol</stitle><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>347</epage><pages>339-347</pages><issn>0770-3198</issn><eissn>1434-9949</eissn><abstract>Objective To investigate the impact of sex differences on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-positive dermatomyositis (MDA5 + DM). Methods We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 251 patients with MDA5 + DM, including 71 in the male group and 180 in the female group. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to analyze independent risk factors for RPILD in each group. An ROC curve was drawn to evaluate the predictive value of independent risk factors. Kaplan‒Meier analysis was used to compare the cumulative survival rates, while the log-rank test was used to test for significant differences between the two groups. Results Patients in the male group had a significantly higher prevalence of heliotrope rash, V sign, severe interstitial lung disease (ILD), and rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD) than those in the female group. Anti-Ro52 positivity, high CRP level and short disease were identified as independent risk factors for RPILD in both male and female groups by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The mortality rates of males and females were 33.8% and 22.0%, respectively, and the survival time of patients in the male group was shorter than that in the female group. Conclusion Male patients with MDA5 + DM exhibit an increased risk of RPILD, elevated mortality rates and reduced overall survival time compared to their female counterparts, and anti-Ro52 positivity may be an unfavorable prognostic factor for these patients. Key Points • The prevalence of solar rash, V sign, severe interstitial lung disease (ILD) and rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD) in anti-MDA5-positive female patients was significantly lower than that in male patients. • Positive Anti-Ro52, high CRP level, and short course of disease were independent risk factors for RPILD in both men and women. • Female patients exhibited a lower mortality rate than male patients (22.0% vs 33.8%) and demonstrated longer survival time.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>37985533</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10067-023-06816-0</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6812-8930</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0770-3198
ispartof Clinical rheumatology, 2024, Vol.43 (1), p.339-347
issn 0770-3198
1434-9949
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892272474
source SpringerNature Complete Journals
subjects cohort studies
Dermatomyositis
Exanthema
Females
Gender differences
genes
Heliotropium arborescens
Lung diseases
Males
Medical prognosis
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Melanoma
Mortality
Original Article
prognosis
Regression analysis
respiratory tract diseases
Rheumatology
risk
Risk factors
Sex differences
Survival
title Gender differences in patients with anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis: a cohort study of 251 cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A08%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20differences%20in%20patients%20with%20anti-MDA5-positive%20dermatomyositis:%20a%20cohort%20study%20of%20251%20cases&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20rheumatology&rft.au=Cheng,%20Lu&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=347&rft.pages=339-347&rft.issn=0770-3198&rft.eissn=1434-9949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10067-023-06816-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153563627%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2911642176&rft_id=info:pmid/37985533&rfr_iscdi=true