Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Among Various Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategies for Small Coronary Artery Disease

It remains unclear which percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy is the most preferable in patients with small-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). We sought to evaluate the clinical efficacy of various PCI strategies for patients with small-vessel CAD through a network meta-analysis of r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The American journal of cardiology 2024-01, Vol.211, p.334-342
Hauptverfasser:	Kiyohara, Yuko, Aikawa, Tadao, Kayanuma, Keigo, Takagi, Hisato, Kampaktsis, Polydoros N, Wiley, Jose, Kuno, Toshiki
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Angina pectoris Angioplasty Balloon treatment Cardiovascular disease Clinical outcomes Clinical trials Coronary artery disease Coronary vessels Drug delivery Effectiveness Heart diseases Heterogeneity Hyperplasia Implants Intervention Medical equipment Meta-analysis Myocardial infarction Paclitaxel Rapamycin Restenosis Sensitivity analysis Stents Thrombosis Vein & artery diseases
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	It remains unclear which percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy is the most preferable in patients with small-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). We sought to evaluate the clinical efficacy of various PCI strategies for patients with small-vessel CAD through a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched multiple databases for RCTs investigating the efficacy of the following PCI strategies for small-vessel CAD (
ISSN:	0002-9149 1879-1913 1879-1913
DOI:	10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.11.043