Catalyzing System Change: 100 Quality Improvement Projects in 1000 Days

Background Health system change requires quality improvement (QI) infrastructure that supports frontline staff implementing sustainable innovations. We created an 8-week rapid-cycle QI training program, Stanford Primary Care-Project Engagement Platform (PC-PEP), open to patient-facing primary care c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2024-05, Vol.39 (6), p.940-950
Hauptverfasser: Sattler, Amelia, Phadke, Anuradha, Mickelsen, Jake, Seay-Morrison, Timothy, Filipowicz, Heather, Chhoa, Davis, Srinivasan, Malathi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Health system change requires quality improvement (QI) infrastructure that supports frontline staff implementing sustainable innovations. We created an 8-week rapid-cycle QI training program, Stanford Primary Care-Project Engagement Platform (PC-PEP), open to patient-facing primary care clinicians and staff. Objective Examine the feasibility and outcomes of a scalable QI program for busy practicing providers and staff in an academic medical center. Design Program evaluation. Participants A total of 172 PCPH team members: providers ( n  = 55), staff ( n  = 99), and medical learners ( n  = 18) in the Stanford Division of Primary Care and Population Health (PCPH) clinics, 2018–2021. Main Measures We categorized projects by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s (IHI) Quintuple Aim (QA): better health, better patient experience, lower cost of care, better care team experience, and improved equity/inclusion. We assessed project progress with a modified version of The Ottawa Hospital Innovation Framework: step 1 (identified root causes), step 2 (designed/tested interventions), step 3 (assessed project outcome), step 4 (met project goal with target group), step 5A (intervention(s) spread within clinic), step 5B (intervention(s) spread to different setting). Participants rated post-participation QI self-efficacy. Key Results Within 1000 days, 172 unique participants completed 104 PC-PEP projects. Most projects aimed to improve patient health (55%) or care team experience (23%). Among projects, 9% reached step 1, 8% step 2, 16% step 3, 26% step 4, 21% step 5A, and 20% step 5B. Learner involvement increased likelihood of scholarly products (47% vs 10%). Forty-six of 47 (98%) survey respondents reported improved QI self-efficacy. Medical assistants, more so than physicians, reported feeling acknowledged by the health system for their QI efforts (100% vs 61%). Conclusions With appropriate QI infrastructure, scalable QI training models like Stanford PC-PEP can empower frontline workers to create meaningful changes across the IHI QA.
ISSN:0884-8734
1525-1497
DOI:10.1007/s11606-023-08431-w